Late-Quaternary Activity Characteristics of the Ganhezi Segment of the Fukang Fault Belt, in Xinjiang
-
摘要: 为了解阜康断裂晚第四纪以来的活动特征, 准确评价该断裂的大震危险性, 在野外地震地质调查的基础上, 对变形的微地貌进行了测量, 开挖了2个大型古地震探槽, 并采集了系列释光年龄样品, 对阜康断裂甘河子段进行了细致研究.甘河子断裂段是一条全新世活动断裂, 全长约33 km, 构成博格达北麓与山前冲洪积扇的界线.该断裂晚第四纪期间活动性较强, 运动方式以向盆地方向的逆冲为主, 形成了一系列地质地貌现象.晚第四纪晚期以来, 断裂的平均垂直滑动速率在0.34~0.43 mm/a.全新世中期以来, 断裂有过2次古地震事件, 断裂大震(特征地震)的复发周期为2 100~3 750 a, 最新一次古地震事件造成的地表垂直位移量为1.5 m左右, 对应的古地震震级在7.2~7.4之间, 该次古地震事件离逝时间已达4.11 ka, 目前该断裂已经累积了较高能量.Abstract: In order to understand the activity characteristics of the Fukang fault in Late-Quaternary, and accurately estimate the seismic hazard of the fault, a geological survey has been conducted along the Fukang fault. By surveying the deformation micro-topography, excavating two large paleoearthquake trenches, and dating a series of samples of thermoluminescence, the quantity activity characteristics of the Ganhezi fault segment of the Fukang fault belt are revealed. The Ganhezi fault segment is a Holocene active fault, with a total length about 33 km. The fault activity is obvious, generating a series of apparent geomorphic traces on the surface. Since the Late-Quaternary, the average vertical slip rate of fault is about 0.34-0.43 mm/a. Since the Mid-Holocene, there were two paleoearthquake events; the strong earthquake recurrence period of the fualt segment is about 2 100-3 750 a. The vertical surface displacement is about 1.5 m and the elapsed time is 4.11 ka of the latest paleoearthquake, corresponding to the paleoearthquake magnitude of between Ms7.2-7.4. The fault has accumulated a high energy so far.
-
Key words:
- Fukang fault belt /
- tectonic landform /
- Late-Quaternary /
- deformation characteristics /
- paleoearthquake
-
图 8 五宫沟左岸T2阶地探槽剖面
①灰白色砾石层,松散,砾石呈次棱角状,分选一般,无明显层理,粒径一般在4~10 cm,最大可达20 cm;②土黄色粉土层,松散,表层植物根系发育,含少量砾石;③土黄色粉土层,松散;④灰色崩积楔体,以砾石为主,下部粒径较上部大,粉土、砂砾充填;⑤灰色崩积楔体,以砾石为主,无层理,杂乱堆积,砂砾充填;⑥土黄色粉土层,稍密,下部含少量砾石,砾石粒径大小不一,分选较差,最大者达5 cm左右;⑦灰色砾石层,次棱角状,具水平层理,分选较差,下部普遍粒径较大,上部略有减小,中细砾和粗砂混杂,局部夹有粗砂透镜体;⑧灰色砾石层,次棱角状,具水平层理,分选较好,粒径普遍较小,一般在2 cm以下,局部夹有细砂和粉土透镜体;⑨灰色砾石层,次棱角状,具水平层理,分选差,下部砾石粒径较大,多在5~15 cm,上部砾石砾径相对较小
Fig. 8. Fault profile at the second terrace on the left bank of the Wugonggou
表 1 五宫沟附近沉积物热释光年龄测定值
Table 1. Thermoluminescence age of the sediment from the Wugonggou
样品序号 采样地点与层位 放射性元素含量 年剂量率 等效剂量 样品年龄(ka) U(10-6) Th(10-6) K2O(%) G(10-3a) ED(Gy) WGG-01 T2阶地砾石层中上部 2.69 9.02 2.66 1.99 30.0 15.02±1.27 WGG-02 T2阶地上覆粉土层下部 3.10 10.6 2.86 2.27 12.0 5.27±0.45 WGG-03 T2阶地上覆粉土层上部 3.39 12.0 2.70 2.43 10.0 4.11±0.35 WGG-04 T2阶地上覆粉土层底部 2.69 11.9 2.80 2.25 22.0 9.76±0.83 WGG-05 T2阶地上覆粉土层顶部 3.20 12.8 2.69 2.44 12.0 4.91±0.42 WGG-06 T2阶地上覆粉土层中部 2.84 10.3 2.83 2.12 14.0 6.44±0.55 WGG-07 T2阶地上覆粉土层下部 2.65 9.48 2.91 2.07 14.0 6.75±0.57 WGG-08 T2阶地砾石层顶部 3.34 8.69 2.55 2.13 24.0 11.28±0.96 WGG-09 T2阶地砾石层中上部 2.57 9.02 2.61 1.95 37.0 18.93±1.61 -
[1] Allen, M.B., Vencint, S.T., Wheller, P.T., 1999. Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Keping Thrust Zone: Interactions of the Tien Shan and Tarim Basin, Northwest China. Tectonics, 18(4): 639-654. doi: 10.1029/1999TC900019 [2] Avouac, J.P., Tapponnier, P.T., Bai, M.X., et al., 1993. Active Thrusting and Folding along the Northern Tienshan, and Late Cenozoic Rotation of the Tarim Relative to Dzhungaria and Kazakhstan. J. Geophys. Res. , 98: 6755-6840. doi: 10.1029/92JB01963 [3] Bai, M.X., Fan, F.Q., Wu, X.L., et al., 1997. The Active Tectonics in Northern apron of Bogeda Mountain. Inland Earthquake, 11(1): 16-21 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ199701003.htm [4] Burchfiel, B.C., Brown, E.T., Deng, Q.D., et al., 1999. Crustal Shortening on the Margins of the Tien Shan, Xinjiang, China. International Geology Review, 41(8): 665-700. doi: 10.1080/00206819909465164 [5] Chen, G.H., Xu, X.W., Wen, X.Z., et al., 2006. Application of Digital Aerophotogrammetry in Active Tectonics. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 31(3): 405-410 (in Chinese with English abstract). [6] Deng, Q.D., Feng, X.Y., Zhang, P.Z., et al., 1999. Reverse Fault and Fold Zone in the Urumqi Range Front Depression of the Northern Tianshan and Its Genetic Mechansim. Earth Science Frontier, 6(4): 191-201 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY199904000.htm [7] Deng, Q.D., Feng, X.Y., Zhang, P.Z., et al., 2000. Active Tectonics of Tianshan. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese). [8] Deng, Q.D., Yu, G.H., Ye, W.H., 1992. Study on the Relationship of Earthquake Surface Rupture Parameters and Magnitude. In: Deng, Q.D., ed., Research on Active Faults (2). Seismological Press, Beijing, 247-264 (in Chinese with English abstract). [9] Feng, X.Y., 1997. The Paleoearthquakes in Xinjiang Region. Sci-Tech and Public Health Press of Xinjiang, Urumqi (in Chinese). [10] Field, E.H., Dawson, T.E., Felzer, K.R., et al., 2009. Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2). Bulletion of the Seismological Society of America, 99(4): 2053-2107. doi: 10.1785/0120080049 [11] Hendrix, M.S., Dumitru, T.A., Graham, S.A., 1994. Late Oligocene-Early Miocene Unroofing in the Chinese Tianshan: An Early Effect of the India-Asia Collision. Geology, 22(6): 487-490. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613 [12] Li, J., Wang, X.Q., Fang, W., et al., 2006. Deformation Character of Tectonic Block Motion in Urumqi Region Inverted with GPS Technique. Inland Earthquake, 20(2): 143-148 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ200602009.htm [13] Lu, H.F., He, Z.T., Zhao, J.X., et al., 2008. Quantitative Analysis on Activity of the Yuanmou Fault in Late Quaternary. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 33(6): 852-860 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2008.102 [14] Luan, C.Q., Luo, F.Z., Hu, J., et al., 1998a. The Dislocating Activities of Gumudi Fault in Xinjiang in Holocene. Inland Earthquake, 12(2): 133-141 (in Chinese with English abstract). [15] Luan, C.Q., Luo, F.Z., Hu, J., et al., 1998b. The Structures and Activities in Holocene on the Western Segments of Northern Bogeda Fault in Xinjiang. Inland Earthquake, 12(4): 355-361 (in Chinese with English abstract). [16] Luo, F.Z., Ruan, C.W., Fang, W., 2006. Modern Tectonic Motion Character on the Northern Verge of Bogurda Mountain, in Xinjiang. Inland Earthquake, 20(2): 109-114 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ200602003.htm [17] Lv, H.H., Li, Y.L., Nan, F., et al., 2008. Sequences and Ages Ogfluvial Terraces along the Northern Piedmont of the Tianshan Mountains. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(1): 65-74 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/287952217_Sequences_and_ages_of_fluvial_terraces_along_the_northern_Piedmont_of_the_Tianshan_Mountains [18] Mao, F.Y., Zhang, P.Z., 1995. Method for Progressive Con-straint of Paleoseismic Events and Paleoseismological Study of Major Fault Zone in Northern Xinjiang. In: Deng, Q.D., ed., Research on Active Faults (4). Seismological Press, Beijing, 153-164 (in Chinese with English abstract). [19] Wang, Y.P., Shen, J., 2000. Basic Features of Active Structures at the Northern Foothill of Tianshan Mountains, China. Xinjiang Geology, 18(3): 203-210 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/286185320_Basic_features_of_active_structures_at_the_northern_foothill_of_Tianshan_Mountains_China [20] Wen, X.Z., 1991. Problem on Quantitative Study of Active Fault and Probabilistic Estimation of Long-Term Seismic Potential. In: Deng, Q.D., ed., Research on Active Faults (1). Seisnological Press, Beijing, 174-183 (in Chinese with English abstract). [21] Wu, C.Y., Shen, J., Shi, J., et al., 2010. Late-Quaternary Activity of the Gumudi Fault of the South Fukang Fault Belt on the North Margin of the Bogda Mountains in the Xinjiang Automonous Region. Quaternary Sciences, 30(5): 1020-1029 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DSJJ201005023.htm [22] Wu, Z.Z., 1989. The Features of Oil and Gas Accumulation and Suggestion for Exploration in East Junggar Basin. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 10(4): 15-21 (in Chinese with English abstract). [23] Shimazaki, K., Nakata, T., 1980. Time-Predictable Recurrence Model for Large Earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. , 7(4): 279-282. doi: 10.1029/GL007i004p00279 [24] You, H.C., Ren, L.S., Chen, G.X., et al., 2002. Activity Forms and Slip Rates of Fukang Fault. Earthquake Research in China, 18(3): 239-248 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://epub.cnki.net/grid2008/docdown/docdownload.aspx?filename=ZGZD200203002&dbcode=CJFD&year=2002&dflag=pdfdown [25] You, H.C., Ren, L.S., Zhang Y.M., 2003. Structural Geometry and Activities of the Fukang-Jimsar Fualt Zone, Xinjiang. Seismology and Geology, 25(3): 375-384 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200303002.htm [26] Zhang, P.Z., Deng, Q.D., Yang, X.P., et al., 1995. Glaciofluvial Geomorphology and Neotectonics along the Range-Front of the Northern Tianshan. In: Deng, Q.D., ed., Research on Active Faults (4). Seisnological Press, Beijing, 63-78 (in Chinese with English abstract). [27] 柏美祥, 范芳琴, 吴晓莉, 等, 1997. 博格达山北麓活动构造. 内陆地震, 11(1): 16-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ199701003.htm [28] 陈桂华, 徐锡伟, 闻学泽, 等, 2006. 数字航空摄影测量学方法在活动构造中的应用. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 31(3): 405-410. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200603019.htm [29] 邓起东, 于贵华, 叶文华, 1992. 地震地表破裂参数与震级关系的研究. 见: 邓起东编, 活动断裂研究(2). 北京: 地震出版社, 247-264. [30] 邓起东, 冯先岳, 张培震, 等, 1999. 乌鲁木齐山前坳陷逆断裂-褶皱带及其形成机制. 地学前缘, 6(4): 191-201. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1999.04.001 [31] 邓起东, 冯先岳, 张培震, 等, 2000. 天山活动构造. 北京: 地震出版社. [32] 冯先岳, 1997. 新疆古地震. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆科技卫生出版社. [33] 李杰, 王晓强, 方伟, 等, 2006. 应用GPS技术反演乌鲁木齐地区构造块体运动变形特征. 内陆地震, 20(2): 143-148. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ200602009.htm [34] 卢海峰, 何仲太, 赵俊香, 等, 2008. 元谋断裂晚第四纪活动性定量分析. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 33(6): 852-860. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200806014.htm [35] 栾超群, 罗福忠, 胡军, 等, 1998a. 新疆古牧地断裂全新世的断错活动. 内陆地震, 12(2): 133-141. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ199802006.htm [36] 栾超群, 罗福忠, 胡军, 等, 1998b. 新疆博格达山北麓山前断裂西段的断裂组成及其在全新世时期的活动. 内陆地震, 12(4): 355-361. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ199804012.htm [37] 罗福忠, 阮成雯, 方伟, 2006. 新疆博格达山北缘现今构造运动特征. 内陆地震, 20(2): 109-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LLDZ200602003.htm [38] 吕红华, 李有利, 南峰, 等, 2008. 天山北麓河流阶地序列及形成年代. 地理学报, 63(1): 65-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DLXB200801009.htm [39] 毛风英, 张培震, 1995. 古地震研究的逐次限定方法与新疆北部主要断裂带的古地震研究. 见: 邓起东编, 活动断裂研究(4). 北京: 地震出版社, 153-164. [40] 汪一鹏, 沈军, 2000. 天山北麓活动构造基本特征. 新疆地质, 18(3): 203-210. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI200003003.htm [41] 闻学泽, 1991. 活断层的定量研究与长期地震潜势的概率估计问题. 见: 邓起东编, 活动构造研究(1). 北京: 地震出版社, 174-183. [42] 吴传勇, 沈军, 史杰, 等, 2010. 新疆博格达北缘阜康南断裂带古牧地段晚第四纪活动特征. 第四纪研究, 30(5): 1020-1029. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7410.2010.05.20 [43] 伍致中, 1989. 准噶尔盆地东部地区油气聚集特征及勘探建议. 新疆石油地质, 10(4): 15-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD198904001.htm [44] 尤惠川, 任利生, 陈国星, 等, 2002. 东天山阜康断裂的变形方式与全新世滑动速率. 中国地震, 18(3): 239-248. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZD200203002.htm [45] 尤惠川, 任利生, 张玉梅, 2003. 新疆阜康-吉木萨尔断裂带的几何特征与活动性研究. 地震地质, 25(3): 375-384. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200303002.htm [46] 张培震, 邓起东, 杨晓平, 等, 1995. 天山北麓的冰水冲洪积地貌与新构造运动. 见: 邓起东编, 活动断裂研究(4). 北京: 地震出版社, 63-78.