Lithofacies of the Upper Middle Triassic Guanggaishan Formation in Both Sides of the Bailongjiang Uplift, Southwestern Qinling Orogenic Belt: Implications to the Basin Analysis
-
摘要: 对西秦岭南部白龙江隆起南北两侧的中三叠统上部光盖山组岩相进行了研究，按照沉积作用方式识别划分出碎屑流、颗粒流、浊流、牵引流、平坦床砂静水5种沉积作用及岩相类型，并区分各种亚相类型.位于隆起北侧迭部飞仙剖面的岩相可识别出9个相序旋回，单个相序基本结构为砾质碎屑流相-鲍玛序列组合相，反映构造和沉积作用的旋回性和阶段性.总结发现，隆起南北两侧岩相的共同点是斜坡碎屑流和浊流型重力流较为发育，滑塌型重力作用少见，物源区较近且以灰岩为主；差别是不同剖面岩相结构、相序旋回有所不同，被侵蚀的物源地层时代不一样.进一步研究表明，光盖山组属于较缓的边坡沉积，是大陆碰撞阶段残留海盆大陆一侧的边缘相，盆地的形成与构造挠曲作用产生的沉降有关.鉴于洮河盆地晚古生代和早-中三叠世存在深海和残留洋盆，若尔盖盆地与之共用一个基底，因此，推测这2个盆地的中-上三叠统复理石之下可能没有台地相上古生界和中-下三叠统，不利于在该区开展油气勘探.Abstract: The lithofacies of the upper Middle Triassic Guanggaishan Formation outcropping along both northern and southern sides of the Bailongjiang uplift (composite anticline), southwestern Qinling orogenic belt were studied in this article. By sedimentation and lithofacies, the Guanggaishan Formation is identified and classified into five types: debris flow, grain flow, turbidity current, traction current, and still-water bedding current, which can be subdivided into more sublithofacies in this paper. Nine cycles of lithofacies sequence have been recognized from the Feixian section, Diebu in northern side of the Bailongjiang uplift, of which a single cycle is composed of gavel debris facies to Bouma sequence, indicating cyclicity and periodicity of tectonism and sedimentation. It is proposed that there are some similarities and discrepancies for lithofacies in two sides of the Bailongjiang uplift. The similarities are well-developed slope debris and turbidity flow facies with little slumping and collapsed facies, and proximal sources comprising limestone. The discrepancies are different texture and cycle number of facies sequence from different sections, different aged strata in source regions. The assemblage of lithofacies indicates that the Guanggaishan Formation is of relatively ramp continental slope facies within remnant sea basin, where the basin had been formed by flexing during continent collision. According to deep sea basins and remnant basin in the Late Paleozoic-Early Middle Triassic for the Taohe basin, north to the Bailongjiang uplift, and to the sharing of the same basin basement for the Ruo'ergai flysch basin, south to the uplift, it is inferred that there could be no shallow platform carbonate facies under the both flysch basins, which means poor prospective for oil-gas resources exploration in the region.
-
Key words:
- lithofacies /
- sedimentology /
- petroleum /
- Guanggaishan Formation /
- Middle Triassic /
- Bailongjiang uplift /
- West Mt. Qinling
-
图 1 研究区地质略图及剖面位置
a.研究区构造区划略图；b.研究区地质略图及实测剖面位置.①岷县-宕昌-凤县断裂；②迭山-舟曲-成县断裂；③迭部-武都断裂.1.震旦系；2.海相古生界；3.浅海相中-下三叠统；4.光盖山组；5.深海复理石中-上三叠统；6.陆相侏罗系-古近系；7.陆相古近系；8.不整合界线；9.整合接触界线；10.断层；11.剖面位置.AA'.热尔郎山实测剖面；BB'.飞仙实测剖面；CC'.益哇观察剖面
Fig. 1. Regional tectonic zonation for the study area and location of measured cross-section
图 2 甘肃迭部光盖山飞仙和四川若尔盖热尔郎山光盖山组剖面岩相解释
a.迭部飞仙剖面；b.若尔盖热尔郎山剖面；1.泥岩；2.页岩；3.硅质页岩和硅质岩；4.灰质岩屑杂砂岩；5.(长石)岩屑杂砂岩；6.灰质细砾岩；7.细砾/中砾角砾岩；8.近等轴状中砾/粗砾角砾岩；9.板状/条状中砾/粗砾角砾岩；10.微晶灰岩；11.泥灰岩；12.粉屑灰岩；13.砂屑灰岩；14.残余粉屑粉晶灰岩；15.(细晶以上)结晶灰岩；16.残余团粒/团块灰岩；17.水平层理；18.砂纹层理；19.平行层理；20.粒序层理；21.槽模；22.变形层理；23.相序旋回；24.断层；25.地层覆盖
Fig. 2. Lithology and lithofacies of the Guanggaishan Formation from the Feixian section, southern Gansu Province and Re'er Langshan section, northern Sichuan Province
图 3 野外岩石和室内岩性镜下照片
a.条状粗砾角砾岩，迭部飞仙剖面北约800 m处，瑞士军刀长9 cm；b.分选差的粗砾角砾岩，迭部飞仙剖面距底约80 m处，瑞士军刀长9 cm；c.含砾泥岩，指示泥质碎屑流沉积，若尔盖热尔郎山剖面260 m处，记号笔长13.8 cm；d.大型槽模构造，迭部飞仙剖面约475 m处，记号笔长13.2 cm；e.由粉屑粉晶灰岩风化作用显示的砂纹层理，若尔盖热尔郎山剖面120 m处，记号笔长13.8 cm；f.含砂质残余砂屑灰岩(样品YP06-15)，正交偏光，迭部飞仙剖面约780 m处；g.粉晶灰岩(样品S04-09Y)，可见残余粉屑，若尔盖热尔郎山剖面275 m处；h.粉屑灰岩(样品FX-03B)，迭部飞仙剖面约280 m处
Fig. 3. Photos showing texture of lithology in field and under microscope
图 4 岩相剖面所在沉积环境模式及其位置
a.迭部飞仙垭口剖面；b.迭部益哇-卓泥卡车沟；c.若尔盖热尔郎山垭口.1.粉砂岩和页岩为主的复理石沉积；2.台间相页岩；3.灰质岩屑杂砂岩；4.(长石)岩屑杂砂岩；5.碎屑流沉积；6.残余钙屑粉晶灰岩；7.灰岩(类型未分)；8.残余颗粒灰岩；9.上古生界；10.泥盆系；11.石碳系；12.二叠系；13.浅海相下-中三叠统；14.斜坡相中三叠统光盖山组；15.复理石相中-上三叠统；16.提供陆源碎屑可能的下古生界和震旦系；17.剖面设想的古环境位置
Fig. 4. Sedimentary environmental models of lithofacies at corresponding measured cross-section localities
图 5 白龙江隆起南侧中上三叠统复理石相沉积盆地模式及与下伏台地相关系模型
a.正常边缘斜坡相；b.同生深断裂控制的边缘斜坡相；c.碰撞作用产生挠曲残留海盆，下伏震旦系和古生界属于亲扬子克拉通建造；d.碰撞作用产生挠曲残留海盆，下伏地层背景统属深海或部分属残留洋盆.1.复理石相中-上三叠统；2.边缘斜坡相中三叠统光盖山组；3.浅海相中-下三叠统；4.深海相上古生界；5.海相古生界(上古生界为台地相)；6.原岩为碎屑沉积岩的变质震旦系
Fig. 5. Models showing the relationships between the Middle-Upper Triassic flysch basins and underlied basements in the south of the Bailongjiang uplift
表 1 光盖山组的岩相、亚相划分及其特征
Table 1. Features and classification of litho- and sublitho-facies of the Guanggaishan Formation
沉积作用及相 亚相 特征 分布 斜坡碎屑流相(FA) 砾质碎屑流亚相(FA-1) 漂砾级以下各种级别角砾岩，砾石成分为台地相灰岩，砾石颗粒支撑，砾级以下碎屑、泥等填隙物一般10%~20%.依据砾石形态进一步可分为条块状和等轴状2种类型 南北两侧均发育 砂质碎屑流亚相(FA-2) 以长石岩屑杂砂岩含悬浮泥砾为特点，可见少量滑移变形构造 发育在南侧中上部 泥质碎屑流亚相(FA-3) 典型的副砾岩：砾石含量少于50%，基底式胶结，杂基支撑，填隙物基本为泥.可与滑移变形构造共生 仅见于南侧少数层位如热尔郎山层10 斜坡颗粒流相(FB) 高成熟度细砾岩，砾石成分基本为灰岩，填隙物含量少于10%，且多为胶结物 仅见于北侧飞仙剖面层17 斜坡浊流相(FC) 钙屑浊流亚相(FC-1) 中厚层砂屑灰岩，填隙物多为灰泥杂基，但重结晶现象十分普遍，基底式胶结常见，常伴随槽模、粒序层理构造 大量发育在南北两侧各层段 陆屑浊流亚相(FC-2) 长石岩屑杂砂岩，杂基多超过15%，杂基支撑和颗粒支撑均有，槽模构造常见.按照碎屑组分可分为灰质和硅质碎屑两亚类 多见于北侧飞仙剖面中部 斜坡牵引流相(FD) 钙屑牵引流亚相(FD-1) 岩性主要为细粒砂屑灰岩、残余粉屑粉晶灰岩，灰泥填隙物多重结晶，但风化后显示明显的平行层理和砂纹层理 南北两侧均发育 陆屑牵引流亚相(FD-2) 岩性主要为细粒岩屑砂岩、粉砂岩，杂基含量常少于20%，平行层理和砂纹层理发育 见于飞仙剖面局部层位 斜坡静水沉积相(FE) 斜坡灰泥亚相(FE-1) 薄层、微层状微晶灰岩、泥灰岩夹残余粉屑粉晶灰岩或页岩 南北两侧均发育多 斜坡页岩亚相(FE-2) 灰绿色、灰色、深灰色页岩，偶夹粉砂岩 见于飞仙剖面中部 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Cai, L.G., Liu, W.X., Song, L.H., et al., 2005. Basin evolution and hydrocarbon potential in Songpan-Aba area. Oil & Gas Geology, 26(1): 92-98 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200501012.htm [2] Cai, L.G., Zheng, B., Liu, J.R., et al., 1993. Basic characteristics of petroleum geology in eastern Tibet-Qinghai plateau. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing, 101 (in Chinese). [3] Fang, G.Q., Zhang, X.B., Li, Y.C., 1994. Rift-faultings of Hercynian-Indosinian epoch of western Qinling orogenic belt and its relationship with Palaeotethys. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 12(3): 762-781 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB403.008.htm [4] Gao, R., Wang, H.Y., Ma, Y.S., et al., 2006a. Tectonic relationships between the Zoigê basin of the Song-Pan block and the West Qinling orogen at lithosphere scale: results of deep seismic reflection profiling. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 27(5): 411-418 (in Chinese with English abstract). [5] Gao, R., Ma, Y.S., Li, Q.S., et al., 2006b. Structure of the lower crust beneath the Songpan block and West Qinling orogen and their relation as revealed by deep seismic reflection profiling. Geological Bulletin of China, 25 (12): 1361-1367 (in Chinese with English abstract). [6] Hao, Z.W., Yu, R.L., 1983. On relationships between the Kunlun-Bayan Hara Sea and evolution of the Tethys Ocean. In: The Editorial Board of Sanjiang Monographs, ed., Contribution to the geology of Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) plateau (13). Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 25-42 (in Chinese). [7] He, H.Q., 1996. Early Triassic sediments and their tectonic controlling factors, western Qinling. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 14(1): 86-92 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB601.009.htm [8] Ingersoll, R.V., 1988. Tectonics of sedimentary basins. GSA Bulletin, 100(11): 1704-1719. doi: 7606(1988)100<1704:TOSB>2.3.CO;2 [9] Jin, H.J., Li, Y.C., 1994. Model of sedimentary evolution of the Early Triassic deep-water carbonate rocks in western Qinling. Science in China (Ser. B), 24(8): 890-896 (in Chinese with English abstract). [10] Jin, H.J., Li, Y.C., 2001. A Study on Middle Triassic Flysch facies in West Qinling orogenic belt. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 19(3): 321-326 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=5639625 [11] Köver, S., Haas, J., Ozsvárt, P., et al., 2009. Lithofacies and age data of Jurassic foreslope and basin sediments of Rudabánya Hills (NE Hungary) and their tectonic interpretation. Geologica Carpathica, 60(5): 351-379. doi: 10.2478/v10096-009-0027-y [12] Lai, X.L., Yin, H.F., Yang, F.Q., 1995. Reconstruction of the Qinling Triassic Paleo-ocean. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 20(6): 648-656 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX506.006.htm [13] Li, J.L., 1992. Fundamental problems of tectonics in Southeast China. In: Li, J.L., ed., Study of structure and evolution of continental lithosphere in Southeast China. China Press of Science and Technology, Beijing, 315 (in Chinese). [14] Liu, S., Li, C., Yang, D.M., et al., 2000. The evolution of Late-Mesozoic tectonic petrographic facies in Coqen basin, Tibet. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology, 30(2): 134-138 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CCDZ200002007.htm [15] Mack, G.H., James, W.C., 2009. Control of basin symmetry on fluvial lithofacies, camp rice and Palomas Formations (Plio-Pleistocene), southern Rio Grande rift, USA. In: Marzo, M., Puigdefábregas, C., eds., Alluvial sedimentation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK, 439-449. doi: 10.1002/9781444303995 [16] Meng, Q.R., Qu, H.J., Hu, J.M., 2007. Triassic deep-water sediments in West Qinling and Songpan terrane. Science in China (Ser. D), 37(Supp. Ⅰ): 209-223 (in Chinese). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/60111X/2007z2/1000887583.html [17] Nie, S.Y., Yin, A., Rowley, D.B., et al., 1994. Exhumation of the Dabie Shan ultra-high-pressure rocks and accumulation of the Songpan-Ganze flysch sequence, Central China. Geology, 2(11): 999-1002. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613 [18] Niu, X.S., Wang, C.S., Zhang, Y.X., 2010. Carbonate debris flow deposition from Devonian to Triassic in Bailongjiang uplift, Songpan area and its palaeogeographical implications. Global Geology, 29(1): 33-44 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SJDZ201001005.htm [19] Pei, X.Z., Zhang, G.W., Lai, S.C., et al., 2002. Main geological features of the Mianlue tectonic belt on the southern margin of the West Qinling. Geological Bulletin of China, 21(8-9): 486-493 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/academic-journal-cn_geological-bulletin-china_thesis/0201252294475.html [20] Rao, R.B., Zhu, Z.X., Huang, S.B., 1985. The discovery of Ladinian stage in Songpan area, western Sichuan and its geological implications. In: The Editorial Board of Sanjiang Monographs, ed., Contribution to the geology of Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) plateau (9). Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 157-163 (in Chinese). [21] Ricketts, B.D., Balance, P.F., Hayward, B.W., et al., 1989. Basal Waitemata Group lithofacies: rapid subsidence in an Early Miocene interarc basin, New Zealand. Sedimentology, 36(4): 559-580. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613 [22] Willan, R.C.R., Hunter, M.A., 2005. Basin evolution during the transition from continental rifting to subduction: evidence from the lithofacies and modal petrology of the Jurassic Latady Group, Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 20(3): 171-191. doi: 10.1111/1365-3091.1989.tb02086.x [23] Xu, Q., Pan, G.T., Jiang, X.S., 2003. Songpan-Ganze belt: forearc accretion or backarc collapsing? Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 23(2): 27-31 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kwys200302006 [24] Yan, Z., Yu, L.J., Li, J.L., et al., 2007. Sedimentary association of the Middle-Upper Triassic in Songpan-Ruo'ergai area. Progresses in Natural Sciences, 17(2): 196-204 (in Chinese). [25] Yang, F.Q., Wang, Z.P., 1995. Reconstruction of the Qinling Permian Paleo-ocean. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 20(6): 641-647 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX506.005.htm [26] Yang, Z.R., 2002. The formation and evolution of the Songpan-Garze fore-arc basin, western Sichuan. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 22(3): 53-59 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://epub.cnki.net/grid2008/docdown/docdownload.aspx?filename=TTSD200203008&dbcode=CJFD&year=2002&dflag=pdfdown [27] Yin, A., Nie, S.Y., 1993. An indentation model for the North and South China collision and the development of the Tan-Lu and Honam fault systems, eastern Asia. Tectonics, 12(4): 801-813. doi: 10.1029/93TC00313 [28] Yin, H.F., Yang, F.Q., Huang, Q.S., et al., 1992. Triassic in Qinling and adjacent area. Press of China University of Geoscience, Wuhan, 129 (in Chinese). [29] Zhang, X.T., Wang, B.Z., Yu, J., et al., 2005. Sedimentary characteristics of the Bayan Hara remnant ocean basin, northwestern China. Geological Bulletin of China, 24(7): 613-620 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZQYD200507004.htm [30] Zhao, J.T., Yang, F.Q., 1991. Early and Middle Triassic basin-slope environments in the Hezuo region, Gansu. Paleogeography, (5): 27-34 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD199105003.htm [31] Zhou, D., Graham, S.A., 1996. The Songpan-Ganze complex of the western Qinling Shan as a Triassic remnant ocean basin. In: Yin, A., Harrison, T.M., eds., The tectonic evolution of Asian. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 281-299. doi: 10.1029/93TC00313 [32] Zhou, D., Sun, Z., Chen, H.Z., et al., 2005. Evolution of Mesozoic paleogeography and tectonic in South Sea and adjacent area. Earth Science Frontier, 12(3): 204-218 (in Chinese with English abstract). [33] Zhu, Z.X., Rao, R.B., 1985. Discovery of Daollela bed of the Ladinian stage of the Middle Triassic in western Sichuan plateau. Journal of Stratigraphy, 9(4): 278-283 (in Chinese). [34] Zuo, J.X., Tong, J.N., Zhao, L.S., 2003. Relationship between the differentiation of lithopaleogeography and the movement of blocks in the Early Triassic in South China. Geological Science and Technology Information, 22(2): 29-34 (in Chinese with English abstract). [35] 蔡立国, 刘伟新, 宋立珩, 等, 2005. 松潘-阿坝地区盆地演化及油气远景. 石油与天然气地质, 26(1): 92-98. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2005.01.013 [36] 蔡立国, 郑冰, 刘建荣, 等, 1993. 青臧高原东部石油地质基本特征. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 101. [37] 方国庆, 张晓宝, 李育慈, 1994. 西秦岭海西-印支期裂陷活动及其与古特提斯的关系. 沉积学报, 12(3): 762-781. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB403.008.htm [38] 高锐, 王海燕, 马永生, 等, 2006a. 松潘地块若尔盖盆地与西秦岭造山带岩石圈尺度的构造关系——深地震反射剖面探测成果. 地球学报, 27(5): 411-418. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB200605004.htm [39] 高锐, 马永生, 李秋生, 等, 2006b. 松潘地块与西秦岭造山带下地壳的性质和关系——深地震反射剖面的揭露. 地质通报, 25(12): 1361-1367. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200612002.htm [40] 郝子文, 俞如龙, 1983. 论昆仑-巴颜喀拉海及其与特提斯洋演化关系. 见: "三江"专著编辑委员会编, 青藏高原地质文集(13). 北京: 地质出版社, 25-42. [41] 何海清, 1996. 西秦岭早三叠世沉积特征及其构造控制作用. 沉积学报, 14(1): 86-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJXB601.009.htm [42] 晋慧娟, 李育慈, 1994. 西秦岭早三叠世深水碳酸盐岩沉积演化模式. 中国科学(B辑), 24(8): 890-896. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JBXK199408015.htm [43] 晋慧娟, 李育慈, 2001. 西秦岭造山带中三叠统复理石相研究. 沉积学报, 19(3): 321-326. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2001.03.001 [44] 赖旭龙, 殷鸿福, 杨逢清, 1995. 秦岭三叠纪古海洋再造. 地球科学, 20(6): 648-656. http://www.earth-science.net/article/id/255 [45] 李继亮, 1992. 中国东南地区大地构造基本问题. 见: 李继亮编, 中国东南海陆岩石圈结构与演化研究. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 315. [46] 刘燊, 李才, 杨德明, 等, 2000. 西藏措勤盆地晚中生代构造-岩相演化. 长春科技大学学报, 30(2): 134-138. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5888.2000.02.007 [47] 孟庆任, 渠洪杰, 胡健民, 2007. 西秦岭和松潘地体三叠系深水沉积. 中国科学(D辑), 37(增刊Ⅰ): 209-223. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK2007S1023.htm [48] 牛新生, 王成善, 张玉修, 2010. 松潘地区白龙江隆起泥盆纪至三叠纪碳酸盐碎屑流沉积及其古地理意义. 世界地质, 29(1): 33-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJDZ201001005.htm [49] 裴先治, 张国伟, 赖绍聪, 等, 2002. 西秦岭南缘勉略构造带主要地质特征. 地质通报, 21(8-9): 486-493. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD2002Z2005.htm [50] 饶荣标, 朱占祥, 黄盛碧, 1985. 川西松潘地区中三叠世拉丁期的瓣鳃类和牙形石. 见: "三江"专著编辑委员会, 编, 青藏高原地质文集(9). 地质出版社, 北京, 199-205. [51] 徐强, 潘桂糖, 江新胜, 2003. 松潘－甘孜带: 是弧前增生还是弧后消减?矿物岩石, 23(2): 27-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2003.02.006 [52] 闫臻, 俞良军, 李继亮, 等, 2007. 松潘-若尔盖地区中-上三叠统沉积相组合特征. 自然科学进展, 17(2): 196-204. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-008X.2007.02.007 [53] 杨逢清, 王志平, 1995. 秦岭二叠纪古海洋再造. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 20(6): 641-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX506.005.htm [54] 杨宗让, 2002. 川西松潘-甘孜弧前盆地的形成及演化. 特提斯地质与沉积地质, 22(3): 53-59. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD200203008.htm [55] 殷鸿福, 杨逢清, 黄其胜, 等, 1992. 秦岭及邻区三叠系. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 129. [56] 张雪亭, 王秉璋, 俞建, 等, 2005. 巴颜喀拉残留洋盆的沉积特征. 地质通报, 24(7): 613-620. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2005.07.004 [57] 赵江天, 杨逢清, 1991. 甘肃合作地区早、中三叠世盆地一斜坡沉积环境分析. 岩相古地理, (5): 27-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD199105003.htm [58] 周蒂, 孙珍, 陈汉宗, 等, 2005. 南海及其围区中生代岩相古地理和构造演化. 地学前缘, 12(3) : 204-218. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2005.03.022 [59] 朱占祥, 饶荣标, 1985. 川西高原发现中三叠统拉丁阶鱼鳞蛤层. 地层学杂志, 9(4): 278-283. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCXZ198504005.htm [60] 左景勋, 童金南, 赵来时, 2003. 中国南方早三叠世岩相古地理分异演化与板块运动的关系. 地质科技情报, 22(2): 29-34. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ200302007.htm -
点击查看大图
图(5) / 表(1)
计量
- 文章访问数: 131
- HTML全文浏览量: 86
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
