湖南锡田钨锡多金属矿田燕山期NE向断层演化历史及其成矿意义

刘飚; 吴堑虹; 李欢; 奚小双; 孔华; 曹荆亚; 蒋江波; 林智炜; 吴经华; 梁伟

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2019.263

湖南锡田钨锡多金属矿田燕山期NE向断层演化历史及其成矿意义

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.263

刘飚^1,,
吴堑虹¹,
李欢^1, , ,,
奚小双¹,
孔华¹,
曹荆亚¹,
蒋江波¹,
林智炜¹,
吴经华¹,
梁伟^{1, 2}

1.
中南大学地球科学与信息物理学院, 湖南长沙 410083
2.
中南大学有色金属成矿预测与地质环境监测教育部重点实验室, 湖南长沙 410083

基金项目:

中国地质调查局整装勘查区 12120114052101

详细信息

作者简介:
刘飚(1989-), 男, 博士研究生, 矿产普查与勘探专业.E-mail:Biaoliu@csu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
李欢, ORCID:0000-0001-5211-8324.E-mail:lihuan@csu.edu.cn

中图分类号: P571
计量
- 文章访问数: 1050
- HTML全文浏览量: 217
- PDF下载量: 50
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-10-21
- 刊出日期: 2021-01-15

Yanshanian NE-Striking Fault Evolution and Its Implications on Mineralization in the Xitian W-Sn Polymetallic Ore Field, Hunan Province

1.
School of Geosciences and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals and Geological Environment Monitoring, Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

摘要

摘要: 为了确定湖南锡田矿田燕山期NE向断层演化历史、蚀变特征及与钨锡成矿关系本文调查了矿田内燕山期断层野外宏观特征，对断层中充填石英脉进行了显微鉴定、阴极发光、含矿元素分析，结果显示：(1)断层以NE60°~70°平行分布于茶汉盆地南北两侧，均倾向茶汉盆地，断层的陡倾、棱角状角砾及梳状石英等指示了断层的张性性质；(2)断层经历了3期流体活动，第一期的石英脉中石英颗粒相对粗大(0.5~15.0 mm)，局部发育破裂与变形纹，石英可为断层角砾；第二期与第三期沿断层中张性裂隙充填的石英脉，粒径较小(0.01~2.00 mm)，第二期石英发育微裂隙，而第三期石英为自形长柱状，无变形；(3)第一期与第三期石英脉中不含云母，第二期则富含绢云母，其W、Sn元素含量高，并有少量白钨矿、黄铁矿等矿物，其组分演化特征与区内矿床热液组分演化趋势相似；(4)锡田地区燕山期钨锡矿化分布与NE向系列断层关系密切，显示了茶汉盆地两侧由南向北分带格局.作者认为在燕山期华南伸展背景控制下，地幔上隆及重熔岩浆上侵产生的综合伸展是NE向系列断层形成的可能机制，NE向系列断层的张性环境是岩浆热液聚集的有利因素，为成矿热液运移提供了通道.
- 正断层 /
- 流体活动 /
- W-Sn成矿 /
- 锡田矿田 /
- 矿物学
Abstract: In order to determine the fault activity history and its relationship with hydrothermal alteration and W-Sn mineralization,we investigated the field characteristics of the Yanshanian faults in the Xitian ore field and carried out microscopic identification,cathodoluminescence and ore-forming element analysis on quartz in faults. The results show that:(1) The faults are distributed in northern and southern sides of the Chahan basin and dipping to the basin,with striking directions of NE 60°-70°. High dip angles,angular breccias and pectination quartz veins in the faults indicate extensional characteristics. (2) Three stages of magmatic fluid activities occurred in the faults. The stage Ⅰ is characterized by quartz veins occurring as coarse quartz particles (0.5-15.0 mm) with local deformation and fragmentation structures. The stage Ⅱ and stage Ⅲ are typically quartz veins filling in tensile fractures with small quartz particles (0.01-2.00 mm). Moreover,stage Ⅱ quartz develops microcrack structures while stage Ⅲ quartz is idiomorphic and unreformed,suggesting a progressively weakening trend of fault deformation. (3) In contrast to stage Ⅰ and stage Ⅲ mica-free quartz veins,stage Ⅱ quartz veins involve more micas with the high contents of W and Sn elements and minor scheelites and pyrites,which show similar compositional evolutionary characteristics to that of the W-Sn deposits in the Xitian ore field. (4) The distribution of Yanshanian mineralization in the Xitian ore field is closely related to the normal faults,showing clear and regular mineralizing zonation of W-Sn and Pb-Zn deposits from the south to the north on each side of the Chahan Basin. Under the control of extensional tectonic setting of the South China Block during Yanshanian,the comprehensive extension resulting from mantle uplift and remelted magmatic intrusion may be a potential mechanism for the formation of normal faults. The extensional environment of the normal faults was favorable to accumulation of magmatic hydrothermal fluids; and the normal faults provided a channel for the migration of ore-forming hydrothermal fluids.
- normal faults /
- fluid activity /
- W-Sn mineralization /
- Xitian ore field /
- mineralogy

HTML全文

图 1 湖南锡田矿田燕山期构造纲要图

据伍式崇等(2013)修改

Fig. 1. The structural map during Yanshanian in Xitian ore field, Hunan Province

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 锡田矿田断层产状玫瑰图

a.邓阜仙地区断层走向玫瑰花图；b.邓阜仙地区法向等密图; c.锡田地区断层走向玫瑰花图；d.锡田地区断层法向等密图; e.宁冈地区断层走向玫瑰花图；f.宁冈地区断层法向等密图;等密图均为下半球投影

Fig. 2. The rose diagram of joint of fault in the Xitian ore field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 NE向正断层野外宏观特征

a.构造破碎带(鸡冠石断裂西段)；b.构造破碎带及充填的石英脉(光明断裂西段)；c.构造破碎带及充填的石英脉(茶汉断裂西段)；d.硅化破碎带(宁冈断裂西段)；e.构造破碎带, 断层泥, 充填的石英脉(光明断裂西段)；f构造破碎带中的花岗岩角砾, 为硅质胶结(光明断裂西段)；g.发育在厚层石英砂岩构造破碎带(上寨断裂西段)；h.隐爆角砾岩(茶汉断裂西段)；i.煌斑岩脉(茶汉断裂东段)

Fig. 3. The field photos of the NE normal fault

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 断层角砾岩显微构造与热液活动

a.断层两侧轻微破裂花岗岩；b.构造破碎带中的破裂岩；c.碎粉岩；d.断层泥砾岩；e.断层中充填石英脉(星高断裂)；f.断层中充填煌斑岩脉(茶汉断裂东段)；g.第二期石英脉穿切第一期石英脉与印支期花岗岩(锡湖断裂)；h.第二期石英脉穿切第一期石英脉(茶汉断裂)；i.第三期石英脉穿切第二期石英脉(狗打栏断裂)；Qz.石英；Pl.长石

Fig. 4. The micro textures of the breccia in the NE-extending faults and fault fluid activity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 NE向断层中不同期次石英脉的显微照片与CL图

a.第一期石英脉中破裂、碎粉状石英；b.第一期石英脉中的石英发育变形纹与强波状消光；c.第二期石英脉沿第一期石英脉的裂隙分布, 并富含云母；d.第二期石英脉中的粒状石英；e.第二期的石英脉中发育少量白钨矿；f.第三期长柱状并呈梳状排列石英；g.第一期石英的破裂特征；h.第二期石英只发育裂隙；i.第三期石英脉穿切第二期石英; a~c, e, g, h为锡湖断层, d, f, i为狗打栏断层；a~d与f为正交偏光照片, e为单偏光照片, g~i为CL照；Qz.石英；Sch.白钨矿

Fig. 5. The photomicrograph and cathodoluminescence of quartz

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 NE向系列断层大地构造背景图

Fig. 6. The tectonic background of normal faults in the Xitian ore field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 锡田矿田成矿模式

Fig. 7. The regional metallogenic model in the Xitian ore field

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 主要断层带控制点与样品信息表

Table 1. The samples information of fault in Xitian ore field

点号	坐标X	坐标Y	产状(°)	断层性质
6D1115-4	2975161	474692	290∠60	正断层
6D1115-7	2975436	475521	355∠75	正断层
6D1115-8	2975007	474940	295∠55	正断层
6D1115-13	2976547	474392	310∠65	正断层
6D1118-3	2973279	476869	335∠86	正断层
6D1118-10	2974756	477507	320∠70	正断层
6D1119-1	2977036	475800	320∠70	正断层
6D1119-9	2971921	479268	335∠70	正断层
6D1115-6	2975314	475245	195∠60	正断层
6D1115-12	2975408	474113	310∠70	正断层
6D1115-14	2976392	474640	365∠60	正断层
6D1115-16	2976332	474253	300∠70	正断层
6D1116-2	2971860	479047	150∠80	正断层
6D1118-5	2969648	476752	350∠75	正断层
6D1119-3	2977745	475443	305∠60	正断层
6D1119-7	2971676	478716	350∠75	正断层
6D1119-8	2971798	479047	180∠77	正断层
6D1119-12	2971889	479903	350∠50	正断层
7D0927-1	2972018	477790	10∠75	正断层
7D0927-2	2971800	479140	330∠60	正断层
7D0927-3	2971897	479893	330∠75	正断层
7D0927-6	2981366	480291	310∠75	正断层
7D0927-7	2980671	477903	300∠80	正断层
7D0927-8	2980627	477860	295∠70	正断层
7D0927-10	2980195	477859	305∠66	正断层
7D0927-11	2979837	477694	340∠80	正断层
7D0929-21	2969228	477003	330∠75	正断层
7D0929-27	2969031	476919	330∠70	正断层
7D0924-10	2968216	469509	330∠72	正断层
6D1205-4	2973909	470301	300∠78	正断层
6D1208-1	2968779	480920	330∠78	正断层
6D1208-2	2968656	480561	330∠72	正断层
7D0927-2	2957282	489283	140∠85	正断层
6D0823-18	2959120	487249	345∠80	正断层
6D0822-8	2963644	490605	160∠57	正断层
6D0822-10	2965590	487900	150∠81	正断层
6D0823-16	2960202	486532	145∠70	正断层
6D0823-14	2960830	487843	125∠70	正断层
6D0816-12	2960721	483896	170∠60	正断层
6D0816-13	2960744	484000	160∠61	正断层
6D0817-10	2957170	482685	170∠86	正断层
6D1206-1	2989525	480180	171∠72	正断层
6D1206-5	2989495	479794	180∠40	正断层
6D1206-7	2989589	478801	150∠50	正断层
6D1207-1	2989872	475246	135∠72	正断层
6D1207-3	2989870	476652	160∠73	正断层
6D1207-6	2990054	476624	150∠75	正断层
6D1207-7	2989899	477258	180∠90	正断层
6D1207-10	2989899	477479	160∠72	正断层
6D0430-3	2985021	464045	150∠70	正断层
7D0430-4	2984610	464153	150∠70	正断层
7D0502-5	2981859	460684	150∠75	正断层
7D0502-6	2981762	460598	150∠75	正断层
7D0503-1	2983476	460809	155∠70	正断层
7D0503-2	2988424	463305	155∠71	正断层
6D0811-2	2990355	468407	170∠68	正断层
6D0811-3	2991283	468881	170∠70	正断层
6D0811-4	2992344	470841	155∠70	正断层
6D0811-5	2992218	471915	160∠72	正断层
6D0811-8	2989416	472819	150∠55	正断层
6D0605-1	2998308	474023	180∠69	正断层
6D0605-2	2997662	474021	180∠69	正断层
6D0602-2	2993281	465497	160∠60	正断层
5D0616-6	2994480	476448	170∠80	正断层
5D6-1			154∠45	正断层
5D8-2			125∠79	正断层
8D6-2			155∠30	正断层
10D10-1				不清
12D1-1			165∠20	正断层
7D0925-17	2963196	474680	150∠85	正断层
7D0926-12	2966227	480895	150∠75	正断层
7D0926-12	2966233	480905	150∠76	正断层
7D0926-12	2966240	480925	150∠78	正断层
7D0927-1	2957307	489264	110∠60	正断层
6D0816-14	2960661	484136	155∠62	正断层
6D0817-1	2962312	476791	150∠60	正断层
6D0817-2	2959665	481425	345∠54	正断层
6D0817-04	2958172	480600	110∠70	正断层
6D0817-05	2957469	480579	165∠80	正断层
6D0817-08	2957382	482909	220∠70	正断层
6D0817-06	2956976	482496	155∠84	正断层
6D0817-11	2957044	482633	140∠86	正断层

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 锡田矿田断层蚀变岩成矿元素含量及特征值统计表

Table 2. The ore-forming elements content and statistical value of alteration rock in the Xitian ore field

样品编号	位置	样品	断裂名称	Ag	Bi	Cu	Mo	Pb	Sn	W	Zn
24D1	垄上村	断层泥	上寨断裂	24.50	108.00	919	0.5	300	1 560	150	846
24D2		断层泥	上寨断裂	5.90	47.00	1 080	2.0	84	641	2 470	466
24D3		断层泥	上寨断裂	0.50	0.15	75	14.0	21	143	446	141
24D4		断层泥	上寨断裂	0.10	0.15	46	1.0	7	128	77	182
24D11-2		断层泥	上寨断裂	0.10	0.15	19	1.0	36	125	178	91
24D13-1		断层泥	上寨断裂	0.10	0.15	13	2.0	12	116	114	122
24D9-1		断层泥	上寨断裂	0.10	0.15	6	2.0	44	43	290	24
24D10-1		断层泥	上寨断裂	0.80	0.15	37	1.0	57	113	292	62
24D15-1		断层泥	上寨断裂	0.10	0.15	42	2.0	18	36	284	72
1D6-3	麦源村	硅化蚀变岩	鸡冠石断裂	0.25	1.00	94	5.0	58	12	11	66
2D4-2	卧龙村	硅化蚀变岩	鸡冠石断裂	0.25	1.00	6	3.0	55	21	6	74
2D5-3	沛江村	硅化蚀变岩	鸡冠石断裂	0.25	1.00	2	2.0	8	2	2	6
3D6-1	攸县	硅化蚀变岩	鸡冠石断裂	0.25	1.00	102	0.5	54	12	21	101
5D4-2	东坪村	硅化蚀变岩	茶汉断裂	0.25	1.00	2	1.0	9	18	3	19
5D6-1	茶汉断裂	硅化蚀变岩	茶汉断裂	1.00	1.00	2	7.0	130	1	8	14
5D8-2	湘东钨矿	硅化蚀变岩	茶汉断裂	1.40	1.00	409	2.0	34	163	28	1 570
8D6-2		硅化蚀变岩	茶汉断裂	0.25	5.00	6	2.0	4	10	10	2
10D10-1		断层泥	茶汉断裂	2.00	11.00	137	5.0	46	162	20	173
12D1-1		断层泥	茶汉断裂	2.60	36.00	127	5.0	53	143	25	320
克拉克值^①				0.07	0.17	26	0.5	15	1.4	0.6	76
平均值				2.00	11.00	164	3	54	181	233	229
标准差				5.60	27.00	310	3	67	363	557	383
变异系数				3.5	3.0	1.9	1.0	1.2	2.0	2.4	1.7
富集系数				31	67	6	6	4	130	389	3
注:①中国东部大陆地壳, 单位:10^-6；富集系数为元素平均含量与克拉克值的比值, 变异系数为标准差与平均值的比值.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(72)

[1]	Bai, D.Y., Huang, J.Z., Li, J.D., et al., 2007.Multiple Geological Elements Constraint on the Mesozoic Tectonic Evolution of South China: Apocalypse of the Mesozoic Geological Evolution in Southeastern Hunan and the Hunan-Guangdong-Jiangxi Border Area. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 31(1):1-13 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90781X/200701/23819387.html
[2]	Bai, D.Y., Li, Y.M., Zhong, X., et al., 2018.Geological Features, Activity History and Tectonic Attribute of NW-Trending Changde-Anren Fault in Hunan. Earth Science, 43(7):2496-2514 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX201807022.htm
[3]	Bai, D.Y., Liu, B., Ni, Y.J., et al., 2010.Characteristics of Basin-Controlling Faults, Basin Type and Dynamic Mechanisms of the Xiangyin Sag in Northeastern Hunan. Resources Survey & Environment, 31(3):157-168 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HSDZ201003000.htm
[4]	Bai, D.Y., Ma, T.Q., Wang, X.H., et al., 2008.Progress in the Study of Mesozoic Tectono- Magmatism and Mineralization in the Central Segment of the Nanling Mountains-Summary of Major Achievements of the 1:250, 000 Geological Survey in Southeastern Hunan. Geology in China, 35(3):436-455 (in Chines with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_geology-in-china_thesis/0201252107431.html
[5]	Cai, Y., Lu, J.J., Ma, D.S., et al., 2013.Chronology and Geochemical Characteristics of Late Indosinian Dengfuxian Two-mica Granite in Eastern Hunan Province, China, and its Significance. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 29(12):4215－4231 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/285966516_Chronology_and_geochemical_characteristics_of_Late_Indosinian_Dengfuxian_two-mica_granite_in_eastern_Hunan_Province_China_and_its_significance
[6]	Cai, Y., Ma, D.S., Lu, J.J., et al., 2013.Re-Os Geochronology and S Isotope Geochemistry of Dengfuxian Tungsten Deposit, Hunan Province, China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 28(12):3798－3808 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[7]	Cao, J. Y., Wu, Q. H., Yang, X. Y., et al., 2018. Geochronology and Genesis of the Xitian W-Sn Polymetallic Deposit in Eastern Hunan Province, South China: Evidence from Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite Ar-Ar Dating, Petrochemistry, and Wolframite Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopes. Minerals, 8(3): 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8030111
[8]	Chen, G.D., Yang, X.Y., Liang, X.Q., et al., 2003. Some Cruxes of Dynamics Study on Activated Region. Chinese Journal of Geology, 37(3):320-331 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX200203008.htm
[9]	Chen, Y.C., Wang, D.H., Xu, Z.G., et al., 2014. Outline of Regional Metallogeny of Ore Deposits Associated with the Mesozoic Magmatism in South China. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 38(2):219-229 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201402002.htm
[10]	Deng, X.T., Cao, J.Y., Wu, Q.H., et al., 2017.Difference of sources of the Yanshanian Xitian and Dengfuxian Granites in Hunan Province and Their Implication. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 48(1):212-222 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[11]	Dong, C.G., Yu, Y.C., Liang, X.Q., et al., 2018. Re-Os Dating of Molybdenite from the Ore-Bearing Quartz Veins in the Xiangdong Tungsten Deposit (Hunan Province) and Its Geological Significance. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 42(1):84-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12]	He, M., Liu, Q., Hou, Q.L., et al., 2018.Petrogenesis of the Dengfuxian Granite, Eastern Hunan Province and Constraints on Mineralization: Evidences from Zircon and Cassiterite U-Pb Geochronology, Zircon Hf-O Isotopes and Whole-Rock Geochemistry. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 34(3):637－655 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201803007.htm
[13]	Huang, H.X., Chen, Z.H., Lu, Y.F., et al., 2014. Zircon U-Pb Dating for Xiangdong Tungsten Mineralization Rocks and Its Geological Significance. Journal of East China Institute of Technology, 37(1):26-36 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1080/02533839.2012.751331
[14]	Jiang, Y. H., Jiang, S. Y., Dai, B. Z., et al., 2009. Middle to Late Jurassic Felsic and Mafic Magmatism in Southern Hunan Province, Southeast China: Implications for a Continental Arc to Rifting. Lithos, 107(3/4): 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2008.10.006
[15]	Lapierre, H., Jahn, B. M., Charvet, J., et al., 1997. Mesozoic Felsic Arc Magmatism and Continental Olivine Tholeiites in Zhejiang Province and Their Relationship with the Tectonic Activity in Southeastern China. Tectonophysics, 274(4): 321-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(97)00009-7
[16]	Liang, X. Q., Dong, C. G., Jiang, Y., et al., 2016. Zircon U-Pb, Molybdenite Re-Os and Muscovite Ar-Ar Isotopic Dating of the Xitian W-Sn Polymetallic Deposit, Eastern Hunan Province, South China and its Geological Significance. Ore Geology Reviews, 78: 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.0.018
[17]	Liu, B., Wu, Q.H., Xi, X.S., et al., 2018. Mineralization Zone Styles and Mechanism of Xitian Tin-Tungsten Polymetallic Orefield, Hunan Province. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 49(3):633-641 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/327302150_Mineralization_zone_styles_and_mechanism_of_Xitian_Tin-Tungsten_Polymetallic_orefield_Hunan_Province
[18]	Liu, Y.H., Fu, J.M., Long, B.L., et al., 2006.He and Ar Isotopic Components of Main Tin Deposits from Central Nanling Region and Its Signification. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 36(5):774-780 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200605018.htm
[19]	Mao, J., 1997. Metallogenic Speciality of Super Giant Polymetallic Tungsten Deposit: Taking the Shizhuyuan Deposit as Example. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 32(3):351-363 (in Chines with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287565205_Metallogenic_speciality_of_super_giant_polymetallic_tungsten_deposit_Taking_the_Shizhuyuan_deposit_as_an_example
[20]	Mao, J. W., Cheng, Y. B., Chen, M. H., et al., 2013. Major Types and Time-Space Distribution of Mesozoic Ore Deposits in South China and their Geodynamic Settings. Mineralium Deposita, 48(3): 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-012-0446-z
[21]	Mao, J.W., Xie, G.Q., Li, X.F., et al., 2004.Mesozic Large Scale Minerallzation and Multiple Lithospheric Extension in South China. Earth Science Frontiers, 38(2):46-55 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[22]	Ni, Y.J., Shan, Y.H., Wu, S.C., et al., 2015. Determination of Slip Sense of the Laoshan'ao Fault in the Xiangdong Tungsten Deposit (Southeast Hunan) and Its Implications for Mineral Exploration. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 39(3):436-445 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/282683837_Determination_of_slip_sense_of_the_Laoshan'ao_Fault_in_the_Xiangdong_tungsten_deposit_Southeast_Hunan_and_its_implications_for_mineral_exploration
[23]	Quan, T.J., Xi, X.S., Kong, H., et al., 2013. Yanshanian Triple Junction Tectonic Pattern and Metallogenesis in Southern Hunan, China. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 23(9):2613-2620 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXZ201309033.htm
[24]	Ren, J. Y., Tamaki, K., Li, S. T., et al., 2003. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic Rifting and Its Dynamic Setting in Eastern China and Adjacent Areas. Tectonophysics, 344(3/4): 175-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(1)00271-2
[25]	Shu, L.S., Yu, J.H., Dong, J., et al., 2008.Early Paleozoic Orogenic Belt in the Eastern Segment of South China. Geological Bulletin of China, 27(10):1581-1593 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200810002.htm
[26]	Song, C., Wei, W., Hou, Q.L., et al., 2016.Geological Characteristics of the Laoshan'ao Shear Zone and Its Relationship with the Xiangdong Tungsten Deposit, Chaling, Eastern Hunan Province. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 32(5):1571－1580 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-YSXB201605021.htm
[27]	Wan, Q.F., Zhu, H., 2003. Tectonics and Environment Change of Meso-Cenozoic in China Continent and Its Adjacent Areas.Geoscience, 16(2):107-118 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200202000.htm
[28]	Wang, Z., Chen, B., Ma, X., 2014.Petrogenesis of the Late Mesozoic Guposhan Composite Plutons from the Nanling Range, South China: Implications for W-Sn Mineralization. American Journal of Science, 314(1):235-277 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.2475/01.2014.07
[29]	Wei, N., Huang, F., Wang, Y., et al., 2018. Genesis of Yuanlingzhai Large Porphyry Molybdenum Deposits in East Section of Nanling: Evidence from Fluid Inclusions and Stable Isotope. Earth Science, 43(Suppl.2):135-148 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX2018S2011.htm
[30]	Wei, W., Song, C., Hou, Q.L., et al., 2017. The Late Jurassic Extensional Event in the Central Part of the South China Block: Evidence from the Laoshan'ao Shear Zone and Xiangdong Tungsten Deposit (Hunan, SE China). International Geology Review, 60(11/12/13/14): 1644-1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2017.1395714
[31]	Wu, Q. H., Cao, J. Y., Kong, H., et al., 2016. Petrogenesis and Tectonic Setting of the Early Mesozoic Xitian Granitic Pluton in the Middle Qin-Hang Belt, South China: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Ages and Bulk-Rock Trace Element and Sr-Nd-Pb Isotopic Compositions. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 128: 130-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.002
[32]	Wu, S.C., Long, Z.Q., Xu, H.H., et al., 2013. Structural Characteristics and Prospecting Significance of the Xitian Tin-Tungsten Polymetallic Deposit, Hunan Province, China. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 36(2):217-226 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/303165271_Structural_characteristics_and_prospecting_significance_of_the_Xitian_tin-tungsten_polymetallic_deposit_Hunan_Province_China?ev=auth_pub
[33]	Xiong, Y.Q., 2016. Spatiotemporal Structure and Ore-forming Process of Hydrothermal Metallogenic System in Dengfuxian Orefield, Eastern Hunan(Dissertation). Central South University, Hunan (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34]	Xiong, Y. Q., Shao, Y. J., Zhou, H. D., et al., 2017. Ore-Forming Mechanism of Quartz-Vein-Type W-Sn Deposits of the Xitian District in SE China: Implications from the Trace Element Analysis of Wolframite and Investigation of Fluid Inclusions. Ore Geology Reviews, 83: 152-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.1.007
[35]	Xu, D.R., Zou, F.H, Ning, J.T., et al., 2017.Discussion on Geological and Structural Characteristics and Associated Metallogeny in Northeastern Hunan Province, South China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 33(3):695－715 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36]	Yao, Y., Chen, J., Lu, J.J., et al., 2013.Geochronology, Hf Isotopic Compositions and Geochemical Characteristics of Xitian A-Type Granite and its Geological Significance. Mineral Deposit, 32(3):467-488 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ201303002.htm
[37]	Yin, A., Harrison, T. M., 2000. Geologic Evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan Orogen. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 28(1): 211-280. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.211
[38]	Zhang, J.J., Huang, T.L., 2019. An Overview on Continental Extensional Tectonics. Earth Science, 44(5): 1705-1715 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX201905022.htm
[39]	Zhang, Y.Q., Xu, X.B., Jia, D., et al., 2009. Deformation Record of the Change from Indosinian Collision-related Tectonic System of Yanshanian Subduction-Related Tectonic Systemin South China During the Early Mesozoic. Earth Science Frontiers, 16(1):234-247 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/284573329_Deformation_record_of_the_change_from_Indosinian_collision-related_tectonic_system_to_Yanshanian_subduction-related_tectonic_system_in_South_China_during_the_Early_Mesozoic
[40]	Zheng, M.H., Shao, Y.J., Liu, Z.F., et al., 2016.Rb-Sr Isotope and Main Trace Element Composition Characteristics of Sulfide and Deposit Genesis Investigation of Dalong Pb-Zn Deposit. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 47(11):3792-3799 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/312126919_Rb-Sr_isotope_and_main_trace_element_composition_characteristics_of_sulfide_and_deposit_genesis_investigation_of_Dalong_Pb-Zn_deposit
[41]	Zheng, M.H., Shao, Y.J., Wei, H.T., et al., 2015.Petrogenesis of Batuan Intrusion: Constraints from Petro-Geochemistry, Zircon U-Pb Dating and Hf Isotope. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 25(11):3171-3181 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXZ201511028.htm
[42]	Zhou, Y., Liang, X.Q., Cai, Y.F., et al., 2017. Petrogenesis and Mineralization of Xitian Tin-Tungsten Polymetallic Deposit: Constraints from Mineral Chemistry of Biotite from Xitian A-Type Granite, Eastern Hunan Province. Earth Science, 2(10): 1647-1657 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201710001.htm
[43]	柏道远, 黄建中, 李金冬, 等, 2007.华南中生代构造演化过程的多地质要素约束——湘东南及湘粤赣边区中生代地质研究的启示.大地构造与成矿学, 31(1):1-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2007.01.001
[44]	柏道远, 李银敏, 钟响, 等, 2018.湖南NW向常德-安仁断裂的地质特征、活动历史及构造性质.地球科学, 43(7):2496-2514. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.571
[45]	柏道远, 刘波, 倪艳军, 等, 2010.湘东北湘阴凹陷控盆断裂特征、盆地性质及动力机制研究.资源调查与环境, 31(3):157-168. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4814.2010.03.001
[46]	柏道远, 马铁球, 王先辉, 等, 2008.南岭中段中生代构造-岩浆活动与成矿作用研究进展.中国地质, 35(3):436-455. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2008.03.008
[47]	蔡杨, 陆建军, 马东升, 等, 2013a.湖南邓阜仙印支晚期二云母花岗岩年代学、地球化学特征及其意义.岩石学报, 29(12):4215-4231. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201312011.htm
[48]	蔡杨, 马东升, 陆建军, 等, 2013b.湖南邓阜仙钨矿辉钼矿铼-锇同位素定年及硫同位素地球化学研究.岩石学报, 28(12):3798-3808. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201212002.htm
[49]	陈国达, 杨心宜, 梁新权, 2003.关于活化区动力学研究的几个问题.地质科学, 37(3):320-331. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX200203008.htm
[50]	陈毓川, 王登红, 徐志刚, 等, 2014.华南区域成矿和中生代岩浆成矿规律概要.大地构造与成矿学, 38(2):219-229. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201402002.htm
[51]	邓渲桐, 曹荆亚, 吴堑虹, 等, 2017.湖南锡田和邓阜仙燕山期花岗岩的源区差异及其意义.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 48(1):212-222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201701029.htm
[52]	董超阁, 余阳春, 梁新权, 等, 2018.湖南湘东钨矿含矿石英脉辉钼矿Re-Os定年及地质意义.大地构造与成矿学, 42(1):84-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201801008.htm
[53]	何苗, 刘庆, 侯泉林, 等, 2018.湘东邓阜仙花岗岩成因及对成矿的制约:锆石/锡石U-Pb年代学、锆石Hf-O同位素及全岩地球化学特征.岩石学报, 34(3):637-655. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201803007.htm
[54]	黄鸿新, 陈郑辉, 路远发, 等, 2014.湘东钨矿成矿岩体锆石U-Pb定年及地质意义.东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 37(1):26-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3504.2014.01.005
[55]	刘飚, 吴堑虹, 奚小双, 等, 2018.湖南锡田钨锡多金属矿田成矿分带样式及机理.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 49(3):633-641. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201803017.htm
[56]	刘云华, 付建明, 龙宝林, 等, 2006.南岭中段主要锡矿床He、Ar同位素组成及其意义.吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 36(5):774-780. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200605018.htm
[57]	毛景文, 1997.超大型钨多金属矿床成矿特殊性-以湖南柿竹园矿床为例.地球科学, 32(3):351-363. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX703.012.htm
[58]	毛景文, 谢桂青, 李晓峰, 等, 2004.华南地区中生代大规模成矿作用与岩石圈多阶段伸展.地学前缘, 38(2):46-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200401002.htm
[59]	倪永进, 单业华, 伍式崇, 等, 2015.湖南东南部湘东钨矿区老山坳断层性质的厘定及其对找矿的启示.大地构造与成矿学, 39(3):436-445. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201503008.htm
[60]	全铁军, 奚小双, 孔华, 等, 2013.湘南燕山期区域三叉断裂构造型式及成矿作用.中国有色金属学报, 23(9):2613-2620. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXZ201309033.htm
[61]	宋超, 卫巍, 侯泉林, 等, 2016.湘东茶陵地区老山坳剪切带特征及其与湘东钨矿的关系, 32(5): 1571-1580.
[62]	万天丰, 朱鸿, 2003.中国大陆及邻区中生代-新生代大地构造与环境变迁.现代地质, 16(2):107-118. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200202000.htm
[63]	魏娜, 黄凡, 王岩, 等, 2018.南岭东段园岭寨斑岩型钼矿成因——流体包裹体和稳定同位素证据.地球科学, 43(Suppl.2):135-148. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.194
[64]	伍式崇, 龙自强, 徐辉煌, 等, 2013.湖南锡田锡钨多金属矿床成矿构造特征及其找矿意义.大地构造与成矿学, 36(2):217-226. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201202011.htm
[65]	熊伊曲, 2016.湘东邓阜仙矿田热液成矿系统的时空结构与成矿过程(博士学位论文).湖南: 中南大学, 108-111.
[66]	许德如, 邹凤辉, 宁钧陶, 等, 2017.湘东北地区地质构造演化与成矿响应探讨.岩石学报, 33(3):695-715. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201703003.htm
[67]	姚远, 陈骏, 陆建军, 等, 2013.湘东锡田A型花岗岩的年代学、Hf同位素、地球化学特征及其地质意义.矿床地质, 32(3):467-488. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2013.03.002
[68]	张进江, 黄天立, 2019.大陆伸展构造综述.地球科学, 44(5): 1705-1715. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.009
[69]	张岳桥, 徐先兵, 贾东, 等, 2009.华南早中生代从印支期碰撞构造体系向燕山期俯冲构造体系转换的形变记录.地学前缘, 16(1):234-247. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2009.01.026
[70]	郑明泓, 邵拥军, 刘忠法, 等, 2016.大垅铅锌矿床硫化物Rb-Sr同位素和主微量成分特征及矿床成因.中南大学学报(自然科学版), 47(11):3792-3799. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNGD201611024.htm
[71]	郑明泓, 邵拥军, 隗含涛, 等, 2015.湘东八团岩体的成因:地球化学、锆石U-Pb年代学以及Hf同位素的制约.中国有色金属学报, 25(11):3171-3181. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYXZ201511028.htm
[72]	周云, 梁新权, 蔡永丰, 等, 2017.湘东锡田燕山期A型花岗岩黑云母矿物化学特征及其成岩成矿意义.地球科学, 2(10):1647-1657. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.557