A Signal-Noise Separation Method for Magnetotelluric Impedance Tensor Estimate Improvement
-
摘要: 在强噪声环境下，由于相关噪声的影响，准确地估算大地电磁张量阻抗越来越困难.研究一种处理相关噪声问题的信噪分离方法，即采用最小二乘Robust方法，利用相关噪声相对较小的远参考站磁场信号求取分离张量，将本地磁场的观测信号分离为MT信号和噪声，估算大地电磁张量阻抗.分别对模拟数据与实测数据进行处理, 结果表明，信噪分离方法能够分离出较强的相关噪声，给出的视电阻率和相位曲线比最小二乘Robust方法和远参考方法获得的更加平滑，处理效果明显.研究表明，在处理受相关噪声影响的MT数据中，信噪分离方法具有明显的优势.Abstract: It is difficult to estimate precise magnetotelluric (MT) impedance tensor in high correlated noise areas. In order to approximate MT impedance tensor, we use remote sites which contain relatively lower correlated noise to compute separation tensor by using Robust least square method. The MT data in three sites which are contaminated by higher and lower correlated noises are processed using signal-noise separation method. The results show that it can separate higher correlated noise and get much smoother apparent resistivity and phase curves than those obtained by using Robust least square method and remote reference method. It is concluded that signal-noise separation method is efficient for much more precise MT impedance tensor.
-
Key words:
- signal-noise separation /
- magnetotellurics /
- impedance tensor /
- geophysics
-
图 1 信噪分离方法总体流程
Fig. 1. Flow chart for the basic steps used to compute impedance tensor
图 2 原始时间序列的视电阻率和相位曲线
a.Robust方法；b.信噪分离方法
Fig. 2. Apparent resistivity and phase estimates of original time series
图 3 噪声占10%的时间序列的视电阻率和相位曲线
a.Robust；b.信噪分离方法
Fig. 3. Apparent resistivity and phase estimates of time series (10% noise)
图 4 噪声占20%的时间序列的视电阻率和相位曲线
a.Robust方法；b.信噪分离方法
Fig. 4. Apparent resistivity and phase estimates of time series (20% noise)
图 5 实例1中Robust (a)、远参考方法(c)和信噪分离方法(相关噪声(b)、MT信号(d))比较
Fig. 5. Comparison of the results obtained from robust least square(a), robust remote reference(c) and signal-noise separation method (correlated noise(b), MT signal(d)) respectively in the first example
图 6 实例2中Robust方法(a)、远参考方法(b)和信噪分离方法(c)比较
Fig. 6. Comparison of the results obtained from robust least square (a), robust remote reference (b) and signal-noise separation method(c) respectively in the second example
-
[1] Chave, A.D., Thomson, D.J., 2004. Bounded Influence Magnetotelluric Response Function Estimation. Geophysical Journal International, 157: 988-1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.0203.x [2] Chen, J., Heincke, B., Jegen, M., et al., 2012. Using Empirical Mode Decomposition to Process Marine Magnetotelluric Data. Geophysical Journal International, 190: 293-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05470x [3] Dmitriev, V.I., Berdichevsky, M.N., 1979. The Fundamental Model of Magnetotelluric Sounding. Proceedings of the IEEE, 67(7): 1034-1044. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1979.11386 [4] Egbert, G.D., 1997. Robust Multiple-Station Magnetotelluric Data Processing. Geophysical Journal International, 130: 475-496. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb05663.x [5] Egbert, G.D., Booker, J.R., 1986. Robust Estimation of Geomagnetic Transfer Functions. Geophysical Journal International, 87: 173-194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1986.tb04552.x [6] Gamble, T.D., Goubau, W.M., Clarke, J., 1979. Magnetotellurics with a Remote Magnetic Reference. Geophysics, 44(1): 53-68. doi: 10.1190/1.1440923 [7] Garcia, X., Jones, A.G., 2008. Robust Processing of Magnetotelluric Data in the AMT Dead Band Using the Continuous Wavelet Transform. Geophysics, 73(6): F223-F234. doi: 10.11901/1.2987375 [8] Iliceto, V., Santarato, G., 1999. On the Interference of Man-Made EM Fields in the Magnetotelluric 'Dead Band'. Geophysical Prospecting, 47(5): 707-719. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1999.00153.x [9] Jones, A.G., Chave, A.D., Egbert, G., et al., 1989. A Comparison of Techniques for Magnetotelluric Response Function Estimation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 94(B10): 201-213. doi: 10.1029/JB094iB10p14201 [10] Larsen, J.C., Mackie, R., Manzella, A., et al., 1996. Robust Smooth Magnetotelluric Transfer Functions. Geophysical Journal International, 124(3): 801-819. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb05639.x [11] Law, L.K., Auld, D.R., Booker, J.R., 1980. A Geomagnetic Variation Anomaly Coincident with the Cascade Volcanic Belt. Journal of Geophysical Research, 85(B10): 5297-5302. doi: 10.1029/JB085iB10p05297 [12] Li, T.L., Weng, A.H., Lin, J., 1999. Robust Estimation of Electromagnetic Function for Marine Magnetotelluric Data. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology, 29(1): 81-83(in Chinese). [13] Liu, J.X., Yan, J.B., He, J.S., et al., 2003. Robust Estimation Method of Sea Magnetotelluric Impedance Based on Correlative Coefficient. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 46(2): 241-245 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1002/cjg2.349/abstract [14] Oettinger, G., Haak, V., Larsen, J.C., 2001. Noise Reduction in Magnetotelluric Time-Series with a New Signal-Noise Separation Method and Its Application to a Field Experiment in the Saxonian Granulite Massif. Geophysical Journal International, 146(3): 659-669. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2001.00473.x [15] Tang, J.T., Li, J., Xiao, X., et al., 2012. Mathematical Morphology Filtering and Noise Suppression of Magnetotelluric Sounding Data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(5): 1784-1793(in Chinese with English abstract). [16] Touran, A., Wiser, E.P., 1992. Monte Carlo Technique with Correlated Random Variables. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118(2): 258-272. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:2(258) [17] Wang, J.Y., Xu., Y.X., Hu, X.Y., et al., 1998. Methods and Advances for Estimation of Magnetotelluric Response Function Abroad. Earth Science Frontiers, 5(1-2): 217-222(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY802.006.htm [18] Wei, W.B., Tan, H.D., Jin, S., et al., 2002. Conductivity Structure of Lithosphere in Central North China: Magnetotelluric Study of Yingxian-Shanghe Profile. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 27(5): 645-660(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200205027.htm [19] Xu, Y.X., Wang, J.Y., 2000. Power Spectrum Estimation for Magnetotelluric Signal Based on Continuous Wavelet Transform. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 43(5): 677-683(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/297984677_Power_spectrum_estimation_for_magnetotelluric_signal_based_on_continuous_wavelet_transform [20] Ye, G.F., Jin, S., Wei, W.B., et al., 2007. Research of Conductive Structure of Crust and Upper Mantle beneath the South-Central Tibetan Plateau. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 32(4): 491-498(in Chinese with English abstract). http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=26247312 [21] 李桐林, 翁爱华, 林君, 1999. 海洋环境中大地电磁测深阻抗的Robust估计. 长春科技大学学报, 29(1): 81-83. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ901.017.htm [22] 柳建新, 严家斌, 何继善, 等, 2003. 基于相关系数的海底大地电磁阻抗Robust估算方法. 地球物理学报, 46(2): 241-245. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2003.02.018 [23] 汤井田, 李晋, 肖晓, 等, 2012. 数学形态滤波与大地电磁噪声压制. 地球物理学报, 55(5): 1784-1793. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQWX201205037.htm [24] 王家映, 徐义贤, 胡祥云, 等, 1998. 国外大地电磁响应函数估计方法. 地学前缘, 5(1-2): 217-222. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY802.006.htm [25] 魏文博, 谭捍东, 金胜, 等, 2002. 华北中部岩石圈电性结构-应县-商河剖面大地电磁测深研究. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 27(5): 645-650. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200205027.htm [26] 徐义贤, 王家映, 2000. 基于连续小波变换的大地电磁信号谱估计方法. 地球物理学报, 43(5): 677-683. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2000.05.011 [27] 叶高峰, 金胜, 魏文博, 等, 2007. 西藏高原中南部地壳与上地幔导电性结构. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 32(4): 491-498. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200704009.htm -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 3315
- HTML全文浏览量: 171
- PDF下载量: 499
- 被引次数: 0
