• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    喜马拉雅造山带晚新生代构造隆升的裂变径迹证据

    刘德民 李德威 杨巍然 汪校锋 张金阳

    刘德民, 李德威, 杨巍然, 汪校锋, 张金阳, 2005. 喜马拉雅造山带晚新生代构造隆升的裂变径迹证据. 地球科学, 30(2): 147-152.
    引用本文: 刘德民, 李德威, 杨巍然, 汪校锋, 张金阳, 2005. 喜马拉雅造山带晚新生代构造隆升的裂变径迹证据. 地球科学, 30(2): 147-152.
    LIU De-min, LI De-wei, YANG Wei-ran, WANG Xiao-feng, ZHANG Jin-yang, 2005. Evidence from Fission Track Ages for the Tectonic Uplift of the Himalayan Orogen during Late Cenozoic. Earth Science, 30(2): 147-152.
    Citation: LIU De-min, LI De-wei, YANG Wei-ran, WANG Xiao-feng, ZHANG Jin-yang, 2005. Evidence from Fission Track Ages for the Tectonic Uplift of the Himalayan Orogen during Late Cenozoic. Earth Science, 30(2): 147-152.

    喜马拉雅造山带晚新生代构造隆升的裂变径迹证据

    基金项目: 

    国土资源部1∶25万定结县幅 H45C004003

    陈塘区幅 G45C001003

    区域地质调查项目 200013000145

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      刘德民(1975 -),男,博士,主要研究方向为大陆动力学.E-mail: lymldm2002@163.com

    • 中图分类号: P54

    Evidence from Fission Track Ages for the Tectonic Uplift of the Himalayan Orogen during Late Cenozoic

    • 摘要: 喜马拉雅造山带的隆升,在地质学研究中是一个非常让人感兴趣的问题,为了对其进行定量研究,揭示隆升历史及幅度等相关问题,运用磷灰石、锆石裂变径迹法对研究区淡色花岗岩进行了分析,所取样品的裂变径迹年龄位于17.0~5.7 Ma之间,小于其地层时代或侵入年龄(40~17 Ma),表明研究区喜马拉雅造山带的强烈隆升开始于晚新生代.用磷灰石裂变径迹年龄来计算可知,研究区内花岗岩5.7 Ma以来的冷却速率和剥蚀速率分别为18.421 ℃/Ma和0.526 mm/a.5.7~9.2 Ma间的相对抬升与剥蚀速率为0.229 mm/a,9.2~17.0 Ma间的相对抬升与剥蚀速率为0.032 mm/a.用锆石裂变径迹年龄来计算知,研究区内花岗岩16.2 Ma以来的冷却速率和剥蚀速率分别为12.963 ℃/Ma和0.370 mm/a,冷却速率和剥蚀速率均小于用磷灰石计算的结果.因此说喜马拉雅造山带从9.2 Ma到现在隆升和剥蚀的速率是处于加快的状态.

       

    • 图  1  研究区地质简图

      1.正断层; 2.平移断层; 3.逆冲断层; 4.拆离断层; 5.花岗岩体; 6.取样地点及样号; 7.山峰及高程(m); 8.国界线; F1.萨迦逆冲断层; F2.定日-岗巴逆冲断层; F3.藏南折离系主干断层; AnZL.拉轨岗日杂岩; AnZM.马卡鲁杂岩; AnZz.扎西惹嘎岩组; Pz—Kz.古生界—新生界; Mz—Kz.中生界—新生界

      Fig.  1.  Geological sketch map of the study area

      图  2  裂变径迹年龄、高程及径迹长度关系

      Fig.  2.  Relationship of fission track date, elevation and length of fission track

      图  3  磷灰石、锆石裂变径迹年龄得出的花岗岩体的冷却路径

      Fig.  3.  Granite body's cooling track obtained from the fission track dates of apatite and zircon

      表  1  裂变径迹实验结果

      Table  1.   Results of fission track

      表  2  磷灰石裂变径迹年龄和隆升、剥蚀速率

      Table  2.   Rate of uplifting and exhuming counted from fission track ages of apatite and zircon

    • [1] Chen, Z.L., Zhang, Y.Q., Wang, X.F., et al., 2001. Fission track dating of apatite constrains on the Cenozoic uplift of the Altyn Tagh mountain. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 22(5): 413-418(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [2] Ding, L., Zhong, D.L., Pan, Y.S., et al., 1997. Fission track dating evidence on fast uplifting since Pliocene of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis. Chinese Science Bulletin, 44(16): 1497-1500(in Chinese).
      [3] Green, P.F., Duddy, I.R., Gleadow, A.J.W., et al., 1986. Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite. 1, A quantitative description. Chemical Geology(Isotope Geoscience Section), 59: 237-253. doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(86)90074-6
      [4] Green, P.F., Duddy, I.R., Laslett, G.M., et al., 1989. Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite. 4, Quantitative modeling techniques and extension to geological time scales. Chemical Geology(Isotope Geoscience Section), 79: 155-182. doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(89)90018-3
      [5] Li, D.W., 2003. A new model for uplifting mechanism of Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 28(6): 593-600(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [6] Liu, D.M., Li, D.W., Xie, D.F., et al., 2003. Primary study on tectonic landforms in northern part of middle Himalayan orogen. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 28(6): 639-644(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [7] Reiners, P. W., Zhou, Z. Y., Ehlers, T. A., et al., 2003. Post-orogenic evolution of the Dabie Shan, eastern China, from(U-Th)/He and fission-track thermochronology. American Journal of Science, 303(6): 489-518. doi: 10.2475/ajs.303.6.489
      [8] Ventura, B., Lisker, F., 2003. Long-term landscape evolution of the northeastern margin of the Bohemian massif, apatite fission-track data from the Erzgebirge(Germany). International Journal of Earth Sciences, 92(5): 691-700. doi: 10.1007/s00531-003-0344-9
      [9] Wagner, G. A., Heil, E., 1991. Apatite fission-track agespectrum based on projected track length analysis. Chemical Geology(Isotope Geoscience Section), 87: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(91)90029-V
      [10] Wang, G.C., Wu, Y.L., Xiang, S.Y., et al., 2003. Mountain building process and geomorphic migration of Eastern Kunlun Mountains during Quaternary. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 28(6): 583-592(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [11] Wang, G. C., Yang, W. R., 1998. Some progresses of research methods on the uplift and exhumation of Cenozoic. Earth Science Frontiers, 5(1-2): 151-156(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [12] Wang, J., 1996. Some existing problems in uplift rate calculated by apatite fission track analysis. Geological Science and Technology In fomation, 16(1): 97-102(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [13] Wang, Y.B., Wang, J., Wang, S.C., 1998. Fission track evidence for rapid uplift of the Nyalam, higher Himalaya, Tibet, China. Geological Review, 44(4): 430-434(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [14] Wang, Y., Wan, J.L., Li, D.M., et al., 2001. Thermochro151 nological evidence of tectonic uplift in Nyalam, south Tibetan detachment system. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 20(4): 292-294(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [15] Wu, Z.H., Wu, Z.H., 1999. Use of fission track dating in studying the uplift history of orogenic belt. Geological Science and Techonolgy In formation, 18(4): 28-32 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [16] Wu, Z.H., Wu, Z.H., 2001. Ordos and Qinshui basin history of uplift denudation. Geological Science and Technology In formation, 20(3): 16-20(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [17] Yang, W.R., Wang, G.C., Jian, P., 2000. Study on the tectono-chronology of the Dabie orogenic belt. China University of Geosciences Press, Wuhan, 1-17(in Chinese).
      [18] Yin, G.M., Lu, Y.C., Zhao, H., et al., 2001. Cenozoic tectonic uplifting of Hua mountain. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46(13): 1121-1123(in Chinese). doi: 10.1360/csb2001-46-13-1121
      [19] Zeitler, P.K., 1985. Cooling history of the NW Himalaya, Pakistan. Tectonics, 10: 729-741.
      [20] Zeitler, P.K., Johnson, N.M., Naeser, C.W., et al., 1982. Fission-track evidence for Quaternary uplift of the Nanga Parbat region, Pakistan. Nature, 298: 255-257. doi: 10.1038/298255a0
      [21] 陈正乐, 张乐桥, 王小凤, 等, 2001. 新生代阿尔金山脉隆升历史的裂变径迹证据. 地球学报, 22(5): 413-418. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2001.05.006
      [22] 丁林, 钟大赉, 潘裕生, 等, 1997. 东喜马拉雅构造结上新世以来快速抬升的裂变径迹证据. 科学通报, 44(16): 1497-1500. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB199516017.htm
      [23] 李德威, 2003. 青藏高原隆升机制新模式. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 28(6): 593-600. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200306002.htm
      [24] 刘德民, 李德威, 谢德凡, 等, 2003. 喜马拉雅造山带中段北坡构造地貌初步研究. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 28(6): 639-644. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200306009.htm
      [25] 王国灿, 吴燕玲, 向树元, 等, 2003. 东昆仑东段第四纪成山作用过程与地貌变迁. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 28(6): 583-592. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200306001.htm
      [26] 王国灿, 杨巍然, 1998. 地质晚近时期山脉地区隆升及剥露作用研究. 地学前缘, 5(1-2): 151-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY801.024.htm
      [27] 王军, 1997. 利用磷灰石裂变径迹计算隆升速率的一些问题. 地质科技情报, 16(1): 97-102. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ701.018.htm
      [28] 王彦斌, 王军, 王世成, 1998. 高喜马拉雅地区聂拉木花岗岩快速抬升的裂变径迹证据. 地质论评, 44(4): 430-434. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1998.04.012
      [29] 王瑜, 万景林, 李大明, 等, 2001. 藏南伸展拆离系聂拉木一带构造抬升的热年代学证据. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 20 (4): 292-294. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2001.04.024
      [30] 吴中海, 吴珍汉, 1999. 裂变径迹法在研究造山带隆升过程中的应用介绍. 地质科技情报, 18(4): 28-32. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ199904007.htm
      [31] 吴中海, 吴珍汉, 2001. 鄂尔多斯、沁水盆地晚新生代隆升—剥蚀历史. 地质科技情报, 20(3): 16-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2001.03.004
      [32] 杨巍然, 王国灿, 简平, 2000. 大别造山带构造年代学. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1-17.
      [33] 尹功明, 卢演俦, 赵华, 等, 2001. 华山新生代构造抬升. 科学通报, 46(13): 1121-1123. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2001.13.016
    • 加载中
    图(3) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  4118
    • HTML全文浏览量:  82
    • PDF下载量:  4
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2004-07-15
    • 刊出日期:  2005-03-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回