岩溶洞穴系统SO42-、NO3-来源及其对水岩作用的影响

石亮星; 周忠发; 张恒; 安丹; 丁圣君; 黄静; 董慧

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2021.115

岩溶洞穴系统SO₄^2-、NO₃^-来源及其对水岩作用的影响

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.115

石亮星^{1, 2, ,},
周忠发^{1, 2, , ,},
张恒^{1, 2},
安丹^{1, 2},
丁圣君^{1, 2},
黄静^{1, 2},
董慧^{1, 2}

1.
贵州师范大学喀斯特研究院/地理与环境科学学院, 贵州贵阳 550001
2.
贵州省喀斯特山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地, 贵州贵阳 550001

基金项目:

贵州师范大学资助博士科研项目 GZNUD[2017]6号

国家自然科学基金地区项目 41361081

贵州省高层次创新型人才培养计划—“百”层次人才项目黔科合平台人才〔2016〕5674

详细信息

作者简介:
石亮星(1994-), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要从事喀斯特地貌与洞穴研究. ORCID: 0000-0001-5662-9914. E-mail: shiliangxing999@163.com

通讯作者:
周忠发, ORCID: 0000-0002-5021-7254. E-mail: fa6897@163.com

中图分类号: P951
计量
- 文章访问数: 359
- HTML全文浏览量: 71
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-10-26
- 刊出日期: 2022-02-25

Sources of SO₄^2- and NO₃^- and Their Disturbances to Water Rock Processes in Karst Cave Systems

Shi Liangxing^{1, 2
,
,},
Zhou Zhongfa^{1, 2
, ,
,},
Zhang Heng^{1, 2},
An Dan^{1, 2},
Ding Shengjun^{1, 2},
Huang Jing^{1, 2},
Dong Hui^{1, 2}

1.
College of Karst Institute/Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China
2.
National Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Karst Mountain Ecological Environment in Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550001, China

摘要

摘要: 为揭示洞穴系统中SO₄^2-和NO₃^-离子来源及其对洞穴碳酸盐溶解的影响，通过对麻黄洞6个水点自2018年8月至2019年7月进行为期一个完整水文年的系统监测，对于监测结果进行综合分析.结果表明：（1）麻黄洞洞穴水水化学类型为HCO₃-Ca·Mg以及HCO₃·SO₄-Ca·Mg型；（2）通过实地调查与元素比值法综合分析可知，麻黄洞NO₃^-与SO₄^2-各水点来源存在一定差异，其中麻黄洞NO₃^-主要源于农业活动和大气N沉降，而SO₄^2-主要以农业活动、石膏溶解为主要来源，SO₄^2-和NO₃^-均参与了岩溶作用，加速了基岩的溶蚀，这一过程主要受离子浓度、径流大小以及补给模式影响；（3）基于水化学计量法和稳定同位素技术估算可知，SO₄^2-和NO₃^-洞穴水DIC的贡献为0.05~0.61，释放DIC的同时改变了水中离子浓度，对于岩溶作用形成扰动，总体呈现出旱季>雨季、滴水>裂隙水的特征.同样，由于岩溶区的复杂和不可知，在对其进行系统研究时应当注重多种方法的结合与比较，提高研究精度与可信度.
- 岩溶洞穴 /
- 水岩作用 /
- SO₄^2-和NO₃^- /
- 麻黄洞 /
- 水文地质
Abstract: In order to reveal the source of SO₄^2-and NO₃^-in the cave water and their influence on the hydrogeochemical process, a complete hydrological year monitoring was carried out at six monitor points in Mahuang Cave from August 2018 to July 2019. The results showed as follows: (1)The cave waters hydrochemical types are HCO₃-Ca·Mg and HCO₃·SO₄-Ca·Mg; (2)SO₄^2- and NO₃^- are mainly derived by agricultural activities, atmospheric deposition and gypsum dissolution, and their sources are different at different drip points. NO₃^- in the Mahuang cave is mainly caused by agricultural activities and atmospheric N deposition, while SO₄^2- is supplemented by agricultural activities and gypsum dissolution; The SO₄^2- and NO₃^- both participate in the karstification and accelerate the dissolution of bedrock; (3)Based on the estimation of hydrochemistry method and stable isotope technique, the contribution of DIC of SO₄^2- and NO₃^-cave water ranges from 0.05 to 0.61. The release of DIC also changes the ion concentration in the water, causing disturbance to karstification and presenting a general pattern of Dry season > Rainy season and dripwaters > fissure water. Similarly, due to the complexity and unknowability of karst area, the combination and comparison of various methods should be paid attention to in the systematic study of karst area, so as to improve the accuracy and credibility of the study.
- Karst caves /
- water-rock process /
- SO₄^2-and NO₃^- /
- Mahuang Cave /
- hydrogeology

HTML全文

图 1 研究区水文地质概况

Fig. 1. Overview of hydrogeology in the study area.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 各水点基本参数变化特征

Fig. 2. The variation of general parameter of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 麻黄洞各水点Piper图

Fig. 3. Piper diagram of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 麻黄洞各水点水化学参数变化特征

Fig. 4. The variation characteristics of hydrochemical parameter of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 麻黄洞各类型水中(NO₃^-/Cl^-)与Cl^-的当量浓度比

Fig. 5. Equivalence ratio of (NO₃^-/Cl^-) and Cl^- in Mahuang Cave water

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 (a) 麻黄洞各类型水中(SO₄^2-/Ca²⁺)与(NO₃^-/Ca²⁺)的当量浓度比; (b)麻黄洞各类型水中(SO₄^2-/Cl^-)与(NO₃^-/Cl^-)相关性分析

Fig. 6. (a) Equivalence ratio of (SO₄^2-/Ca²⁺) and (NO₃^-/Ca²⁺) of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave in Mahuang Cave water; (b) the relationship with (SO₄^2-/Cl^-) and (NO₃^-/Cl^-) in Mahuang Cave water

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 (a) 麻黄洞各类型水中[HCO₃^-]与[Ca²⁺+Mg²⁺]的当量浓度比; (b)麻黄洞各类型水中[HCO₃^-+SO₄^2-+NO₃^-]与[Ca²⁺+Mg²⁺]的当量浓度比

Fig. 7. (a)Equivalence ratio of [HCO₃^-] and [Ca²⁺+Mg²⁺] of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave; (b) Equivalence ratio of [HCO₃^-+SO₄^2-+NO₃^-] and [Ca²⁺+Mg²⁺] of the cave water samples in the Mahuang cave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 麻黄洞各类型水中[Ca²⁺+Mg²⁺]/[HCO₃^-]与δ¹³C_DIC相关关系

Fig. 8. The relationship of [Ca²⁺+Mg²⁺]/[HCO₃^-] with δ¹³C_DIC of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 洞穴水点基本参数

Table 1. General parameters of cave water in the Mahuang cave

序号	样号	水样类型	滴水类型	沉积物类型	顶板厚度(m)	距洞口距离(m)
1	MH1#	钟乳石滴水	慢速常年性滴水	石钟乳	99.979	107.27
2	MH2#	钟乳石滴水	慢速常年性滴水	石笋、石钟乳	107.826	173.47
3	MH3#	裂隙水	快速常年流水	石幔、石钟乳	123.5	427.40
4	MH4#	壁流水	季节性流水	石幔	96.7	523.75
5	MH5#	地下河流水	常年流水	石幔	86.9	720.68
6	MH6#	钟乳石滴水	慢速常年性滴水	石笋、石钟乳	107.6	1169.73

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 SO₄^2-、NO₃^-对洞穴基岩溶蚀贡献估算比例.

Table 2. Estimation of the contribution ratio of SO₄^2- and NO₃^- to cave bedrock dissolution of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave

	MH1#	MH2#	MH3#	MH4#	MH5#	MH6#
201808	0.29	0.54	0.32	0.08	0.41	0.42
201809	0.60	0.29	0.31	0.45	0.47	0.49
201810	0.57	0.56	0.40	0.31	0.34	0.61
201811	0.47	0.31	0.50	0.39	0.29	0.53
201812	0.51	0.56	0.51	0.51	0.46	0.74
201901	0.41	0.16	0.24	0.26	0.37	0.39
201902	0.35	0.17	0.08	0.19	0.11	0.25
201903	0.04	0.35	0.16	0.12	0.42	0.26
201904	0.26	0.41	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.24
201905	0.24	0.06	0.14	0.04	0.08	0.05
201906	0.28	0.19	0.17	0.37	0.10	0.36
201907	0.23	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.23
Average	0.36	0.30	0.24	0.23	0.25	0.38
Cv	0.46	0.64	0.74	0.80	0.72	0.50

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 SO₄^2-、NO₃^-对洞穴水DIC贡估算比例.

Table 3. The ratio of contribution of SO₄^2- and NO₃^- to DIC in of the cave water samples in the Mahuang Cave

	MH1#	MH2#	MH3#	MH4#	MH5#	MH6#
201808	0.23	0.32	0.15	0.15	0.22	0.39
201809	0.21	0.31	0.10	0.07	0.15	0.11
201810	0.26	0.38	0.11	0.09	0.26	0.29
201811	0.24	0.38	0.21	0.26	0.46	0.41
201812	0.22	0.40	0.27	0.42	0.57	0.45
201901	0.27	0.42	0.37	0.46	0.60	0.42
201902	0.32	0.42	0.39	0.47	0.61	0.42
201903	0.33	0.39	0.36	0.42	0.58	0.40
201904	0.25	0.36	0.17	0.07	0.10	0.34
201905	0.28	0.32	0.15	0.11	0.23	0.30
201906	0.25	0.30	0.14	0.08	0.09	0.40
201907	0.19	0.29	0.10	0.05	0.05	0.39
Average	0.25	0.36	0.21	0.22	0.33	0.36
Cv	0.16	0.13	0.53	0.78	0.67	0.25

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(43)

[1]	Ali, H. N., Atekwana, E. A., 2011. The Effect of Sulfuric Acid Neutralization on Carbonate and Stable Carbon Isotope Evolution of Shallow Groundwater. Chemical Geology, 284(3-4): 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.02.023
[2]	Buckerfield, S. J., Waldron, S., Quilliam, R. S., et al., 2019. How Can We Improve Understanding of Faecal Indicator Dynamics in Karst Systems under Changing Climatic, Population, and Land Use Stressors? Research Opportunities in SW China. Science of the Total Environment, 646: 438-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.292
[3]	Dorale, J. A., Liu, Z., 2009. Limitations of Hendy Test Criteria in Judging the Paleoclimatic Suitability of Speleothems and the Need Forreplication. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 71(1): 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.01.001
[4]	Elaid, M., Hind, M., Abdelmadiid, B., et al., 2020. Contribution of Hydrogeochemical and Isotopic Tools to the Management of Upper and Middle Cheliff Aquifers. Journal of Earth Science, 31(5): 993-1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-020-1293-y.
[5]	Jody, S., Kevin, T., 2005. The Role of Sulfur in Chemical Weathering and Atmospheric CO₂ Fluxes: Evidence from Major Ions, δ¹³C_DIC and δ³⁴S_SO4in Rivers of the Canadian Cordillera. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69(23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.07.011
[6]	Ju, X. T., Xing, G. X., Chen, X. P., et al., 2009. Reducing Environmental Risk by Improving N Management in Intensive Chinese Agricultural Systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(9): 3041-3046. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813417106
[7]	Kuzyakov Y., 2006. Sources of CO₂ Efflux from Soil and Review of Partitioning Methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(3): 425-448. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.020 doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.020
[8]	Li, G., Han, Z., Shen, C., et al., 2019. Distribution Characteristics and Causes of Nitrate in Waters of Typical Small Karst Catchment: A Case of the Houzhai River Catchment. Earth Science, 44(9): 2899-2908(in Chinses with English abstract).
[9]	Li, T. Y., Li, H. C., Xiang, X. J., et al., 2012. Transportation Characteristics of δ¹³C in the Plants-Soil-Bedrock-Cave System in Chongqing Karst Area. Science China Earth Science, 55(4): 685-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4294-y
[10]	Li, Y., Cao, M., Jin, M., et al., 2020. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Tracing of Nitrate Sources in Quanshui River Catchment, Hubei Province. Earth Science, 45(3): 1061-1070(in Chinses with English abstract).
[11]	Li, Y., Liu, Z., Lv, X., et al., 2017. Elemental Variation of Cave Drips during Rainfall in Rocky Desertification Areas: A Case Study of Shijiangjun Cave. Mountain Research, 35(6): 799-807(in Chinses with English abstract).
[12]	Liu, C. Q., Li, S. L., Lang, Y. C., et al., 2006. Using δ¹⁵N and δ¹⁸O Values to Identify Nitrate Sources in Karst Ground Water, Guiyang, Southwest China. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(22): 6928-6933. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0610129
[13]	Liu, C., Jiang, Y., Tao F., et al., 2008. Chemical Weathering of Carbonate Rocks by Sulfuric Acid and the Carbon Cycling in Southwest China. Geochimica, (4): 404-414(in Chinses with English abstract).
[14]	Liu, Z., Li, Q., Sun, H., et al., 2007. Seasonal, Diurnal and Storm-Scale Hydrochemical Variations of Typical Epikarst Springs in Subtropical Karst Areas of SW China: Soil CO₂ and Dilution Effects. Journal of Hydrology, 337(1-2): 207-223. https://https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.034
[15]	Lu, L., Cheng, H., Pu, X., et al., 2015. Nitrate Behaviors and Source Apportionment in an Aquatic System from a Watershed with Intensive Agricultural Activities. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 17(1): 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4em00502c
[16]	Milanolo, S., Gabrovšek, F., Estimation of Carbon Dioxide Flux Degassing from Percolating Waters in a Karst Cave: Case Study from Bijambare Cave, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Chemie der Erde-Geochemistry, 75(4): 465-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2015.10.004
[17]	Pauwels, H., Ayraud-Vergnaud, V., Aquilina, L., et al., 2010. The Fate of Nitrogen and Sulfur in Hard-Rock Aquifers as Shown by Sulfate-Isotope Tracing. Applied Geochemistry, 25(1): 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.11.001
[18]	Petitta, M., Fracchiolla, D., Aravena, R., et al., 2009. Application of Isotopic and Geochemical Tools for the Evaluation of Nitrogen Cycling in an Agricultural Basin, the Fucino Plain, Central Italy. Journal of Hydrology, 372(1-4): 124-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.04.009
[19]	Pracný, P., Faimon, J., Všianský, D., et al., 2019. Evolution of Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios during the Experimental Dissolution of Limestone. Chemical Geology, 523: 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.05.040
[20]	Silva, S.R., Ging, P. B., Lee, R.W., et al., 2002. Forensic Applications of Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotopes in Tracing Nitratesourcesin Urban Environments. Environmental Forensices, 3(2): 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1006/enfo.2002.0086
[21]	Spence, J, Telmer, K., 2005. The Role of Sulfur in Chemical Weathering and Atmospheric CO₂ Fluxes: Evidence from Major Ions, δ¹³C_DIC, and δ³⁴S_SO4 in Rivers of the Canadian Cordillera. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69: 5441-5458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2005.07.011
[22]	Tang, Y., Han, G., 2017. Water Chemistry and Sulfur Isotope of Ground/River Waterin Banzhai Small Watershed of Libo and Their Significances for Weathering. Earth and Environment, 45(1): 91-95(in Chinses with English abstract).
[23]	Touhari, F., Meddi, M., Mehaiguene, M., et al., 2014. Hydrogeochemical Assessment of the upper Cheliff Groundwater (North West Algeria). Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(7): 3043-3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3598-6
[24]	Wang, S., Liu, C., Yeager, K.M., et al., 2009. The Spatial Distribution and Emission of Nitrous Oxide (N₂O) in a Large Eutrophic Lake in Eastern China: Anthropogenic Effects. Science of the Total Environment, 407(10): 3330-3337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.037
[25]	Wu, P., Tang, C. Y., Zhu, L. J., et al., 2009. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Surface Water and Groundwater in the Karst Basin, Southwest China. Hydrological Processes, 23(14): 2012-2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7332
[26]	Xu, L., Jiang, Y., Duan, S., et al., 2020. Quantification of Nitrate Sources to Groundwater in Karst Trough-Valley Areas Based on Dual Stable Isotopes of δ¹⁵N_NO3 and δ¹⁸O_NO3 and the IsoSource Model. Environmental Science, 41(8): 3637-3645(in Chinses with English abstract).
[27]	Xu, Z., Liu, C., 2010. Water Geochemistry of the Xijiang Basin Rivers, South China: Chemical Weathering and CO₂Consumption. Applied Geochemistry, 25(10): 1603-1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.08.012
[28]	Ye, H., Zhang, R., Wu, P., et al., 2019. Characteristics and Driving Factor of Hydrochemical Evolution in Karst Water in the Critical Zone of Liupanshui Mining Area. Earth Science, 44(9): 2887-2898(in Chinses with English abstract).
[29]	Yin, C., Yang, H., Wang, J., et al., 2020. Combined Use of Stable Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotopes to Constrain the Nitrate Sources in a Karst Lake. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 303: 107089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107089
[30]	Yu, S., Sun, P., Du, W., et al., 2015. Effect of Hydrochemistry Characteristics Under Impact of Human Activity: A Case Study in the upper Reaches of the Xijiang River Basin. Environmental Science, 36(1): 72-79(in Chinses with English abstract).
[31]	Zhang, X., Jiang, Y., Qiu, S., et al., 2012. Agricultural Activities and Carbon Cycling in Karst Areas in Southwest China: Dissolving Carbonate Rocks and CO₂ Sink. Advances in Earth Science, 27(4): 466-476(in Chinses with English abstract).
[32]	Zhao, C., Liang, Y., Lu, H., et al., 2019. Chemical Characteristics and Environmental Significance of SO₄^2- and Sulfur Isotope in the Karst Watershed of the Niangziguan Spring, Shanxi Province. Carsologica Sinica, 38(6): 867-875(in Chinses with English abstract).
[33]	Zhao, M., Zeng, C., Liu, Z., Wang, S., 2010. Effect of Different Land Use/Land Cover on Karst Hydrogeochemistry: a Paired Catchment Study of Chenqi and Dengzhanhe, Puding, Guizhou, SW China. Journal of Hydrology, 388 (1-2): 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.034
[34]	李耕, 韩志伟, 申春华, 等, 2019. 典型岩溶小流域水体中硝酸盐分布特征及成因: 以普定后寨河流域为例. 地球科学, 44(9): 2899-2908. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201909008.htm
[35]	李严, 曹明达, 靳孟贵, 等, 2020. 湖北泉水河流域水化学特征和硝酸盐来源示踪. 地球科学, 45(3): 1061-1070. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202003029.htm
[36]	李渊, 刘子琦, 吕小溪, 等, 2017. 贵州石漠化地区降雨期间洞穴滴水的元素变化特征——以石将军洞为例. 山地学报, 35(6): 799-807. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYA201706006.htm
[37]	刘丛强, 蒋颖魁, 陶发祥, 等, 2008. 西南喀斯特流域碳酸盐岩的硫酸侵蚀与碳循环. 地球化学, (4): 404-414. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2008.04.014
[38]	唐杨, 韩贵琳, 2017. 荔波板寨小流域水体硫同位素特征及其对流域风化的指示意义. 地球与环境, 45(1): 91-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ201701013.htm
[39]	徐璐, 蒋勇军, 段世辉, 等, 2020. 基于双同位素(δ¹⁵N_NO3-δ¹⁸O_NO3)和IsoSource模型的岩溶槽谷区地下水硝酸盐来源的定量示踪: 以重庆龙凤和龙车岩溶地下河系统为例. 环境科学, 41(8): 3637-3645. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKZ201904022.htm
[40]	叶慧君, 张瑞雪, 吴攀, 等, 2019. 六盘水矿区关键带岩溶水水化学演化特征及驱动因子. 地球科学, 44(9): 2887-2898. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201909007.htm
[41]	于奭, 孙平安, 杜文越, 等, 2015. 人类活动影响下水化学特征的影响: 以西江中上游流域为例. 环境科学, 36(1): 72-79. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKZ201501010.htm
[42]	张兴波, 蒋勇军, 邱述兰, 等, 2012. 农业活动对岩溶作用碳汇的影响: 以重庆青木关地下河流域为例. 地球科学进展, 27(4): 466-476. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXJZ201204012.htm
[43]	赵春红, 梁永平, 卢海平, 等, 2019. 娘子关泉域岩溶水SO₄^2-、δ³⁴S特征及其环境意义. 中国岩溶, 38(6): 867-875. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYR201906007.htm

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

点击查看大图

图(8) / 表(3)

计量

文章访问数: 359
HTML全文浏览量: 71
PDF下载量: 44
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

岩溶洞穴系统SO₄^2-、NO₃^-来源及其对水岩作用的影响

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2021.115

作者简介:
石亮星(1994-), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要从事喀斯特地貌与洞穴研究. ORCID: 0000-0001-5662-9914. E-mail: shiliangxing999@163.com

通讯作者:
周忠发, ORCID: 0000-0002-5021-7254. E-mail: fa6897@163.com

计量

Sources of SO₄^2- and NO₃^- and Their Disturbances to Water Rock Processes in Karst Cave Systems

计量

目录

留言板