Volume 45 Issue 2
Feb.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Gu Haochen, Wang Quanrong, Zhan Hongbin, 2020. An Improved Approach in Modeling Injection-Withdraw Test of the Partially Penetrating Well. Earth Science, 45(2): 685-692. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.366
Citation: Gu Haochen, Wang Quanrong, Zhan Hongbin, 2020. An Improved Approach in Modeling Injection-Withdraw Test of the Partially Penetrating Well. Earth Science, 45(2): 685-692. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.366

An Improved Approach in Modeling Injection-Withdraw Test of the Partially Penetrating Well

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2018.366
  • Received Date: 2018-12-09
  • Publish Date: 2020-02-15
  • Single Well Injection-Withdraw (SWIW) test has been widely used to estimate physical and chemical parameters of aquifer due to its advantages of low budget, less time consuming and easy to operate. However, the complex flow fields near the wellbore pose challenges in solving the model of the SWIW test, especially for partially penetrating wells. Currently, three methods included in MODFLOW/MT3DMSwere used to deal with this problem:traditional WELL module, high permeability WELL module and MNW module, which respectively represent three types of commonly used numerical methods. However, it was found that all of these models were based on assumptions which might not be satisfied in the actual applications. In this study, a new method was developed by coupling the MNW module and high permeability WELL module. The case studies demonstrated the accuracy of the new model of the SWIW test. Meanwhile, we employed the new model to investigate two assumptions included in the previous studies, and found that:(1) the influence of the well screen location on the results was not negligible. (2) The assumption of the steady-flow field used in the traditional mathematical model of SWIW will cause non-negligible errors when the ratio of permeability coefficient to storage coefficient is small.

     

  • loading
  • Chen, C., Wen, Z., Liang, X., et al., 2017. Estimation of Hydrogeological Parameters for Representative Aquifers in Jianghan Plain. Earth Science, 42(5):743-750(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX201705007.htm
    Cvetkovic, V., Cheng, H., 2011. Evaluation of Single-Well Injection-Withdrawal Tests in Swedish Crystalline Rock Using the Lagrangian Travel Time Approach. Water Resources Research, 47(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009627
    Gelhar, L.W., Collins, M.A., 1971. General Analysis of Longitudinal Dispersion in Nonuniform Flow. Water Resources Research, 7(6):1511-1521. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR007i006p01511
    Gouze, P., Le Borgne, T., Leprovost, R., et al., 2008. Non-Fickian Dispersion in Porous Media:1. Multiscale Measurements Using Single-Well Injection Withdrawal Tracer Tests. Water Resources Research, 44(6):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006278
    Harbaugh, A.W., 2005. The US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model: the Ground-Water Flow Process. US Geological Survey, Reston VA, 253.
    Huang, J.Q., Christ, J.A., Goltz, M.N., 2010. Analytical Solutions for Efficient Interpretation of Single-Well Push-Pull Tracer Tests. Water Resources Research, 46(8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007647
    Istok, J.D., 2013. Push-Pull Tests for Site Characterization. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
    Li, M., Liu, W.B., Chen, C.X., 2003. Can MODFLOW Simulating the Groundwater Flow of Mixing Well? Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 30(5):116-117 (in Chinese).
    Li, X., Wen, Z., Liang, X., et al., 2017. Aquifer Parameter Estimation of Transient Pumping Test Based on Analytical and Numerical Method. Earth Science, 42(5):743-750 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DQKX201705009.htm
    Mathias, S.A., Todman, L.C., 2010.Step-Drawdown Tests and the Forchheimer Equation. Water Resources Research, 46(7). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008635
    McDonald, B., Harbaugh, A.W., 1988. MODFLOW, A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite Difference Ground-Water Flow Model, US Geological Survey, Reston VA, 588.
    Neville, C.J., Tonkin, M.J., 2004. Modeling Multiaquifer Wells with MODFLOW. Ground Water, 42(6):910-919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2004.t01-9-.x
    Peaceman, D.W., 1983. Interpretation of Well-Block Pressures in Numerical Reservoir Simulation with Nonsquare Grid Blocks and Anisotropic Permeability. SPE Journal, 23(03):531-543. https://doi.org/10.2118/10528-pa
    Rorabaugh, M.I., 1953. Graphical and Theoretical Analysis of Step-Drawdown Test of Artesian Well. Proceedings of American Society of Civil Engineers, 79(362).
    Schroth, M.H., Istok, J.D., 2005. Approximate Solution for Solute Transport during Spherical-Flow Push-Pull Tests. Ground Water, 43(2):280-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.0002.x
    Tsang, Y.W., 1995. Study of Alternative Tracer Tests in Characterizing Transport in Fractured Rocks. Geophysical Research Letters, 22(11):1421-1424. https://doi.org/10.1029/95gl01093
    Wang, Q.R., Zhan, H.B., Wang, Y.X., 2017. Single-Well Push-Pull Test in Transient Forchheimer Flow Field. Journal of Hydrology, 549:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.066
    Zheng, C.M., Wang, P.P., 1999. MT3DMS:A Modular Three-Dimensional Multispecies Transport Model.Army Corps of Engineers, 169(4):1196-1197. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.4.9308495
    Zheng, C.M., 2010. MT3DMS v5.3 Supplemental User's Guide.U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington DC, 51.
    陈晨, 文章, 梁杏等, 2017.江汉平原典型含水层水文地质参数反演.地球科学, 42(5):728-733. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.060
    黎明, 刘文波, 陈崇希, 2003.MODFLOW能模拟地下水混合井流吗?水文地质工程地质, 30(5):116-117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3665.2003.05.029
    李霞, 文章, 梁杏等, 2017.基于解析法和数值法的非稳定流抽水试验参数反演.地球科学, 42(5):743-750. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.062
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(1)

    Article views (2692) PDF downloads(30) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return