• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    前陆盆地二级层序内可容纳空间发育演化及三级层序对比

    王家豪 陈红汉 王华 严德天 赵忠新

    王家豪, 陈红汉, 王华, 严德天, 赵忠新, 2005. 前陆盆地二级层序内可容纳空间发育演化及三级层序对比. 地球科学, 30(2): 140-146.
    引用本文: 王家豪, 陈红汉, 王华, 严德天, 赵忠新, 2005. 前陆盆地二级层序内可容纳空间发育演化及三级层序对比. 地球科学, 30(2): 140-146.
    WANG Jia-hao, CHEN Hong-han, WANG Hua, YAN De-tian, ZHAO Zhong-xin, 2005. Accommodation Space Evolution and Third-Order Sequence Correlation in the Second-Order Sequence of a Foreland Basin. Earth Science, 30(2): 140-146.
    Citation: WANG Jia-hao, CHEN Hong-han, WANG Hua, YAN De-tian, ZHAO Zhong-xin, 2005. Accommodation Space Evolution and Third-Order Sequence Correlation in the Second-Order Sequence of a Foreland Basin. Earth Science, 30(2): 140-146.

    前陆盆地二级层序内可容纳空间发育演化及三级层序对比

    基金项目: 中国地质大学(武汉)优秀青年教师基金
    详细信息
      作者简介:

      王家豪(1968-), 男, 讲师, 博士在读, 主要从事层序地层学、油气储层地质学

    • 中图分类号: P53

    Accommodation Space Evolution and Third-Order Sequence Correlation in the Second-Order Sequence of a Foreland Basin

    • 摘要: 强烈不对称的楔型地层是前陆盆地的典型特点,前隆带地层大量减薄或缺失、前隆带与前渊带三级层序的细分对比是建立前陆盆地层序地层格架的关键.结合前人对前陆盆地岩石圈挠曲变形模拟的认识,经过对库车前陆盆地的实例分析表明,前陆盆地挤压构造活动引起前渊带沉降、而前隆带隆升,导致可容纳空间发育在横向上不协调.可容纳空间的不协调发育与前隆的产生和迁移的动态演化过程相伴随: 在构造的活动期,前隆隆升并向冲断带迁移,盆地变窄变深,可容纳空间发育的不协调性逐渐增强; 在构造宁静期,盆地变宽变浅,可容纳空间整体性发育.因此,前陆盆地二级层序在地震剖面上具双层结构(如库车盆地侏罗系、白垩系卡普沙良群),其下层为一组楔状、向冲断带收缩的退积反射; 上层反射呈带状、延续范围广.层序的对比模式为: 在二级层序的底部,三级层序向克拉通渐次超覆; 在二级层序的中部,三级层序的分布向冲断带渐次收缩; 在二级层序的上部,三级层序分布广泛,可对比性强(如库车盆地下第三系).

       

    • 图  1  可容纳空间与岩石圈沉降关系示意(据Giles and Dickinson, 1995)

      Fig.  1.  Schematic diagram displaying the relationship of the lithospheric flexure to accommodation space

      图  2  粘弹性岩石圈在逆冲负载和侵蚀卸载作用下的挠曲响应(据Beaumont et al., 1988)

      a.逆冲负载; b.侵蚀卸载

      Fig.  2.  Flexural response of the viscoelastic lithosphere of the thrust loading and erosional unloading

      图  3  前陆盆地前隆-前渊带三级层序对比模式

      Fig.  3.  Correlation model of third-order sequences from the forebugle to foredeep of a foreland basin

      图  4  P1地震剖面白垩系卡普沙良群反射波组结构(剖面位置见图 6)

      Fig.  4.  Reflection configuration of Kapushaliang Group, Cretaceous in seismic profile P1(the profile location seeing in Fig. 6)

      图  5  P2地震剖面侏罗系反射波组结构(剖面位置见图 6)

      Fig.  5.  Reflection configuration of the Jurassic in seismic profile P2(the profile location seeing in Fig. 6)

      图  6  库车前陆盆地东部下第三系北北西向层序地层对比剖面

      Fig.  6.  NNW sequence stratigraphic correlation profile of Lower Tertiary in the east of Kuqa foreland basin

    • [1] Beaumont, C., Quinlan, G.M., Hamilton, J., 1988. Orogeny and stratigraphy: Numeral model of the Paleozoic in the eastern interior of North American. Tectonics, 7(3): 389-416. doi: 10.1029/TC007i003p00389
      [2] Blair, T.C., Bilodeau, W., L., 1988. Development of tectonic cyclothems in rift, pull-apart, and foreland basins: Sedimentary response to episode tectonism. Geology, 16: 517-520(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [3] Crampton, S.L., Allen, P.A., 1995. Recognition of forebulge unconformities associated with early stage foreland basin development: Example from the north Alpine foreland. Bull. Am. Ass. Petrol. Geol. , 79: 1495-1514.
      [4] Flemings, P.B., Jordan, T.E., 1989. A synthetic stratigraphic model of foreland basin development. Jour. Geophys. Res. , 94: 3851-3866. doi: 10.1029/JB094iB04p03851
      [5] Flemings, P.B., Jordan, T.E., 1990. Stratigraphic modeling of foreland basins: Interpreting thrust deformation and lithospheric rheology. Geology, 18: 430-434.
      [6] Giles, K.A., Dickinson, W.R., 1995. The interplay of eustacy and lithospheric flxure in forming stratigraphic sequences in foreland settings: An example from the Antler foreland, Nevada and Utah. In: Dorobek, S. L, Ross, G.M., eds., Evolution of foreland basins. SEPM Special Publication, 52: 187-210.
      [7] Jia, J.H., 2000. Depositional sequence and reservoir of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kuqa foreland basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 7(3): 133-143(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [8] Li, Y., Wang, C.S., Zeng, Y.F., 2000. Orogeny and sedimentary response. J. Mineral Petrol. , 20(2): 49-56 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [9] Lin, C.S., Liu, J.Y., Zhang, Y.M., et al., 2002. Depositional architecture of the Tertiary tectonic sequences and their response to foreland tectonism in the Kuqa depression, the Tarim basin. Science in China(Series D), 32 (3): 177-183(in Chinese).
      [10] Liu, S.F., Li, S.T., 1995. The theoretical models for simulating the flexural process of foreland basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 2(3): 69-77(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [11] Liu, Y. J., 1998. Sequence stratigraphy discussions for research foreland basins. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, 19(1): 90-96(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [12] Parkash, B., Kumar, S., 1991. The Indogangetic basin. In: Tandon, T.K., Pant, C.C., Casshyup, S.M., eds., Sedimentary basins of India. Gyanodaya Prakorshan.
      [13] Posamentier, H.W., Allen, G.P., 1993. Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphic patterns in foreland ramp-type basins. Geology, 21: 455-458.
      [14] Quinlan, G.M., Beaumont, C., 1984. Appalachian thrusting, lithospheric flexure and Paleozoic stratigraphy of eastern interior of North America. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 21: 973-996. doi: 10.1139/e84-103
      [15] Vail, P.R., Audemard, F., Browman, S.A., et al., 1991. The stratigraphic signatures of tectonics, eustacy and sedimentology-An overview. In: Einsele, ed., Cycles and events in stratigraphy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springerverlag, 617-659.
      [16] Xiao, J. X., Lin, C.S., Liu, J. Y., 2002. Characteristics of Cretaceous sequence stratigraphy and system tract in Kuqa depression, northern Tarim basin. Acta Geoscientia Sinica, 23(5): 453-458(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [17] Yang, G., Qian, X.L., 1995. Subsidence of the Kuqa depression and Mesozoic-Cenozoic structural reactivations in Tianshan. Xinjiang Geology, 13(3): 264-274(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [18] Zhai, G.M., 2002. On prospective hydrocarbon resources of China in 21st century. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 23 (4): 271-279(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [19] Zhang, X.M., Liu, Q.F., Wang, G.Q., 1996. Plate structural setting of the Triassic-Jurassic provenance and its relationship with sedimentary basin type in the north of the Tarim basin. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 18 (3): 252-258(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [20] 贾进华, 2000. 库车前陆盆地白垩纪巴什基奇克组沉积层序与储层研究. 地学前缘, 7(3): 133-143. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2000.03.014
      [21] 李勇, 王成善, 曾允孚, 2000. 造山作用与沉积响应. 矿物岩石, 20(2): 49-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2000.02.011
      [22] 林畅松, 刘景彦, 张燕梅, 等, 2002. 库车坳陷第三系构造层序的构成特征及其对前陆构造作用的响应. 中国科学(D辑), 32(3): 177-183. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200203000.htm
      [23] 刘少峰, 李思田, 1995. 前陆盆地挠曲过程模拟的理论模型. 地学前缘, 2(3): 69-77. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1995.03.009
      [24] 刘贻军, 1998. 前陆盆地层序地层学研究中的几个问题. 地球学报, 19(1): 90-96. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQXB801.011.htm
      [25] 肖建新, 林畅松, 刘景颜, 2002. 塔里木盆地北部库车坳陷白垩系层序地层与体系域特征. 地球学报, 23(5): 453-458. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2002.05.011
      [26] 杨庚, 钱祥麟, 1995. 库车坳陷沉降与天山中新生代构造活动. 新疆地质, 13(3): 264-274. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI503.008.htm
      [27] 翟光明, 2002.21世纪中国油气资源远景. 新疆石油地质, 23 (4): 271-279. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2002.04.002
      [28] 张希明, 刘青芳, 王贵全, 1996. 塔里木盆地北部三叠-侏罗纪物源区板块构造背景与沉积盆地类型关系的研究. 石油实验地质, 18(3): 252-258. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD603.003.htm
    • 加载中
    图(6)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  3289
    • HTML全文浏览量:  78
    • PDF下载量:  3
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2004-07-23
    • 刊出日期:  2005-03-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回