Petrogenesis of the Zijingguan Mafic Pluton, Northern Taihang Orogen: Constraints from Petrology and Geochemistry
-
摘要: 通过对北太行紫荆关晚中生代基性岩体的岩石学和地球化学特征研究, 讨论其岩浆源区特征及成因.结果表明, 紫荆关岩体主要由橄榄二辉石岩、角闪辉长岩和闪长岩等岩石组成.橄榄二辉石岩具有明显的堆晶结构, 可能是堆晶成因, 而角闪辉长岩和闪长岩可能是堆晶形成之后的残余岩浆的结晶.闪长岩中的斜长石显示复杂的结构和成分环带, 相对富钠的核部见富钙斜长石叠加, 后者又向富钠斜长石演化.闪长岩中的单斜辉石也显示复杂的成分环带, 主要是最边部的MgO含量比紧邻的内侧辉石更高.这表明在闪长岩形成过程中有新的幔源高温富镁的岩浆注入.以上各岩石类型具有类似的地球化学性质, 包括较强的稀土分异((La/Yb)N比值为5.76~23.13), 高Sr/Y比值(50.95~146.13), 富集K、Sr、Ba等大离子亲石元素和LREE, 亏损Nb、Zr、Ti等高场强元素和HREE, Eu异常不明显.都显示富集的Sr-Nd同位素特征, ISr=0.7058~0.7066, εNd(t) =-13.8~-18.2.这些特征表明紫荆关基性岩体的母岩浆来源于EM1型富集地幔的部分熔融.橄榄辉石岩和角闪辉长岩具有类似的Nd同位素成分(主要为εNd(t) =-15.0~-16.6), 但形成较晚的闪长岩的εNd(t) 值却比较高(-13.8~-14.6), 也支持新的幔源岩浆在晚期的注入.Abstract: Through the petrological and geochemical study carried out for the Zijingguan mafic pluton (North Taihang), this paper is to understand their magma sources and petrogenesis.The Zijingguan mafic rocks are mainly made up of olivine-bearing pyroxenites, hornblende gabbros and diorites.Cumulate textures can be seen in the olivine-bearing pyroxenites, suggesting a cumulus origin of them.Hornblende gabbros and diorites are probably crystallized products from the residual melts after the accumulation process.Plagioclases from diorites show complicated textures and compositional zoning, with relatively sodium-rich core mantled by calcium-rich plagioclase, the latter evolved to sodium-rich plagioclase towards the rim with descent of magma temperature.Similarly, clinopyroxenes from diorite show complicated compositional zoning, with the MgO abundances in the rim being slightly higher than that of immediate inner part of pyroxenes.These textures suggest that the magma chamber had experienced a process of magma recharge from the mantle source.The different rock types of the Zijingguan mafic pluton share many common geochemical features like highly fractionated REE patterns ((La/Yb)N=5.76-23.13) and high Sr/Y ratios (50.95-146.13), highly enriched LILE (K, Sr, Ba) and LREE, and depleted HFSE (Nb, Zr, Ti) and HREE, with minor Eu anomalies in the REE patterns.They show enriched Sr-Nd isotopic compositions, with ISr=0.7058-0.7066, εNd(t) =-13.8 to-18.2.These geochemical features suggest that the mafic pluton originated from partial melting of an EM1 type mantle source.Olivine-bearing pyroxenites have isotopic composition identical to that of hornblende gabbros (mostly εNd(t) =-15 to-16.6), while the later-crystallizing diorites have a slightly higher εNd(t) =-13.8 to-14.6, which is in agreement with the model of magma recharge during magma evolution.
-
Key words:
- mafic pluton /
- compositional zoning of plagioclase /
- Sr-Nd isotopes /
- magma recharge /
- Taihang Mountains
-
图 4 紫荆关基性岩体的AFM图(Irvine and Baragar, 1971)
A=Na2O+K2O; F=FeO+0.899 8Fe2O3; M=MgO
Fig. 4. AFM plots of the Zijingguan gabbroic rocks
图 7 紫荆关辉长岩体的稀土元素配分型式图(图a, b, c)和微量元素蛛网图(图d, e, f)(球粒陨石和原始地幔值来自Sun and Mcdonough, 1989)
Fig. 7. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and primitive mantle-normalized spidergrams of the Zijingguan gabbroic rocks
图 8 紫荆关基性岩体的εNd(t) -ISr图(EM1地幔的位置引自Zindler and Hart, 1986)
Fig. 8. Plot of ISr vs. εNd(t) for the Zijingguan mafic pluton
表 1 紫荆关基性岩体中闪长岩的斜长石电子探针分析(%)
Table 1. Microprobe analysis data of plagioclase from diorite of the Zijingguan mafic pluton
表 2 紫荆关基性岩体中闪长岩的单斜辉石电子探针分析(%)
Table 2. Microprobe analysis data of clinopyroxene from diorite of the Zijingguan mafic pluton
表 3 闪长岩结晶温度和相关电子探针分析(%)
Table 3. The crystallizing temperature and related microprobe analysis data of diorite
表 4 二辉石岩的结晶温度和相关电子探针分析(%)
Table 4. The crystallizing temperature and related microprobe analysis data of pyroxenite
表 5 紫荆关基性岩体的主量(%)和微量(μg/g)元素分析数据
Table 5. Major and trace elements of the Zijingguan mafic rocks
表 6 紫荆关基性岩体的Sr-Nd同位素数据
Table 6. Sr-Nd isotopic data of the Zijingguan mafic rocks
-
[1] Cai, J. H., Yan, G. H., Chang, Z. S., et al., 2003. Petrologi-cal and geochemical characteristics of the Wang'anzhencomplex and discussion onits genesis. Acta PetrologicaSinica, 19 (1): 81-92 (in Chinese with English ab-stract). [2] Cai, J. H., Yan, G. H., Xiao, C. D., et al., 2004. Nd, Sr, Pbisotopic characteristics of the Mesozoic intrusive rocksin the Taihang-Da Hinggan Mountains tectonomagmaticbelt and their source region. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 20 (5): 1225-1242 (in Chinese with English abstract). [3] Chang, Z. S., Feng, Z. Y., Chen, T. L., 2000. Research ontheultramafic rocks in the Laiyuan batholith, Hebei Prov-ince. Geology and Prospecting, 36 (3): 36-39 (in Chi-nese with English abstract). [4] Chen, B., Jahn, B. M., Zhai, M. G., 2003. Sr-Nd isotopic characteristics of the Mesozoic magmatism in theTaihang-Yanshan orogen, NCC, and implications forArchean lithosphere thining. J. Geol. Sco. , 160: 963-970. doi: 10.1144/0016-764902-129 [5] Chen, B., Liu, C. Q., Tian, W., 2006. Magma-mixing be-tween mantle-and crustal-derived melts inthe process ofMesozoic magmatism, Taihangshan: Constraints frompetrology and geochemistry. Earth Science Frontiers, 13 (2): 140-147 (in Chinese with English abstract). [6] Chen, B., Tian, W., Zhai, M. G., et al., 2005. Zircon U-Pbgeochronology and geochemistry of the Mesozoic mag-matismin the Taihang Mountains and other places ofthe North China craton, with implications for petrogen-esis and geodynamic setting. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 21 (1): 13-24 (in Chinese with English abstract). [7] Chen, B., Zhai, M. G., 2003. Geochemistry of Late Mesozoiclamprophyre dykes fromthe Taihang Mountains, NorthChina, and implications for the sub-continental lithos-pheric mantle. Geol. Mag. , 140: 87-93. doi: 10.1017/S0016756802007124 [8] Chen, B., Zhai, M. G., Shao, J. A., 2002. Genesis and signifi-cance of the Mesozoic batholith in North Taihang: Ma-jor and minor elements geochemistry constraints. Sci-ence in China (Ser. D), 32: 896-907 (in Chinese). [9] Chen, Z. C., Chen, B., Tian, W., 2007. Zircon U-Pb ages, Hfisotopic compositions and geological significance: Acasestudy of Mesozoic batholiths and mafic enclaves inNorth Taihang. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 23 (2): 295-306 (in Chinese with English abstract). [10] Deng, J. F., Su, S. G., Zhao, H. L., et al., 2003. Deep proces-ses of Mesozoic Yanshanian lithosphere thining inNorth China. Earth Science Frontiers, 10 (3): 41-50 (in Chinese with English abstract). [11] Fan, Q. C., Sui, J. L., Liu, R. X., et al., 2001. Eclogite faciesgarnet-pyroxenolite xenolithin Hannuoba area: Newev-idence of magma underplating. Acta Petrologica Sini-ca, 17 (1): 1-6 (in Chinese with English abstract). [12] Irvine, T. N., Baragar, W. R. A., 1971. Aguide to the chemi-cal classification of the common volcanic rocks. Canadi-an Journal of Earth Sciences, 8: 523-548. doi: 10.1139/e71-055 [13] Jahn, B. M., Auvray, B., Cornichet, J., et al., 1987.3. 5Gaold amphibolites from eastern Hebei Province, China: Field occurrence, petrology, Sm-Nd isochron age andREE geochemistry. Precambrian Res. , 34: 311-346. doi: 10.1016/0301-9268(87)90006-4 [14] Lu, F. X., Zheng, J. P., Shao, J. A., et al., 2006. Asthenospheric upwelling and lithospheric thinning in Late Cretaceous-Ce-nozoic in eastern North China. Earth Science Frontiers, 13 (2): 86-92 (in Chinese with English abstract). [15] Luo, Z. H., Deng, J. F., Zhao, G. C., et al., 1997. Character-istics of magmatic activities and orogenic process of Taihangshan intraplate orogen. Earth Science—Journalof China University of Geosciences, 22 (3): 279-284 (in Chinese with English abstract). [16] Nehru, C. E., Wyllie, P. J., 1974. Electron microprobe meas-urement of pyroxenes coe-xisting with H2O-undersatu-rated liquid in the join Ca MgSi2O6-Mg2Si2O6-H2O at30kilobars, with applications to geothermometry. Con-tr. Mineral. Petrol. , 48: 221-228. doi: 10.1007/BF00383357 [17] Rudnick, R. L., Fountain, D. M., 1995. Nature and composi-tion of the continental crust: A lower crustal perspec-tive. Rev. Geophys. , 33: 267-309. doi: 10.1029/95RG01302 [18] Sun, S. S., Mcdonough, W. E., 1989. Chemical and isotopicsystematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantlecomposition and processes. In: Saunders, A. D., Norry, M. J., eds., Magmatismin the ocean basins. Geological Society Special Publication, 42: 313-345. [19] Wu, F. Y., Sun, D. Y., Zhang, G. L., et al., 2000. Deep geo-dynamics of Yanshain movement. Geological Journal of China Universities, 6 (3): 379-388 (in Chinese withEnglish abstract). [20] Yang, J. H., Wu, F. Y., Chung, S. L., et al., 2006. A hybridorigin for the Qianshan A-type granite, Northeast Chi-na. Geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic evidence. Lithos, 89: 89-106. [21] Zhang, Y., Chen, B., Shao, J. A., et al., 2003. Geochemistryand origin of Late Mesozoic lamprophyre dykes inTaihang Mountains, North China. Acta Petrologica etMineralogica, 22 (1): 29-33 (in Chinese with Englishabstract). [22] Zindler, A., Hart, S. R., 1986. Chemical geodynamics. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. , 14: 493-571. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ea.14.050186.002425 [23] 蔡剑辉, 阎国翰, 常兆山, 等, 2003. 王安镇岩体岩石地球化学特征及成因探讨. 岩石学报, 19 (1): 81-92. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200301008.htm [24] 蔡剑辉, 阎国翰, 肖成东, 等, 2004. 太行山-大兴安岭构造岩浆带中生代侵入岩Sr、Nd、Pb同位素特征及物质来源探讨. 岩石学报, 20 (5): 1225-1242. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200405017.htm [25] 常兆山, 冯钟燕, 陈廷礼, 2000. 河北涞源岩基中的超镁铁质岩研究. 地质与勘探, 36 (3): 36-39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0495-5331.2000.03.011 [26] 陈斌, 刘超群, 田伟, 2006. 太行山中生代岩浆作用过程中的壳幔岩浆混合作用: 岩石学和地球化学证据. 地学前缘, 13 (2): 140-147. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2006.02.012 [27] 陈斌, 田伟, 翟明国, 等, 2005. 太行山和华北其他地区中生代岩浆作用的锆石U-Pb年代学和地球化学特征及其岩浆成因和地球动力学意义. 岩石学报, 21: 13-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200501002.htm [28] 陈斌, 翟明国, 邵济安, 等, 2002. 太行山北段中生代岩基的成因和意义: 主要和微量元素地球化学证据. 中国科学(D辑), 32: 896-907. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200211002.htm [29] 陈智超, 陈斌, 田伟, 2007. 太行山北段中生代岩基及其包体锆石U-Pb年代学和Hf同位素性质及其地质意义. 岩石学报, 23 (2): 295-306. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200702011.htm [30] 邓晋福, 苏尚国, 赵海玲, 等, 2003. 华北地区燕山期岩石圈减薄的深部过程. 地学前缘, 10 (3): 41-50. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2003.03.003 [31] 樊祺诚, 隋建立, 刘若新, 等, 2001. 汉诺坝榴辉岩相石榴辉石岩——岩浆底侵作用新证据. 岩石学报, 17 (1): 1-6. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200101000.htm [32] 路凤香, 郑建平, 邵济安, 等, 2006. 华北东部中生代晚期-新生代软流圈上涌与岩石圈减薄. 地学前缘, 13 (2): 86-92. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2006.02.007 [33] 罗照华, 邓晋福, 赵国春, 等, 1997. 太行山造山带岩浆活动特征及其造山过程反演. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 22 (3): 279-284. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX703.009.htm [34] 吴福元, 孙德有, 张广良, 等, 2000. 论燕山运动的深部地球动力学本质. 高校地质学报, 6 (3): 379-388. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2000.03.002 [35] 张勇, 陈斌, 邵济安, 等, 2003. 华北太行晚中生代煌斑岩地球化学特征及成因探讨. 岩石矿物学杂志, 22 (1): 29-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2003.01.004