• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    滨里海盆地M区块晚石炭世古地貌恢复与白云岩储层预测

    苗钱友 ,  朱筱敏 ,  李国斌 ,  郭洪明 ,  杨勤林 ,  张静 ,  张亚军 ,  洪亮

    苗钱友, 朱筱敏, 李国斌, 郭洪明, 杨勤林, 张静, 张亚军, 洪亮, 2014. 滨里海盆地M区块晚石炭世古地貌恢复与白云岩储层预测. 地球科学, 39(7): 871-879. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.081
    引用本文: 苗钱友, 朱筱敏, 李国斌, 郭洪明, 杨勤林, 张静, 张亚军, 洪亮, 2014. 滨里海盆地M区块晚石炭世古地貌恢复与白云岩储层预测. 地球科学, 39(7): 871-879. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.081
    Miao Qianyou, Zhu Xiaomin, Li Guobin, Guo Hongming, Yang Qinlin, Zhang Jing, Zhang Yajun, Hong Liang, 2014. Paleogeomorphology Recovery and Reservoir Prediction of Upper Carboniferous in M Block, Pre-Caspian Basin. Earth Science, 39(7): 871-879. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.081
    Citation: Miao Qianyou, Zhu Xiaomin, Li Guobin, Guo Hongming, Yang Qinlin, Zhang Jing, Zhang Yajun, Hong Liang, 2014. Paleogeomorphology Recovery and Reservoir Prediction of Upper Carboniferous in M Block, Pre-Caspian Basin. Earth Science, 39(7): 871-879. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.081

    滨里海盆地M区块晚石炭世古地貌恢复与白云岩储层预测

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2014.081
    基金项目: 

    中石油海外油气勘探项目 2008E-1606

    国家重大油气专项资助项目 2011ZX05029-002

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      苗钱友(1970-), 男, 高级工程师, 博士研究生, 主要从事油气田地质勘探与开发研究.E-mail: miaoqianyou@126.com

    • 中图分类号: P618

    Paleogeomorphology Recovery and Reservoir Prediction of Upper Carboniferous in M Block, Pre-Caspian Basin

    • 摘要: 白云岩储层的发育主要受原始沉积岩性和后期溶蚀作用影响, 原始沉积岩性受沉积时古地貌控制, 后期溶蚀作用受溶蚀古地貌控制.滨里海盆地M区块石炭世KT-Ⅰ层有利储集岩为溶蚀白云岩, 分布在KT-Ⅰ层顶部, 孔隙类型为晶间(溶)孔、粒内溶孔和生物体腔孔.M区块石炭系沉积时为"西高东低"古地貌背景, 在二叠世早期地层回返呈"东高西低"特征, KT-Ⅰ层顶部遭受剥蚀.通过残余地层厚度法和沉积补偿厚度印模法对KT-Ⅰ层原始沉积古地貌和后期溶蚀古地貌进行了恢复, 指出了M区块原始沉积古地貌高地与溶蚀斜坡带叠合区为有效白云岩储层分布区, 提出了M区块勘探方向为"向南扩大勘探场面, 向东拓展勘探新区", 在中-南部和南部建议了3口井位, 取得了很好的钻探实效.表明古地貌恢复技术是M区块预测白云岩储层的有效方法.

       

    • 图  1  滨里海盆地构造分区

      Fig.  1.  Structural units of Pre-Caspian basin

      图  2  滨里海盆地盐下层系地层图

      Fig.  2.  Stratum histogram for the pre-salt sediments of Pre-Caspian basin

      图  3  A4井KT-Ⅰ层沉积相综合分析

      Fig.  3.  Comprehensive analysis histogram in KT-Ⅰ of Well A4

      图  4  研究区KT-Ⅰ白云岩薄片特征

      a.样品编号6-3s(A-4井2 342.81 m),残余生屑(泥)粉晶白云岩,晶间溶孔,生物有4种遭受破坏后的类型:①有其外形,但体腔全被溶蚀;②保持壳壁,体内全溶;③壳壁被溶,形成壳模孔;④高岭石充填体腔;b.样品编号7-31(A-4井2 352.92 m),泥晶残余生屑云岩,体腔孔,大部分生屑为被溶蚀后的残余类,虽保持了其外形特征,但内部房室被溶,其他瓣鳃类、腹足类均被溶为铸模孔、壳壁孔;c.样品编号2-7s(A-4井),溶蚀孔隙及晶间孔隙发育,溶孔内被菱面体白云石部分充填;d.样品编号7-6zx(A-4井),晶间孔隙及溶蚀孔隙发育,见高岭石及伊利石少量分布

      Fig.  4.  Thin section characteristics of dolomite reservoir in KT-Ⅰ in study area

      图  5  古地貌恢复模式

      Fig.  5.  The mode pattern of palaeo-geomorphology recovery

      图  6  KT-Ⅰ层原始沉积古地貌

      Fig.  6.  The pre-depositional palaeo-geomorphology of KT-Ⅰ Formation

      图  7  A33-A34-35连井A2+A3层岩性对比剖面

      Fig.  7.  The lithology correlation section of A2+A3 in wells A33-A34-35

      图  8  KT-Ⅰ层溶蚀古地貌

      Fig.  8.  The karst-geomorphology of KT-Ⅰ Formation

      图  9  KT-Ⅰ层顶部A2+A3沉积相

      Fig.  9.  The sedimentary facies of A2+A3 in KT-Ⅰ Formation

    • [1] Bai, W.H., Lü, X.M., Li, X.J., et al., 2002. The Mode of Palaeokarstification and the Fine Reconstruction of the Palaeogeomorphology in the Karst Basin: Taking Ordovician Karst in Eastern Ordos Basin for Example. Geoscience, 16(3): 292-298(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/292814126_The_mode_of_palaeokarstification_and_the_fine_reconstruction_of_the_palaeogeomorphology_in_the_karst_basin_Taking_Ordovician_karst_in_eastern_Ordos_Basin_for_example
      [2] Fairbridge, R.W., 1957. The Dolomite Question: Regional Aspects of Carbonate Deposition. Paleontologists and Mineralogists Spec. Publ. , 5: 125-178. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10003544293
      [3] Fan, J.S., 2005. Characteristics of Carbonate Reservoirs for Oil and Gas Fields in the World and Essential Controlling Factors for Their Formation. Earth Science Frontiers, 12(3): 23-30(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200503003.htm
      [4] Flvgel, 1989. Limestone Microfacies. Translated by Zeng, Y.F. . Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
      [5] Hohlt, R.B., 1948. The Nature and Origin of Limestone Porosity. Colorado School Mines Quart. , 43(4): 1-51. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1949JG.....57..441J
      [6] Jia, Z.Y., Cai, Z.X., 2004. Carbonate Paleo-Weathered Crust Reservoirs (Body). Geological Science and Technology Information, 23(4): 94-104(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93477A/200404/11648712.html
      [7] Jin, Z.J., Wang, J., Zhang, S.G., et al., 2007. Main Factors Controlling Hydrocarbon Reservoirs and Exploration Directions in the Pre-Salt Sequence in Pre-Caspian Basin. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 29(2): 111-115(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD200702001.htm
      [8] Landes, K.K., 1946. Porosity through Dolomitization. AAPG Bulletin, 30(3): 305-318.
      [9] Liu, D.Z., Dou, L.R., Hao, Y.Q., et al., 2004. The Origin of Hydrocarbon Accumulation below the Lower Permian Salt Bed and the Prospecting in the East Part of Pre-Caspian Basin. Marine Origin Petoleum Geology, 9(1-2): 53-58(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ2004Z1008.htm
      [10] Liu, L.F., Guo, Y.Q., Zhu, Y.X., 2007. Reservoir Characteristics and Oil-Bearing Characters of the Carbonate Reservoir Beds in the Pre-Salt Sediments of Pre-Caspian Basin. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 22(1): 53-58, 63 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/291234831_Reservoir_characteristics_and_oil-bearing_characters_of_the_carbonate_reservoir_beds_in_the_pre-salt_sediments_of_Pre-Caspian_Basin
      [11] Liu, L.F., Zhu, Y.X., 2007. Pre-Caspian Basin and Central Asia Oil & Gas Geological Characteristics. China Petrochemical Press Co. LTD., Beijing (in Chinese).
      [12] Liu, L.F., Zhu, Y.X., Hu, A.M., et al., 2002. Petroleum Geology of Pre-Salt Sediments in the Pre-Caspian Basin. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 24(3): 11-15 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/288950418_Petroleum_geology_of_pre-salt_sediments_in_the_Precaspian_basin
      [13] Pan, J.G., Wei, P.S., Cai, Z.X., et al., 2012. Reservoir Architectural System in the Middle-Low Ordovician Carbonate Rock of Tazhong Areas in Tarim. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 37(4): 751-761 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [14] Л. П. Мстиславская. Ren, Y., Tranlated, 2002. Ancient Tectonic Conditions of Syncline Oil-Gas Accumulation in Southeast Caspian Giant Platform. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 23(4): 351-354 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [15] Shi, X., Cheng, X.B., Wang, J., et al., 2012. Geochemical Characteristics of the Carboniferous KT-Ⅰ Interval Dolostone in Eastern Margin of Coastal Caspian Sea Basin. Journal of Palaeogeography, 14(6): 777-785 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/313006129_Geochemical_characteristics_of_the_Carboniferous_KT-Iinterval_dolostone_in_eastern_margin_of_coastal_Caspian_Sea_Basin
      [16] Sun, S.Q., 1995. Dolomite Reservoirs: Porosity Evolution and Reservoir Characteristics. AAPG Bulletin, 79(2): 186-204. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014890629599522Y
      [17] Wang, L.D., Shen, R.F., Lü, F.J., et al., 2004. Petroleum Geology Characteristics and Exploration Direction Analysis of Pre-Caspian Basin. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 23(2): 17-18 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [18] Warren, J., 2000. Dolomite: Occurrence, Evolution and Economically Important Associations. Earth-Science Review, 52(1-3): 1-81. doi: 10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00022-2
      [19] Wu, L.Y., Chen, C.Q., Jiang, C.M., et al., 2005. Paleogeomorphic Restoring Techniques in China's Hydrocarbon Exploration. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 27(4): 559-560, 586 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7068880
      [20] Xia, R.Y., Tang, J.S., Guan, B.Z., et al., 1999. Ordovician Palaeokarst Landform in Ordos Basin and Gas Enrichment Characteristics. Oil & Gas Geology, 20(2): 133-136 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT902.007.htm
      [21] Xu, K.Q., 2011. The Oil & Gas Accumulation Characteristics and Exploration Practice in the Middle Block of Eastern Margin of Pre-Caspian Basin. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      [22] Yao, J., Wang, X., Wang, C.C., et al., 2013. The Influence of Carbonate Rocks Reservoir Parameters on Microscopic Flow. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 38(5): 1047-1051 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2013.102
      [23] Yao, J.L., Wang, L.P., Zhang, Q., et al., 2011. Controlling Factor and Distribution of Paleo-Karst Development in Ordovician of Southern Ordos Basin. Natural Gas Geoscience, 22(1): 56-65(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.oalib.com/paper/1417967
      [24] Zhang, B., Zheng, R.C., Wang, X.B., et al., 2011. Paleokarst and Reservoirs of the Huanglong Formation in Eastern Sichuan Basin. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 38(3): 257-267(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(11)60032-3
      [25] Zhao, C.L., Zhu, X.M., 2001. Sedimentary Petrology. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      [26] Zhao, J.X., Chen, H.D., Shi, Z.Q., 2001. The Way and Implications of Rebuilding Palaeogeomorphology—Taking the Research of Palaeogeomorphology of the Ordos Basin before Jurassic Deposition as Example. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 28(3): 260-266(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG200103008.htm
      [27] Zhao, M., Wang, D.Y., Liu, J.F., et al., 2010. Favorable Conditions for Petroleum Accumulation by Paleogeomorphology before Deposition—Taking Lower Jurassic in Ziwuling Area, Ordos Basin as an Example. Natural Gas Geoscience, 21(3): 476-481 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201003021.htm
      [28] Zhao, Z.P., Mou, X.Q., Chen, L., 2009. Analysis on Main Diagenesises and Controlling Factors of Carboniferous Carbonate Reservoirs in the Eastern Margin of Pre-Caspian Basin. Geoscience, 23(5): 828-834(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ200905010.htm
      [29] Zheng, R.C., Peng, J., Gao, H.C., 2003. Palaeokarst-Related Characteristics and Cycles of Carbonate Reservoirs in Huanglong Formation, Upper Carboniferous, Eastern Chongqing. Geology-Geochemistry, 31(1): 28-35 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dzdqhx200301005
      [30] 拜文华, 吕锡敏, 李小军, 等, 2002. 古岩溶盆地岩溶作用模式及古地貌精细刻画——以鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳为例. 现代地质, 16(3): 292-298. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2002.03.013
      [31] 范嘉松, 2005. 世界碳酸盐岩油气田的储层特征及其成藏的主要控制因素. 地学前缘, 12(3): 23-30. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2005.03.004
      [32] Flvgel, 1989. 灰岩微相. 曾允孚译. 北京: 地质出版社.
      [33] 贾振远, 蔡忠贤, 2004. 碳酸盐岩古风化壳储集层(体)研究. 地质科技情报, 23(4): 94-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2004.04.019
      [34] 金之钧, 王俊, 张生根, 等, 2007. 滨里海盆地盐下油气成藏主控因素及勘探方向. 石油实验地质, 29(2): 111-115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2007.02.001
      [35] 刘东周, 窦立荣, 郝银全, 等, 2004. 滨里海盆地东部盐下成藏主控因素及勘探思路. 海相油气地质, 9(1-2): 53-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXYQ2004Z1008.htm
      [36] 刘洛夫, 郭永强, 朱毅秀, 2007. 滨里海盆地盐下层系的碳酸盐岩储集层与油气特征. 西安石油大学学报, 22(1): 53-58, 63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2007.01.013
      [37] 刘洛夫, 朱毅秀, 2007. 滨里海盆地及中亚地区油气地质特征. 北京: 中国石化出版社.
      [38] 刘洛夫, 朱毅秀, 胡爱梅, 等, 2002. 滨里海盆地盐下层系的油气地质特征. 西南石油学院学报(自然科学版), 24(3): 11-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY200203003.htm
      [39] 潘建国, 卫平生, 蔡忠贤, 等, 2012. 塔中地区中-下奥陶统碳酸盐岩孔洞-裂缝储集系统划分及其特征. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 37(4): 751-761. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201204015.htm
      [40] Л. П. Мстиславская. 任俞, 译, 2002. 滨里海巨型台向斜东南部油气聚集的古构造条件. 新疆石油地质, 23(4): 351-354.
      [41] 石新, 程绪彬, 汪娟, 等, 2012. 滨里海盆地东缘石炭系KT-Ⅰ油层组白云岩地球化学特征. 古地理学报, 14(6): 777-785. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GDLX201206014.htm
      [42] 王连岱, 沈仁福, 吕风军, 等, 2004. 滨里海盆地石油地质特征及勘探方向分析. 大庆石油地质与开发, 23(2): 17-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2004.02.006
      [43] 吴丽艳, 陈春强, 江春明, 等, 2005. 浅谈我国油气勘探中的古地貌恢复技术. 石油天然气学报: 27(4): 559-560, 586. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX2005S4005.htm
      [44] 夏日元, 唐健生, 关碧珠, 等, 1999. 鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系古岩溶地貌及天然气富集特征. 石油与天然气地质, 20(2): 133-136. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.1999.02.008
      [45] 徐可强, 2011. 滨里海盆地东缘中区块油气成藏特征和勘探实践. 北京: 石油工业出版社.
      [46] 姚军, 王鑫, 王晨晨, 等, 2013. 碳酸盐岩储层参数对微观渗流的影响. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 38(5): 1047-1051. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201305016.htm
      [47] 姚泾利, 王兰萍, 张庆, 等, 2011. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部奥陶系古岩溶发育控制因素及展布. 天然气地球科学, 22(1): 56-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201101010.htm
      [48] 张兵, 郑荣才, 王绪本, 等, 2011. 四川盆地东部黄龙组古岩溶特征与储集层分布. 石油勘探与开发, 38(3): 257-267. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201103002.htm
      [49] 赵澄林, 朱筱敏, 2001. 沉积岩石学. 北京: 石油工业出版社.
      [50] 赵俊兴, 陈洪德, 时志强, 2001. 古地貌恢复技术方法及其研究意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪沉积前古地貌研究为例. 成都理工学院学报, 28(3): 260-266. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2001.03.008
      [51] 赵敏, 王多云, 刘军锋, 等, 2010. 沉积前古地貌对油藏成藏的有利条件分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地子午岭地区下侏罗统为例. 天然气地球科学, 21(3): 476-481. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201003021.htm
      [52] 赵中平, 牟小清, 陈丽, 2009. 滨里海盆地东缘石炭系碳酸盐岩储层主要成岩作用及控制因素分析. 现代地质, 23(5): 828-834. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2009.05.010
      [53] 郑荣才, 彭军, 高红灿, 2003. 渝东黄龙组碳酸盐岩储层的古岩溶特征和岩溶旋回. 地质地球化学, 31(1): 28-35. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDQ200301004.htm
    • 加载中
    图(9)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  3583
    • HTML全文浏览量:  230
    • PDF下载量:  431
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2013-05-19
    • 刊出日期:  2014-07-15

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回