• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    中扬子地块宜昌斜坡白垩系陆内挤压盆地的断-坳结构

    刘晓峰 沈传波 王家豪

    刘晓峰, 沈传波, 王家豪, 2021. 中扬子地块宜昌斜坡白垩系陆内挤压盆地的断-坳结构. 地球科学, 46(5): 1677-1691. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.115
    引用本文: 刘晓峰, 沈传波, 王家豪, 2021. 中扬子地块宜昌斜坡白垩系陆内挤压盆地的断-坳结构. 地球科学, 46(5): 1677-1691. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.115
    Liu Xiaofeng, Shen Chuanbo, Wang Jiahao, 2021. Rift-Sag Structure of Cretaceous Intracontinental Compressional Basin in Yichang Slope of Middle Yangtze Block. Earth Science, 46(5): 1677-1691. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.115
    Citation: Liu Xiaofeng, Shen Chuanbo, Wang Jiahao, 2021. Rift-Sag Structure of Cretaceous Intracontinental Compressional Basin in Yichang Slope of Middle Yangtze Block. Earth Science, 46(5): 1677-1691. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.115

    中扬子地块宜昌斜坡白垩系陆内挤压盆地的断-坳结构

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2020.115
    基金项目: 

    国家自然科学基金项目 41972152

    中国地质大学(武汉)中央高校教改基金项目(本科教学工程) 2019G39

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      刘晓峰(1970-),男,教授,主要从事沉积盆地分析的教学和科研工作.ORCID:0000-0003-4690-194X. E-mail: xfliu@cug.edu.cn

    • 中图分类号: P542

    Rift-Sag Structure of Cretaceous Intracontinental Compressional Basin in Yichang Slope of Middle Yangtze Block

    • 摘要: 宜昌斜坡残留的白垩系盆地是认识中扬子地块白垩纪构造演化的一个窗口.基于对白垩系露头的构造-沉积特征的观察,并结合二维地震剖面的构造-地层解释,厘定了宜昌斜坡白垩系盆地的构造属性和沉积充填特征,构建了白垩系陆内挤压盆地的挤压断-坳结构.宜昌斜坡白垩系盆地是由天阳坪逆冲断裂带控制的陆内挤压盆地.下白垩统盆地为同造山期的挤压断陷,充填有扇三角洲-湖泊沉积体系;上白垩统盆地为后造山期的挤压坳陷,充填了冲积扇-辫状河-风成-浅水含膏湖泊沉积体系.宜昌斜坡和湘鄂西弧形带的上白垩统盆地属于陆内挤压盆地的挤压坳陷,揭示中扬子地块由挤压向伸展构造体制转换的起始时间是新生代.

       

    • 图  1  宜昌斜坡区域地质简图和白垩系露头位置

      据中华人民共和国地质图 1∶200 000宜昌幅和长阳幅简化; Ftyp. 天阳坪逆冲断裂带;Fxns. 仙女山断裂带;Fwdh. 雾渡河断裂带;Ftl. 郯庐断裂带

      Fig.  1.  Regional geological map of the Yichang slope and locations of Cretaceous outcrops

      图  2  露头点OC1下白垩统石门组扇三角洲平原岩相类型

      OC1A.混杂堆积的青灰色厚‒巨厚层状块状粗砾岩岩相(FA01);OC1B.青灰色透镜状块状粗砾岩岩相(FA02);OC1C.砖红色厚层状块状泥质粉砂岩岩相(FA03)

      Fig.  2.  Lithofacies types of fan delta plain of the Lower Cretaceous Shimen Formation at the outcrop OC1

      图  3  露头点OC2下白垩统五龙组扇三角洲平原岩相类型

      OC1.混杂堆积的泥石流中砾岩;OC2.冲刷面之上为中砾岩‒粗砂岩,之下为泥质粉砂岩

      Fig.  3.  Lithofacies types of fan delta plain of the Lower Cretaceous Wulong Formation at the outcrop OC2

      图  4  露头点OC3天阳坪逆冲断裂带地层结构特征

      OC3A.下白垩统五龙组混杂堆积的厚‒巨厚层状块状粗砾岩岩相(FA01);OC3B.上白垩统罗镜滩组巨厚层状砾石定向构造的中‒粗砾岩岩相(FA06)

      Fig.  4.  Stratigraphic structure of Tianyangping thrust fault zone at the outcrop OC3

      图  5  露头点OC4红花套组风成砂岩的高角度前积交错层理

      OC4A.前积纹层;OC4B.前积层系相互截切;红色箭头指示古近系与红花套组不整合面

      Fig.  5.  High-angle foreset cross-bedding of eolian sandstones of the Honghuatao Formation at the outcrop OC4

      图  6  露头点OC4红花套组风成砂岩薄片照片和粒度曲线特征

      Qtz.石英;Pl.斜长石;Lm.褐铁矿;Cal.方解石

      Fig.  6.  Thin-section photographs and probability cumulative grain-size curves of eolian sandstone of the Honghuatao Formation at the outcrop OC4

      图  7  露头点OC5上白垩统与下志留统角度不整合

      Fig.  7.  Angular unconformity between the Upper Cretaceous and Lower Silurian at the outcrop OC5

      图  8  露头点OC6A下白垩统五龙组扇三角洲前缘‒前扇三角洲

      OC6-1.水下分流河道冲刷面‒滞留外源砾‒大型槽状交错层理;OC6-2.水下分流河道冲刷面‒滞留泥砾‒大型槽状交错层理;OC6-3.水下分流河道冲刷面‒大型槽状交错层理含砾粗砂岩,冲刷面之下为粉砂质泥岩;OC6-4.水下分流河道大型槽状交错层理粗砂岩;OC6-5.水下分流河道上部平行层理中砂岩;OC6-6.厚层状块状紫红色粉砂质泥岩夹灰白色细砂岩,见波痕和波状交错层理;FA08-FA11见正文解释

      Fig.  8.  Fan delta front and pro-fan delta of the Lower Cretaceous Wulong Formation at the outcrop OC6A

      图  9  露头点OC6B下白垩统五龙组扇三角洲前缘

      OC6B-1.水下分流河道滞留泥砾和小型槽状交错层理;OC6B-2.水下分流河道内撕裂状的炭屑沿大型槽状交错层理展布

      Fig.  9.  Fan delta front of the Lower Cretaceous Wulong Formation at the outcrop OC6B

      图  10  伸展盆地与挤压盆地的断‒坳结构

      Fig.  10.  Compressional rift-sag structure of extensional and compressional basins

      图  11  宜昌斜坡二维地震剖面A构造‒地层格架解释

      剖面位置见图 1

      Fig.  11.  2D seismic interpretation of tectonic-stratigraphic framework on the Yichang slope

      图  12  宜昌斜坡白垩系盆地挤压断‒坳结构与沉积充填模式

      1.风成砂岩;2.冲积扇;3.辫状河;4.扇三角洲平原泥石流;5.扇三角洲平原辫状分支河道;6.扇三角洲前缘水下分流河道;7.扇三角洲前缘河口坝;8.前扇三角洲席状砂;9.前扇三角洲‒浅湖泥;10.露头点位置

      Fig.  12.  Model of compressional rift-sag structure and sedimentary filling in the Cretaceous basin

    • [1] Asurmendi, E., Sanchez, M. L., Fennell, L., 2017. Neuquen Group (Upper Cretaceous): A Case of Underfilled-Overfilled Cycles in an Andean Foreland Basin, Neuquen Basin, Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 80: 444-459. doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2017.09.012
      [2] Catuneanu, O., 2004. Retroarc Foreland Systems-Evolution through Time. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 38: 225-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.01.004
      [3] Catuneanu, O., 2019. First-Order Foreland Cycles: Interplay of Flexural Tectonics, Dynamic Loading, and Sedimentation. Journal of Geodynamics, 129: 290-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2018.03.001
      [4] Catuneanu, O., Hancox, P. G., Rubidge, B. S., 1998. Reciprocal Flexural Behaviour and Contrasting Stratigraphies: A New Basin Development Model for the Karoo Retroarc Foreland System, South Africa. Basin Research, 10: 417-439. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2117.1998.00078.x
      [5] Cheng, L., Li, Z.H., Yan, C. B., et al., 2018. Braided River Deposits of the Lower Cretaceous Wulong Formation in the Yichang Area of Western Jianghan Basin. Journal of Stratigraphy, 42(1): 90-99 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [6] Deng, M. Z., He, D. F., 2018. The Geological Structure in the Dangyang Area and Its Significance to the Shale Gas Exploration in Yichang Area, China. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 45(4): 487-500 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [7] Flemings, P. B., Jordan, T. E., 1990. Stratigraphic Modeling of Foreland Basins: Interpreting Thrust Deformation and Lithospheric Rheology. Geology, 18: 430-434. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<0430:SMOFBI>2.3.CO;2
      [8] Guo, F. F., Kang, J. Y., Sun, J. F., et al., 2010. Tectonic Evolution and Hydrocarbon Accumulation Model for Marine Strata in Jianghan Basin. Lithologic Reservoirs, 22(1): 23-29 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [9] Guo, X. S., Mei, L. F., Tang, J. G., et al., 2006. Constraint of Meso-Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution of Yangtze Massif on Formation of Marine Reservoirs. Oil & Gas Geology, 27(3): 296-304 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200603002.htm
      [10] He, Z. L., Wang, X. W., Li, S. J., et al., 2011. Yanshan Movement and Its Influence on Petroleum Preservation in Middle-Upper Yangtze Region. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 33(1): 1-11 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201101003.htm
      [11] Heller, P. L., Angevine, C. L., Winslow, N. S., et al., 1988. Two-Phase Stratigraphic Model of Foreland- Basin Sequences. Geology, 16(6): 501-504. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<0501:TPSMOF>2.3.CO;2
      [12] Jiang, X. S., Li, Y. W., 1996. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of the Cretaceous Desert in Central and Eastern China and Its Climatic Significance. Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography, 16(2): 42-51 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [13] Jiang, Y. H., Ye, Z. Z., 1999. The Type of Oil and Gas Basins, Sedimentary Characteristics and Background Geodynamics of Cenozoic in Jiangsu and the Neighbouring Regions. Volcanology & Mineral Resources, 20(1): 1-12 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [14] Jiao, F. Z., Feng, J. H., Yi, J. Z., et al., 2015. Direction, Key Factors and Solution of Marine Natural Gas Exploration in Yangtze Area. China Petroleum Exploration, 20(2): 1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90278A/201502/1005689368.html
      [15] Jordan, T. E., Flemings, P. B., 1991. Large-Scale Stratigraphic Architecture, Eustatic Variation, and Unsteady Tectonism: A Theoretical Evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 96: 6681-6699. doi: 10.1029/90JB01399
      [16] Li, Q., Guo, J. H., Zeng, F., et al., 2006. Cretaceous Sedimentary Facies and the Evolution in Jianghan Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 28(6): 5-8 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [17] Li, T. Y., He, S., He, Z. L., et al., 2012. Reconstruction of Tectonic Uplift and Thermal History since Mesozoic in the Dangyang Synclinorium of the Central Yangtze Area. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 33(2): 213-224 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [18] Liu, H. F., 1995. Classification of Foreland Basins and Fold Thrust Style. Earth Science Frontiers, 2(3-4): 59-68 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [19] Liu, S. F., Heller, P. L., Zhang, G. W., 2003. Mesozoic Basin Development and Tectonic Evolution of the Dabieshan Orogenic Belt, Central China. Tectonics, 22(4): 1038. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Tecto..22.1038L
      [20] Liu, S. F., Li, W. P., Wang, K., et al., 2015. Late Mesozoic Development of the Southern Qinling-Dabieshan Foreland Fold-Thrust Belt, Central China, and Its Role in Continent-Continent Collision. Tectonophysics, 644-645: 220-234. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.01.015
      [21] Liu, S. F., Steel, R., Zhang, G. W., 2005. Mesozoic Sedimentary Basin Development and Tectonic Implication, Northern Yangtze Block, Eastern China: Record of Continent- Continent Collision. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 25(1): 9-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.01.010
      [22] Luo, S. Y., Chen, X. H., Li, H., et al., 2019. Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions and Target Optimization of Lower Cambrian Shuijingtuo Formation in Yichang Area, West Hubei. Earth Science, 44(11): 3598-3615 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX201911002.htm
      [23] Luo, Z. L., Liu, S. G., 2002. Comments on the Citation of the Term "Foreland Basin" in the Petroliferous Basins of Central and Western China—A Review on the Development of Chinese Petroleum Tectonics. Geological Review, 48(4): 398-407 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP200204010.htm
      [24] Mei, L. F., Liu, Z. Q., Tang, J. G., et al., 2010. Mesozoic Intra-Continental Progressive Deformation in Western Hunan-Hubei-Eastern Sichuan Provinces of China: Evidence from Apatite Fission Track and Balanced Cross-Section. Earth Science, 35(2): 161-174 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [25] Peng, X. L., Liang, D. G., Wang, C. G., et al., 2006. Discussion on the Theory of Foreland Basin and Its Application in China. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 27(1): 132-144 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [26] She, X. Y., Ding, X. H., Liang, B., et al., 2012. Structural Style and Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Part of Jianghan Basin in the Jianghan Plain Region. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 36(2): 209-216 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [27] Shen, C. B., Mei, L. F., Liu, Z. Q., et al., 2009. Apatite and Zircon Fission Track Data, Evidences for the Mesozoic-Cenozoic Uplift of Huangling Dome, Central China. Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 29(2): 54-60 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [28] Shi, W., Zhang, Y. Q., Dong, S. W., et al., 2012. Intra-Continental Dabashan Orocline, Southwestern Qinling, Central China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 46: 20-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2011.10.005
      [29] Wang, B. J., Lin, C. S., Chen, Y., et al., 2006. Episodic Tectonic Movement and Evolutional Character in Jianhan Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 41(2): 226-230 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [30] Wang, D. L., Mei, L. F., Liu, Y. S., et al., 2018. Mesozoic-Cenozoic Episodic Subsidence and Migration of Jianghan Basin in Extensional Composite Basin-Mountain System. Earth Science, 43(11): 4180-4192 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [31] Wang, J. H., Wang, H., Chen, H. H., et al., 2006. Stratigraphic Record in a Whole Episode of Foreland Basin Tectonic Evolution: The Lower Cretaceous in Kuqa Depression. Geological Science and Technology Information, 25(6): 31-36 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DZKQ200606005.htm
      [32] Wang, J. H., Wang, H., Chen, H. H., et al., 2013. Responses of Two Lithosomes of Lower Cretaceous Coarse Clastic Rocks to Tectonism in Kuqa Foreland Sub-Basin, Northern Tarim Basin, Northwest China. Sedimentary Geology, 289: 182-193. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2013.03.001
      [33] Wang, P., Liu, S. F., Zheng, H. B., et al., 2013. Late Orogenic Arcuate Fold-Thrust Belts in Northern Yangtze Area: Structural Characteristics and Basin Evolution. Journal of Palaeogeography, 15(6): 820-838 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [34] Wu, L. L., Mei, L. F., Liu, Y. S., et al., 2018. The Stratigraphic and Structural Record of the Cretaceous Jianghan Basin, Central China: Implications for Initial Rifting Processes and Geodynamics. Cretaceous Research, 90: 21-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2018.03.028
      [35] Xu, D. L., Peng, L. H., Liu, H., et al., 2013. Meso- Cenozoic Tectono-Sedimentary Response of Multiphased Uplifts of Huangling Anticline, Central China. Geology and Mineral Resources of South China, 29(2): 90-99 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [36] Xu, Z. Y., Lin, G., Liu, C. Y., et al., 2004. A Discussion on Amalgamation Course between the South China and North China Blocks: Evidences from Deformational Characters in the Jianghan Superimposed Basin. Chinese Journal of Geology, 39(2): 284-295 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX200402014.htm
      [37] Yang, Y. T., Miall, A. D., 2008. Marine Transgressions in the Mid-Cretaceous of the Cordilleran Foreland Basin Re-Interpreted as Orogenic Unloading Deposits. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 56: 179-198. doi: 10.2113/gscpgbull.56.3.179
      [38] Yang, Y. T., Miall, A. D., 2010. Migration and Stratigraphic Fill of an Underfilled Foreland Basin: Middle-Late Cenomanian Belle Fourche Formation in Southern Alberta. Sedimentary Geology, 227: 51-64. doi: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.03.005
      [39] Yue, W. Z., Ding, B. L., 1999. Jiangsu Cretaceous Continental Stratigraphy. Volcanology & Mineral Resources, 20(4): 287-344 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [40] Zhu, R., Zhang, C. M., Gong, F. H., et al., 2010. Use of Sediment Dynamic Analysis in Environment Interpretation: A Case Study on Honghuatao Formation, Upper Cretaceous of Western Jianghan Basin, Hubei Province. Geological Journal of China Universities, 16(3): 358-364 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX201003010.htm
      [41] 程龙, 李志宏, 阎春波, 等, 2018. 江汉盆地西缘宜昌地区下白垩统五龙组辫状河沉积特征. 地层学杂志, 42(1): 90-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ201801011.htm
      [42] 邓铭哲, 何登发, 2018. 当阳地区地质结构及其对宜昌地区志留系页岩气勘探的意义. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 45(4): 487-500. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2018.04.09
      [43] 郭飞飞, 康建云, 孙建峰, 等, 2010. 江汉盆地构造演化与海相地层油气成藏模式. 岩性油气藏, 22(1): 23-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2010.01.005
      [44] 郭旭升, 梅廉夫, 汤济广, 等, 2006. 扬子地块中、新生代构造演化对海相油气成藏的制约. 石油与天然气地质, 27(3): 296-304. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200603002.htm
      [45] 何治亮, 汪新伟, 李双建, 等, 2011. 中上扬子地区燕山运动及其对油气保存的影响. 石油实验地质, 33(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2011.01.001
      [46] 江新胜, 李玉文, 1996. 中国中东部白垩纪沙漠的时空分布及其气候意义. 岩相古地理, 16(2): 42-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD199602005.htm
      [47] 姜月华, 业治铮, 1999. 江苏及临区新生代含油气盆地的类型、沉积特征和地球动力学背景. 火山地质与矿产, 20(1): 1-12.
      [48] 焦方正, 冯建辉, 易积正, 等, 2015. 中扬子地区海相天然气勘探方向、关键问题与勘探对策. 中国石油勘探, 20(2): 1-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2015.02.001
      [49] 李群, 郭建华, 曾芳, 等, 2006. 江汉盆地白垩系沉积相与沉积演化. 西南石油学院学报, 28(6): 5-8. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2006.06.002
      [50] 李天义, 何生, 何治亮, 等, 2012. 中扬子地区当阳复向斜中生代以来的构造抬升和热史重建. 石油学报, 33(2): 213-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201202006.htm
      [51] 刘和甫, 1995. 前陆盆地类型及褶皱-冲断层样式. 地学前缘, 2(3-4): 59-68. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY503.008.htm
      [52] 罗胜元, 陈孝红, 李海, 等, 2019. 鄂西宜昌下寒武统水井沱组页岩气聚集条件与含气特征. 地球科学, 44(11): 3598-3615. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.179
      [53] 罗志立, 刘树根, 2002. 评述"前陆盆地"名词在中国中西部含油气盆地中的引用——反思中国石油构造学的发展. 地质论评, 48(4): 398-407. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2002.04.010
      [54] 梅廉夫, 刘昭茜, 汤济广, 等, 2010. 湘鄂西-川东中生代陆内递进扩展变形: 来自裂变径迹和平衡剖面的证据. 地球科学, 35(2): 161-174. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2010.02.008
      [55] 彭希龄, 梁狄刚, 王昌桂, 等, 2006. 前陆盆地理论及其在中国的应用. 石油学报, 27(1): 132-144. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.01.029
      [56] 佘晓宇, 丁小辉, 梁斌, 等, 2012. 江汉平原东部构造特征与演化. 大地构造与成矿学, 36(2): 209-216. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2012.02.008
      [57] 沈传波, 梅廉夫, 刘昭茜, 等, 2009. 黄陵隆起中-新生代隆升作用的裂变径迹证据. 矿物岩石, 29(2): 54-60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2009.02.009
      [58] 王必金, 林畅松, 陈莹, 等, 2006. 江汉盆地幕式构造运动及其演化特征. 石油地球物理勘探, 41(2): 226-230. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2006.02.022
      [59] 王德良, 梅廉夫, 刘云生, 等, 2018. 伸展型复合盆山体系下江汉盆地中、新生代幕式沉降与迁移. 地球科学, 43(11): 4180-4192. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.211
      [60] 王家豪, 王华, 陈红汉, 等, 2006. 一幕完整的前陆盆地构造演化的地层记录: 库车坳陷下白垩统. 地质科技情报, 25(6): 31-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2006.06.005
      [61] 王平, 刘少峰, 郑洪波, 等, 2013. 扬子北缘晚造山阶段弧形构造特征与盆地演化. 古地理学报, 15(6): 820-838. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201306009.htm
      [62] 徐大良, 彭练红, 刘浩, 等, 2013. 黄陵背斜中新生代多期次隆升的构造-沉积响应. 华南地质与矿产, 29(2): 90-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNKC201302002.htm
      [63] 徐政语, 林舸, 刘池洋, 等, 2004. 从江汉叠合盆地构造形变特征看华南与华北陆块的拼贴过程. 地质科学, 39(2): 284-295. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2004.02.015
      [64] 岳文哲, 丁保良, 1999. 江苏白垩纪陆相地层研究. 火山地质与矿产, 20(4): 287-344. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HSDZ199904001.htm
      [65] 朱锐, 张昌民, 龚福华, 等, 2010. 粒度资料的沉积动力学在沉积环境分析中的应用: 以江汉盆地西北缘上白垩统红花套组沉积为例. 高校地质学报, 16(3): 358-364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2010.03.009
    • 加载中
    图(12)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  701
    • HTML全文浏览量:  370
    • PDF下载量:  54
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2020-09-19
    • 刊出日期:  2021-05-15

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回