Zircon U-Pb Geochronology of the Shangma Fault, Dabie: Constraints on the Transformation from Ductile to Brittle Deformation, and Its Significance to the Tectonic Evolution of Dabie Orogenic Belt
-
摘要: 通过对商麻断裂的几何学和运动学的详细构造解析, 鉴别出呈先后依次发育层次由深到浅的3种不同构造层次的伸展性断裂构造活动, 从早到晚分别为: ①低角度向北西西方向滑脱的韧性剪切; ②西倾的低角度脆性、脆-韧性滑脱正断层; ③西倾的高角度脆性正断层.在构造年代学的基础上, 选择①末期与围岩同构造并顺围岩面理侵入结晶的花岗质伟晶岩脉和后期的花岗岩侵入体进行了锆石U-Pb年龄测试, 花岗质伟晶岩脉中13颗岩浆锆石给出了125.9±4.2Ma的年龄数据, 花岗岩中10颗岩浆锆石给出了118.8±4.1Ma年龄数据, 从而可以将商麻断裂带从伸展滑脱型韧性变形向脆性滑脱断层转换的时间很好的约束在126~119Ma之间.通过与前人研究结果的对比, 笔者将罗田穹窿形成的时间限定在了150~126Ma之间, 为研究整个大别山构造演化提供了新的年代学约束.Abstract: According to the particular investigations on the geometry and kinematics of the Shangma fault, three different crust-levels of extension movements have been differentiated in sequence of development from the deep to the shallow: ① ductile shearing with top to the NWW in low dip angle; ② brittle or brittle-ductile transition normal fault with top to the NWW in low dip angle; ③ brittle normal fault with top to the NWW in high dip angle. Two samples were chosen for zircon U-Pb age dating to test the constraints on the activity age of the Shangma fault. A bedding intrusive granitoid pegmatite vein which was parallel to the foliation of the ductile shear zone of the country rock which exhibits a boudinage deformation, showing syn-tetonic emplacing at the end of ductile deformation period and deformation in the brittle-ductile transition domain. The zircon U-Ph age dating of the granitoid pegmatite vein gives a result of 125.9±4.2 Ma, expressing the extension age in the brittle-ductile transition domain of the Shangma fault. Another sample, which was collected from a granite pluton cutting the foliation of the extension ductile shear zone, gives a zircon U-Ph age of 118.8±4. 1 Ma, constraining the end of the ductile shearing. Then the transformation time from ductile to brittle deformation can he constrained at 126-119 Ma.Compared with the former researches, the formation of the Luotian dome, which is located to the east of the Shangma fault can be constrained at 150-126 Ma. This study offers a new time constraint to the evolution of the Dabie orogenic belt.
-
图 1 商麻断裂带区域地质构造略图（据刘早学和李金平，1993；周汉文等，1991修改）
1.白垩—第四系；2.古元古代变质岩系；3.太古宙片麻岩（大别杂岩）；4.英云闪长质片麻岩；5.花岗质片麻岩；6.混合花岗片麻岩；7. 花岗岩；8.脆性断裂；9.韧性剪切带；10.地质界线；11.定向标本；12.锆石U —Pb年龄样品；SMF.商麻断裂；JSF.金寨—舒城断裂；MXF.磨子潭—晓天断裂；TLF.郯庐断裂；XGF.襄樊—广济断裂
Fig. 1. Sketch map of regional geology in the area of the Shangma fault
图 2 麻城市冲口一带地质剖面图
1.砂砾岩；2.构造碎裂岩；3.碎裂的花岗质糜棱岩；4.花岗质糜棱岩—构造片麻岩；5.二长花岗岩；6.花岗质片麻岩；7.脆性正断层
Fig. 2. Structural section of the Shangma fault in the Chongkou area, Macheng
图 3 商麻断裂带不同构造层次伸展型断裂现象
A.桃林河低角度韧性滑脱中长石的拖尾构造；B.明山水库顺面理的藕节状香肠化的花岗伟晶岩脉；C.新洲区低角度韧性滑脱引起的面理拖曳；D.冲口高角度脆性断层破碎带
Fig. 3. Field images of ductile deformation from Shangma fault
图 4 样品D5-2和D11-3中的锆石阴极发光照片
Fig. 4. CL images of dating zircons from sample D5-2and D11-3
图 5 样品D5-2花岗质伟晶岩的错石U-Pb 年龄Tera-Wasserburg 图解
Fig. 5. Concordia U-Pb plot of LA-ICP-MS analyses ofsample D5-2 from Shangma fault
图 6 样品D11-3二长花岗岩的错石U-Pb 年龄Tera-Wasserburg 图解
Fig. 6. Concordia U-Pb plot of LA-ICP-MS analyses ofsample D11-3 from Shangma fault
图 7 商麻断裂带及东大别地区区域构造略图
1.上白垩统；2.新元古界随县群；3.太古宇—下元古界大别杂岩；4.燕山期花岗岩；5.断层
Fig. 7. Schematic map of regional structure geology in the area of the East Dabie and Shangma fault
表 1 样品D5-2和D11-3的错石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄测试结果
Table 1. Results of the zircon U-Pb age dating by LA-ICP-MS for sample D5-2 and D11-3 in Shangma fault, Dabieshan
-
[1] Chen, J.F., Xie, Z., Li, H.M., 2003. U/Pb zircon ages for a collision related K-rich comples at Shidao in the Sulu ultrahigh pressure terrane, China. Geochemical Journal, 37(1): 35-46. doi: 10.2343/geochemj.37.35 [2] Faure, M., Lin, W., Schaerer, U., et al., 2003. Continental subduction and exhumation of U HP rocks: Structural and geochronological insights from the Dabieshan (East China). Lithos, 70: 213-241. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(03)00100-2 [3] Gu, C.Z., 1981.6 scale earthquake in 1932, Huangtugang, Macheng County, Hubei Province, and the new activities of Macheng-Tuanfeng fault. Crustal Deformation and Earthquake, 1(2): 83-90(in Chinese). [4] Hacker, B.R., Ratschbacher, L., Webb, L., et al., 1998. UPb zircon ages constrain the architecture of the ultrahigh-pressure Qinling-Dabie Orogen, China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. , 161(1-4): 315-263. [5] Li, Q.L., Li, S.G., Zheng, Y.F., 2003. A high precision U-Pb age of metamorphic rutile in coesite-bearing eclogite from the Dabie Mountains in central China: A new constraint on the cooling history. Chem. Geology, 200(3-4): 255-265. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(03)00194-3 [6] Li, S.G., Hart, S.R., Zheng, G., et al., 1989. Timing of collision between the north and south China blocks: The Sm-Nd isotopic age evidence. Science in China (Series B), 32(11): 1391-1400. [7] Liu, Z.X., Li, J.P., 1993. Preliminary research on basic characteristics and formation time of Macheng-T uanfeng shear zone. Resources Env ironment and Engineering, 1(7): 38-45(in Chinese with English abstract). [8] Rowley, D.B., Xue, F., Tucker, R.D., et al., 1997. Ages of ultrahigh pressure metamorphism and protolith orthogneisses from the eastern Dabie Shan: U/Pb zircon geochronology. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. , 151(3-4): 191-203. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)81848-1 [9] Sun, W.D., Li, S.G., Chen, Y.D., 2002. Timing of synorogenic granitoids in the South Qinling, central China: Constraints on the evolution of the Qinling-Dabie orogenic belt. J. of Geology, 110(4-6): 457-468. [10] Wang, G.C., Yang, W.R., 1996. Structural and chronological evidence of the Luotian dome in the core of the eastern Dabie mountains, central China. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 21(5): 524-528(in Chinese with English abstract). [11] Wang, G.C., Yang, W.R., 1998. Uplift evolution during Mesozoic-Cenozoic of the Dabie orogenic belt: Evidence from the tectono-chronology. Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences, 23(5): 461-467 (in Chinese with English abstract). [12] Wang, Y.T., Li, J.L., Liu, D.L., et al., 2000. 40 Ar-39 Ar dating of the Shangcheng-Macheng fault belt in the Dabie orogen and its significance. Geological Review, 46 (6): 611-615(in Chinese with English abstract). [13] Xie, G.L., Xu, X.W., Xu, M.X., et al., 1980. Activity of Fuyang-T uanfeng fault. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 2(3): 48-56(in Chinese). [14] Zhou, H.W., Suo, S.T., Li, J.P., et al., 1991. Primary study of activity of the Macheng-Tuanfeng shear zone. Exp loration of Geosciences, 4(4): 66-72 (in Chinese with English abstract). [15] 古成志, 1981.1932年湖北麻城黄土岗6级地震与麻城-团风断裂带新活动. 地壳形变与地震, 1(2): 83-90. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DKXB198102009.htm [16] 刘早学, 李金平, 1993. 麻城-团风剪切带的基本特征及形成时代初探. 资源环境与工程, 1(7): 38-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HBDK199301004.htm [17] 王国灿, 杨巍然, 1996. 大别山核部罗田穹窿形成的构造及年代学证据. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 21(5): 524-528. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX605.013.htm [18] 王国灿, 杨巍然, 1998. 大别造山带中新生代隆升作用的时空格局——构造年代学证据. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 23(5): 461-467. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX805.005.htm [19] 王义天, 李继亮, 刘德良, 等, 2000. 大别山商城-麻城断裂带的40 Ar-39 Ar年龄及其意义. 地质论评, 46(6): 611-615. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2000.06.008 [20] 谢广林, 徐孝文, 许明孝, 等, 1980. 阜阳-团风断裂带的活动性. 西北地震学报, 2(3): 48-56. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ198003005.htm [21] 周汉文, 索书田, 李金平, 等, 1991. 麻城-团风剪切带活动初探. 地学探索, 4(4): 66-72. -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 3690
- HTML全文浏览量: 119
- PDF下载量: 198
- 被引次数: 0
