Laguigangri Leucogranites and Its Relation with Laguigangri Metamorphic Core Complex in Sajia, South Tibet
-
摘要: 藏南拉轨岗日带展布着串珠状变质核杂岩, 其内出露的淡色花岗岩体构成北喜马拉雅淡色花岗岩带.岩体既有在变质核杂岩内核中分布的, 亦有在滑脱系分布的, 岩体均表现出强力主动侵位的特征.淡色花岗岩可分为两期: 早期黑云母淡色花岗岩和晚期白云母淡色花岗岩.岩石高硅富铝, 含白云母±电气石±石榴石特征富铝矿物, 为S型花岗岩.北喜马拉雅淡色花岗岩结晶年龄为17~10Ma, 源岩为MCT上部基底副变质岩.当挤压体制与伸展体制转换时, 降压作用导致了岩浆的生成, 同时, 由于压力骤减, 年轻造山带更为塑性的下地壳物质与软层隆起导致上地壳伸展, 从而形成变质核杂岩, 岩浆对内核的上隆起到促进作用.Abstract: Laguigangri metamorphic core complexes (MCC) occurred in paternoster shape in south Tibet. Leucogranites, distributed in the core or detachment of the MCC, form the famous northern Himalayan leucogranites belt. They actively emplaced and occurred in two periods: early biotite leucogranites and late muscovite leucogranites. With high SiO2 and Al2O3, the leucogranites have muscovite±tourmaline±garnet aluminous minerals and so do S-type granites. The crystalline of the northern Himalayan leucogranites is dated 17-10 Ma, whose source is the para-metamorphical rocks in the high Himalayan crystalline basement on top of the MCT. The magma resulted from decompression during the conversion of the structural mechanism. Simultaneously, the pressure decompression caused more plastic lower crust and the liquid layer in younger orogen to rise to the upper crust and formed the MCC. It is found that the magma speeds the formation of the MCC.
-
Key words:
- metamorphic core complex /
- leucogranites /
- Laguigangri /
- Sajia of Tibet
-
表 1 拉轨岗日淡色花岗岩主量元素分析结果
Table 1. Chemical compositions of the leucogranites
表 2 拉轨岗日淡色花岗岩稀土元素和微量元素分析结果
Table 2. REE and trace element compositions of the leucogranites
-
[1] Chen Z L, Liu Y P, Hodges K V, et al. The Kangmar dome: A metamorphic core complex in southern Xizang (Tibet)[J]. Science, 1990, 250: 1552-1556. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4987.1552 [2] 李德威. 喜马拉雅造山带的构造不对称演化[J]. 地球科学———中国地质大学学报, 1992, 17 (5): 539-545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX199205008.htmLI D W. On tectonic asymmetrical evolution of the Himalayan orogenic belt[J]. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1992, 17 (5): 539-545. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX199205008.htm [3] 李德威, 刘德民, 廖群安, 等. 藏南萨迦拉轨岗日变质核杂岩的厘定及其成因[J]. 地质通报, 2003, 22 (5): 7-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200305001.htmLI D W, LIU D M, LIAO Q A, et al. Definition and significance of the Lhagoi Kangri metamorphic core complex in Sa'gya, southern Tibet[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2003, 22 (5): 7-11. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200305001.htm [4] 高洪学, 李海平, 宋子季. 藏南变质核杂岩[J]. 中国区域地质, 1996, (4): 317-322. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD604.004.htmGAO H X, LI H P, SONG Z J. Metamorphic core complexes in southern Tibet[J]. Regional Geology of China, 1996, (4): 317-322. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD604.004.htm [5] 李昌年. 火成岩微量元素岩石学[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1992.74-93.LI C N. Trace element petrology of igneous rocks[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 1992.74-93. [6] 任留东, 陈炳蔚. 北喜马拉雅变质作用和花岗岩研究及其与高喜马拉雅结晶岩系的对比[J]. 地质通报, 2002, 21 (7): 397-404. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2002.07.006REN L D, CHEN B W. The metamorphism and granitic features of the north Himalayas and their comparison with that of the high Himalayan belt[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2002, 21 (7): 397-404. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2002.07.006 [7] 王德滋, 刘昌实, 沈渭洲, 等. 日本西南冲岛新生代过铝质花岗岩类的特征和成因[J]. 岩石学报, 1990, (3): 27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB199003002.htmWANG D Z, LIU C S, SHEN W Z, et al. Characteristics and genesis of Cenozoic paraluminous granitoids of the Okinoshima island, SW Japan[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 1990, (3): 27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB199003002.htm [8] Acosta-Vigil A, Pereira M D, Shaw D M, et al. Contrasting behaviour of boron during crustal amatexis[J]. Lithos, 2001, (56): 15-31. [9] Pearce J A, Harris B W, Tindle A G. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1984, 25 (4): 956-983. doi: 10.1093/petrology/25.4.956 [10] Forster H J, Tischendorf G, Trumbull R B. An evaluation of the Rb vs. (Y+Nb) discrimination diagram to infer tectonic setting of silicic igneous rocks[J]. Lithos, 1997, (40): 261-293. [11] 张旗, 钱青, 王焰. 造山带火成岩地球化学研究[J]. 地学前缘, 1999, 6 (3): 113-120. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1999.03.011ZHAN G Q, QIAN Q, WANG Y. Geochemical study on igneous rocks of orogenic belts[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 1999, 6 (3): 113-120. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1999.03.011 [12] 周云生, 张魁武, 张旗, 等. 西藏岩浆活动和变质作用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1981.1-49.ZHOU Y S, ZHANG K W, ZHAN G Q, et al. The activity of magma and metamorphism in Tibet[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1981.1-49. [13] 孙鸿烈. 青藏高原的形成与演化[M]. 上海: 上海科学出版社, 1994.50-95.SUN H L. The formation and evolution of the Tibet plateau[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science Press, 1994.50-95. [14] Harrison T M, Oscar M L, Marty G, et al. New insight into the origin of two contrasting Himalayan granite belts[J]. Geology, 1997, 25 (10): 899-902. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0899:NIITOO>2.3.CO;2 [15] 陈智梁, 刘宇平. 藏南拆离系[J]. 特提斯地质, 1996, (20): 32-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD600.001.htmCHEN Z L, LIU Y P. The south Tibetan detachment system[J]. Tethyan Geology, 1996, (20): 32-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TTSD600.001.htm [16] 肖庆辉, 李晓波, 贾跃明, 等. 当代造山带研究中值得重视的若干前沿问题[J]. 地学前缘, 1995, 2 (1-2): 45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY501.008.htmXIAO Q H, LI X B, JIA Y M, et al. Frontiers on orogenic belt researches[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 1995, 2 (1-2): 45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY501.008.htm [17] 李德威. 关于大陆构造的思考[J]. 地球科学———中国地质大学学报, 1995, 20 (1): 10-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201905005.htmLI D W. Speculations on continental tectonics[J]. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 1995, 20 (1): 10-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201905005.htm