小江-则木河断裂带大地震序列的静应力触发作用

朱航; 闻学泽

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2012.020

小江-则木河断裂带大地震序列的静应力触发作用

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2012.020

朱航^1,,
闻学泽^{1, 2}

1.
四川省地震局, 四川成都 610041
2.
中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036

基金项目:

地震行业科研专项经费课题"小江断裂带的中长期地震潜势定量研究" 200708035

详细信息

作者简介:
朱航(1966-), 男, 高级工程师, 主要从事地震学与地震预测研究.E-mail: zhuhang1234@163.com

中图分类号: P315.72
计量
- 文章访问数: 3213
- HTML全文浏览量: 107
- PDF下载量: 57
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-06-10
- 刊出日期: 2012-01-15

Effects of Static Stress Triggering of the Major Earthquake Sequence on Xiaojiang-Zemuhe Fault Zone

ZHU Hang^1
,,
WEN Xue-ze^{1, 2}

1.
Earthquake Administration of Sichuan Province, Chengdu 610041, China
2.
Institute of Earthquake Science, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100036, China

摘要

摘要: 通过计算和研究1733-1850年期间发生在小江-则木河断裂带上的、由4次M≥7地震组成的大地震序列引起的库仑应力变化图像, 分析先发大地震破裂对后发大地震破裂的静态应力触发作用.结果表明, 在该序列中, 后发大地震破裂均发生在先发大地震破裂引起的库仑应力显著增加区内.其中, 1733年小江断裂带北段的7³/₄级大地震破裂和1833年中段的8级大地震破裂均引起则木河断裂带较显著的库仑应力正值变化, 亦即1850年则木河断裂带发生的7¹/₂级大地震与前2次大地震破裂引起的应力触发作用有关; 1733年小江断裂带北段和中-南段的7³/₄级和1789年2次7级大地震均对该断裂带中段产生了十分显著的库仑应力触发作用, 与此相关的是1833年8级大地震的发生.因此, 认为小江断裂带各段之间以及该断裂带与则木河断裂带之间存在显著的力学上的相互作用.
- 小江-则木河断裂带 /
- 库仑应力变化 /
- 静态应力触发 /
- 地震 /
- 序列 /
- 构造
Abstract: In this article, we calculate and map the patterns of Coulomb stress changes induced by a major earthquake sequence of 4 events M≥7 on the Xiaojiang-Zemuhe fault zone in 1733 to 1850, and analyze the effects of the static stress triggering induced by the individual preceding events to the following events. The results show that, in the sequence of major earthquakes, every following event occurred in an area where Coulomb stress had been remarkably increased by the preceding event (s). For instance, both the M=7³/₄ earthquake of 1733 on the northern segment of the Xiaojiang fault zone and the M=8 earthquake of 1833 on the middle segment of the fault zone induced positive increments of Coulomb stress on the Zemuhe fault zone, suggesting that the occurrence of the M=7¹/₂ earthquake of 1850 on Zemuhe fault zone is related to the stress triggering effects caused by the 2 preceding major events. Again, the M=7³/₄ earthquake of 1733 on the northern segment of the Xiaojiang fault zone and the M=7 earthquake of 1789 on the middle-southern segment of the fault zone produced remarkable Coulomb stress triggering effects on the middle segment of the fault zone, that is related with the occurrence of the M=8 earthquake of 1833 on the middle segment of the fault zone. Therefore, we believe that mechanically significant interactions exist among the different segments of the Xiaojiang fault zone, as well as between the fault zone and the Zemuhe fault zone.
- Zemuhe-Xiaojiang fault zone /
- Coulomb stress change /
- static stress triggering /
- earthquakes /
- sequence /
- tectonics

HTML全文

图 1 (a) 小江-则木河断裂带1733年以来M≥7地震破裂区和(b)研究区在区域活动构造系统中的位置

1.主干走滑断层；2.正断层；3.逆断层；4.推测断层；5.湖泊, 6.城镇；7.地震破裂区；8.地块运动方向；历史地震的破裂区范围闻学泽等(2011)

Fig. 1. (a) Map of ruptured areas for M≥7 earthquakes on the Xiaojiang-Zemuhe fault zone since 1733 and (b) index map showing the position of the study area in the regional active tectonic system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 1733-1850年期间小江-则木河断裂带大地震序列的库仑应力变化

a.1733年8月2日7³/₄级地震破裂引起的库仑应力变化(以1789年6月7日7级地震破裂段作为接受断层)；b.1733年8月2日7³/₄级地震破裂引起的库仑应力变化(以1850年9月12日7¹/₂级地震破裂段作为接受断层)；c.前一破裂以及1789年6月7日7级地震破裂引起的库仑应力变化(以1833年9月6日8级地震破裂段作为接受断层)；d.前3次破裂引起的库仑应力变化(以1850年9月12日7¹/₂级地震破裂段作为接受断层)

Fig. 2. Maps showing Coulomb stress changes during the major earthquake sequence on the Xiaojiang-Zemuhe fault zone in 1733 to 1850

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 1733-1850年期间小江-则木河断裂带大地震序列事件

Table 1. Events of the major earthquake sequence on the Xiaojiang-Zemuhe fault zone in 1733 to 1850

编号	时间	震中位置		震级	震中烈度	地点
编号	年-月-日	北纬	东经	M	震中烈度	地点
1	1733-08-02	26.3°	103.1°	7³/₄	Ⅹ	云南东川-巧家间
2	1789-06-07	24.2°	102.9°	7	Ⅸ+	云南华宁
3	1833-09-06	25.0°	103.0°	8	≥Ⅹ	云南嵩明
4	1850-09-12	27.7°	102.4°	7¹/₂	Ⅹ	四川西昌南

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 1733-1850年期间小江-则木河断裂带M≥7地震的地震断层参数

Table 2. Parameters of the seismogenic faults of M≥7 earthquakes on Xiaojiang-Zemuhe fault zone in 1733 to 1850

编号	时间	震中位置		震级	地点	发震断层产状				地表破裂长度(km)	走滑位错(m)	倾滑位错(m)
编号	年-月-日	北纬	东经	M	地点	走向	倾向	倾角	滑动角	地表破裂长度(km)	走滑位错(m)	倾滑位错(m)
1	1733-08-02	26.3°	103.1°	7³/₄	云南东川-巧家间	167°	SWW	65°	-10°	115	2.8	0.5
2	1789-06-07	24.2°	102.9°	7	云南华宁	185°	W	55°	-6°	78	1.9	0.2
3	1833-09-06	25.0°	103.0°	8	云南嵩明	189°	W	55°	-6°	162	4	0.4
4	1850-09-12	27.7°	102.4°	7¹/₂	四川西昌南	330°	NEE	75°	-11°	114	2.8	0.5

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(36)

[1]	Cui, D.X., Hu, Y.X., Wang W.P., et al., 2009. Coulomb stress accumulation along Haiyuan fault zone. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 34(4): 641-650. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2009.070
[2]	Deng, J., Sykes, L.R., 1997. Evolution of the stress field in southern California and triggering of moderate-size earthquakes: a 200-year perspective. J. Geophys. Res., 103: 9859-9886. doi: 10.1029/96JB03897
[3]	Freed, A.M., 2005. Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 33: 335-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122505
[4]	Gkarlaouni, C.H., Papadimitriou, E.E., Karakostas, V.G., et al., 2008. Implication of fault interaction to seismic harzard assessment in Sichuan-Yunnan region of southeastern China. Translated by Yang, J.L.. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 30(2): 176-197 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	Huang, Y.B., 2000. The Songming, Yunnan Province, earthquake of M 5.0 of September 20th, 1989. In: Zhang, Z.C., Zheng D.L., Luo P., et al., eds., Earthquake cases in China (1989-1991). Seismological Press, Beijing, 43-58 (in Chinese).
[6]	King, G.C.P., Stein, R.S., Lin, J., 1994. Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull. Seismo. Soc. Amer., 84(3): 935-953. http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=ssabull&resid=84/3/935
[7]	Liu, Z.Y., Su, Y.J., Qin, J.Z., et al., 2002. Seismicity in Yunnan on 20th Century. Seismological Press, Beijing, 75-79 (in Chinese).
[8]	Ma, J., Ma, S.L., Liu, L.Q., et al., 2002. Experimental study on patterns of fault interaction. Progress in Natural Sciences, 12(5): 503-508 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[9]	Okada, Y., 1992. Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 82 (2), 1018-1040. http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=ssabull&resid=75/4/1135
[10]	Papadimitriou, E.E., Sykes, L.R., 2001. Evolution of the stress field in the northern Aegean Sea (Greece). Geophys. J. Int., 146(3): 747-759. doi: 10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01486.x
[11]	Papadimitriou, E.E., Wen, X.Z., Karakostas, V., et al., 2004. Earthquake triggering along the Xianshuihe fault zone of western Sichuan, China. Pure Appl. Geophys., 161(8): 1683-1707. doi: 10.1007/s00024-003-2471-4
[12]	Qin, J.Z., Qian, X.D., 2005. Study on the Huize M 5.3 and Wenshan M 5.3 earthquakes in Yunnan. Journal of Seismological Research, 28(4): 403-407 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZYJ200504018.htm
[13]	Scholz, C.H., 1990. The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 439.
[14]	Shen, Z.K., Wan, Y.G., Gan, W.J., et al., 2003. Viscoelastic triggering among large earthquakes along the East Kunlun fault system. Chinese J. Geophys., 46(6): 786-795 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1002/cjg2.432/full
[15]	Stein, R.S., 1999. The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence. Nature, 402(6762): 605-609. doi: 10.1038/45144
[16]	Stein, R.S., Barka, A.A., Dieterich, J.H., 1997. Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering. Geophys. J. Int., 128(3): 594-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb05321.x
[17]	Wells, D.L., Coppersmith, K.J., 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer., 84(4): 974-1002. http://gji.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/ijlink?linkType=ABST&journalCode=ssabull&resid=84/4/974
[18]	Wen, X.Z., Du, F., Long, F., et al., 2011. Tectonic dynamics and correlation of major earthquake sequences of the Xiaojiang and Qujiang-Shiping fault systems, Yunnan, China. Sci. China Earth Sci., 54. doi: 10.1007/s11430-011-4231-0
[19]	Wen, X.Z., Ma, S.L., Xu, X.W., et al., 2008. Historical pattern and behavior of earthquake ruptures along the eastern boundary of the Sichuan-Yunnan faulted-block, southwestern China. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 168(1-2): 16-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.04.013
[20]	Working Group for Geologic Mapping on Zemuhe Fault, 2000. Geologic mapping and comprehensive analysis on the active faults of Zemuhe. Earthquake Research in Sichuan, (Supple) (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SCHZ2000Z1000.htm
[21]	Yu, W.X., Song, F.M., Wen, X.Z., et al., 2001. Study of the surface rupture zone of Xichang earthquake in 1850. Journal of Seismological Research, 24(4): 346-350 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dzyj200104011.aspx
[22]	Zhou, C.H., Pei, T., Li, Q.L., et al., 2003. Research on spatial pattern and temporal-spatial migration model of strong earthquakes in China and its adjacent areas. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 28(3): 306-314. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200303011.htm
[23]	Zhu, H., Wen, X.Z., 2009. Stress triggering process of the 1973 to 1976 Songpan, Sichuan, sequence of strong earthquakes. Chinese J. Geophys, 52(4): 994-1003. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001 5733.2009.04.016
[24]	Zhu, H., Wen, X.Z., 2010. Static stress triggering effects related with Ms 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Earth Science, 21(1): 32-41. doi: 10.1007/s12583-010-0001-8
[25]	Gkarlaouni, C.H., Papadimitriou, E.E., Karakostas, V.G., 等, 2008. 断层相互作用对中国川滇地区地震危险评估的意义. 杨家亮译. 地震学报, 30(2): 176-197.
[26]	崔笃信, 胡亚轩, 王文萍, 等, 2009. 海原断裂带库仑应力积累. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 34(4): 641-650. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200904011.htm
[27]	黄云宝, 2000.1989年9月20日云南省嵩明5.0级地震. 见: 张肇诚, 郑大林, 徐京华, 等编, 中国震例(1989-1991). 北京: 地震出版社, 43-58.
[28]	刘祖荫, 苏有锦, 秦嘉政, 等, 2002.20世纪云南地震活动. 北京: 地震出版社, 75-79.
[29]	马瑾, 马胜利, 刘力强, 等, 2002. 断层相互作用型式的实验研究. 自然科学进展, 12(5): 503-508. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-008X.2002.05.010
[30]	秦嘉政, 钱晓东, 2005. 云南会泽和文山5.3级地震研究. 地震研究, 28(4): 403-407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2005.04.019
[31]	沈正康, 万永革, 甘卫军, 等, 2003. 东昆仑活动断裂带大地震之间的黏弹性应力触发研究. 地球物理学报, 46(6): 786-795. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2003.06.010
[32]	闻学泽, 杜方, 龙锋, 等, 2011. 小江和曲江－石屏两断裂系统的构造动力学与强震序列的关联性. 中国科学(D辑), 41(5): 713-724. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201105010.htm
[33]	俞维贤, 宋方敏, 闻学泽, 等, 2001.1850年西昌地震地表破裂带的考察研究. 地震研究, 24(4): 346-350. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0666.2001.04.011
[34]	则木河活断裂填图组, 2000. 则木河活动断裂带1∶5万地质填图及综合研究. 四川地震, (增刊). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCHZ2000Z1000.htm
[35]	周成虎, 裴韬, 李全林, 等, 2003. 近500年中国及邻区强震空间格局及迁移模式初步分析. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 28(3): 306-314. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200303011.htm
[36]	朱航, 闻学泽, 2009.1973-1976年四川松潘强震序列的应力触发过程. 地球物理学报, 52(4): 994-1003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.04.016