滇东南建水地区高镁火山岩包体的成因和构造背景

刘德民; 郭宏杰; 张根袁; 孔令昊; 邵俊琦; 张婧琪

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2019.078

滇东南建水地区高镁火山岩包体的成因和构造背景

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.078

1.
中国地质大学地球科学学院, 湖北武汉 430074
2.
青海省地质调查院, 青海西宁 810012
3.
中国地质大学地质调查研究院, 湖北武汉 430074

基金项目:

苏北盆地干热岩控热构造背景研究项目 2018016417

中国地质调查局项目 1212011220400

详细信息

作者简介:
刘德民(1975-), 男, 副教授, 长期从事区域地质矿产调查方面的教学和研究

通讯作者:
刘德民

中图分类号: P581
计量
- 文章访问数: 4228
- HTML全文浏览量: 1250
- PDF下载量: 66
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-04-11
- 刊出日期: 2019-05-15

Petrogenesis and Tectonic Setting of High-Mg Volcanic Rock Xenoliths in Jianshui Area, Southeast Yunnan, China

1.
School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2.
Qinghai Geological Survey Institute, Xining 810012, China
3.
Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

摘要

摘要: 在滇东南建水地区发现产于峨眉山玄武岩中的高镁火山岩包体, 这对于地幔柱的形成演化具有重要研究意义.对这些包体进行了锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和岩矿分析.高镁火山岩包体具斑状结构, 致密块状构造, 斑晶主要为贵橄榄石和透辉石.13颗锆石U-Pb LA-ICP-MS加权平均年龄为259±2 Ma（MSWD=1.9）, 显示与寄主岩石同期形成.包体岩石具有高镁（Mg^#=68~75）、低硅（SiO₂=45.11%~45.93%）特征, 轻稀土元素（LREE）、高场强元素（HFSE）富集而重稀土元素（HREE）亏损, 属于亚碱性、拉斑玄武岩系列, 具有板内玄武岩（IPB）特征.火山岩包体的原始岩浆起源于石榴子石二辉橄榄岩低程度部分熔融的产物, 岩浆演化过程中发生了橄榄石和单斜辉石的分离结晶作用, 在侵位上升过程中未受明显的地壳混染作用.该高镁火山岩的存在, 显示地幔柱除了垂直上升运动外, 在地球深部不同的边界还有多次侧向扩展移动, 表明滇东南晚二叠世存在峨眉山地幔柱的一个分支-地幔枝活动.
- 高镁火山岩包体 /
- 峨眉山玄武岩 /
- 岩石成因 /
- 地幔枝 /
- 滇东南建水 /
- 构造地质
Abstract: It reports for the first time the presence of a suite of high-Mg volcanic xenoliths in Jianshui area of Southeast Yunnan, western Yangtze platform, China, which provides new insights into mantle plume activity in the platform during the Permian. Zircon U-Pb dating, geochemistry and petrology of the xenoliths were studied to assess the petrogenetic origin and geodynamic setting of these high-Mg volcanic rocks in this paper. The high-Mg volcanic xenoliths are porphyritic texture and contain only large phenocrysts of olivine, which show as dense mass, develop as lenticulars in the Permian Emeishan basalts in Jianshui area, Southeast Yunnan. The igneous zircons from the volcanic xenoliths yield a weighted age of ca. 259±2 Ma that is interpreted to be the formation age of the magmatic protolith, which is the same as the host rocks of the Emeishan basalts. The volcanic xenoliths are characterized by low SiO₂, moderate TiO₂ and high Mg^#. All the volcanic xenoliths are enriched in LREE but depleted in HREE. The geochemical characteristics of the xenoliths show that they belong to sub-alkali basalts and intra-plate tholeiitic basalts, suggesting that the primary magma of the high-Mg volcanic rock is likely produced by low partial melting of garnet lherzolite. The original magma may have undergone the process of fractional crystallization of olivines and clinopyroxenes. The original magma has not been affected obviously by crustal material contamination in the emplacement and uplifting. The high-Mg volcanic xenoliths may origin from riched-mantle and may be the product of the main stage of the mantle plume activity. All above indicates that there was a mantle branch developed in the study area in Late Permian. It is proposed that several mantle branches have not only ascending motion but also lateral movement while the thermal melting mantle plume arrives at the boundary of mantle and crust.
- high-Mg volcanic xenolith /
- Emeishan basalt /
- petrogenesis /
- mantle branch /
- Jianshui area, Southeast Yunnan /
- tectonics

HTML全文

图 1 峨眉山玄武岩分布(a)和云南建水县研究区地质略图(b)

改自何斌等(2006).F1.怒江断裂; F2.柯街断裂; F3.澜沧江断裂; F4.金沙江-哀牢山断裂; F5, F6, F7.甘孜-理塘断裂; F8.龙门山-箐河断裂; F9.炉霍-道孚断裂; F10.雅砻江-绿汁江断裂; F11.安宁河-益门断裂; F12.普渡河-小江断裂; F13.罗泽河-紫云断裂; F14.师宗-弥勒断裂; 1.第四系; 2.新近系; 3.三叠系; 4.二叠系; 5.石炭系; 6.泥盆系; 7.南华系; 8.峨眉山玄武岩; 9.晚石炭世玄武岩; 10.断裂; 11.采样位置

Fig. 1. Distribution of Emeishan basalts (a) and geological sketch map of Jianshui area, Yunnan (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 高镁火山岩包体野外露头(a)及镜下橄榄石斑晶溶蚀边(b)(+)

Pl.斜长石; Ol.橄榄石

Fig. 2. Field photograph (a) and microphotograph characters (b) of high-Mg volcanic rock xenoliths in Emeishan basalts

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 建水高镁火山岩部分代表性锆石阴极发光图

Fig. 3. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of selected zircons from the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 建水高镁火山岩锆石U-Pb年龄协和图及加权平均年龄

Fig. 4. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb concordia diagram for the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths in Jiangshui area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 高镁火山岩包体TAS分类和AFM图解

a.底图据Le et al.(1986); b.底图据Ivrine and Baargar(1971)

Fig. 5. TAS (a) and AFM diagrams (b) for the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 高镁火山岩包体原始地幔标准化微量元素蛛网图(a)和球粒陨石标准化稀土元素配分图(b)

标准值据Winchester and Floyd(1977)

Fig. 6. Primitive mantle-normalized trace element spider diagram (a) and chondrite-normalized REE diagram (b) for the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 Nb/Th-Zr/Nb(a)和Zr/Y-Nb/Y图解(b)

底图据Condie(2003)

Fig. 7. Nb/Th-Zr/Nb(a) and Zr/Y-Nb/Y (b) diagrams for the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 峨眉山玄武岩高镁包体(La/Sm)-(Sm/Yb)图解

底图据Lassiter and Depaolo(1997).PM.原始地幔；DMM.亏损地幔；CLM.大陆岩石圈地幔；LC.下地壳；CC.整个地壳；UC.上地壳

Fig. 8. (La/Sm)-(Sm/Yb) diagram for the high-Mg xenoliths in Emeishan basalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 高镁火山岩包体Ti-Zr-Y图解

底图据Pearce and Cann(1973)

Fig. 9. Ti-Zr-Y for the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 高镁火山岩包体Th-Hf-Nb图解

底图据Wood(1980)

Fig. 10. Th-Hf-Nb diagram for the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 建水高镁火山岩地幔柱(枝)成因模式

1.高镁火山岩包体；2.峨眉山玄武岩；3.沉积盖层；4.变质基底；5.地壳热熔体；6.地幔熔融热流体；7.核幔边界形成的熔融热流体

Fig. 11. A possible mantle plume branches model for explanation of the origin of the xenoliths in Emeishan basalt

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 高镁火山岩包体锆石U-Pb年龄测试分析结果

Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb analytical results of the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths

点号	Pb	²³²Th(10^-6)	²³⁸U(10^-6)	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb		²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U		²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U		²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁶Pb		²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U		²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U
点号	Pb	²³²Th(10^-6)	²³⁸U(10^-6)	Th/U	比值	1σ	比值	1σ	比值	1σ	年龄(Ma)	1σ	年龄(Ma)	1σ	年龄(Ma)	1σ
1	8	74	207	0.36	0.050 6	0.002 3	0.225 3	0.011 0	0.032 1	0.000 6	391	176.8	288	24.5	262	4.9
2	30	557	7 097	0.79	0.053 3	0.004 0	0.226 4	0.016 3	0.030 6	0.000 4	326	61.3	258	6.5	252	3.2
3	22	231	538	0.43	0.051 1	0.001 6	0.231 6	0.007 3	0.032 6	0.000 4	364	82.9	266	9.6	255	4.3
4	26	371	683	0.54	0.055 7	0.002 3	0.230 4	0.008 2	0.030 0	0.000 5	393	90.3	273	38.4	258	3.1
5	40	569	1 040	0.55	0.051 6	0.001 3	0.215 3	0.005 4	0.030 0	0.000 3	543	51.3	282	6.4	250	4.9
6	23	281	575	0.49	0.050 0	0.001 5	0.220 9	0.006 3	0.031 9	0.000 4	503	86.2	275	87.7	257	3.6
7	16	131	429	0.30	0.047 0	0.002 5	0.200 0	0.010 8	0.030 6	0.000 7	478	72.3	280	151.3	258	4.3
8	16	204	363	0.56	0.053 2	0.001 8	0.250 7	0.008 4	0.034 0	0.000 5	363	77.4	282	8.8	271	3.8
9	22	299	535	0.56	0.053 9	0.001 6	0.235 7	0.007 6	0.031 4	0.000 4	521	338.6	282	63.4	261	8.7
10	25	242	613	0.39	0.050 7	0.001 2	0.234 7	0.005 8	0.033 4	0.000 4	171	144.3	252	19.1	258	2.6
11	21	251	525	0.48	0.053 5	0.002 1	0.228 8	0.009 2	0.030 8	0.000 5	190	151.1	257	17.5	261	5.0
12	21	235	541	0.43	0.051 4	0.001 8	0.221 8	0.007 5	0.031 2	0.000 4	387	96.1	276	37.4	262	4.1
13	16	175	361	0.49	0.052 2	0.001 5	0.245 1	0.007 2	0.034 1	0.000 4	477	41.1	288	13.7	267	5.0
14	61	145	447	0.32	0.067 4	0.002 3	1.056 2	0.034 0	0.112 7	0.001 3	850	71.1	732	16.8	689	7.8
15	60	174	352	0.49	0.065 2	0.001 7	1.233 1	0.033 1	0.136 8	0.001 3	789	55.6	816	15.1	827	7.3
16	58	84	344	0. 42	0.071 2	0.001 6	1.448 0	0.034 4	0.146 1	0.002 2	965	46.3	909	14.3	879	12.3
17	47	76	113	0.67	0.108 1	0.002 0	4.922 1	0.098 2	0.327 3	0.003 9	1 768	38.1	1 806	16.9	1 825	18.8
18	133	130	238	0.55	0.166 7	0.002 8	9.573 2	0.220 8	0.412 1	0.009 3	2 524	28.9	2 395	21.3	2 225	42.5
19	26	56	34	1.68	0.159 2	0.005 7	9.902 2	0.358 3	0.451 2	0.008 1	2 447	59.4	2 426	33.4	2 401	35.9

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 二叠纪高镁火山岩包体主量元素及峨眉山玄武岩岩石化学平均组成(%)

Table 2. Major element data for high-Mg volcanic xenoliths and the mean data from Emeishan basalt (%)

	序号	SiO₂	MgO	FeO	Fe₂O₃	Al₂O₃	Na₂O	K₂O	CaO	TiO₂	MnO	P₂O₅	H₂O⁺	CO₂	Mg^#	LOI
本文测试数据	D02-1	45.11	10.46	8.05	5.22	13.12	2.16	0.81	9.91	2.29	0.23	0.31	1.96	0.04	69.80	1.13
	D02-2	45.86	10.79	8.11	4.62	13.18	2.17	0.77	9.69	2.22	0.22	0.31	1.66	0.11	70.41	0.86
	D02-3	45.14	11.12	9.15	3.45	12.93	2.27	0.67	10.01	2.16	0.22	0.28	2.20	0.10	68.40	1.27
	D02-4	45.28	10.92	9.05	3.51	13.11	2.31	0.68	9.93	2.18	0.22	0.29	2.15	0.06	68.30	1.22
	D02-5	45.93	10.76	8.15	4.52	13.17	2.21	0.77	9.66	2.23	0.22	0.32	1.63	0.12	70.21	0.85
	D02-6	45.79	10.75	8.05	4.57	13.06	2.17	0.75	9.73	2.23	0.22	0.31	1.92	0.10	70.40	1.17
	D02-7	45.78	10.35	6.21	6.66	13.06	2.16	0.75	9.83	2.22	0.21	0.32	1.89	0.11	74.91	1.33
	D02-8	45.77	10.81	8.05	4.71	13.19	2.15	0.76	9.72	2.23	0.22	0.31	1.68	0.08	70.50	0.88
	D02-9	45.76	10.28	6.12	7.01	13.05	2.18	0.76	9.79	2.22	0.22	0.32	1.92	0.06	75.11	1.33
	D02-10	45.93	10.76	8.15	4.52	13.17	2.21	0.77	9.66	2.23	0.22	0.32	1.63	0.12	70.20	0.85
	D02-11	45.79	10.41	6.31	6.62	13.08	2.14	0.75	9.85	2.21	0.22	0.29	1.87	0.12	74.70	1.33
	D02-12	45.88	10.29	6.18	6.78	13.06	2.16	0.76	9.86	2.23	0.22	0.31	1.88	0.07	74.81	1.29
	D02-13	45.91	10.31	6.25	6.54	13.08	2.14	0.76	10.03	2.21	0.21	0.32	1.85	0.08	74.60	1.25
	D02-14	45.76	10.28	6.11	7.01	13.05	2.18	0.76	9.79	2.22	0.22	0.31	1.92	0.06	75.00	1.33
峨眉山玄武岩	1	48.11	6.27	8.68	4.61	13.36	2.74	1.15	8.16	2.93	0.18	0.31
	2	49.95	6.07	7.82	5.82	13.86	2.92	1.29	8.69	3.01	0.21	0.41
	3	48.45	4.61	8.66	5.16	13.74	2.62	1.28	8.21	3.07	0.17	0.33
	4	48.17	6.06	7.61	5.74	13.58	2.65	0.87	9.23	2.78	0.19	0.31
	5	47.22	6.59	7.94	4.73	12.83	2.91	1.11	9.47	3.21	0.18	0.35
	6	49.07	7.01		12.05	12.92	3.14	0.84	8.75	2.42	0.18	0.28			55.53	3.64
注：序号1~2数据分别来源于文献(潘杏南等，1987)中204、608个样品的平均值；3数据来源于文献(熊舜华和李建林，1984)中62个样品的平均值；4数据来源于文献(陈智梁和陈世瑜，1987)中114个样品的平均值；5数据为本人在收集文献(侯增谦等，1999；宋谢炎等，2001)中选取的53个样品的平均值；6数据来源于文献(肖龙等，2003)中25个样品的平均值.本文测试数据由自然资源部武汉地质矿产测试中心化学实验室测试完成，Mg^#=Mg/(Mg+Fe²⁺).

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 高镁火山岩包体的微量和稀土元素地球化学数据(10^-6)

Table 3. Trace and rare earth element data for the high-Mg volcanic xenoliths (10^-6)

	D02-1	D02-2	D02-3	D02-4	D02-5	D02-6	D02-7	D02-8	D02-9	D02-10	D02-11	D02-12	D02-13	D02-14
Sc	31.41	31.09	31.37	30.65	31.23	31.63	31.57	31.15	30.35	31.02	30.92	29.85	31.45	30.39
Co	57.96	58.29	57.41	60.44	57.85	58.93	58.92	57.62	58.59	58.76	57.83	59.99	60.89	58.91
Cu	43.92	43.15	42.27	44.95	42.71	42.87	43.34	42.10	45.03	43.95	41.92	43.31	46.59	42.61
Zn	100.71	92.01	91.97	101.72	91.99	100.11	98.15	93.33	97.55	98.83	94.69	100.92	102.51	97.81
Rb	21.45	20.97	21.36	24.36	21.17	25.38	23.61	22.42	24.98	23.61	23.44	25.05	23.67	24.29
Zr	122	112	114	116	113	123	117	113	121	122	113	116	116	115
Nb	23.180	21.120	18.660	20.735	19.890	21.170	21.440	19.195	21.250	21.210	19.730	20.540	20.930	20.140
Hf	3.630	3.150	3.160	3.215	3.160	3.470	3.140	3.165	3.310	3.390	3.170	3.320	3.110	3.250
Ta	1.870	1.620	1.370	1.465	1.490	1.520	1.540	1.412	1.470	1.510	1.430	1.460	1.470	1.450
Pb	2.740	2.480	3.080	3.855	2.730	3.150	2.610	2.995	2.730	2.980	2.910	3.470	4.240	3.190
Th	2.930	2.530	2.340	2.460	2.440	2.510	2.520	2.381	2.510	2.520	2.420	2.410	2.510	2.410
U	0.51	0.48	0.48	0.52	0.49	0.54	0.48	0.471	0.47	0.51	0.46	0.53	0.51	0.49
Ba	334	349	310	344	329	302	330	317	388	345	3242	381	307	353
Cr	580	700	673	648	686	609	615	633	596	603	593	671	625	632
Ni	192	215	207	211	211	202	202	206	200	201	205	207	215	206
Sr	321	297	298	346	298	330	329	318	331	330	338	345	347	342
V	272	260	254	277	257	275	270	258	267	271	263	277	276	270
Nb/U	45.450	43.990	38.880	40.320	40.590	39.210	45.040	40.745	44.930	41.410	42.610	38.610	42.030	41.110
(Th/Ta)_N	0.760	0.750	0.820	0.805	0.780	0.810	0.790	0.815	0.820	0.820	0.810	0.790	0.820	0.810
La	15.430	15.090	14.760	15.650	15.370	15.870	16.040	15.265	15.960	16.010	15.770	15.850	15.450	15.110
Ce	31.950	31.910	30.810	31.640	31.860	32.670	33.060	31.735	32.870	32.890	32.660	31.990	31.290	29.910
Pr	4.760	4.650	4.520	4.685	4.650	4.820	4.870	4.635	4.850	4.840	4.750	4.740	4.630	4.490
Nd	20.27	19.72	19.36	20.065	20.07	20.85	20.91	19.92	20.88	20.83	20.48	20.29	19.84	19.21
Sm	4.85	4.75	4.56	4.81	4.75	5.04	5.02	4.765	5.03	4.96	4.97	4.84	4.78	4.57
Eu	1.76	1.72	1.71	1.815	1.72	1.82	1.84	1.76	1.83	1.85	1.81	1.82	1.81	1.68
Gd	4.620	4.540	4.510	4.555	4.560	4.720	4.720	4.580	4.720	4.570	4.650	4.630	4.480	4.320
Tb	0.710	0.710	0.690	0.715	0.720	0.730	0.730	0.705	0.730	0.720	0.720	0.720	0.710	0.680
Dy	3.85	3.76	3.62	3.83	3.81	3.88	3.98	3.78	3.93	3.88	3.94	3.87	3.79	3.64
Ho	0.720	0.710	0.720	0.715	0.710	0.740	0.750	0.730	0.750	0.730	0.740	0.720	0.710	0.670
Er	1.84	1.76	1.75	1.86	1.78	1.89	1.92	1.82	1.91	1.86	1.89	1.85	1.87	1.76
Tm	0.26	0.26	0.26	0.26	0.26	0.27	0.27	0.26	0.27	0.26	0.26	0.26	0.26	0.24
Yb	1.610	1.550	1.560	1.605	1.540	1.630	1.630	1.595	1.650	1.650	1.630	1.620	1.590	1.520
Lu	0.24	0.23	0.24	0.23	0.23	0.24	0.26	0.24	0.25	0.25	0.24	0.23	0.23	0.21
Y	16.990	16.640	16.330	17.115	16.960	17.240	17.560	16.810	17.410	17.550	17.270	17.210	17.020	16.320
∑REE	92.870	90.530	89.040	92.340	92.010	95.140	95.980	91.775	95.560	95.280	94.510	93.420	91.260	87.980
(La/Nb)_N	0.690	0.790	0.730	0.805	0.860	0.780	0.790	0.755	0.790	0.770	0.780	0.830	0.780	0.760

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(55)

[1]	Campbell, I.H., Daviese, G.F., 2006.Do Mantle Plumes Exist?.Episodes, 29(3):162-168. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ025023479/
[2]	Chen, Z.L., Chen, S.Y., 1987.Tectonic Evolution of Western Yangtze Block.Chongqing Publishing House, Chongqing, 104-120 (in Chinese).
[3]	Chung, S.L., Jahn, B.M., 1995.Plume-Lithosphere Interaction in Generation of the Emeishan Flood Basalts at the Permian-Triassic Boundary.Geology, 23(10):889-892.https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023 < 0889:pliigo > 2.3.co; 2 doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0889:pliigo>2.3.co;2
[4]	Condie, K.C., 2003.Incompatible Element Ratios in Oceanic Basalts and Komatiites:Tracking Deep Mantle Sources and Continental Growth Rates with Time.Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4(1):1-28. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gc000333
[5]	Dmitriev, Y.I., Bogatikov, O.A., 1996.Emeishan Flood Basalts, Yangtze Platform:Indications of an Aborted Oceanic Environment.Petrology, 4:407-418.
[6]	Frey, F.A., Green, D.H., Roy, S.D., 1978.Integrated Models of Basalt Petrogenesis:A Study of Quartz Tholeiites to Olivine Melilitites from South Eastern Australia Utilizing Geochemical and Experimental Petrological Data.Journal of Petrology, 19(3):463-513. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/19.3.463
[7]	Gan, X.C., Zhao, F.Q., Jin, W.S., et al., 1996.The U-Pb Ages of Early Proterozoic-Archean Zircons Captured by Igneous Rocks in Southern China.Geochimica, 25(2):112-120 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600048548
[8]	Geoffrey, F.D., 2005.Grounds for the Mantle Existing.Chinese Science Bulletin, 50(17):1801-1813.
[9]	He, Q., Xiao, L., Balta, B., et al., 2010.Variety and Complexity of the Late-Permian Emeishan Basalts:Reappraisal of Plume-lithosphere Interaction Processes.Lithos, 119(1-2):91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2010.07.020
[10]	He, B., Xu, Y.G., Xiao, L., et al., 2006.Sedimentary Responses to Uplift of Emeishan Mantle Plume and Its Implications.Geological Review, 52(1):30-37 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/OA000004910
[11]	Hofmann, A.W., 1988.Chemical Differentiation of the Earth:The Relationship between Mantle, Continental Crust, and Oceanic Crust.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 90(3):297-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(88)90132-x
[12]	Hou, Z.Q., Lu, J.R., Lin, S.Z., 2005.The Axial Zone Consisting of Pyrolite and Eclogite in the Emei Mantle Plume Major, Trace Element and Sr-Nd-Pb Isotope Evidence.Acta Geologica Sinica, 79(2):200-219 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb200502007
[13]	Hou, Z.Q., Wang, Y.L., Zhang, C.J., et al., 1999.Chemical Characteristic of Major Elements, Cr and Ni of Mantle Plume in Emei Igneous Province.Geological Review, 45(Suppl.):880-884 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/OA000002294
[14]	Irvine, T.N., Baragar, W.R.A., 1971.A Guide to the Chemical Classification of the Common Volcanic Rocks.Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8(5):523-548. https://doi.org/10.1139/e71-055
[15]	Lassiter, J.C., Depaolo, D.J., 1997.Plume/Lithosphere Interaction in the Generation of Continental and Oceanic Flood Basalts:Chemical and Isotope Constraints.Geophysical Monography 100, American Geophysical Union, 100:335-355.
[16]	Le, M.J., Le, R.W., Streckeisen, A., 1986.A Chemical Classification of Volcanic Rocks Based on the Total Alkalisilica Diagram.Journal of Petrology, 27:745-750. doi: 10.1093/petrology/27.3.745
[17]	Li, H.B., Zhang, Z.C., Lü, L.S., 2010.Geometry of the Mafic Dyke Swarms in Emeishan Large Igneous Province:Implications for Mantle Plume.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 26(10):3143-3152 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[18]	Li, X.R., Wang, J., Wan, Y.L., et al., 2018.Geochemical Characteristics and Tetonic Implications of Nayixiong Formation Basalts in Eastern Qiangtang Basin, Tibet.Earth Science, 43(2):401-416 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[19]	Liu, Y.P., Ye, L., Li, C.Y., et al., 2006.Discovery of the Neoproterozoic Magmatics in Southeastern Yunnan:Evidence from SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb Dating and Lithogeochemistry.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(4):916-926 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[20]	Luo, Z.L., Jin, Y.Z., Zhao, X.K., 1990.The Emei Taphrogenesis of the Upper Yangtze Platform in South China.Geological Magazine, 127(5):393-405. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756800015156
[21]	Neal, C.R., 2002.Mantle Sources and the Highly Variable Role of Continental Lithosphere in Basalt Petrogenesis of the Kerguelen Plateau and Broken Ridge LIP:Results from ODP Leg 183.Journal of Petrology, 43(7):1177-1205. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/43.7.1177
[22]	Nickel, K.G., 1986.Phase Equilibria in the System SiO₂-MgO-Al₂O₃-CaO-Cr₂O₃(SMACCR) and Their Bearing on Spinel/Garnet Iherzolite Relationships.Neues Jahrbuch Fur Mineralogie-Abhandlungen, 155(3):259-287.
[23]	Pan, X.N., Zhao, J.T., Zhang, X.Y., et al., 1987.Tectonics and Rifting in Kangdian Region.Chongqing Publishing House, Chongqing, 214-224 (in Chinese).
[24]	Pearce, J.A., Cann, J.R., 1973.Tectonic Setting of Basic Volcanic Rocks Determined Using Trace Element Analyses.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 19(2):290-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(73)90129-5
[25]	Song, X.Y., Hou, Z.Q., Cao, Z.M., et al., 2001.Geochemical Characteristics and Period of the Emei Igneous Province.Acta Geologica Sinica, 75(4):498-506 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[26]	Song, X.Y., Zhou, M.F., Cao, Z.M., et al., 2004.Late Permian Rifting of the South China Craton Caused by the Emeishan Mantle Plume?.Journal of the Geological Society, 161(5):773-781. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-764903-135
[27]	Wang, L.X., Ma, C.Q., Lai, Z.X., et al., 2015.Early Jurassic Mafic Dykes from the Xiazhuang Ore District (South China):Implications for Tectonic Evolution and Uranium Metallogenesis.Lithos, 239:71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2015.10.008
[28]	Wang, Y., Ma, C.Q., Wang, L.X., et al., 2018.Zircon U-Pb Geochronoloty, Geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopes of the Neoproterozoic Granites on the Southeastern Margin of the Yangtze Block:Constraint on Crustal Growth.Earth Science, 43(3):635-654 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	Wang, Y.L., Zhang, C.J., Xiu, S.Z., 2001.Th/Hf-Ta/Hf Identification of Tectonic Setting of Basalts.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 17(3):413-421 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200103009
[30]	Winchester, J.A., Floyd, P.A., 1977.Geochemical Discrimination of Different Magma Series and Their Differentiation Products Using Immobile Elements.Chemical Geology, 20:325-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(77)90057-2
[31]	Wood, D.A., 1980.The Application of a ThHfTa Diagram to Problems of Tectonomagmatic Classification and to Establishing the Nature of Crustal Contamination of Basaltic Lavas of the British Tertiary Volcanic Province.Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 50(1):11-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821x(80)90116-8
[32]	Wu, Y.B., Zheng, Y.F., 2004.Study on the Mineralogy of Zircon and Its Constraints on the Interpretation of U-Pb Age.Chinese Science Bulletin, 49(16):1589-1604 (in Chinese).
[33]	Xiao, L., Xu, Y.G., Mei, H.J., et al., 2003.Geochemistry of Emeishan Flood Basalts at Binchuan Area, SW China:Rock Types and Temporal Evolution.Chinese Journal of Geology, 38(4):478-494 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[34]	Xiong, S.H., Li, J.L., 1984.The Characteristics of the Late Permian Basalts in the Margin of Continental Rift in Emeishan Area.Journal of Chengdu College of Geology, 11(3):43-59 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=89c0a2363521ff34b3b7a2a8378b168a
[35]	Xu, Y.G., Chung, S.L., 2001.The Emeishan Large Igneous Province:Evidence for Mantle Plume Activity and Melting Conditions.Geochimica, 30(1):1-9 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[36]	Xu, Y.G., Chung, S.L., Jahn, B.M., et al., 2001.Petrologic and Geochemical Constraints on the Petrogenesis of Permian-Triassic Emeishan Flood Basalts in Southwestern China.Lithos, 58(3-4):145-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-4937(01)00055-x
[37]	Xu, Y.G., He, B., Chung, S.L., et al., 2004.Geologic, Geochemical, and Geophysical Consequences of Plume Involvement in the Emeishan Flood-Basalt Province.Geology, 32(10):917-920. https://doi.org/10.1130/g20602.1
[38]	Zhang, Z.C., Wang, F.S., Hao, Y.L., 2005.Picrites from the Emeishan Large Igneous Province:Evidence for the Mantle Plume Activity.Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 24(1):17-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[39]	陈智梁, 陈世瑜, 1987.扬子地块西缘地质构造演化.重庆:重庆出版社, 104-120.
[40]	甘晓春, 赵风清, 金文山, 等, 1996.华南火成岩中捕获锆石的早元古代-太古宙U-Pb年龄信息.地球化学, 25(2): 112-120. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1996.02.002
[41]	何斌, 徐义刚, 肖龙, 等, 2006.峨眉山地幔柱上升的沉积响应及其地质意义.地质论评, 52(1): 30-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2006.01.005
[42]	侯增谦, 卢记仁, 林盛中, 2005.峨眉地幔柱轴部的榴辉岩-地幔岩源区:主元素、痕量元素及Sr、Nd、Pb同位素证据.地质学报, 79(2): 200-219. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb200502007
[43]	侯增谦, 汪云亮, 张成江, 等, 1999.峨眉火成岩省地幔热柱的主要元素及Cr, Ni地球化学特征.地质论评, 45(增刊): 880-884. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/OA000002294
[44]	李宏博, 张招崇, 吕林素, 2010.峨眉山大火成岩省基性墙群几何学研究及对地幔柱中心的指示意义.岩石学报, 26(10): 3143-3152. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201010025
[45]	李学仁, 王剑, 万友利, 等, 2018.羌塘盆地东部那益雄组玄武岩地球化学特征及构造意义.地球科学, 43(2): 401-416. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3749
[46]	刘玉平, 叶霖, 李朝阳, 等, 2006.滇东南发现新元古代岩浆岩:SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学证据.岩石学报, 22(4): 916-926. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200604015
[47]	潘杏南, 赵济汀, 张选阳, 等, 1987.康滇构造与裂谷作用.重庆:重庆出版社, 214-224.
[48]	宋谢炎, 侯增谦, 曹志敏, 等, 2001.峨眉大火成岩省的岩石地球化学特征及时限.地质学报, 75(4): 498-506. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2001.04.009
[49]	王艳, 马昌前, 王连训, 等, 2018.扬子东南缘新元古代花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和Sr-Nd-Hf同位素:对地壳生长的约束.地球科学, 43(3): 635-654. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3772
[50]	汪云亮, 张成江, 修淑芝, 2001.玄武岩类形成的大地构造环境的Th/Hf-Ta/Hf图解判别.岩石学报, 17(3): 413-421. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ysxb98200103009
[51]	吴元保, 郑永飞, 2004.锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约.科学通报, 49(16): 1589-1604. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2004.16.002
[52]	肖龙, 徐义刚, 梅厚钧, 等, 2003.云南宾川地区峨眉山玄武岩地球化学特征岩石类型及随时间演化规律.地质科学, 38(4): 478-494. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2003.04.007
[53]	熊舜华, 李建林, 1984.峨眉山区晚二叠世大陆裂谷边缘玄武岩系的特征.成都地质学院学报, 11(3): 43-59.
[54]	徐义刚, 钟孙霖, 2001.峨眉山大火成岩省:地幔柱活动的证据及其熔融条件.地球化学, 30(1): 1-9. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cckjdxxb201602010
[55]	张招崇, 王福生, 郝艳丽, 2005.峨眉山大火成岩省中的苦橄岩:地幔柱活动证据.矿物岩石地球化学通报, 24(1): 17-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2005.01.003