• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区关键构造期构造特征及陆相致密砂岩天然气成藏响应

    刘昭茜 罗开平 唐永 杨帆 梅廉夫 沈传波

    刘昭茜, 罗开平, 唐永, 杨帆, 梅廉夫, 沈传波, 2019. 四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区关键构造期构造特征及陆相致密砂岩天然气成藏响应. 地球科学, 44(3): 756-772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.032
    引用本文: 刘昭茜, 罗开平, 唐永, 杨帆, 梅廉夫, 沈传波, 2019. 四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区关键构造期构造特征及陆相致密砂岩天然气成藏响应. 地球科学, 44(3): 756-772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.032
    Liu Zhaoqian, Luo Kaiping, Tang Yong, Yang Fan, Mei Lianfu, Shen Chuanbo, 2019. Critical Tectonic Periods and the Response of Gas Accumulation in Non-Marine Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Yuanba-Tongnanba Area, Sichuan Basin. Earth Science, 44(3): 756-772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.032
    Citation: Liu Zhaoqian, Luo Kaiping, Tang Yong, Yang Fan, Mei Lianfu, Shen Chuanbo, 2019. Critical Tectonic Periods and the Response of Gas Accumulation in Non-Marine Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Yuanba-Tongnanba Area, Sichuan Basin. Earth Science, 44(3): 756-772. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.032

    四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区关键构造期构造特征及陆相致密砂岩天然气成藏响应

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.032
    基金项目: 

    国家科技重大专项 2016ZX05002-006

    国家自然科学基金项目 41302112

    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目 CUG160228

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      刘昭茜(1982-), 女, 副教授, 主要从事石油与天然气地质学、构造与成藏年代学、有机地球化学研究

    • 中图分类号: P618.13

    Critical Tectonic Periods and the Response of Gas Accumulation in Non-Marine Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Yuanba-Tongnanba Area, Sichuan Basin

    • 摘要: 中国多旋回叠合盆地陆相致密碎屑岩层系油气资源丰富,多期、多属性构造作用使其具有复杂而特殊的油气地质特征,四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区位于多旋回、多属性构造作用交接部位,是揭示叠合盆地内多期复杂构造作用与陆相致密碎屑岩油气成藏作用关系和油气富集规律的典型地区.基于地震资料、磷灰石裂变径迹年代学和成藏特征对比,厘定元坝-通南巴地区陆相层系存在燕山晚期(晚白垩世100~70 Ma)和喜山早期(始新世-渐新世40~25 Ma)两个关键构造期.陆相致密砂岩天然气富集主要受这两次关键构造作用的控制,燕山晚期形成NE向主体构造,是NE向弱变形区、NW-SN向过渡变形带(通南巴西部)和NW向密集变形带的关键成藏期,构造-成藏响应模式为早期成藏、陆源充注、背斜控藏、褶皱控缝.喜山早期形成NW向构造和局限在早期NE向构造之间的近SN向构造,是SN向过渡变形带和NW-SN向过渡变形带(元坝东部)的关键成藏期,也是NW-SN向过渡变形带(通南巴西部)和NW向密集变形带的关键改造期,构造-成藏响应模式为晚期成藏、海相混源、断裂控藏、断裂控缝.

       

    • 图  1  四川盆地元坝和通南巴地区构造位置

      Fig.  1.  Tectonic location of Yuanba-Tongnanba area in Sichuan Basin

      图  2  四川盆地元坝-通南巴及周边地区磷灰石裂变径迹数据分布

      图中数据为中值年龄,部分数据来源:何登发等(2012);Lei et al.(2012); Tian et al. (2012)Yang et al.(2013, 2017)

      Fig.  2.  Apatite fission track ages plotted on geologic map of Micang Shan Uplift, South Dabashan Fold and Thrust Belt and Yuanba-Tongnanba area in Sichuan Basin

      图  3  四川盆地元坝-通南巴及周边地区磷灰石裂变径迹模拟结果

      (9)~(14)、(18)、(20)~(21)、(27)样品为实测数据,(1)~(2)、(8)、(24)~(26)来自Yang et al.(2013); (3)~(7)、(15)~(17)、(19)来自Tian et al. (2012);(22)~(23)、(28)来自何登发等(2012)

      Fig.  3.  Apatite fission track (AFT) thermal history modeling results of the Micang Shan Uplift, South Dabashan Fold and Thrust Belt and Yuanba-Tongnanba area in Sichuan Basin

      图  4  元坝-通南巴地区上三叠统须家河组四段顶部构造体系及构造分区

      ①为NE向弱变形区;②为NE-NW向叠加变形区;②-Ⅰ为SN向过渡变形带;②-Ⅱ为NW-SN向过渡变形带;②-Ⅲ为NW向密集变形带

      Fig.  4.  Structural system and tectonic division of the top of 4th member of Xujiahe Formation of the Upper Triassic in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  5  元坝-通南巴地区构造剖面

      Fig.  5.  Structural cross section of Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  6  元坝-通南巴地区燕山晚期上三叠统须家河组四段顶部古构造格架

      Fig.  6.  Late Yanshan epoch paleotectonic framework of the top of 4th member of Xujiahe Formation of the Upper Triassic in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  7  元坝-通南巴地区喜山早期上三叠统须家河组四段顶部古构造格架

      Fig.  7.  Early Himalayan epoch paleotectonic framework of the top of 4th member of Xujiahe Formation of the Upper Triassic in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  8  元坝-通南巴地区上三叠统须家河组四段顶部各构造带断层发育规模

      a.NE向弱变形带;b.SN向过渡变形带;c.NW-SN向过渡变形带;d.NW向密集变形带

      Fig.  8.  Structure belts' fault scales of the top of 4th member of Xujiahe Formation of the Upper Triassic in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  9  元坝-通南巴地区上三叠统须家河组四段顶部3种方向断层发育密度

      ①为NE向弱变形区;②为SN向过渡变形带;③为NW-SN向过渡变形带;④为NW向密集变形带

      Fig.  9.  Three direction faults' density of the top of 4th member of Xujiahe Formation of the Upper Triassic in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  10  元坝-通南巴地区褶皱剖面

      Fig.  10.  Fold sections in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  11  元坝-通南巴地区陆相致密砂岩层系烃类赋存类型及特征

      图a、b、d、e据盘昌林和王威(2013);图c、f据张枝焕(2015).a.沥青包裹体(元坝204井须二段);b.油包裹体(马201井须二段);c.油包裹体(元坝204井须二段石英颗粒加大边);d.气态烃包裹体(元坝6井须四段方解石脉);e.气态烃包裹体(元陆6井须二段石英颗粒裂纹);f.气态烃包裹体(马2须二段、马102须四段石英颗粒裂纹)

      Fig.  11.  Three kinds of hydrocarbon type in non-marine tight sandstone reservoirs in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  12  元坝-通南巴地区陆相层系天然气类型分析

      数据来源据张枝焕(2015)

      Fig.  12.  Gas type in non-marine strata in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  13  元坝-通南巴地区陆相致密砂岩天然气成藏模式

      Fig.  13.  The hydrocarbon accumulation pattern in non-marine tight sandstone reservoirs in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      图  14  通南巴地区海相层系和陆相层系喜山期NW向断裂发育程度对比

      a.上三叠统须家河组四段顶反射层断裂分布;b.中二叠统顶反射层断裂分布

      Fig.  14.  The distribution of Early Himalayan epoch NW-trend faults in marine and non-marine strata in Tongnanba area

      表  1  元坝-通南巴地区各构造带断裂特征对比

      Table  1.   Comparison of fracture characteristics of each structural belt in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      构造区NE向弱变形区NW-SN向叠加变形区
      构造带NE向弱变形带SN向过渡变形带NW-SN向过渡变形带NW向密集变形带
      地理位置元坝西部元坝中部元坝东部通南巴西部通南巴东部
      断层
      特征
      走向NE向近SN向SN、NW向SN、NW向NW向
      平面延伸长度
      纵向切层层位少, T2l-J1z多, 膏岩-J2s多, 膏岩-J1z多, 膏岩-J2s多, 海相地层-J2s
      发育密度NW>SNNW>SN
      形成时间燕山晚期喜山早期喜山早期喜山早期喜山早期
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  元坝-通南巴地区构造-成藏响应特征

      Table  2.   Tectonic-accumulation response characteristics in Yuanba-Tongnanba area

      构造分带关键成藏期关键改造期及程度控缝要素层系差异烃源差异
      NE向弱变形区燕山晚期弱改造褶皱控缝浅层少成藏陆源近源
      SN向过渡变形带喜山早期弱改造断裂控缝浅层多成藏陆源近源
      NW-SN向过渡变形带(元坝东部)喜山早期弱改造断裂控缝浅层少成藏陆源近源
      NW-SN向过渡变形带(通南巴西部)燕山晚期喜山早期强改造褶皱-断裂联控浅层少成藏海陆混源,以陆为主近源为主,局部远源
      NW向密集变形带燕山晚期喜山早期强改造褶皱-断裂联控浅层多成藏海陆混源,以海为主近源+远源
      下载: 导出CSV
    • [1] Chen, L.B., He, D.F., Wang, B., et al., 2017.Dating the Tectonic Deformation since the Middle Triassic for the Tongnanba Anticline in the Northeastern Sichuan Basin and Its Geological Implications.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 41(3):433-445 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DGYK201703001.htm
      [2] Cheng, L.X., Wang, W., Wang, T., et al., 2017.Reasons for the Productivity Difference of Quartz Sandstone Gas Reservoirs of Upper Triassic Xu 2 Member between Yuanba and Malubei Areas in NE Sichuan Basin.Natural Gas Industry, 37(8):14-21 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-TRQG201708004.htm
      [3] Dai, J.X., Ni, Y.Y., Wu, X.Q., et al., 2012.Tight Gas in China and Its Significance in Exploration and Exploitation.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 39(3):257-264 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876380412600433
      [4] Dai, J.X., Liao, F.R., Ni, Y.Y., et al., ,2013.Discussions on the Gas Source of the Triassic Xujiahe Formation Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs in Yuanba and Tongnanba, Sichuan Basin:An Answer to Yinfeng et al.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40(2):250-256 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876380413600336
      [5] Fan, C.H., Tao, J.L., Zhou, K., et al., 2017.Fractal Characteristics of Fracture of Xujiahe Formation in Fault-Fold Belt of Central Yuanba Area.Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 39(1):35-42 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [6] Fan, J.Y., Qin, Q.R., Su, P.D., et al., 2009.Fracture Genesis in Tongnanba Structural Belt.Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 16(1):38-41 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TZCZ200901014.htm
      [7] Guo, T.L., 2013.Key Controls on Accumulation and High Production of Large Non-Marine Gas Fields in Northern Sichuan Basin.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40(2):139-149 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(13)60017-8
      [8] Jin, W.Z., Wan, G.M., Cui, Z.H., et al., 2012.Key Tectonic Change Epoch and Hydrocarbon Accumulation Periods of Continental Clastic Reservoir in Sichuan Basin. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 19(3):273-277 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DKYT201203003.htm
      [9] Jiang, L., Deng, B., Liu, S.G., et al., 2018.Differential Uplift and Fragmentation of Upper Yangtze Basin in Cenozoic.Earth Science, 43(6):1872-1886 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2018.597
      [10] Lei, Y.L., Jia, C.Z., Li, B.L., et al., 2012.Meso-Cenozoic Tectonic Events Recorded by Apatite Fission Track in the Northern Longmen-Micang Mountains Region.Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 86(1):153-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6724.2012.00618.x
      [11] Li, H., Fan, C.H., Qin, Q.R., et al., 2018.Fracture Characteristics and Its Genesis of Tight Reservoir in Xujiahe Formation of Central Yuanba Area in Sichuan Basin. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 8(2):1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yqzpjykf201802001
      [12] Li, H.T., 2016.Accumulation Process and Pattern of Oolitic Shoal Gas Pools in the Platform:A Case from Member 3 of Lower Triassic Feixianguan Formation in the Heba Area, Northeastern Sichuan Basin.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 43(5):723-732 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SKYK201605008.htm
      [13] Li, J., Hu, D.F., Zou, H.Y., et al., 2016.Coupling Relationship between Reservoir Diagenesis and Gas Accumulation in Xujiahe Formation of Yuanba-Tongnanba Area, Sichuan Basin, China.Natural Gas Geoscience, 27(7):1164-1178 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468256X16300657
      [14] Li, J.R., Zhu, H., Fen, X.M., et al., 2016.Differences of Fracture Characteristics and the Influence on Productivity in the Northeastern Sichuan Continental Basin.Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 38(6):742-747 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD201606007.htm
      [15] Li, P.P., Hao, F., Guo, X.S., et al., 2016.Origin and Distribution of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Yuanba Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, Southwest China.Marine and Petroleum Geology, 75:220-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.04.021
      [16] Liu, Z.Q., 2011.Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Marine Strata at Critical Tectonic Moment in Southern Middle and Upper Yangtze Intra-Continental Structural Belt, South China (Dissertation).China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [17] Long, S.X., Xiao, K.H., Li, X.P., et al., 2012.Gas Accumulation Conditions and Exploration Strategies of Mesozoic Terrestrial Strata in the Sichuan Basin.Natural Gas Industry, 32(11):10-17 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [18] Luo, L., Qi, J.F., Zhang, M.Z., et al., 2015.Difference Study on Evolution and Deformation of the Fold-Thrust Belts Surrounding Sichuan Basin.Geological Review, 61(3):525-535 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP201503006.htm
      [19] Magoon, L.B., Dow, W.G., 1994.The Petroleum System——From Source to Trap.AAPG Memoir 60.American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa.
      [20] Qin, S.F., Zhang, Y.H., Zhao, C.Y., et al., 2018.Geochemical Evidence for in Situ Accumulation of Tight Gas in the Xujiahe Formation Coal Measures in the Central Sichuan Basin, China.International Journal of Coal Geology, 196:173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.07.009
      [21] Tang, L.J., Jin, W.Z., He, C.B., et al., 2009.Key Tectonic Changes and Staging Differential Structural Deformation in Superimposed Basins.Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 30(2):163-167 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/article_en/cjfdtotal-xjsd200902008.htm
      [22] Tang, L.J., Jin, Z.J., Jia, C.Z., et al., 2001.Tectonic Analysis of Superimposed Basins.Experimental Petroleum Geology, 23(3):251-255 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzykt201202024
      [23] Tian, Y.T., Kohn, B.P., Zhu, C.Q., et al., 2012.Post-Orogenic Evolution of the Mesozoic Micang Shan Foreland Basin System, Central China.Basin Research, 24(1):70-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2011.00516.x
      [24] Wang, H., Zhou, W., Zhang, C., et al., 2016.Reservoir Characteristics and Main Controlling Factor of the Third Member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba Gas Reservoir.Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 38(4):19-26 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201604003.htm
      [25] Wu, X.Q., Chen, Y.B., Liu, Q.Y., et al., 2019.Molecular Geochemical Characteristics of Source Rocks in the 5th Member of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation, Xinchang Gas Field, Western Sichuan Depression.Earth Science, 44(3):859-871 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2019.000
      [26] Wu, Z.T., Liu, X.W., Li, X.F., et al., 2017.The Application of Noble Gas Isotope in Gas-Source Correlation of Yuanba Reservoir, Sichuan Basin.Natural Gas Geoscience, 28(7):1072-1077 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201707010.htm
      [27] Xie, X.Q., Guan, P., Han, D.K., et al., 2014.Geochemical Characteristics and Source of Terrestrial Reservoir Gas in Northeast Sichuan.Natural Gas Geoscience, 25(S1):131-140 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-TDKX2014S1024.htm
      [28] Xiao, K.H., Li, H.T., Jia, S., et al., 2014.Characteristics of Calcarenaceous Sandstone Reservoirs and Gas Accumulation Control Factors of the 3rd Member of Xujiahe Formation in Yuanba Area, Northeast Sichuan Basin.Oil & Gas Geology, 35(5):654-660 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [29] Yang, R., He, S., Li, T.Y., et al., 2016.Origin of Over-Pressure in Clastic Rocks in Yuanba Area, Northeast Sichuan Basin, China.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 30:90-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.01.043
      [30] Yang, Z., Ratschbacher, L., Jonckheere, R., et al., 2013.Late-Stage Foreland Growth of China's Largest Orogens (Qinling, Tibet):Evidence from the Hannan-Micang Crystalline Massifs and the Northern Sichuan Basin, Central China.Lithosphere, 5(4):420-437. https://doi.org/10.1130/l260.1
      [31] Yang, Z., Shen, C.B., Ratschbacher, L., et al., 2017.Sichuan Basin and beyond:Eastward Foreland Growth of the Tibetan Plateau from an Integration of Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic Fission Track and (U-Th)/He Ages of the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, Qinling, and Daba Shan.Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 122(6):4712-4740. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb013751
      [32] Yu, D.D., Tang, L.J., Yu, Y.X., et al., 2016.Differential Structural Evolution and Its Influence on the Natural Gas Accumulation of Continental Strata in the Western and Northeastern Sichuan Basin.Geoscience, 30(5):1085-1095 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ201605013.htm
      [33] Zhang, L., Zou, H.Y., Hao, F., et al., 2017.Characteristics and Densification Causes and of Highly-Tight Sandstone of the Xujiahe Formation(T3x2)in the Yuanba Area, Northeastern Sichuan Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 91(9):2105-2118 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [34] Zhang, Q.F., Chen, Z.Q., Zhao, Y.Q., et al., 2013.Relationship between Tectonic Evolution and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the Changxing and Feixianguan Fms in the Frontal Concealed Structural Zone of Micangshan Mountain, Northeastern Sichuan Basin.Natural Gas Industry, 33(5):24-29 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG201305007.htm
      [35] 陈龙博, 何登发, 王贝, 等, 2017.川东北地区通南巴背斜中三叠世以来构造变形时间厘定及其地质意义.大地构造与成矿学, 41(3):433-445. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201703001
      [36] 程立雪, 王威, 王涛, 等, 2017.川东北元坝、马路背地区上三叠统须二段石英砂岩储层天然气产能差异的原因.天然气工业, 37(8):14-21. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqgy201708002
      [37] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇, 等, 2012.中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义.石油勘探与开发, 39(3):257-264. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201203001
      [38] 戴金星, 廖凤蓉, 倪云燕, 等, 2013.四川盆地元坝和通南巴地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏气源探讨——兼答印峰等.石油勘探与开发, 40(2):250-256. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SKYK201302020.htm
      [39] 范存辉, 陶佳丽, 周坤, 等, 2017.元坝中部断褶带须家河组裂缝分形特征.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 39(1):35-42. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnsyxyxb201701004
      [40] 樊靖宇, 秦启荣, 苏培东, 等, 2009.通南巴构造带裂缝成因研究.特种油气藏, 16(1):38-41. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2009.01.010
      [41] 郭彤楼, 2013.四川盆地北部陆相大气田形成与高产主控因素.石油勘探与开发, 40(2):139-149. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syktykf201302004
      [42] 金文正, 万桂梅, 崔泽宏, 等, 2012.四川盆地关键构造变革期与陆相油气成藏期次.断块油气田, 19(3):273-277. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dkyqt201203001
      [43] 姜磊, 邓宾, 刘树根, 等, 2018.上扬子盆地新生代差异抬升剥蚀与分异过程.地球科学, 43(6):1872-1886. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2018.597
      [44] 李虎, 范存辉, 秦启荣, 等, 2018.川东北元坝中部地区须家河组致密储层裂缝特征及成因探讨.油气藏评价与开发, 8(2):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2018.02.001
      [45] 李宏涛, 2016.台内鲕粒滩气藏成藏过程与模式——以川东北河坝地区下三叠统飞仙关组三段为例.石油勘探与开发, 43(5):723-732. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201605008.htm
      [46] 李军, 胡东风, 邹华耀, 等, 2016.四川盆地元坝-通南巴地区须家河组致密砂岩储层成岩-成藏耦合关系.天然气地球科学, 27(7):1164-1178. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201607004
      [47] 黎静容, 朱桦, 冯晓明, 等, 2016.川东北陆相储层裂缝特征差异性及对产能的影响.石油实验地质, 38(6):742-747. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sysydz201606005
      [48] 刘昭茜, 2011.中、上扬子区南部陆内构造带关键构造期海相油气成藏作用研究(博士学位论文).武汉: 中国地质大学.
      [49] 龙胜祥, 肖开华, 李秀鹏, 等, 2012.四川盆地陆相层系天然气成藏条件与勘探思路.天然气工业, 32(11):10-17. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.11.003
      [50] 罗良, 漆家福, 张明正, 等, 2015.四川盆地周缘冲断带构造演化及变形差异性研究.地质论评, 61(3):525-535. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzlp201503006
      [51] 汤良杰, 金文正, 何春波, 等, 2009.叠合盆地关键构造变革期与分期差异构造变形.新疆石油地质, 30(2):163-167. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xjsydz200902004
      [52] 汤良杰, 金之钧, 贾承造, 等, 2001.叠合盆地构造解析几点思考.石油实验地质, 23(3):251-255. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2001.03.001
      [53] 王浩, 周文, 张冲, 等, 2016.元坝气藏须家河组三段储层特征与主控因素.西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 38(4):19-26. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnsyxyxb201604003
      [54] 吴小奇, 陈迎宾, 刘全有, 等, 2019.川西坳陷新场气田须家河组烃源岩分子地球化学特征.地球科学, 44(3):859-871. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2019.000
      [55] 仵宗涛, 刘兴旺, 李孝甫, 等, 2017.稀有气体同位素在四川盆地元坝气藏气源对比中的应用.天然气地球科学, 28(7):1072-1077. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqdqkx201707010
      [56] 谢小琴, 关平, 韩定坤, 等, 2014.川东北陆相储层天然气地球化学特征及来源分析.天然气地球科学, 25(S1):131-140. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97226X/2014S1/84687588504849528349485052.html
      [57] 肖开华, 李宏涛, 贾爽, 等, 2014.川东北元坝地区须三段钙屑砂岩储层特征及控气因素.石油与天然气地质, 35(5):654-660. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201405011
      [58] 于冬冬, 汤良杰, 余一欣, 等, 2016.川西和川东北地区差异构造演化及其对陆相层系天然气成藏的影响.现代地质, 30(5):1085-1095. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2016.05.013
      [59] 张莉, 邹华耀, 郝芳, 等, 2017.川东北元坝地区须家河组储层特征与超致密成因探讨.地质学报, 91(9):2105-2118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2017.09.013
      [60] 张庆峰, 陈祖庆, 赵永庆, 等, 2013.米仓山前缘隐伏构造带构造演化与长兴-飞仙关组油气成藏的关系.天然气工业, 33(5):24-29. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-TRQG201305007.htm
    • 加载中
    图(14) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  3508
    • HTML全文浏览量:  1578
    • PDF下载量:  40
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2019-02-26
    • 刊出日期:  2019-03-15

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回