Physical Simulation on Development of Multilayer Detachment Fold Belt in Eastern Sichuan
-
摘要: 川东地区发育典型的"侏罗山式"褶皱构造带，以北东走向的齐岳山断裂为界，南东侧为隔槽式褶皱，北西侧为隔挡式褶皱.中生代川东地区经历了自南东向北西的陆内递进变形，受多套滑脱层（基底拆离面、下寒武统页岩、志留系泥页岩和三叠系膏盐）的共同控制.但是，关于川东褶皱带的形成机制及其整体和分段形成时间仍存在较大争议.应用构造物理模拟方法，再现了川东"侏罗山式"褶皱带的形成过程，并分析了先存断裂及其倾角对川东褶皱构造变形的影响.模拟结果表明，川东褶皱带是齐岳山断裂、华蓥山断裂、志留系滑脱层和基底拆离面组成的阶梯状体系在构造挤压下发生断层相关褶皱作用的结果.基底拆离面（深度约16 km）控制隔槽式褶皱的发育，志留系页岩主要控制隔挡式褶皱的形成.中生代（165~75 Ma）川东地区的构造缩短率约为32%.齐岳山断裂是隔槽式褶皱向隔挡式褶皱过渡的重要枢纽，是先存高角度断裂浅部向北西迁移后的产物.华蓥山断裂的倾角控制着隔挡式褶皱的波长，当倾角较陡时（45°）更有利于发育典型的隔挡式褶皱.Abstract: Jura-type folds are well-developed in the eastern Sichuan fold-thrust belt, which are separated into two areas with different structural styles by the northeast-trending Qiyueshan fault, ejective folds to the northwest and trough-like folds to the southeast.The tectonic deformation of the Mesozoic intra-continental structural belt is progressive from southeast to northwest and controlled by multiple detachment layers which are the basement decollement horizon, lower-Cambrian shale, Silurian shale and Triassic gypsum-rock, respectively.However, there is still much controversy about the formation mechanism of the eastern Sichuan fold belt and its overall and segmentation formation time.Based on tectonic physical simulation, we reproduced the formation of the Jura-type folds in eastern Sichuan and analyzed the influence of pre-existing fault and fault dips on the tectonic deformation of the eastern Sichuan fold belt.The simulation results show that the eastern Sichuan fold belt is the product of fault-related folding caused by tectonic extrusion in the step system composed of Qiyueshan fault, Huayingshan fault, basement decollement horizon and Silurian detachment layer.The basement decollement horizon (depth of~16 km) results in trough-like folds, while the Silurian shale leads to ejective folds.The structural shortening rate of Mesozoic (about 165-75 Ma) in eastern Sichuan is about 32%.The Qiyueshan fault is an important hinge for the transition from trough-like folds to ejective folds, and is the product of migration of the shallow part of this high-angle fault to the northwest.The steep-dipping Huayingshan fault determines the wavelength of folds, favoring the development of typical ejective folds.
-
图 1 川东地区构造地质简图
a.研究区的大地构造位置；b.川东地区构造纲要简图，修改自颜丹平等(2000)、梅廉夫等(2010)和Li et al.(2015)；c.典型剖面图，平面位置如图b所示，修改自胡召齐等(2009)和王平等(2013)
Fig. 1. Simplified geological map of the eastern Sichuan
图 2 川东地区综合柱状图
Fig. 2. Comprehensive stratigraphic column of the eastern Sichuan
图 4 实验1变形过程与构造解释
a~h分别代表缩短率为0%、5%、10%、15%、20%、25%、30%的变形结果和30%时对应的构造解释，a中白线为预设断层；Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ分别代表高隆区、隔槽区、过渡区和隔挡区；虚线代表发生滑脱作用的部位；箭头指示主控滑脱层
Fig. 4. Deformation process and tectonic interpretation of Experiment 1
图 5 实验2变形过程与构造解释
a~h分别代表缩短率为0%、5%、10%、15%、20%、25%、30%的变形结果和30%时对应的构造解释，a中白线为预设断层；Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ分别代表高隆区、隔槽区、过渡区和隔挡区；虚线代表发生滑脱作用的部位；箭头指示主控滑脱层
Fig. 5. Deformation process and tectonic interpretation of Experiment 2
图 6 模型缩短率与齐岳山断裂地层断距关系
Fig. 6. Relations of shortening versus displacement of Qiyueshan fault for experiments
图 7 实验3变形过程与构造解释
a~h分别代表缩短率为0%、5%、10%、15%、20%、25%、30%的变形结果和30%时对应的构造解释，a中白线为预设断层；Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ分别代表高隆区、隔槽区、过渡区和隔挡区；虚线代表发生滑脱作用的部位；箭头指示主控滑脱层
Fig. 7. Deformation process and tectonic interpretation of Experiment 3
图 8 实验4变形过程与构造解释
a~h分别代表缩短率为0%、5%、10%、15%、20%、25%、30%的变形结果和30%时对应的构造解释，a中白线为预设断层；Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ分别代表高隆区、隔槽区、过渡区和隔挡区；虚线代表发生滑脱作用的部位；箭头指示主控滑脱层
Fig. 8. Deformation process and tectonic interpretation of Experiment 4
表 1 实验模型的分层参数
Table 1. Layer parameters of experiment apparatus
序号 地层/断层 厚度(cm) 材料 ① J-T3 0.75 玻璃珠 ② T1j 0.25 硅树脂 ③ P-S 0.50 玻璃珠 ④ S1 0.25 硅树脂 ⑤ ∈2-3 0.50 玻璃珠 ⑥ ∈1q 0.25 硅树脂 ⑦ Z 0.30 玻璃珠 ⑧ 基底 1.20 玻璃珠 ⑨ 拆离面 0.60 硅树脂 ⑩ 华蓥山断裂 硬纸板 ⑪ 齐岳山断裂 硬纸板 注：据解国爱等(2013)和张小琼等(2013)修改. 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 模拟实验变量参数
Table 2. Variable parameters for each simulation experiment
模型
参数缩短量
(%)挤压速率
(mm/min)齐岳山断裂倾角
(°)华蓥山断裂倾角
(°)实验1 30 0.4 无 45 实验2 30 0.4 45 45 实验3 30 0.4 35 45 实验4 30 0.4 45 35
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 模拟实验褶皱变形特征
Table 3. The fold deformation characteristics of each simulation experiment
实验 褶皱数量 波长(从右至左, cm) 波幅(从右至左, cm) 隔槽区 隔挡区 隔槽区 隔挡区 隔槽区 隔挡区 1 2 2 13.9 24.2 7.0 2.9 3.9 3.1 1.9 0.3 2 2 5 26.5 30.9 5.0 4.3 3.4 3.6 5.6 3.4 3.4 1.1 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.4 3 3 5 11.6 11.0 24.9 3.6 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.8 3.3 2.0 3.4 2.4 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.3 4 3 5 12.1 10.9 26.1 6.0 6.4 4.3 5.6 5.7 4.6 3.1 3.2 1.3 1.3 0.3 0.8 0.6
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Cao, H.Y., Zhu, C.Q., Qiu, N.S., 2016.Maximum Paleotemperature of Main Paleozoic Argillutite in the Eastern Sichuan Basin.Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 59(3):1017-1029 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqwlxb201603023 [2] Costa, E., Vendeville, B.C., 2002.Experimental Insights on the Geometry and Kinematics of Fold-and-Thrust Belts above Weak, Viscous Evaporitic Décollement.Journal of Structural Geology, 24(11):1729-1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8141(01)00169-9 [3] Dai, F.Y., Hao, F., Hu, H.Y., et al., 2017.Occurrence Mechanism and Key Controlling Factors of Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale Gas, Eastern Sichuan Basin.Earth Science, 42(7):1185-1194 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.096 [4] Ding, D.G., Guo, T.L., Zhai, C.B., et al., 2005.Kink Structure in the West Hubei and East Chongqing.Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 27(3):205-210 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=sysydz200503001 [5] Ding, D.G., Liu, G.X., Lü, J.X., et al., 2007.Progressive Deformation of Middle Paleozoic Marine Basins in the Yangtze Plate, China.Geological Bulletin of China, 26(9):1178-1188 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-ZQYD200709020.htm [6] Doglioni, C., Prosser, G., 1997.Fold Uplift versus Regional Subsidence and Sedimentation Rate.Marine and Petroleum Geology, 14(2):179-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-8172(96)00065-7 [7] Feng, C.M., Liu, J., Song, L.J., 2008.Formation Mechanism of the Tectonic Deformation Belt and the Prognosis of Favorable Oil and Gas Exploration Areas in the Middle and Upper Yangtze Valley.Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 29(2):199-204 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqxb200802010 [8] Feng, X.Y., Meng, X.G., Shao, Z.G., et al., 2003.A Preliminary Discussion on Features and Dynamics of Sequence Deformation in South China and Neighboring Areas.Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 24(2):115-120 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqxb200302004 [9] Guo, X.S., Hu, D.F., Wen, Z.D., et al., 2014.Major Factors Controlling the Accumulation and High Productivity in Marine Shale Gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Sichuan Basin and Its Periphery:A Case Study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation of Jiaoshiba Area.Geology in China, 41(3):893-901 (in Chinese with English abstract). [10] Hu, J.P., Zhao, J.L., Wang, W.B., et al., 2005.Relation of Deep Geophysics Fields and Rupture Construct in Yangtze Gorges Chongqing Reservoir Area.Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 27(3):49-54 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX200503012.htm [11] Hu, S.Q., Zhu, G., Liu, G.S., et al., 2009.The Folding Time of the Eastern Sichuan Jura-Type Fold Belt:Evidence from Unconformity.Geological Review, 55(1):32-42 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/OA000004186 [12] Jia, X.L., 2016.Structural Geometry and Kinematics of Southeast Sichuan Basin: Insights into Tectonic Relationship with the Western Segment of Xuefeng Mountain Orogenic Belt (Dissertation).China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese). [13] Konstantinovskaya, E.A., Rodriguez, D., Kirkwood, D., et al., 2009.Effects of Basement Structure, Sedimentation and Erosion on Thrust Wedge Geometry:An Example from the Quebec Appalachians and Analogue Models.Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 57(1):34-62. https://doi.org/10.2113/gscpgbull.57.1.34 [14] Koyi, H.A., Cotton, J., 2004.Experimental Insights on the Geometry and Kinematics of Fold-and-Thrust Belts above Weak, Viscous Evaporitic Décollement:A Discussion.Journal of Structural Geology, 26(11):2139-2141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2004.04.001 [15] Li, C.X., He, D.F., Sun, Y.P., et al., 2015.Structural Characteristic and Origin of Intra-Continental Fold Belt in the Eastern Sichuan Basin, South China Block.Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 111:206-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.07.027 [16] Li, S.J., Li, J.M., Zhou, Y., et al., 2011.Fission Track Evidence for Mesozoic-Cenozoic Uplifting in the Southeastern Margin of Sichuan Basin.Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 30(2):225-233 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yskwxzz201102007 [17] Li, Z.Q., Ran, L.H., Chen, G.S., et al., 2002.Genetic Geologic Model and Gas-Bearing Analysis of High and Steep Structures in East Sichuan.Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 29(6):605-609 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=cdlgxyxb200206003 [18] Liu, C.Q., Zhou, J.X., Lang, J., 2013.Study on Restrictive Factor of Fold-Thrust Belt Formation with Multiple Decollements:Taking Eastern Sichuan-Xuefeng Tectonic Belt as an Example.Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 35(2):45-55 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XAGX201302005.htm [19] Liu, S.G., Ma, W.X., Luba, J., et al., 2011.Characteristics of the Shale Gas Reservoir Rocks in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, East Sichuan Basin, China.Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(8):2239-2252 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201108003 [20] Liu, S.Z., 1995.My Opinion of Structural Pattern of Thin-Skinned Structure in East Sichuan.Acta Geologica Sichuan, 15(4):264-267 (in Chinese with English abstract). [21] Lin, J.F., Hu, H.Y., Li, Q., 2017.Geochemical Characteristics and Implications of Shale Gas in Jiaoshiba, Eastern Sichuan, China.Earth Science, 42(7):1124-1133 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.091 [22] Massoli, D., Koyi, H.A., Barchi, M.R., 2006.Structural Evolution of a Fold and Thrust Belt Generated by Multiple Décollements:Analogue Models and Natural Examples from the Northern Apennines (Italy).Journal of Structural Geology, 28(2):185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.11.002 [23] Mei, L.F., Liu, Z.Q., Tang, J.G., et al., 2010.Mesozoic Intra-Continental Progress Deformation in Western Hunan-Hubei-Eastern Sichuan Provinces of China:Evidence form Apatite Fission Track and Balanced Cross-Section.Earth Science, 35(2):161-174 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2010.017 [24] Mitra, S., 2003.A Unified Kinematic Model for the Evolution of Detachment Folds.Journal of Structural Geology, 25(10):1659-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8141(02)00198-0 [25] Richardson, N.J., Densmore, A.L., Seward, D., et al., 2008.Extraordinary Denudation in the Sichuan Basin:Insights from Low-Temperature Thermochronology Adjacent to the Eastern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau.Journal of Geophysical Research, 113(B4):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jb004739 [26] Shi, H.C., Shi, X.B., 2014.Exhumation Process of Middle-Upper Yangtze since Cretaceous and Its Tectonic Significance:Low-Temperature Thermochronology Constraints.Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 57(8):2608-2619 (in Chinese with English abstract). [27] Wang, P., Liu, S.F., Gao, T.J., et al., 2012.Cretaceous Transportation of Eastern Sichuan Arcuate Fold Belt in Three Dimensions:Insights from AFT Analysis.Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(5):1662-1673 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201205024.htm [28] Wang, P., Liu, S.F., Zheng, H.B., et al., 2013.Late-Orogenic Acurate Fold-Thrust Belts in Northern Yangtze Area:Structural Characteristics and Basin Evolution.Journal of Palaeogeography, 15(6):819-838 (in Chinese with English abstract). [29] Xie, G.A., Jia, D., Zhang, Q.L., et al., 2013.Physical Modeling of the Jura-Type Folds in Eastern Sichuan.Acta Geologica Sinica, 87(6):773-788 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb201306003 [30] Yamato, P., Kaus, B.J.P., Mouthereau, F., et al., 2011.Dynamic Constraints on the Crustal-Scale Rheology of the Zagros Fold Belt, Iran.Geology, 39(9):815-818. https://doi.org/10.1130/g32136.1 [31] Yan, D.P., Wang, X.W., Liu, Y.Y., 2000.Analysis of Fold Style and Its Formation Mechanism in the Area of Boundary among Sichuan, Hubei and Hunan.Geoscience, 14(1):37-43 (in Chinese with English abstract). [32] Yan, D.P., Zhang, B., Zhou, M.F., et al., 2009.Constraints on the Depth, Geometry and Kinematics of Blind Detachment Faults Provided by Fault-Propagation Folds:An Example from the Mesozoic Fold Belt of South China.Journal of Structural Geology, 31(2):150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2008.11.005 [33] Yan, D.P., Zhou, M.F., Song, H.L., et al., 2003.Origin and Tectonic Significance of a Mesozoic Multi-Layer Over-thrust System within the Yangtze Block (South China).Tectonophysics, 361(3-4):239-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-1951(02)00646-7 [34] Zhang, B.L., Zhu, G., Hu, S.Q., et al., 2009.Numerical Modeling and Formation Mechanism of the Eastern Sichuan Jura-Type Folds.Geological Review, 55(5):701-711 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzlp200905012 [35] Zhang, W.Y., Ye, H., Zhong, J.Y., 1978.Fault Blocks and Plates.Scientia Sinica Terrae, (2):195-211 (in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ0224460906/ [36] Zhang, X.Q., Shan, Y.H., Ni, Y.J., et al., 2015.Numerical Modeling of the Mesozoic East Sichuan Fold Belt:A Two-Stage Tectonic Model.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 39(6):1022-1032 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DGYK201506004.htm [37] Zhang, X.Q., Shan, Y.H., Nie, G.J., et al., 2013.Numerical Modeling of the Mesozoic East Sichuan Fold Belt:Influence of Detachment Depth on the Fold Pattern in the Platform Cover.Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 37(4):622-632 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DGYK201304008.htm [38] Zhou, J.X., Lang, J., Liu, C.Q., 2009.Influence of Viscosity of Ductile Substrate on Deformational Features of Fold-Thrust Belts:Insight from Physical Modeling.Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 39(3):392-398 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XBDZ200903008.htm [39] Zou, Y.T., Duan, J.B., Zhao, Y.J., et al., 2015.Tectonic Characteristics and Evolution of the High and Steep Fault Folding Belt in East Sichuan.Acta Geologica Sinica, 89(11):2046-2052 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb201511015 [40] 曹环宇, 朱传庆, 邱楠生, 2016.川东地区古生界主要泥页岩最高古温度特征.地球物理学报, 59(3):1017-1029. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqwlxb201603023 [41] 戴方尧, 郝芳, 胡海燕, 等, 2017.川东焦石坝五峰-龙马溪组页岩气赋存机理及其主控因素.地球科学, 42(7):1185-1194. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.096 [42] 丁道桂, 郭彤楼, 翟常博, 等, 2005.鄂西-渝东区膝折构造.石油实验地质, 27(3):205-210. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2005.03.001 [43] 丁道桂, 刘光祥, 吕俊祥, 等, 2007.扬子板块海相中古生界盆地的递进变形改造.地质通报, 26(9):1178-1188. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.09.019 [44] 冯常茂, 刘进, 宋立军, 2008.中上扬子地区构造变形带成因机制及有利油气勘探区域预测.地球学报, 29(2):199-204. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2008.02.010 [45] 冯向阳, 孟宪刚, 邵兆刚, 等, 2003.华南及邻区有序变形及其动力学初探.地球学报, 24(2):115-120. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2003.02.004 [46] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 文治东, 等, 2014.四川盆地及周缘下古生界海相页岩气富集高产主控因素——以焦石坝地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例.中国地质, 41(3):893-901. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2014.03.016 [47] 胡建平, 赵军龙, 汪文秉, 等, 2005.三峡重庆库区深部地球物理特征与断裂构造.地球科学与环境学报, 27(3):49-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2005.03.012 [48] 胡召齐, 朱光, 刘国生, 等, 2009.川东"侏罗山式"褶皱带形成时代:不整合面的证据.地质论评, 55(1):32-42. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2009.01.004 [49] 贾小乐, 2016.川东南构造几何学与运动学特征及其与雪峰山西段的构造关系探讨(博士学位论文).北京: 中国地质大学. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1016067913.htm [50] 李双建, 李建明, 周雁, 等, 2011.四川盆地东南缘中新生代构造隆升的裂变径迹证据.岩石矿物学杂志, 30(2):225-233. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2011.02.007 [51] 李忠权, 冉隆辉, 陈更生, 等, 2002.川东高陡构造成因地质模式与含气性分析.成都理工学院学报, 29(6):605-609. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2002.06.003 [52] 刘重庆, 周建勋, 郎建, 2013.多层滑脱条件下褶皱-冲断带形成制约因素研究:以川东-雪峰构造带为例.地球科学与环境学报, 35(2):45-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2013.02.005 [53] 刘尚忠, 1995.川东薄皮构造模式之我见.四川地质学报, 15(4):264-267. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCDB504.004.htm [54] 刘树根, 马文辛, Luba Jansa, 等, 2011.四川盆地东部地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征.岩石学报, 27(8):2239-2252. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201108003 [55] 林俊峰, 胡海燕, 黎祺, 2017.川东焦石坝地区页岩气特征及其意义.地球科学, 42(7):1124-1133. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.091 [56] 梅廉夫, 刘昭茜, 汤济广, 等, 2010.湘鄂西-川东中生代陆内递进扩展变形:来自裂变径迹和平衡剖面的证据.地球科学, 35(2):161-174. https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2010.017 [57] 石红才, 施小斌, 2014.中、上扬子白垩纪以来的剥蚀过程及构造意义——低温年代学数据约束.地球物理学报, 57(8):2608-2619. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94718X/201408/662244316.html [58] 王平, 刘少峰, 郜瑭珺, 等, 2012.川东弧形带三维构造扩展的AFT记录.地球物理学报, 55(5):1662-1673. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dqwlxb201205023 [59] 王平, 刘少峰, 郑洪波, 等, 2013.扬子北缘晚造山阶段弧形构造特征与盆地演化.古地理学报, 15(6):819-838. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gdlxb201306007 [60] 解国爱, 贾东, 张庆龙, 等, 2013.川东侏罗山式褶皱构造带的物理模拟研究.地质学报, 87(6):773-788. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2013.06.003 [61] 颜丹平, 汪新文, 刘友元, 2000.川鄂湘边区褶皱构造样式及其成因机制分析.现代地质, 14(1):37-43. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xddz200001008 [62] 张必龙, 朱光, 胡召齐, 等, 2009.川东"侏罗山式"褶皱的数值模拟及成因探讨.地质论评, 55(5):701-711. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2009.05.012 [63] 张文佑, 叶洪, 钟嘉猷, 1978."断块"与"板块".中国科学, (2):195-211. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JAXK197802007.htm [64] 张小琼, 单业华, 倪永进, 等, 2015.中生代川东褶皱带的数值模拟:两阶段的构造演化模型.大地构造与成矿学, 39(6):1022-1032. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201304008 [65] 张小琼, 单业华, 聂冠军, 等, 2013.中生代川东褶皱带的数值模拟:滑脱带深度对地台盖层褶皱型式的影响.大地构造与成矿学, 37(4):622-632. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ddgzyckx201304008 [66] 周建勋, 郎建, 刘重庆, 2009.韧性基底层黏度对褶皱-冲断带变形特征的影响——来自物理模拟的启示.西北大学学报(自然科学版), 39(3):392-398. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xbdxxb200903006 [67] 邹玉涛, 段金宝, 赵艳军, 等, 2015.川东高陡断褶带构造特征及其演化.地质学报, 89(11):2046-2052. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201511015 -
点击查看大图
图(8) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 5074
- HTML全文浏览量: 1646
- PDF下载量: 71
- 被引次数: 0
