北塘凹陷古近系烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟

白云风; 王华; 王振升; 廖远涛; 林正良; 黄传炎

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2011.057

北塘凹陷古近系烃源岩特征及热演化史模拟

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2011.057

白云风^{1, 2,},
王华³,
王振升⁴,
廖远涛³,
林正良³,
黄传炎³

1.
吉林大学地球科学学院, 吉林长春 130061
2.
大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院, 黑龙江大庆 163712
3.
中国地质大学资源学院, 湖北武汉 430074
4.
大港油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院, 天津大港 300280

基金项目:

湖北省杰出青年基金 2003ABB012

详细信息

作者简介:
白云风(1977-), 男, 博士后, 主要从事沉积盆地分析方面研究.E-mail: byf198407@163.com

中图分类号: TE135
计量
- 文章访问数: 3196
- HTML全文浏览量: 201
- PDF下载量: 54
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2010-12-28
- 刊出日期: 2011-05-01

Thermal Evolution Modeling and Characteristic of Source Rock of Paleogene in Beitang Sag

1.
College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
2.
E & D Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing 163712, China
3.
Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
4.
E & D Research Institute of Dagang Oilfield Company Ltd., CNPC, Dagang 300280, China

摘要

摘要: 根据大量的烃源岩地球化学数据, 分析了北塘凹陷古近系烃源岩的地球化学特征, 从有机碳含量(TOC)、氯仿沥青"A"、总烃含量、S₁+S₂、有机质类型和成熟度(R_o)等方面对古近系烃源岩进行了系统分析, 结果表明北塘凹陷东三段、沙一段和沙三段是本区的烃源岩层段, 其中沙三段烃源岩生烃指标最好, 是本区的主力烃源岩层段.烃源岩的模拟结果表明: (1)北塘凹陷的烃源岩门限深度为2 390 m, 门限温度为94.2℃, 进入生烃门限的时间约为25~28 Ma; (2)北塘凹陷沙三段的现今地层温度为140~160℃, R_o达0.9%~1.4%, 正处于生油高峰期; 沙一、二段的现今地层温度为100~140℃, R_o达到了0.75%~1.0%左右, 已进入中等成熟阶段; 东营组的现今地层温度为80~100℃, R_o为0.45%~0.75%, 处于低-中等成熟阶段.
- 北塘凹陷 /
- 古近系 /
- 烃源岩 /
- 热演化史模拟 /
- 沉积学
Abstract: Based on large quantity of organic geochemistry data, the geochemistry characteristics are systematically analyzed on organic carbonate content (TOC), chloroform bitumen "A", overall hydrocarbon content, S₁+S₂, organic matter types and maturity (R_o%) and so on. It shows that the Dong 3 Member, Sha 1 Member and Sha 3 Member are the main oil source beds of Beitang sag, especially, Sha 3 Member is the best in source rock quality. The model results indicate that (1) The depth of oil generative threshold is about 2 390 m, and the temperature is about 94.2℃, and the time entering on the oil generative threshold is from 25 Ma to 28 Ma in Beitang sag; (2) The present-day temperature of Sha 3 Layer is 140-160℃, the present-day R_o ranges between 0.9%-1.4%, It is in its peak of oil generation. The temperature of Sha 1+2 Layer is 100-140℃, the R_o ranged between 0.75%-1.0%, which suggests that it is in the middle-maturity at present. The present-day temperature of Dongying Layer is 80-100℃, the present-day R_o ranges between 0.45%-0.75%, which indicates that the present-day source rocks are in low maturation.
- Beitang sag /
- Paleogene /
- source rock /
- thermal evolution history modeling /
- sedimentology

HTML全文

图 1 北塘凹陷构造位置

Fig. 1. Tectonic location map of Beitang sag

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 北塘凹陷古近系典型井干酪根类型统计结果

Fig. 2. Type of kerogens of Paleogene in Beitang sag

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 北塘凹陷古近系岩石热解干酪根类型判别

Fig. 3. Hierarchy of the Q-mode cluster analysis of the heavy minerals in Dongying Formation in Huanghua depression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 北塘凹陷GH3-1井埋藏史与热演化特征

Fig. 4. Burial history and temperature evolution of Well GH3-1 in Beitang sag

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 北塘凹陷GH3-1井埋藏史与有机质成熟度演化

Fig. 5. Burial history and organic maturity evolution of Well GH3-1 in Beitang sag

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 北塘凹陷2测线模拟温度剖面(a)和成熟度剖面(b)

Fig. 6. Modeling temperature section (a) and maturity section (b) of line 2 in Beitang sag

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 北塘凹陷古近系有机质丰度统计

Table 1. Abundance of organic of Paleogene in Beitang sag

层位	有机碳 (TOC, %)	氯仿沥青“A” (EOM, %)	总烃 (10^-6)	生烃潜量 (S₁+S₂, mg/g)
Ed₃	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.52}\sim \text{1}\text{.03}}{\text{0}\text{.64(58)}}$	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.006}\sim \text{0}\text{.192}}{\text{0}\text{.023(15)}}$	$\frac{\text{55}\sim \text{151}}{\text{79(10)}}$	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.32}\sim \text{5}\text{.96}}{\text{2}\text{.91(8)}}$
Es₁	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.64}\sim \text{1}\text{.22}}{\text{0}\text{.79(78)}}$	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.008}\sim \text{0}\text{.242}}{\text{0}\text{.032(8)}}$	$\frac{\text{75}\sim \text{224}}{\text{141(6)}}$	$\frac{\text{1}\text{.45}\sim \text{9}\text{.61}}{\text{4}\text{.42(6)}}$
Es₃¹	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.63}\sim \text{2}\text{.65}}{\text{1}\text{.17(246)}}$	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.018}\sim \text{0}\text{.331}}{\text{0}\text{.062(58)}} $	$\frac{\text{175}\sim \text{325}}{\text{271(33)}}$	$\frac{\text{2}\text{.22}\sim \text{13}\text{.24}}{\text{5}\text{.33(150)}}$
Es₃²	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.74}\sim \text{2}\text{.01}}{\text{1}\text{.23(147)}}$	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.014}\sim \text{0}\text{.412}}{\text{0}\text{.112(57)}}$	$\frac{\text{478}\sim \text{1 032}}{\text{609(19)}}$	$\frac{\text{2}\text{.41}\sim \text{15}\text{.29}}{\text{6}\text{.59(112)}}$
Es₃³	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.70}\sim \text{9}\text{.73}}{\text{1}\text{.11(18)}}$	$\frac{\text{0}\text{.023}\sim \text{0}\text{.302}}{\text{0}\text{.076(9)}}$	$\frac{\text{152}\sim \text{778}}{\text{394(5)}}$	$\frac{\text{1}\text{.52}\sim \text{9}\text{.77}}{\text{6}\text{.32(205)}}$
注：(1)表格中的数据含义$\frac{最小值\sim 最大值}{平均值(样品数)}$；(2)东三段和沙一段数据为1999年所测数据^①，沙三1段、沙三2段、沙三3段三组数据中增加了2005年以来所测的数据.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(39)

[1]	Bai, Y.F., Wang, Z.S., Wei, A.J., et al., 2008. Time and space distribution characteristics and material resource system of heavy minerals in Dongying Formation of Huanghua depression. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 27(2): 39-42 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQSK200802010.htm
[2]	Bai, Y.F., Zhang, B., Wang, H., et al., 2006. Research on the source direction of Palaeogene Dongying Formation in Huanghua depression. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 28(3): 17-19 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-JHSX200603004.htm
[3]	Burnham, A.K., Sweeney, J.J., 1989. A chemical kinetic model of vitrinite maturation and reflectance. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53(10): 2649-2656. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90136-1
[4]	Chen, R.S., 1994. Geology of oil and gas. China University of Geosciences Press, Wuhan, 121-126 (in Chinese).
[5]	Deng, R.J., Chai, G.Q., Yang, H., et al., 2001. Forming conditions and distribution characteristics of Tertiary oil and gas pools in Beitang sag. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 28(1): 27-29 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SKYK200101008.htm
[6]	Guo, Q.L., Mi, S.Y., Shi, G.R., et al., 1998. Pinciple and method of basin modeling. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 1-7(in Chinese).
[7]	He, L.J., Xiong, L.P., Wang, J.Y., 1998. Effects on the tectonothermal modeling of extensional basins. Scientia Geologica Sinica, 33(2): 222-228 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX802.010.htm
[8]	Hertle, M., Littke, R., 2000. Coalification pattern and thermal modeling of the Permo-Carbonifer ous Saar basin (SW-Germany). International Journal of Coal Geology, 42: 273-296. doi: 10.1016/S0166-5162(99)00043-9
[9]	Hu, J.Y., Huang, D.F., Xu, S.B., et al., 1991. The foundation of China's non-marine petroleum geology theory. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, 167-222(in Chinese).
[10]	Hu, S.B., Wang, J.Y., 1995. Principles and progresses on thermal regime of sedimentary basins—an overview. Earth Science Frontiers, 2(3-4): 171-180 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY504.008.htm
[11]	Hu, S.B., Zhang, R.Y., Luo, Y.H., et al., 1999. Thermal history and tectonic-thermal evolution of Bohai basin, East China. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 42(6): 748-755 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12]	Makhous, M., Galushkin, Y.I., 2003. Burial history and thermal evolution of the southern and western Saharan basins: synthesis and comparison with the eastern and northern Saharan basins. AAPG Bulletin, 87(11): 1799-1822. doi: 10.1306/06180301123
[13]	Ren, Z.L., 1996. Research on the relations between geothermal history and oil-gas accumulation in the Ordos basin. Acta Petrolei. Sinica, 17(1): 17-24 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB601.002.htm
[14]	Ren, Z.L., 1999. Research on geothermal history in sedimentary basins of the North China. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing(in Chinese).
[15]	Ren, Z.L., Zhang, S.H., 1999. Research on the relations between geothermal history and oil-gas accumulation in sedimentary basins of the North China. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 20(Suppl. ): 489-494 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[16]	Sachsenhofer, R.F., Privalov, V.A., Zhykalyak, M.V., et al., 2002. The Donets basin(Ukraine/Russia): coalification and thermal history. International Joural of Coal Geology, 49(11): 33-55. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516201000635
[17]	Shi, Z.S., He, S., Yang, D.Q., 2005. A study of source rock thermal evolution modeling of Hetaoyuan Formation in Dongzhuang sag of Nanyang oilfield. Geological Science and Technology Information, 24(2): 85-89 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ200502019.htm
[18]	Suggate, R.P., 1998. Relations between depth of burial, vitrinite reflectance and geothermal gradient. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 21(1): 5-32. doi: 10.1306/BF9AB79C-0EB6-11D7-8643000102C1865D
[19]	Sweeney, J.J., Burnham, A.K., 1990. Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on chemical kinetics. AAPG Bulletin, 74(10): 1559-1570. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/255005110_Evaluation_of_a_simple_model_of_vitrinite_reflectance_based_on_Chemical_kinetics
[20]	Tissot, B.P., Welte, D.H., 1984. Petroleum formation and occurrence: a new approach to oil and gas exploration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[21]	Wang, J.A., Wang, J.Y., 1993. The geothermal character and oil-gas resource of sedimentary basin in China continent. In: Zhao, C.Y., ed., The research progresses of petroliferous basin geology. Northwest University Press, Xi'an, 227-234 (in Chinese).
[22]	Wang, Z.S., Liu, Q.X., Tan, Z.H., et al., 2009. Comprehensive evaluation of source rock of Qinan sag, Huanghua depression. Natural Gas Geoscience, 20(6): 968-971 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200906023.htm
[23]	Zhao, C.Y., Liu, C.Y., Ren, Z.L., 1990. Geology of petroliferous basins and their systematic engineering in research. Oil & Gas Geology, 11(1): 108-113 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT199001017.htm
[24]	白云风, 王振升, 韦阿娟, 等, 2008. 黄骅坳陷东营组重矿物时空展布特征及物源体系分析. 大庆石油地质与开发, 27(2): 39-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2008.02.011
[25]	白云风, 张兵, 王华, 等, 2006. 黄骅坳陷古近纪东营组物源方向研究. 石油天然气学报, 28(3): 17-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2006.03.005
[26]	陈荣书, 1994. 石油天然气地质学. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 121-126.
[27]	邓荣敬, 柴公权, 杨桦, 等, 2001. 北塘凹陷第三系油气藏形成条件与油气分布. 石油勘探与开发, 28(1): 27-29. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2001.01.009
[28]	郭秋麟, 米石云, 石广仁, 等, 1998. 盆地模拟原理方法. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1-7.
[29]	何丽娟, 熊亮萍, 汪集旸, 1998. 拉张盆地构造热演化模拟的影响因素. 地质科学, 33(2): 222-228. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX802.010.htm
[30]	胡见义, 黄第藩, 徐树宝, 等, 1991. 中国陆相石油地质理论基础. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 167-222.
[31]	胡圣标, 汪集旸, 1995. 沉积盆地热体制研究的基本原理和进展. 地学前缘, 2(3-4): 171-180. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY504.008.htm
[32]	胡圣标, 张荣燕, 罗毓辉, 等, 1999. 渤海盆地热历史及构造—热演化特征. 地球物理学报, 42(6): 748-755. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.1999.06.004
[33]	任战利, 1996. 鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史与油气关系的研究. 石油学报, 17(1): 17-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB601.002.htm
[34]	任战利, 1999. 中国北方沉积盆地构造热演化史研究. 北京: 石油工业出版社.
[35]	任战利, 张世焕, 1999. 中国北方沉积盆地构造热演化史与油气关系研究. 地球学报, 20(增刊): 489-494.
[36]	史忠生, 何生, 杨道庆, 2005. 南阳油田东庄次凹核桃园组烃源岩热演化史模拟研究. 地质科技情报, 24(2): 85-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2005.02.015
[37]	汪缉安, 汪集旸, 1993. 中国大陆沉积盆地地热特征及油气资源. 见: 赵重远编. 含油气盆地地质学研究进展. 西安: 西北大学出版社, 227-234.
[38]	王振升, 刘庆新, 谭振华, 等, 2009. 黄骅坳陷岐南凹陷烃源岩评价. 天然气地球科学, 20(6): 968-971. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX200906023.htm
[39]	赵重远, 刘池洋, 任战利, 1990. 含油气盆地地质学及其研究中的系统工程. 石油与天然气地质学, 11(1): 108-113. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT199001017.htm