Quantitative Characterization of Shale Pore Structure Based on Ar-SEM and PCAS
-
摘要: 页岩孔隙特征是页岩储层研究的重要内容.基于沁水盆地S-1井太原组、山西组页岩样品，利用氩离子抛光扫描电镜（argon ion polishing scanning electron microscope，Ar-SEM）对孔隙形态特征进行分析，并运用孔裂隙特征分析系统软件（pores and cracks analysis system，PCAS）对Ar-SEM照片中孔隙进行定量表征.结果显示样品孔隙以有机质孔、粒间孔、粒内孔为主，孔径多集中在 < 100 nm，占比72.70%~82.13%，其中介孔占比39.76%~45.48%.随深度的增加孔隙结构越来越复杂，且越深的层位，随孔隙面积的增大其结构复杂程度增加的越缓慢.孔隙结构复杂程度在Ro，max=2附近存在拐点，高成熟阶段，随成熟度的增加孔隙结构复杂程度越来越低，且孔隙面积越大其结构复杂程度越低；过成熟阶段，随成熟度的增加孔隙结构复杂程度越来越高，且孔隙面积越大其结构复杂程度越高.Abstract: Shale pore characteristics are important part of shale reservoir research. Based on the shale samples from Taiyuan Formation and Shanxi Formation in the S-1 well of Qinshui basin, the morphology of the pores was analyzed by argon ion polishing scanning electron microscope (Ar-SEM), and the pores of the Ar-SEM micrographs were quantitatively characterized by pores and cracks analysis system (PCAS). The results show that the pore types of the samples are mainly organic matter pores, intergranular pores, and intragranular pores. The pore sizes are mostly less than 100 nm, accounting for 72.70%-82.13%, and the mesopore ratios are 39.76%-45.48%, which is favorable for pore connectivity and gas migration. The pore structure becomes increasingly more complex with the increase of depth; but the deeper the layer, the more slowly the structural complexity increases with the increase of pore area.There is an inflection point in the vicinity of Ro, max=2 for the pore structure complexity. In the high maturity stage, the complexity of the pore structure gets increasingly lower with the increase of the maturity, and the structure complexity is lower as the pore area is larger; in the over mature stage, pore structure is increasingly more complex with the increase of maturity, and the larger the pore area, the greater the structural complexity.
-
图 1 研究区钻井位置、岩性柱状及采样位置
Fig. 1. Columnar drilling and sampling locations of the study area
图 2 黑色页岩中的孔隙形态特征
OM.有机质；InterP.粒间孔；IntraP.粒内孔；Clay.粘土；Pyrite.黄铁矿
Fig. 2. Morphology characteristics of pores in black shale
表 1 基于PCAS获取的孔隙相关参数
Table 1. Parameters of pores obtained by PCAS
参数 SF-1 SF-2 SF-3 SF-4 SF-5 SF-6 SF-7 总孔数 696 442 432 325 367 337 491 孔隙度(%) 3.88 3.76 2.37 1.34 2.09 2.29 4.25 最大孔面积(μm2) 0.42 1.38 0.75 0.33 1.21 1.46 2.39 平均孔面积(μm2) 0.017 0.026 0.017 0.013 0.018 0.021 0.024 平均周长(nm) 608.79 704.64 628.01 523.46 597.04 658.84 687.69 形状因子 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.43 0.41 0.37 0.36 最大孔长(nm) 2 238.84 2 167.59 4 202.38 1 271.35 2 585.43 2 232.72 3 397.72 平均孔长(nm) 223.73 243.25 233.68 173.25 189.41 201.79 217.71 最大孔径(nm) 684.33 1 458.67 523.65 742.33 772.48 1 342.65 1 712.91 平均孔径(nm) 85.59 89.98 78.54 81.88 84.60 94.67 87.80 概率熵 0.85 0.81 0.8 0.73 0.77 0.73 0.76 分形维数 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.12 1.18 1.12 1.14 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Bernard, S., Wirth, R., Schreiber, A., et al., 2012.Formation of Nanoporous Pyrobitumen Residues during Maturation of the Barnett Shale (Fort Worth Basin).International Journal of Coal Geology, 103(23):3-11. https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/formation-of-nanoporous-pyrobitumen-residues-during-maturation-of-the-Jv1b5X6E05 [2] Bu, H.L., Ju, Y.W., Tan, J.Q., et al., 2015.Fractal Characteristics of Pores in Non-Marine Shales from the Huainan Coalfield, Eastern China.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 24:166-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.021 [3] Chalmers, G.R.L., Bustin, R.M., 2007.The Organic Matter Distribution and Methane Capacity of the Lower Cretaceous Strata of Northeastern British Columbia, Canada.International Journal of Coal Geology, 70(1-3):223-239.doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2006.05.001 [4] Chen, Y.Y., Zou, C.N., Mastalerz, M., et al., 2015.Porosity and Fractal Characteristics of Shale across a Maturation Gradient.Natural Gas Geoscience, 26(9):1646-1656 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283185370_Fractal_Characteristics_of_Shales_Across_a_Maturation_Gradient [5] Clarkson, C.R., Solano, N., Bustin, R.M., et al., 2013.Pore Structure Characterization of North American Shale Gas Reservoirs Using USANS/SANS, Gas Adsorption, and Mercury Intrusion.Fuel, 103(1):606-616. https://experts.griffith.edu.au/publication/nc789a060666a40e7a2f5ed09c1bc71db [6] Curtis, J.B., 2002.Fractured Shale Gas System.AAPG Bulletin, 86(11):1921-1938. [7] Curtis, M.E., Cardott, B.J., Sondergeld, C.H., et al., 2012.Development of Organic Porosity in the Woodford Shale with Increasing Thermal Maturity.International Journal of Coal Geology, 103(23):26-31. https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/elsevier/development-of-organic-porosity-in-the-woodford-shale-with-increasing-Za2BGY1yl2 [8] Fu, C.Q., Zhu, Y.M., Chen, S.B., 2016.Pore Structure and Fractal Features of Hetang Formation Shale in Western Zhejiang.Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 45(1):77-86 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgkydxxb201601011 [9] Gensterblum, Y., Ghanizadeh, A., Cuss, R.J., et al., 2015.Gas Transport and Storage Capacity in Shale Gas Reservoirs-A Review.Part A:Transport Processes.Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 12:87-122. doi: 10.1016/j.juogr.2015.08.001 [10] Javadpour, F., Fisher, D., Unsworth, M., 2007.Nanoscale Gas Flow in Shale Gas Sediments.Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 46 (10):55-61. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Farzam_Javadpour/publication/250092811_Nanoscale_Gas_Flow_in_Shale_Gas_Sediments/links/0a85e53402e5b435ea000000.pdf?inViewer=0&pdfJsDownload=0&origin=publication_detail [11] Jiao, K., Yao, S.P., Liu, C., et al., 2014.The Characterization and Quantitative Analysis of Nanopores in Unconventional Gas Reservoirs Utilizing FESEM-FIB and Image Processing:An Example from the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shale, Upper Yangtze Region, China.International Journal of Coal Geology, 128-129:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.03.004 [12] Klaver, J., Desbois, G., Littke, R., et al., 2016.BIB-SEM Pore Characterization of Mature and Post Mature Posidonia Shale Samples from the Hils Area, Germany.International Journal of Coal Geology, 158:78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2016.03.003 [13] Liu, C., Shi, B., Zhou, J., et al., 2011.Quantification and Characterization of Microporosity by Image Processing, Geometric Measurement and Statistical Methods:Application on SEM Images of Clay Materials.Applied Clay Science, 54 (1):97-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2011.07.022 [14] Liu, C., Tang, C.S., Shi, B., et al., 2013.Automatic Quantification of Crack Patterns by Image Processing.Computers & Geosciences, 57(4):77-80. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300413001088 [15] Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., 2014.Scanning-Electron-Microscope Petrographic Evidence for Distinguishing Organic Matter Pores Associated with Depositional Organic Matter versus Migrated Organic Matter in Mudrocks.GCAGS, 10(3):51-60. http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/abstracts/html/2014/90196gcags/abstracts/91.html [16] Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C., et al., 2009.Morphology, Genesis, and Distribution of Nanometer-Scale Pores in Siliceous Mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale.Journal of Sedimentary Research, 79 (12):848-861. doi: 10.2110/jsr.2009.092 [17] Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C., et al., 2012.Spectrum of Pore Types and Networks in Mudrocks and a Descriptive Classification for Matrix-Related Mudrock Pores.AAPG Bulletin, 96 (6):1071-1098. https://doi.org/10.1306/08171111061 [18] Mendhe, V.A., Mishra, S., Khangar, R.G., et al., 2017.Organo-Petrographic and Pore Facets of Permian Shale Beds of Jharia Basin with Implications to Shale Gas Reservoir.Journal of Earth Science, 28(5):897-916. doi: 10.1007/s12583-017-0779-8 [19] Modica, C.J., Lapierre, S.G., 2012.Estimation of Kerogen Porosity in Source Rocks as a Function of Thermal Transformation:Example from the Mowry Shale in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.AAPG Bulletin, 96(1):87-108. https://doi.org/10.1306/04111110201 [20] Qin, Y., Jiang, B., Wang, J.Y., et al., 2008.Coupling Control of Tectonic Dynamical Conditions to Coalbed Methane Reservoir Formation in the Qinshui Basin, Shanxi, China.Acta Geologica Sinica, 82(10):1355-1362 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290024378_Coupling_control_of_tectonic_dynamical_conditions_to_coalbed_methane_reservoir_formation_in_the_Qinshui_Basin_Shanxi_China [21] Qin, Y., Zhang, D.M., Fu, X.H., et al., 1999.A Discussion on Correlation of Modern Tectonic Stress Field to Physical Properties of Coal Reservoirs in Central and Southern Qinshui Basin.Geological Review, 45(6):576-583 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZLP199906005.htm [22] Sezer, G.I., Ramyar, K., Karasu, B., et al., 2008.Image Analysis of Sulfate Attack on Hardened Cement Paste.Materials and Design, (29):224-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.006 [23] Shao, L.Y., Xiao, Z.H., He, Z.P., et al., 2006.Palaeogeography and Coal Accumulation for Measures of the Carboniferous-Permian in Qinshui Basin, Southeastern Shanxi Province.Journal of Palaeogeography, 8(1):43-52 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/303234205_Palaeogeography_and_coal_accumulation_for_coal_measures_of_the_Carboniferous-Permian_in_Qinshui_Basin_southeastern_Shanxi_Province [24] Soroushian, P., Elzafraney, M., 2005.Morphological Operations, Planar Mathematical Formulations, and Stereological Interpretations for Automated Image Analysis of Concrete Microstructure.Cement and Concrete Composites, 27(7-8):823-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.07.008 [25] Strąpoć, D., Mastalerz, M., Schimmelmann, A., et al., 2010.Geochemical Constraints on the Origin and Volume of Gas in the New Albany Shale (Devonian-Mississippian), Eastern Illinois Basin.AAPG Bulletin, 94(11):1713-1740. https://doi.org/10.1306/06301009197 [26] Sun, M.D., Yu, B.S., Hu, Q.H., et al., 2016.Nanoscale Pore Characteristics of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation Shale:A Case Study from Well Yuke #1 in the Southeast of Chongqing, China.International Journal of Coal Geology, 154-155(5):16-29. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25184155 [27] Wang, B.Y., Hu, B., Bai, J.P., et al., 2015.Coal-Accumulating Environments of the Upper Carboniferous-Lower Permian Taiyuan Formation in Southeastern Qinshui Basin, Shanxi Province.Journal of Palaeogeography, 17(5):677-688 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=gdlxb201505009 [28] Wang, P.F., Jiang, Z.X., Li, Z., et al., 2017.Micro-Nano Pore Structure Characteristics in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Shale, Northeast Chongqing.Earth Science, 42(7):1147-1156 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.093 [29] Wang, Y., Zhu, Y.M., Wang, H.Y., et al., 2015.Nanoscale Pore Morphology and Distribution of Lacustrine Shale Reservoirs:Examples from the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin.Journal of Energy Chemistry, 24 (4):512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.06.004 [30] Wei, C.T., Qin, Y., Man, L., 2005.Numerical Simulation Research on the Overpressure Hisrory of Upper Main Coal Seam in Central-South Qinshui Basin.Natural Gas Industry, 25(1):81-84, 10 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298161512_Numerical_simulation_research_on_the_overpressure_history_of_upper_main_coal_seam_in_central-south_Qinshui_Basin [31] Wu, S.T., Zou, C.N., Zhu, R.K., et al., 2015.Reservior Quality Characterization of Upper Triassic Chang 7 Shale in Ordos Basin.Earth Science, 40(11):1810-1823 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.onepetro.org/download/conference-paper/SPE-177012-MS?id=conference-paper%2FSPE-177012-MS [32] Xiong, C.R., Tang, H.M., Liu, B.C., et al., 2007.Using SEM Photos to Gain the Pore Structure Parameters of Soil Samples.Earth Science, 32(3):415-419 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292007821_Using_SEM_photos_to_gain_the_pore_structural_parameters_of_soil_samples [33] Yang, R., He, S., Yi, Q.H., et al., 2016.Nano-Scale Pore Structure and Fractal Dimension of Organic-Rich Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale from Jiaoshiba Area, Sichuan Basin:Investigations Using FE-SEM, Gas Adsorption and Helium Pycnometry.Marine and Petroleum Geology, 70:27-45. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.11.019 [34] Yang, Y.F., Wang, C.C., Yao, J., et al., 2016.A New Method for Microscopic Pore Structure Analysis in Shale Matrix.Earth Science, 41(6):1067-1073 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2016.088 [35] Zhang, L.Y., Li, J.Y., Li, Z., et al., 2015.Development Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Intra-Organic Reservoir Space in Lacustrine Shales.Earth Science, 40(11):1824-1833 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288230302_Development_characteristics_and_formation_mechanism_of_intra-organic_reservoir_space_in_lacustrine_shales [36] Zhang, X., Liu, C.L., Zhu, Y.M., et al., 2015.The Characterization of a Marine Shale Gas Reservoir in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of the Northeastern Yunnan Province, China.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 27:321-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.08.070 [37] 陈燕燕, 邹才能, Mastalerz, M., 等, 2015.页岩微观孔隙演化及分形特征研究.天然气地球科学, 26(9):1646-1656. http://www.oalib.com/paper/5025081 [38] 付常青, 朱炎铭, 陈尚斌, 2016.浙西荷塘组页岩孔隙结构及分形特征研究.中国矿业大学学报, 45(1):77-86. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGKD201601012.htm [39] 秦勇, 姜波, 王继尧, 等, 2008.沁水盆地煤层气构造动力条件耦合控藏效应.地质学报, 82(10):1355-1362. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2008.10.007 [40] 秦勇, 张德民, 傅雪海, 等, 1999.山西沁水盆地中、南部现代构造应力场与煤储层物性关系之探讨.地质论评, 45(6):576-583. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4887212 [41] 邵龙义, 肖正辉, 何志平, 等, 2006.晋东南沁水盆地石炭二叠纪含煤岩系古地理及聚煤作用研究.古地理学报, 8(1):43-52. http://edu.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/Detail/gdlxb200601005 [42] 王保玉, 胡斌, 白建平, 等, 2015.山西沁水盆地东南部上石炭统-下二叠统太原组聚煤环境.古地理学报, 17(5):677-688. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2015.05.056 [43] 王朋飞, 姜振学, 李卓, 等, 2017.渝东北下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩微纳米孔隙结构特征.地球科学, 42(7):1147-1156. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3603 [44] 韦重韬, 秦勇, 满磊, 2005.沁水盆地中南部上主煤层超压史数值模拟研究.天然气工业, 25(1):81-84, 10. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqgy200501023 [45] 吴松涛, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 等, 2015.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统长7段泥页岩储集性能.地球科学, 40(11):1810-1823. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3188 [46] 熊承仁, 唐辉明, 刘宝琛, 等, 2007.利用SEM照片获取土的孔隙结构参数.地球科学, 32(3):415-419. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3469 [47] 杨永飞, 王晨晨, 姚军, 等, 2016.页岩基质微观孔隙结构分析新方法.地球科学, 41(6):1067-1073. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2016.06.1067 [48] 张林晔, 李钜源, 李政, 等, 2015.湖相页岩有机储集空间发育特点与成因机制.地球科学, 40(11):1824-1833. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3189 -
点击查看大图
图(4) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 4164
- HTML全文浏览量: 1885
- PDF下载量: 20
- 被引次数: 0
