Zircon U-Pb Geochronology of the Mesozoic Volcanic Rocks from Qingshan Group in the Eastern Shandong
-
摘要: 青山群火山岩是山东境内最具代表性的中生代火山岩，研究其形成时代及其成因对了解华北克拉通东部的地质演化历史具有重要意义.对鲁东万第地区中生代青山群中基性火山岩和中酸性火山岩样品进行LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年，结果分别为117±2 Ma和116±4 Ma，表明万第地区中生代青山群火山岩的形成年龄为早白垩世中晚期.结合前人研究结果，可得鲁东青山群火山岩岩浆开始和结束的时间均略晚于鲁西；万第中基性和中酸性火山岩形成过程中均受到过华北克拉通古老地壳物质的影响，且万第中基性火山岩还受到了扬子陆壳深俯冲的影响.Abstract: The mesozoic volcanic rocks from the Qingshan Group are the most representative in the Shandong Province, and investigation of its genesis and forming time is very important to reveal the evolution history of the eastern North China Craton. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages of meta-basic volcanic rocks and meta-acid volcanic rocks from the Qingshan Group in the eastern Shandong are reported in this paper. The dating results show that the ages of the meta-basic and meta-acidic volcanic rocks are 117±2 Ma (MSWD=3.2) and 116±4 (MSWD=3.5) respectively, which represent the formation time of the volcanic rocks from the Qingshan Group. Based on the synthesis of geochronology, the start and the end age of the volcanic rocks from the Qingshan Group in the eastern Shandong are younger than those in the western Shandong. The meta-basic volcanic rocks might have undergone multiple events induced by continental crustal materials both from the North China Craton and the deep subduction of the Yangtze Craton.
-
Key words:
- eatern Shandong /
- Mesozoic /
- Qingshan Group /
- zircon U-Pb /
- geochronology
-
图 1 山东区域地质简图
据Zhang et al.(2014)、山东省地质矿产局(1991)修改
Fig. 1. Simplified geological map of the Shandong Province
图 2 山东中生代青山群剖面
据Ling et al.(2009)、山东省地质矿产局(1991)修改
Fig. 2. The section of the Mesozoic Qingshan Group in Shandong Province
图 3 万第火山岩典型锆石CL图片
Fig. 3. Cathodoluminescence (CL) images of selected zircons from the Wandi volcanic rocks
图 4 万第火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄谐和图
Fig. 4. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb Concordia diagrams of the Wandi volcanic rocks
图 5 万第火山岩稀土元素球粒陨石标准化(a)和微量元素原始地幔标准化(b)图解
Fig. 5. Chondrite normalized REE and primitive mantle normalized multi-element diagrams for he volcanic rocks in the Wandi area
图 6 山东青山群火山岩年龄数据分布图
Fig. 6. Histogram of date for the volcanic rocks from the Qingshan Group in Shandong Province
表 1 万第火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年代学分析结果
Table 1. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating results for the volcanic rocks in the Wandi area
样品及分析号 U
(10-6)Th/U 206Pb/238U 207Pb/235U 207Pb/206Pb 年龄(Ma) 比值 1σ 比值 1σ 比值 1σ 206Pb/238U 1σ 207Pb/235U 1σ 207Pb/206Pb 1σ WD16-1 354 0.09 0.039 6 0.000 4 0.282 5 0.005 6 0.051 8 0.001 1 250 2 253 4 276 46 WD16-2 465 0.05 0.030 9 0.000 3 0.217 7 0.005 1 0.051 2 0.001 2 196 2 200 4 249 55 WD16-3 663 2.20 0.018 4 0.000 2 0.123 1 0.002 6 0.048 4 0.001 1 118 1 118 2 121 51 WD16-4 238 1.59 0.017 8 0.000 2 0.120 7 0.003 8 0.049 1 0.001 6 114 1 116 3 155 73 WD16-5 196 0.78 0.125 7 0.001 2 1.115 6 0.016 5 0.064 4 0.001 0 763 7 761 8 753 32 WD16-6 232 0.93 0.018 5 0.000 2 0.126 3 0.004 8 0.049 4 0.001 9 118 1 121 4 167 89 WD16-7 365 0.72 0.092 3 0.000 9 0.809 2 0.011 7 0.063 6 0.001 0 569 5 602 7 727 32 WD16-8 620 0.34 0.331 0 0.003 1 5.345 1 0.052 2 0.117 1 0.001 2 1 843 15 1 876 8 1 913 19 WD16-9 96 0.56 0.336 0 0.003 4 5.196 7 0.074 2 0.112 1 0.001 7 1 868 17 1 852 12 1 834 27 WD16-10 172 0.90 0.021 2 0.000 2 0.155 8 0.005 0 0.053 3 0.001 8 135 2 147 4 343 73 WD16-11 51 1.06 0.113 1 0.001 7 1.008 7 0.045 9 0.064 7 0.003 0 691 10 708 23 764 96 WD16-12 284 0.21 0.038 8 0.000 4 0.291 9 0.008 0 0.054 6 0.001 5 245 3 260 6 394 62 WD16-13 104 0.63 0.028 2 0.000 5 0.193 2 0.013 3 0.049 8 0.003 5 179 3 179 11 184 156 WD16-14 121 1.37 0.105 5 0.001 2 0.901 9 0.022 0 0.062 0 0.001 6 647 7 653 12 673 53 WD16-15 315 1.37 0.042 8 0.000 4 0.370 7 0.006 4 0.062 8 0.001 1 270 3 320 5 701 38 WD16-16 239 0.91 0.017 8 0.000 3 0.121 6 0.006 6 0.049 7 0.002 8 114 2 117 6 179 125 WD16-17 95 1.01 0.122 9 0.001 3 1.095 0 0.021 4 0.064 6 0.001 3 747 7 751 10 762 42 WD21-1 384 1.03 0.018 4 0.000 3 0.124 2 0.005 2 0.049 0 0.002 1 118 2 119 5 146 97 WD21-2 243 1.45 0.018 6 0.000 3 0.124 0 0.005 5 0.048 5 0.002 2 119 2 119 5 123 102 WD21-3 129 1.09 0.017 0 0.000 4 0.121 4 0.010 8 0.051 9 0.004 7 108 2 116 10 283 194 WD21-4 254 1.48 0.018 4 0.000 3 0.124 1 0.005 2 0.048 8 0.002 1 118 2 119 5 140 96 WD21-6 427 0.88 0.423 4 0.005 0 10.07 3 0.125 1 0.172 5 0.001 9 2 276 23 2 442 11 2 582 18 WD21-7 153 1.08 0.018 0 0.000 4 0.123 2 0.010 3 0.049 7 0.004 2 115 2 118 9 180 187 WD21-8 249 1.32 0.017 3 0.000 3 0.122 3 0.006 6 0.051 2 0.002 8 111 2 117 6 251 121 WD21-9 165 1.23 0.017 9 0.000 5 0.126 1 0.015 3 0.051 0 0.006 3 115 3 121 14 241 262 WD21-10 214 1.25 0.018 6 0.000 3 0.123 3 0.007 3 0.048 0 0.002 9 119 2 118 7 97 137 WD21-11 143 1.43 0.018 7 0.000 3 0.121 0 0.007 8 0.047 0 0.003 1 119 2 116 7 46 149 WD21-12 120 1.08 0.018 9 0.000 4 0.127 8 0.010 1 0.048 9 0.003 9 121 2 122 9 145 177 WD21-14 186 1.31 0.018 6 0.000 3 0.122 6 0.007 1 0.047 8 0.002 8 119 2 117 6 89 134 WD21-15 212 1.62 0.018 3 0.000 3 0.121 3 0.007 0 0.048 0 0.002 8 117 2 116 6 101 132 WD21-16 231 1.35 0.018 3 0.000 3 0.121 4 0.005 6 0.048 0 0.002 2 117 2 116 5 101 106 WD21-19 137 1.47 0.018 2 0.000 3 0.120 1 0.008 1 0.047 9 0.003 3 116 2 115 7 95 155 WD21-20 138 0.96 0.018 5 0.000 5 0.121 4 0.013 4 0.047 7 0.005 4 118 3 116 12 83 248 WD21-21 140 0.99 0.027 9 0.000 4 0.190 7 0.009 0 0.049 5 0.002 4 178 3 177 8 172 107 WD21-22 168 1.37 0.018 4 0.000 3 0.124 2 0.007 3 0.048 9 0.002 9 118 2 119 7 145 134 WD21-23 184 1.30 0.018 9 0.000 3 0.129 5 0.006 6 0.049 7 0.002 6 121 2 124 6 180 116 WD21-25 197 1.42 0.019 1 0.000 3 0.131 4 0.008 6 0.049 8 0.003 3 122 2 125 8 188 148 WD21-26 113 1.06 0.019 4 0.000 5 0.127 6 0.013 6 0.047 8 0.005 2 124 3 122 12 86 239 WD21-27 175 1.22 0.017 3 0.000 3 0.118 5 0.008 8 0.049 5 0.003 7 111 2 114 8 173 167 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 万第青山群火山岩主量(%)、微量元素(10-6)和Sr-Nd同位素组成
Table 2. Major (%)、trace element (10-6) and Sr-Nd isotopic compositions for the volcanic rocks in the Wandi area
样品号 WD03 WD04 WD07 WD08 WD16 WD18 WD21 WD23 SiO2 53.56 54.6 54.61 53.98 47.96 61.17 63.76 62.94 TiO2 0.86 0.83 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.32 0.33 0.32 Al2O3 16.54 16.47 16.32 16.37 14.24 16.61 17.11 16.86 Fe2O3T 6.92 6.35 6.49 7.69 6.73 4.49 4.46 4.45 MnO 0.09 0.11 0.1 0.11 0.07 0.08 0.07 0.08 MgO 4.1 3.84 3.7 4.35 1.46 1.42 1.35 1.37 CaO 7.36 7.85 7.62 7.07 10.67 3.27 1.18 1.91 Na2O 3.04 3.14 3.17 3.06 2.69 3.54 5.68 5.75 K2O 2.31 2.43 2.64 2.58 2.71 3.93 4.13 4.22 P2O5 0.38 0.37 0.38 0.38 0.42 0.31 0.32 0.31 LOI 4.39 3.61 3.64 3.38 11.75 5.08 1.79 2.13 Total 99.55 99.6 99.53 99.81 99.54 100.22 100.18 100.34 Be 1.58 1.49 1.66 1.26 1.49 1.56 1.61 1.66 Cr 123 126 116 77.8 111 9.38 6.44 7.42 Co 34.2 27.8 48.5 24.3 19.0 18.5 44 36.2 Ni 33 33.6 32.9 24.8 39.0 3.72 3.18 3.11 Ga 20 20.8 21.2 13.8 17.2 19.5 19.9 19.5 Rb 57 57.7 71.7 66.7 67.6 40.2 55.4 45.6 Sr 1 137 1 150 1 118 772 347 468 544 488 Y 21.7 22.3 23.8 15 21.0 14.4 13.2 13.1 Zr 247 251 294 204 237 198 234 233 Nb 11.6 11.8 14 3.63 12.4 12 12.2 12.1 Cs 0.57 0.55 0.79 0.85 2.54 2.08 0.79 0.86 Ba 1 841 1 923 1 988 1 458 1 704 2 177 2 918 3 341 La 67.1 69.7 78 51.1 65.5 39.3 55.3 41.3 Ce 127 130 148 95 130 71.2 95.5 61.9 Pr 13.6 14.1 15.7 10.1 13.1 8.23 9.83 7.91 Nd 50.7 51.6 56.7 37.4 48.8 30.1 34.5 28.7 Sm 7.76 7.94 8.59 5.58 7.65 4.56 4.52 4.21 Eu 1.92 2.05 2.05 1.38 1.81 1.32 1.27 1.22 Gd 5.12 5.43 5.71 3.78 5.10 2.91 2.93 2.85 Tb 0.69 0.73 0.78 0.49 0.70 0.41 0.4 0.38 Dy 3.99 4.19 4.32 2.74 3.80 2.32 2.27 2.2 Ho 0.75 0.78 0.86 0.55 0.74 0.43 0.43 0.42 Er 1.94 2.02 2.13 1.37 1.98 1.19 1.16 1.15 Tm 0.26 0.29 0.32 0.2 0.28 0.17 0.17 0.18 Yb 1.95 2.02 2.13 1.36 1.94 1.26 1.3 1.34 Lu 0.27 0.29 0.3 0.19 0.27 0.19 0.19 0.19 Hf 5.15 5.43 6.2 4.32 4.93 4.23 4.79 4.9 Ta 0.56 0.58 0.68 0.17 0.60 0.58 0.63 0.64 Pb 18.8 18.9 19.8 15.2 22.6 21.1 25.9 26 Th 10.9 11.4 13.2 8.16 9.84 7.25 9.65 8.83 U 2.05 2.23 2.58 1.7 1.90 1.73 1.54 1.81 87Rb/86Sr 0.145 1 0.145 1 0.185 6 0.25 0.563 8 0.248 8 0.294 5 0.270 5 87Sr/86Sr 0.709 328 0.709 246 0.709 317 0.709 299 0.709 643 0.710 312 0.710 279 0.710 232 2σ(10-6) ±2 ±3 ±3 ±3 ±2 ±3 ±2 ±3 (87Sr/86Sr)t 0.709 081 0.708 999 0.709 0.708 873 0.708 681 0.709 888 0.709 777 0.709 771 147Sm/144Nd 0.092 5 0.093 1 0.091 5 0.090 1 0.094 6 0.091 6 0.079 2 0.088 8 143Nd/144Nd 0.511 658 0.511 657 0.511 657 0.511 657 0.511 694 0.511 645 0.511 641 0.511 645 2σ(10-6) ±1 ±1 ±1 ±1 ±1 ±1 ±1 ±1 (143Nd/144Nd)t 0.511 585 0.511 584 0.511 585 0.511 586 0.511 619 7 0.511 573 0.511 579 0.511 575 εNd(t) -17.5 -17.6 -17.5 -17.5 -16.9 -17.8 -17.7 -17.7 TDM(Ga) 1.87 1.88 1.86 1.84 1.86 1.87 1.71 1.83 T2DM(Ga) 1.97 1.97 1.96 1.96 1.93 1.98 1.92 1.97 注：87Rb/86Sr、147Sm/144Nd比值由Rb、Sr、Sm、Nd的ICP-MS含量计算获得；(87Sr/86Sr)t和εNd(t)的计算参数采用(147Sm/144Nd)CHUR=0.196 7，(143Nd/144Nd)CHUR=0.512 638，其中t=120 Ma.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 山东地区青山群火山岩年代学数据
Table 3. The geochronology data of the volcanic rocks from the Qingshan Group in the Shandong Province
地区 鲁东 鲁西 断裂带 地层层位 年龄(定年方法) 岩性(研究区) 资料来源 年龄(定年方法) 岩性(研究区) 资料来源 年龄(定年方法) 岩性(研究区) 资料来源 八亩地组 111±1 Ma(40Ar-39Ar法) 酸性(胶州) 庞崇进，2015 129±1 Ma(40Ar-39Ar法) 中基性(邹平) 庞崇进，2015 118±1 Ma；
119±1 Ma(U-Pb法)中酸性(莒南) 邱检生等，2013 119±1 Ma；125±1 Ma；126±2 Ma(40Ar-39Ar法) 中性(莱阳) 庞崇进，2015 121±2 Ma(U-Pb法) 中性(临朐) 曹光跃等，2018 124±1 Ma；106±4 Ma
(40Ar-39Ar法)中酸性(汤头) 邱检生等，2012 119±1 Ma；118±1 Ma
(U-Pb法)中酸性(胶东) 曹光跃等，2014 128 ±2 Ma(U-Pb法) 中酸性(蒙阴) Ling et al., 2009 108±1 Ma；103±2 Ma
(K-Ar法)中酸性(莱阳) 唐嘉锋等，2008 108±2 Ma(K-Ar法) 基性(蒙阴) 唐嘉锋等，2008 方戈庄组 93.3±1.2 Ma(K-Ar法) 中酸性(胶州) 唐嘉锋等，2008 128±2 Ma(U-Pb法) 中酸性(蒙阴) Ling et al., 2009 后夼组 106±2 Ma(U-Pb法) 中酸性(胶州) 凌文黎等，2006 117±2 Ma；116±1 Ma
(K-Ar法)中酸性(莱阳) 唐嘉锋等，2008 石前庄组 105±4 Ma；98±1 Ma
(U-Pb法)中酸性(胶州) 凌文黎等，2006 104±1 Ma(K-Ar法) 基性(莱阳) 唐嘉锋等，2008 未分组 111±2 Ma (Rb-Sr法) 中酸性(胶莱) 邱检生等，1996 120±4 Ma(Rb-Sr法) 中酸性(蒙阴) 邱检生等，1996 110±Ma(K-Ar法) 中性(莒县) 唐嘉锋等，2008 110±1 Ma；108±1 Ma
(40Ar-39Ar法)中酸性(五莲) 邱检生等，2001b 124±1 Ma；115±1 Ma
(40Ar-39Ar法)中酸性(蒙阴) 邱检生等，2001a 97±1 Ma(U-Pb法) 中酸性(郯城) 李友连等，2012 117±2 Ma(U-Pb法) 中基性(莱阳) 本文 108±2 Ma(K-Ar法) 基性(莒县) 唐嘉锋等，2008 116±4 Ma(U-Pb法) 中酸性(莱阳) 本文 100±1 Ma(40Ar-39Ar法) 中基性(郯城) 庞崇进，2015 96±3 Ma；113±1 Ma；122±2 Ma(40Ar-39Ar法) 基性(胶东) 匡永生等, 2012a, 2012b 119±1 Ma(U-Pb法) 基性(莱阳) 周建波等，2016
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Andersen, T., 2002.Correction of Common Lead in U-Pb Analyses that Do not Report 204Pb.Chemical Geology, 192(1-2):59-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2541(02)00195-x [2] Cao, G.Y., Xue, H.M., Liu, Z., et al., 2018.Geochronology, Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of the Early Cretaceous Volcanic Rocks of the Qingshan Group in the Linqu Area, Western Shandong Province.Acta Geologica Sinica, 92(3):503-519 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201803006 [3] Cao, G.Y., Xue, H.M., Wang, J.G., et al., 2014.Zircon U-Pb Age and Geochemistry of Mesozoic Intermediate and Acidic Volcanic Rocks from the Shandong Segment (Jiaodong Area) of the Tan-Lu Fault.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 33(6):1019-1038 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-YSKW201406003.htm [4] Chen, F.K., Guo, J.H., Jiang, L.L., et al., 2003.Provenance of the Beihuaiyang Lower-Grade Metamorphic Zone of the Dabie Ultrahigh-Pressure Collisional Orogen, China:Evidence from Zircon Ages.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 22(4):343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1367-9120(03)00068-3 [5] Fan, W.M., Guo, F., Wang, Y.J., et al., 2001.Post-Orogenic Bimodal Volcanism along the Sulu Orogenic Belt in Eastern China.Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A:Solid Earth and Geodesy, 26(9-10):733-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464-1895(01)00123-5 [6] Geology and Mineral Resources Bureau of Shandong Province, 1991.Shandong Province Regional Geology.Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 597 (in Chinese). [7] Jackson, S.E., Pearson, N.J., Griffin, W.L., et al., 2004.The Application of Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry to in Situ U-Pb Zircon Geochronology.Chemical Geology, 211(1-2):47-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.06.017 [8] Kuang, Y.S., Pang, C.J., Hong, L.B., et al., 2012a.Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Late Cretaceous Basalts in the Jiaolai Basin:Constraints on Lithospheric Thinning and Accretion Beneath North China Craton.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 36(4):559-571 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DGYK201204012.htm [9] Kuang, Y.S., Pang, C.J., Luo, Z.Y., et al., 2012b.40Ar-39Ar Geochronology and Geochemistry of Mafic Rocks from Qingshan Group, Jiaodong Area:Implication for the Destruction of the North China Craton.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 28(4):1073-1091 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201204005 [10] Li, Y.L., Qiu, J.S., Liu, L., et al., 2012.Geochronology and Geochemistry of Sodic Volcanic Rocks from Shenquan in Tancheng County, Shandong Province:Implications for Unraveling the Nature of Mantle Source and Petrogenesis.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 31(6):783-798 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSKW201206003.htm [11] Ling, W.L., Duan, R.C., Xie, X.J., et al., 2009.Contrasting Geochemistry of the Cretaceous Volcanic Suites in Shandong Province and Its Implications for the Mesozoic Lower Crust Delamination in the Eastern North China Craton.Lithos, 113(3-4):640-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2009.07.001 [12] Ling, W, L., Xie, X, J., Liu, X, M., et al., 2006.Zircon U-Pb Ages of Cretaceous Standard Section Qingshan Group Volcanic Rocks and Their Tectonic Significance in Eastern Shandong.Science in China (Series D), 36(5):401-411 (in Chinese). [13] Liu, Y.S., Gao, S., Gao, C.G., et al., 2010.Garnet-Rich Granulite Xenoliths from the Hannuoba Basalts, North China:Petrogenesis and Implications for the Mesozoic Crust-Mantle Interaction.Journal of Earth Science, 21(5):669-691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-010-0125-x [14] Ludwig, K.R., 2003.Isoplot v.3.0: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel.Berkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley. [15] Pang, C.J., 2015.Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Cretaceous Mafic to Intermediate Volcanic Rocks in the Eastern North China Craton (Dissertation).University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract). [16] Qiu, J.S., Liu, L., Li, Y.L., 2012.Geochronology and Geochemistry of Potassic and Sodic Volcanic Rocks in Tangtou Basin, Shandong Province:Implications for Lithospheric Thinning Beneath the North China Craton.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 28(4):1044-1056 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201204003 [17] Qiu, J.S., Liu, L., Li, Y.L., et al., 2013.Petrogenesis of Potassic Volcanic Rocks in the Middle-South Parts of the Yishu Deep Fault Zone:Constraints from Elemental Geochemistry and Sr-Nd-Hf Isotopes.Acta Geologica Sinica, 87(9):1193-1209. [18] Qiu, J.S., Wang, D.Z., Luo, Q.H., et al., 2001b.40Ar-39Ar Dating for Volcanic Rocks of Qingshan Formation in Jiaolai Basin, Eastern Shandong Province:A Case Study of the Fenlingshan Volcanic Apparatus in Wulian County.Geological Journal of China Universities, 7(3):351-355 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/article_en/cjfdtotal-gxdx200103010.htm [19] Qiu, J.S., Wang, D.Z., Zhou, J.C., et al., 1996.Geology, Geochemistry and Genesis of the Mesozoic Shoshonitic Volcanic Rocks in Shandong Province.Earth Science, 21(5):546-552 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX605.017.htm [20] Qiu, J.S., Xu, X.S., Luo, Q.H., 2001a.40Ar-39Ar Dating and Source Denoting of K-Rich Volcanic Rocks Lamprophyres in Western Shandong Province.Chinese Science Bulletin, 46 (18):1499-1508 (in Chinese). [21] Tang, J.F., Liu, Y.L., Wang, Q.F., 2008.Geochronology of Mesozoic Volcanic Rocks in Shandong Province.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24(6):1333-1338 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200806017.htm [22] Wu, F.Y., Xu, Y.G., Gao, S., et al., 2008.Lithospheric Thinning and Destruction of the North China Craton.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24(6):1145-1174 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200806001.htm [23] Wu, Y.B., Zheng, Y.F., 2004.Genesis of Zircon and Its Constraints on Interpretation of U-Pb Age.Chinese Science Bulletin, 49(15):1554-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03184122 [24] Xia, Q.K., Cheng, H., Liu, J., 2017.The Distribution of the Early Cretaceous Hydrous Lithospheric Mantle in the North China Craton:Constraints from Water Content in Peridotites of Tietonggou.Earth Science, 42(6):853-861 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.075 [25] Zhang, H.F., Parrish, R., Zhang, L., et al., 2007.A-Type Granite and Adakitic Magmatism Association in Songpan-Garze Fold Belt, Eastern Tibetan Plateau:Implication for Lithospheric Delamination.Lithos, 97(3-4):323-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2007.01.002 [26] Zhang, H.F., Sun, M., Zhou, X.H., et al., 2002.Mesozoic Lithosphere Destruction beneath the North China Craton:Evidence from Major-, Trace-Element and Sr-Nd-Pb Isotope Studies of Fangcheng Basalts.Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 144(2):241-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-002-0395-0 [27] Zhang, J.B., Ling, W.L., Liu, Y.S., et al., 2014.Episodic Mesozoic Thickening and Reworking of the North China Archean Lower Crust Correlated to the Fast-Spreading Pacific Plate.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 80:63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.10.031 [28] Zheng, Y.F., 2003.Neoproterozoic Magmatic Activity and Global Change.Chinese Science Bulletin, 48(16):1705-1720 (in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kxtb-e200316001 [29] Zheng, Y.F., Zhang, S.B., 2007.Formation and Evolution of Precambrian Continental Crust in South China.Chinese Science Bulletin, 52(1):1-10 (in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JXTW200701001.htm [30] Zhou, J.B., Han, W., Song, M.C., 2016.The Exhumation of the Sulu Terrane and the Forming of the Tancheng-Lujiang Fault:Evidence from Detrital Zircon U-Pb Dating of the Mesozoic Sediments of the Laiyang Basin, Central China.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 32(4):1171-1181 (in Chinese with English abstract). [31] 曹光跃, 薛怀民, 刘哲, 等, 2018.鲁西临朐地区早白垩世青山群火山岩的年代学、地球化学及岩石成因.地质学报, 92(3):503-519. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2018.03.006 [32] 曹光跃, 薛怀民, 王金光, 等, 2014.郯庐断裂山东段(胶东)中生代中酸性火山岩的锆石U-Pb年代学及地球化学特征.岩石矿物学杂志, 33(6):1019-1038. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2014.06.003 [33] 山东省地质矿产局, 1991.山东省区域地质志.北京:地质出版社, 597. [34] 匡永生, 庞崇进, 洪路兵, 等, 2012a.胶莱盆地晚白垩世玄武岩的年代学和地球化学特征及其对华北岩石圈减薄-增生的制约.大地构造与成矿学, 36(4):559-571. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201204010 [35] 匡永生, 庞崇进, 罗震宇, 等, 2012b.胶东青山群基性火山岩的Ar-Ar年代学和地球化学特征:对华北克拉通破坏过程的启示.岩石学报, 28(4):1073-1091. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7667383 [36] 李友连, 邱检生, 刘亮, 2012.山东郯城神泉钠质火山岩的年代学与地球化学-对源区地幔性状与岩石成因的启示.岩石矿物学杂志, 31(6):783-798. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2012.06.002 [37] 凌文黎, 谢先军, 柳小明, 等, 2006.鲁东中生代标准剖面青山群火山岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义.中国科学(D辑), 36(5):401-411. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgkx-cd200605001 [38] 庞崇进, 2015.华北克拉通东部白垩纪中基性火山岩的年代学和地球化学特征(博士学位论文).北京: 中国科学院大学. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-80165-1015361490.htm [39] 邱检生, 刘亮, 李友连, 2012.山东汤头盆地钾质及钠质火山岩的年代学与地球化学:对华北克拉通岩石圈减薄的启示.岩石学报, 28(4):1044-1056. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7667385 [40] 邱检生, 刘亮, 李友连, 等, 2013.沂沭断裂带中南段钾质火山岩的元素地球化学与Sr-Nd-Hf同位素组成及其对岩石成因的制约.地质学报, 87(9):1193-1209. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201309001 [41] 邱检生, 徐夕生, 罗清华, 2001a.鲁西富钾火山岩和煌斑岩的40Ar-39Ar定年及源区示踪.科学通报, 46(18):1499-1508. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kxtb200118002 [42] 邱检生, 王德滋, 罗清华, 等, 2001b.鲁东胶莱盆地青山组火山岩的40Ar-39Ar定年-以五莲分岭山火山机构为例.高校地质学报, 7(3):351-355. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-GXDX200103010.htm [43] 邱检生, 王德滋, 周金城, 等, 1996.山东中生代橄榄安粗岩系火山岩的地质、地球化学特征及岩石成因.地球科学, 21(5):546-552. http://earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=420 [44] 唐嘉锋, 刘玉琳, 王启飞, 2008.山东中生代火山岩年代学研究.岩石学报, 24(6):1333-1338. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200806016 [45] 吴福元, 徐义刚, 高山, 等, 2008.华北岩石圈减薄与克拉通破坏研究的主要学术争论.岩石学报, 24(6):1145-1174. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98200806001 [46] 夏群科, 程徽, 刘佳, 2017.山东铁铜沟橄榄岩的水含量:华北克拉通早白垩世富水岩石圈的分布.地球科学, 42(6):853-861. http://earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3583 [47] 郑永飞, 2003.新元古代岩浆活动与全球变化.科学通报, 48(16):1705-1720. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2003.16.001 [48] 郑永飞, 张少兵, 2007.华南前寒武纪大陆地壳的形成和演化.科学通报, 52(1):1-10. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2007.01.001 [49] 周建波, 韩伟, 宋明春, 2016.苏鲁地体折返与郯庐断裂活动:莱阳盆地中生界碎屑锆石年代学的制约.岩石学报, 32(4):1171-1181. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201604016 -
点击查看大图
图(6) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3577
- HTML全文浏览量: 1541
- PDF下载量: 45
- 被引次数: 0
