SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb Dating of Chajian Mafic-Ultramafic Rocks in Hongqiling Mine Field, Jilin Province, and Its Implications
-
摘要: 茶尖1号岩体是茶尖矿床主要成矿岩体,其岩相组合为辉石橄榄岩、橄榄辉石角闪岩、角闪辉岩、辉长岩和闪长伟晶岩.辉长岩的锆石SHRIMP U-Pb测年结果表明,茶尖镁铁-超镁铁岩的形成时代为239.6±2.6 Ma,属于印支期.结合红旗岭矿田已有年代学数据显示,红旗岭矿田成矿岩体形成时代具有由西南至东北依次变新的趋势.茶尖1号岩体的形成年龄明显早于红旗岭成矿岩体,矿床形成年龄差最大可达20 Ma,红旗岭矿区的镁铁-超镁铁岩浆的活动时间应开始于240 Ma之前且持续时间较长.茶尖矿床1号岩体中发现的捕获锆石核年龄为1.7 Ga和0.6 Ga,为镁铁-超镁铁岩浆混入地壳物质提供了直接证据.捕获锆石年龄与华北地台新元古代和中元古代构造-热事件相对应,表明其来源为华北地台基底.Abstract: Chajian No.1 rock mass is the main ore-forming rock mass in Chajian deposit, its lithofacies include pyroxene-peridotite, olivine-pyroxene-amphibolite, Hornblende-pyroxenite, gabbro and diorite-pegmatite.The results of gabbro zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating show that mafic-ultramafic rock masses formed in the Late Triassic and the age is 239.6±2.6 Ma. The existing age data of mafic-ultramafic rocks indicate that the formation age of the rock masses become new in turn from southwest to northeast. The formation age of Chajian No.1 rock mass is earlier than that of Hongqiling rock mass significantly, age difference between them can reach 20 Ma. Mafic-ultramafic magmatism activities in Hongqiling district began before 240 Ma and lasted for a long time. The finding of 1.7 Ga and 0.6 Ga zircon cores is direct evidence of magma mixed with crustal material. The ages of captured zircons are corresponding with those of Neoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic tectonic heat events in the North China Platform, suggesting that their origin is North China platform basement.
-
Key words:
- gabbro /
- geochronology /
- mafic-ultramafic rocks /
- Chajian deposit
-
图 1 红旗岭矿田地质简图(据Wu et al., 2004修改)
1.中新生代盖层;2.中生代花岗岩;3.晚古生代地层;4.早古生代地层;5.石榴石片岩、红柱石片岩;6.燕山早期花岗岩、白岗质花岗岩;7.燕山晚期花岗岩;8.海西期花岗岩;9.花岗闪长岩;10.闪长岩;11.石英斑岩;12.镁铁-超镁铁质岩体及编号;13.正断层;14.不整合界线
Fig. 1. Simplified geological map of Hongqiling orefield
表 1 茶尖1号岩体辉长岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb分析结果
Table 1. SHRIMP U-Pb data on zircons for the gabbro of Chajian No.1 rock mass
Spot 206Pbc(%) U(10-6) Th(10-6) 232Th/238U 206Pb*(10-6) 206Pb/238U年龄(Ma) 207Pb*/206Pb* ±% 207Pb*/235U ±% 206Pb*/238U ±% err corr CJ1.1 0.90 317 93 0.30 10.40 240.4±4.1 0.051 5 5.0 0.265 7.5 0.038 00 1.7 0.229 CJ2.1 2.10 122 41 0.35 4.23 250.4±11.4 0.046 3 10.0 0.275 20.0 0.039 60 4.6 0.229 CJ3.1 1.85 174 65 0.39 5.75 238.6± 4.8 0.051 3 5.6 0.261 9.6 0.037 70 2.1 0.215 CJ4.1 1.22 308 102 0.34 10.20 241.4± 4.1 0.050 7 4.2 0.258 6.8 0.038 16 1.7 0.255 CJ5.1 1.19 109 22 0.21 3.84 257.2±5.5 0.052 6 9.7 0.370 9.6 0.040 71 2.2 0.228 CJ6.1 0.00 629 360 0.59 19.80 232.1±3.5 0.051 1 3.8 0.281 3.8 0.036 65 1.6 0.412 CJ7.1 0.40 663 588 0.92 20.50 227.2±3.4 0.050 4 2.4 0.228 3.6 0.035 88 1.5 0.428 CJ8.1 0.28 290 99 0.35 10.00 253.7±4.3 0.052 9 5.3 0.320 5.7 0.040 13 1.7 0.305 CJ9.1 0.12 325 56 0.18 86.30 1 735.0±24.0 0.113 0 0.95 4.755 1.9 0.308 80 1.6 0.858 CJ9.2 0.15 930 123 0.14 29.30 231.8±3.8 0.049 1 2.1 0.252 2.7 0.036 61 1.7 0.618 CJ10.1 0.34 519 181 0.36 16.80 238.3±3.7 0.048 9 3.2 0.281 4.0 0.037 66 1.6 0.402 CJ11.1 2.46 259 77 0.31 8.67 240.0±4.6 0.044 9 5.2 0.189 21.0 0.037 94 2.0 0.091 CJ12.1 0.46 357 67 0.19 32.50 646.4±9.9 0.101 5 1.4 1.393 2.6 0.105 50 1.6 0.618 CJ12.2 0.35 641 82 0.13 21.40 244.9±3.7 0.049 1 2.8 0.266 3.4 0.038 73 1.6 0.462 CJ13.1 1.83 298 68 0.24 10.00 243.1±4.1 0.048 0 4.3 0.230 8.0 0.038 43 1.7 0.216 CJ14.1 0.23 339 96 0.29 11.50 249.0±4.3 0.048 1 4.1 0.298 4.5 0.039 39 1.8 0.391 注:Pbc和Pb*分别表示普通铅和放射性铅,采用年龄为206Pb/238U年龄. 表 2 红旗岭矿田主要成矿岩体年龄数据统计
Table 2. Statistics of mineralizing rock mass age data in Hongqiling mine field
矿床 岩体 测试对象 测试方法 年龄(Ma) 资料来源 1号岩体 辉长岩 SHRIMP 216±5 Ma 张广良和吴福元,2005 1号岩体 黑云母 40Ar-39Ar 225 Ma 郗爱华等,2005 红旗岭矿床 1号岩体 橄榄辉石岩 U-Pb 220.6±2.0 Ma 冯光英等,2011 2号岩体 辉长岩 SHRIMP 212.5±2.8 Ma 7号岩体 磁黄铁矿 Re-Os 208±21 Ma Lü et al., 2011 三道岗矿床 1号岩体 辉石岩 U-Pb 232.75±0.95 Ma 汪志刚等,2011 茶尖矿床 1号岩体 辉长岩 SHRIMP 239.6± 2.6 Ma 本文 表 3 茶尖1号岩体微量元素Nb、Th、La分析结果
Table 3. Analysis results of trace elements Nb, Th, La in Chajian No.1 rock mass
名称 闪长伟晶岩 辉长岩 角闪辉石岩 辉石橄榄岩 角闪橄榄岩 Nb 1.83 1.84 4.56 2.01 1.79 Th 1.41 1.37 4.79 1.29 1.08 La 6.07 5.59 17.54 4.39 2.57 La/Nb 3.31 3.04 3.84 2.18 1.43 (Th/Nb)N 6.48 6.25 8.80 5.38 5.05 注:表中元素由中国地质科学院地球物理地球化学勘查研究所测试中心测试完成;微量元素单位为10-6;(Th/Nb)N为原始地幔标准化Th/Nb值. -
[1] Cao, X.Y., Jing Z.G., Hou, C., 2011. Analysis of Copper and Silver Metal Ore Source Conditions of Wangjia Mineralization Points of Chajianlin Mining Area. China Homes, 11: 107-108(in Chinese). [2] Chen, Z.C., 1991. Geological Characteristics and Minerogenetic Pattern of Magmatic Cu-Ni Sulphide Depsits in Jilin. Geology and Prospecting, 26(10): 1-10(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT199110000.htm [3] Claoue-Long, J.C., Compston, W., Roberts, J., et al., 1995. Two Carboniferous Ages: A Comparison of SHRIMP Zircon Dating with Conventional Zircon Ages and 40Ar/39Ar Analysis. SEPM Special Publication, 5: 3-31. doi: 10.2110/pec.95.04.0003 [4] Compston, W., Williams, I.S., Kirschvink, J.L., et al., 1992. Zircon U-Pb Ages from the Early Cambrian Time-Scale. Journal of Geological Society of London, 149: 171-184. doi: 10.1144/gsjgs.149.2.0171 [5] Feng, G.Y., Liu, S., Feng, C.X., et al., 2011. Zircon U-Pb Age, Sr-Nd-Hf Isotope Geochemistry and the Petrogenesis of the Ultramafic Pluton in Hongqiling, Jiling Province. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(6): 1594-1606 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=175358 [6] Feng, G.Y., Liu, S., Zhong, H., et al., 2010. Geochemical Characteristics and Petrogenesis of Late Paleozoic Mafic Rocks from Yumuchuan, Jilin Province. Geochimica, 39(5): 427-438(in Chinese with English abstract). [7] Lü, L.S., Mao, J.W., Li, H.B., et al., 2011. Pyrrhotite Re-Os and SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb Dating of the Hongqiling Ni-Cu Sulfide Deposits in Northeast China. Ore Geology Reviews, 43: 106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2011.02.003 [8] Peng, P., Liu, W.J., Zhai, M.G., 2002. Response of North China Block to Rodinia Supercontinent and Its Characteristics. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 21(4): 343-355(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_acta-petrologica-mineralogica_thesis/0201254453698.html [9] Ran, H.Y., Xiao, S.H., 1994. Trace Element Abundances and Tectonic Environment of the Host Intrusion of Kalatongke Cu-Ni Deposit. Geochimica, 23(4): 392-401(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX404.010.htm [10] Song, B., Zhang, S.H., Wang, Y.B., et al., 2006. Avoidance of Systematic Bias of SHRIMP Zircon U-Pb Dating: Necessity of Staged Calibrations. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 25(1): 9-14(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YKCS200601002.htm [11] Sun, D.Y., Wu, F.Y., Gao, S., et al., 2005. Confirmation of Two Episodes of A-Type Granite Emplacement during Late Triassic and Early Jurassic in the Central Jilin Province, and Their Constraints on the Structural Pattern of Eastern Jilin-Heilongjiang Area, China. Earth Science Frontiers, 12(2): 263-275(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy200502028 [12] Williams, I.S., Buick, C.I., Cartwright, I., 1996. An Extended Episode of Early Mesoproterozoic Metamorphic Fluid Flow in the Reylolds Range, Central Australia. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 14: 29-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1996.00029.x [13] Wu, F.Y., Wilde, S.A., Zhang, G.L., et al., 2004. Geochronology and Petrogenesis of the Post-orogenic Cu-Ni Sulfide-bearing Mafic-Ultramafic Complexes in Jilin Province, NE China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 23(5): 781-797. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00114-7 [14] Xi, A.H., Cai, Y.F., Ge, Y.H., et al., 2008. LA-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb Age of Longwang Gabbro of Shanmen Silver Deposit in Siping City and Its Geological Significance. Mineral Deposits, 27(1): 57-63 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-KCDZ200801007.htm [15] Xi, A.H., Gu, L.X., Li, X.J., et al., 2005. Discussion on Metallogenic Epoch of Hongqiling Cu-Ni Sulfide Deposits, Jilin Province. Mineral Deposits, 24(5): 521-526 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/313042639_Discussion_on_metallogenic_epoch_of_Hongqiling_Cu-Ni_sulfide_deposit_Jilin_province [16] Xie, H.Q., Zhang, F.Q., Miao, L.C., et al., 2007. Characteristics of the Piaohechuan Mafic-Ultramafic Complex, Central Jilin, Northeast China: Constrains on the Nature and Evolution of the Northeastern North China Marginal Tectonic Belt. Geological Bulletin of China, 26(7): 810-822 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/292824649_Characteristics_of_the_Piaohechuanmafic-ultramafic_complex_central_Jilin_Northeast_China_Constrains_on_the_nature_and_evolution_of_the_northeastern_North_China_marginal_tectonic_belt [17] Xu, B., 2001. Recent Study of the Rodinia Supercontinent Evolution and Its Main Goal. Geological Science and Technology Information, 20(1): 15-19(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279700530_Recent_study_of_the_Rodinia_supercontinent_evolution_and_its_main_goal [18] Zhang, G.L., Wu, F.Y., 2005. Geochronology Significances of the Postorogenic Mafic-Ultramafic Rocks in Hongqiling Area of Jilin Province, NE China. Seismology and Geology, 27(4): 600-608 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZDZ200504009.htm [19] Zhou, S.L., Wan, W.Z., Sun, X.F., et al., 2010. Geochemistry and Prospecting Implication of the Mafic-Untramafic Rocks in Chajian Ore District, Jilin Province. Geology and Resources, 19(2): 109-114(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-GJSD201002007.htm [20] Zhou, S.L., Zhang, X.D., Li, H.B., et al., 2009. Geologic Characteristics and Prospecting Guide of the Mafic-Ultramafic Intrusive Bodies in Chajian Ore District, Jilin Province. Geology and Resources, 18 (3): 170-176(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-GJSD200903004.htm [21] 曹希英, 荆振刚, 侯闯, 2011. 茶尖岭矿区上汪家矿化点铜银多金属矿源条件分析. 中华居民, 11: 107-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHMJ201111089.htm [22] 陈子诚, 1991. 吉林省岩浆铜镍硫化物矿床地质特征及成矿模式. 地质与勘探, 26(10): 1-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKT199110000.htm [23] 冯光英, 刘燊, 冯彩霞, 等, 2011. 吉林红旗岭超基性岩体的锆石U-Pb年龄、Sr-Nd-Hf同位素特征及岩石成因. 岩石学报, 27(6): 1594-1606. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201106003.htm [24] 冯光英, 刘燊, 钟宏, 等, 2010. 吉林晚古生代榆木川基性岩的地球化学特征及其岩石成因. 地球化学, 39(5): 427-438. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQHX201005003.htm [25] 颉颃强, 张福勤, 苗来成, 等, 2007. 吉林中部漂河川镁铁-超镁铁质杂岩带的特征: 对华北东北缘构造带性质和演化的约束. 地质通报, 26(7): 810-822. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.07.004 [26] 彭澎, 刘文军, 翟明国, 2002. 华北陆块对Rodinia超大陆的响应及其特征. 岩石矿物学杂志, 21(4): 343-355. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2002.04.006 [27] 冉红彦, 肖森宏, 1994. 喀拉通克含矿岩体的微量元素与成岩构造环境. 地球化学, 23(4): 392-401. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1994.04.011 [28] 宋彪, 张拴宏, 王彦斌, 等, 2006. 锆石SHRIMP年龄测定数据处理时系统偏差的避免: 标准锆石分段校正的必要性. 岩矿测试, 25(1): 9-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2006.01.003 [29] 孙德有, 吴福元, 高山, 等, 2005. 吉林中部晚三叠世和早侏罗世两期铝质A型花岗岩的厘定及对吉黑东部构造格局的制约. 地质前缘, 12(2): 263-275. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY20050200Z.htm [30] 汪志刚, 郗爱华, 葛玉辉, 等, 2011. 吉林磐石三道岗含铜镍硫化物矿床岩体群年代学意义. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 41(增刊1): 126-132. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ2011S1018.htm [31] 郗爱华, 蔡元峰, 葛玉辉, 等, 2008. 四平山门Cu-Ni矿化辉长岩体锆石LA-ICP-MS年龄及其地质意义. 矿床地质, 27(1): 57-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2008.01.006 [32] 郗爱华, 顾连兴, 李绪俊, 等, 2005. 吉林红旗岭铜镍硫化物矿床的成矿时代讨论. 矿床地质, 24(5): 521-526. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2005.05.006 [33] 颉颃强, 张福勤, 苗来成, 等, 2007. 吉林中部漂河川镁铁-超镁铁质杂岩带的特征: 对华北东北缘构造带性质和演化的约束. 地质通报, 26(7): 810-822. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.07.004 [34] 徐备, 2001. Rodinia超大陆构造演化研究的新进展和主要目标. 地质科技情报, 20(1): 15-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2001.01.003 [35] 张广良, 吴福元, 2005. 吉林红旗岭地区造山后镁铁-超镁铁岩体的年代测定及其意义. 地震地质, 27(4): 600-608. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2005.04.008 [36] 周树亮, 万文周, 孙雪峰, 等, 2010. 吉林省红旗岭茶尖矿区镁铁-超镁铁岩石地球化学特征及找矿意义. 地质与资源, 19(2): 109-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2010.02.006 [37] 周树亮, 张向东, 李海斌, 等, 2009. 吉林省茶尖矿区镁铁-超镁铁质岩体地质特征及找矿方向. 地质与资源, 18(3): 170-176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2009.03.003