决策树方法在遥感地质填图中的应用

孙赜; 白志强; 樊光明; 施彬

决策树方法在遥感地质填图中的应用

1.
北京大学地空学院, 北京 100871
2.
中国地质大学地球科学学院, 湖北武汉 430074

基金项目:

中国地质调查局“民和县幅1:25万数字地质填图项目” 200213000016

“数字填图过程、多元数据整合及成果表达方式研究”项目基[2003]009-02

详细信息

作者简介:
孙赜(1974-), 男, 博士生, 从事区域地质调查多元数据整合研究.E-mail: sun_ze@sina.com

中图分类号: P623;P627
计量
- 文章访问数: 3613
- HTML全文浏览量: 122
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2004-08-28
- 刊出日期: 2004-11-25

Application of Decision Tree Method in Remote Sensing Geological Mapping

1.
Faculty of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2.
Faculty of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

摘要

摘要: 决策树理论在遥感分类中, 分类准确、高效.依据其理论方法, 对青海省民和地区的遥感数据———ETM + (enhanced thematic mapper plus) 进行了分类, 选用的ETM +数据为1999年10月份数据, 数字高程(DEM) 数据来自于1:2 5万民和幅地形图, 数据格式为MapInfo通用格式MIF, 数据进行了坐标转换(地理坐标), 对原始数据进行了处理, 从等高线中提取数字高程.对遥感数据进行地形及光照矫正, 计算植被因子及缨帽变换的3个分量, 同其他5个遥感波段结合形成原始分类图层, 同时确定目标分类结果.原始数据的采样基于目视, 首先采用不同的彩色合成方案突出不同的目标地物, 交互式进行采样, 使用IDL语言编制程序从原始数据中提取地物数字信息, 使用Clementine7.2对数据进行处理, 其中10 %的采样数据验证模型准确率, 其余数据用来推算模型, 对数据进行10次迭代, 同时给予75 %的剪枝, 得到区分不同地物(如红层、黄土等) 的最合适图层(band 1 & band 3)和具体数值, 形成决策树模型, 将决策树模型导入Envi4.0中, 对原始数据(9个图层) 进行计算形成初步分类结果图, 对初步分类结果图进行一定的碎片合并, 最终形成分类结果图.该图同1:2 5万地质图进行对比确认分类的效果, 同传统分类图比较确认决策树分类方法优于传统分类.另外来自于决策树所提取的信息, 有利于地学知识的归纳总结
- 决策树 /
- 遥感解译 /
- 地质填图
Abstract: The decision tree is an effective and accurate method in remote sensing classification. We use this method to classify the remote sensing data-ETM+ (enhanced thematic mapper plus), which covers most of the area of Minhe County, Qinghai Province. The acquisition date of ETM+ is October 29, 1999. We get digital elevation model (DEM) data from (1:) 250 000 topography map of Minhe area. The format of DEM is MapInfo exchange format *.mif which converted to (geography) coordinate. After primary treatment of the raw data, the DEM data is derived from the contour line. The ETM+ scenes are rectified using the DEM and sun-illumination model. NDVI and other three indexes from Tasseled Cap transform were calculated from RS data. All these indexes are stacked with five RS bands. The target objects are selected. The sampling of the target object is based on visual observation. First, false color composed imagery is essential, and the sampling process is interactive. The digital information of the target object is derived from the program, which compiled by IDL. The decision tree model was calculated by Clementine7.2 software suite. About 10% raw data were used to validate the accuracy of the model. Meantime others were used to build the model. Ten iterative numbers and 75% trim radio are the suit parameters for this model. Then we get the most suitable layer and numerical value for distinguishing different target objects. For instance, distinguishing Tertiary red clastic and loess's best layer is band 1 and band 3. In the next step, we import the model to Envi 4.0 and classify the raw data into different target objects. After some basic treatments, for example clump and (assign) class color, we get the final result map. The map is contrasted with 1:250 000 geology map of Minhe area and achieved the accuracy of classification. The result is that the decision tree method is better than traditional classify methods. Another conclusion is that the rules from decision tree could help geologists to gain a appropriate geological conclusion.
- decision tree /
- interpretation of remote sensing /
- geological mapping

HTML全文

图 1 由样本数据建立的决策树模型

Fig. 1. Model of decision tree extracted from sampling data

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 决策树分类结果

Fig. 2. Diagram of decision tree classification

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 真彩色合成与非监督(IsoData) 分类结果对比(左侧为真彩色合成图)

Fig. 3. Contrast between true color composite and IsoData unsupervised classification images

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 决策树分类

Fig. 4. Classification diagram of decision tree

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(14)

[1]	Bauer, E., Kohavi, R., 1999. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, boosting, and variants. Machine Learning, 36: 105-139. doi: 10.1023/A:1007515423169
[2]	Clark, R.N., Swayze, G.A., 1995. Mapping minerals, amorphous materials, environmental materials, vegetation, water, ice and snow, and other materials: The USGS tricorder algorithm. Summaries of the Fifth Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, January 23-26, R.O. Green, Ed., JPL Publication 95-1, 39-40.
[3]	Friedl, M.A., Brodley, C.E., 1997. Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing Enviro. , 61(3): 399-409. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00049-7
[4]	Friedl, M.A., Strahler, C.E., 1999. Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Remote Sensing, 37(2): 969-977. doi: 10.1109/36.752215
[5]	Heath, D., Kasif, S., Salzberg, S., 1993. Learning oblique decision trees. In: Proc. 13th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 1002-1007.
[6]	Menenti, M., Lorkeers, A., Vissers, M., 1986. An application of thematic mapper data in Tunisia. ITC Journal, (1): 35-42.
[7]	Mulders, M.A., Epema, G.F., 1986. The thematic mapper: A new tool for soil mapping in arid areas. ITC Journal, (1): 24-29.
[8]	Paul, L.R., 2001. Robust pixel unmixing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(9): 1978-1983. doi: 10.1109/36.951088
[9]	Quinlan, J.R., 1993. C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, CA.
[10]	Rasoul, S.S., David, L., 1991. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21(3): 660-674. doi: 10.1109/21.97458
[11]	Ricchetti, E., 2001. Bisible-infrared and radar imagery fusion for geological application: A new approach using DEM and sun-illumination model. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(11): 2219-2230.
[12]	Safavin, S.R., Langrebe, D., 1991. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 21(3): 660-674. doi: 10.1109/21.97458
[13]	Swain, P.H., Hauska, H., 1997. The decision tree classifier: Design and potential. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, GE-15: 142-147.
[14]	Yoav, F., Robert, E.S., 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal ofComputer and System Sciences, 55(1): 119-139. doi: 10.1006/jcss.1997.1504