Geochemical Characteristics of Lower Cretaceous Source Rocks and Thermal History in the Huhehu Depression, Hailar Basin
-
摘要: 呼和湖凹陷下白垩统烃源岩生油条件好，油气资源潜力大.利用研究区7口钻井270个热解资料和125个镜质体反射率数据，分析了下白垩统烃源岩地球化学特征及热演化史.下白垩统烃源岩有机质类型主要为Ⅲ-Ⅱ2型干酪根，现今热演化程度具有中间高、四周低的特点.主力烃源岩层南屯组属于中等-好烃源岩，在约128 Ma进入生烃门限，现今处于高成熟-生气阶段.大磨拐河组属于差-中等烃源岩，在约124 Ma进入生烃门限，现今处于中等-低成熟阶段，大磨拐河组二段烃源岩至今未进入生烃高峰.热史模拟表明呼和湖凹陷在伊敏组沉积晚期达到最大古地温，地温演化具有先升高后降低的特点.从南屯组沉积至今，地温梯度先升高到50~55℃/km，后逐渐降低为现今的35.4℃/km.早白垩世以来较高的地温场对油气生成、成藏起控制作用.包裹体均一温度结合热演化史结果表明126~87 Ma（伊敏组沉积时期）应是呼和湖凹陷油气主成藏期.晚白垩世以来盆地发生抬升，温度降低，烃源岩生烃强度减弱.Abstract: The Huhehu depression, located in the southern of Hailar basin, has favorable oil generating conditions. 270 pyrolysis data and 125 vitrinite reflectance data from 7 wells in the study area are used to analyze the geochemical characteristics and thermal history of Lower Cretaceous source rocks. Results show that the organic matter types of the Lower Cretaceous source rocks are mainly kerogen type Ⅲ-Ⅱ2, and the thermal maturity of the source rocks is characterized by high in the middle and low on all sides. The Nantun Formation belongs to the medium-good source rock with high maturity, which entered the threshold of hydrocarbon generation about 128 Ma, now in high mature to gas generation stage. The Damoguaihe Formation belongs to the poor-medium source rock, which entered the hydrocarbon generating threshold about 124 Ma, and now in the medium to low mature stage, the second member hydrocarbon source rock of Damoguaihe Formation has not entered the peak of hydrocarbon generation up to now. The simulation results of thermal history show that the Huhehu depression has reached the maximum paleogeotemperature at the end of the sedimentary period of Yimin Formation, and the geothermal evolution has the characteristics of increase firstly and then decrease. From the beginning of the Nantun Formation, the geothermal gradient gradually increased to 50-55℃/km, and then decreased to 35.4℃/km now. The higher geothermal field since the Early Cretaceous controlled the formation and accumulation of oil and gas. The inclusion homogenization temperatures and thermal history results indicate that 126-87 Ma(the sedimentary period of Yimin Formation)should be the main hydrocarbon accumulation period in Huhehu depression. As the strata were denuded, and the temperature decreased, the hydrocarbon generated and hydrocarbon expulsed process became weak due to the uplift of the Hailar basin since Late Cretaceous.
-
图 1 呼和湖凹陷位置及钻井分布
Fig. 1. The location and drilling distribution map of Huhehu depression
图 3 呼和湖凹陷HI与热解峰温Tmax关系
Fig. 3. Relationship between HI and themolysis peak temperature Tmax in Huhehu depression
图 4 呼和湖凹陷镜质体反射率与深度关系
Fig. 4. Relation between vitrinite reuflenctance and depth in Huheh depression
图 5 呼和湖凹陷镜质体反射率Ro平面分布
a.大磨拐河组；b.南屯组
Fig. 5. The distribution map of vitrinite reflectance in Huhehu depression
图 6 海参7井古今地温对比
Fig. 6. Comparison of present temperature palaetemperature of Haishen 7
图 7 和1井古今地温对比
Fig. 7. Comparison of present and temperature and palaetemperature of He 1
图 10 呼和湖凹陷包裹体均一温度直方图
Fig. 10. Histogram of the fluid inclusion homogenization temperature in Huhehu depression
图 11 呼和湖凹陷和1井热史模拟与油气主成藏期分析
Fig. 11. Thermal history of He1 and oil-gas accumulation period in Huhehu depression
图 12 呼和湖凹陷沉积速率演化历史
Fig. 12. Sedimentary rate evolution history of the Huhehu depression
表 1 暗色泥岩厚度统计结果
Table 1. Statistics results of dark mudstone thickness
井号 层位 泥岩最大单层厚度（m） 泥岩一般单层厚度（m） 泥岩累计厚度（m） 泥岩占地层总厚（%） 和1 大磨拐河组二段 15 1.5~3.0 163.5 40.5 大磨拐河组一段 90 5~12 500 75.5 南屯组二段 20 3~10 188 58.8 南屯组一段 22 2~5 198 64.9 和2 大磨拐河组二段 9.5 1.5~4.0 136 42.6 大磨拐河组一段 100.5 12~20 452 92.1 南屯组二段 14 3.5~5.0 88 71.5 南屯组一段 5.5 1~3 > 57 28.4 和3 大磨拐河组二段 15 1.5~4.0 91.4 51.9 大磨拐河组一段 83 10~25 250.2 96.6 辉1 大磨拐河组二段 15 1.8~3.0 62.3 21.7 大磨拐河组一段 45 2~6 222.7 55.4 南屯组二段 10 1~3 121.0 46.6 南屯组一段 24 2~4 208.0 40.1 海参7 大磨拐河组二段 16.5 1.2~2.0 106.8 62.3 大磨拐河组一段 25 0.6~1.2 448.4 52.6 南屯组二段 6.4 0.6~2.4 87.4 83.2 南屯组一段 10.8 0.6~1.6 26.4 72.8 和4 大磨拐河组二段 17.9 12.0~23.0 151.4 62.2 大磨拐河组一段 90.0 12.0~16.0 349.5 52.4 南屯组二段 14.0 3.0~6.0 100.2 83.5 南屯组一段 11.0 1.5~4.0 128.5 72.1 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 呼和湖凹陷南屯组烃源岩有机地化统计结果
Table 2. The organic geochemical statistics results of source rocks of Nantun Formation in Huhehu depression
井号 层位 TOC（%） S1+S2（mg/g） “A”（%） Ro（%） 平均值/测量数 平均值/测量数 平均值/测量数 平均值/测量数 海参7井 南屯组二段 3.11/11 5.44/11 0.041/3 0.93/5 南屯组一段 2.89/4 4.13/4 / / 和1井 南屯组二段 2.82/16 6.88/16 0.0629/12 0.72/7 南屯组一段 1.90/8 2.51/8 0.063/8 / 和2井 南屯组二段 3.31/8 10.00/8 0.217/8 0.59/4 南屯组一段 3.6/2 1.16/2 / / 辉1井 南屯组二段 2.5/12 10.63/12 0.088/5 / 南屯组一段 2.19/17 1.85/17 0.016/6 / 和5井 南屯组二段 2.75/9 3.19/9 0.023/3 0.65/7 南屯组一段 1.63/6 3.34/6 0.369/4 0.84/3 和8井 南屯组二段 2.78/17 2.84/17 0.100/5 0.64/5 南屯组一段 1.04/2 0.31/2 0.087/2 / 和9井 南屯组二段 2.43/67 3.41/67 / / 南屯组一段 1.03/91 1.37/91 / / 注：和5井、和8井数据邢娅（2012），和9井数据刘海英（2010）.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 呼和湖凹陷大磨拐河组烃源岩有机地化统计
Table 3. The organic geochemical statistics results of source rocks of Damoguaihe Formation in Huhehu depression
井号 层位 TOC（%） S1+S2（mg/g） “A”（%） Ro（%） 平均值/测量数 平均值/测量数 平均值/测量数 平均值/测量数 海参7井 大磨拐河组二段 1.9/12 1.31/18 0.136/13 0.49/12 大磨拐河组一段 2.29/14 2.13/14 0.032/11 0.59/2 和1井 大磨拐河组二段 2.41/5 3.75/5 0.046/26 0.38/3 大磨拐河组一段 2.90/28 4.60/28 0.135/13 0.59/14 和2井 大磨拐河组一段 2.66/12 2.47/12 0.048/12 0.46/1 和3井 大磨拐河组一段 2.20/4 1.71/4 / 0.55/3 和5井 大磨拐河组一段 2.75/9 3.19/9 0.027/9 / 和8井 大磨拐河组一段 2.46/11 6.45/11 0.072/6 / 和9井 大磨拐河组一段 2.15/20 2.94/20 / / 注：和5井、和8井数据邢娅等（2012），和9井数据刘海英等（2010）.
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 呼和湖凹陷和1井下白垩统烃源岩干酪根镜下鉴定结果
Table 4. Kerogen identification results of Lower Cretaceous source rocks of He1 in Huhehu depression
井深（m） 岩性 层位 腐泥组（%） 壳质组（%） 镜质组（%） 惰质组（%） 腐泥组颜色 类型指数 类型 无定形 藻质体 合计 腐殖无定形 其他 合计 818 深灰色泥岩 大磨拐河组二段 65 65 2 2 8 25 黄 35.00 Ⅱ2 982~1 000 碳质泥岩 大磨拐河组二段 1 1 90 9 -76.00 Ⅲ 1 257.5 黑灰色泥岩 大磨拐河组一段 62 62 30 8 黄 31.50 Ⅱ2 1 637.3 黑灰色泥岩 大磨拐河组一段 54 54 3 3 35 8 黄 21.25 Ⅱ2 1 736.7 黑灰色泥岩 大磨拐河组一段 55 55 5 5 25 15 棕黄 23.75 Ⅱ2 1 790 黑灰色泥岩 南屯组二段 57 57 38 5 棕黄 23.50 Ⅱ2 1 832.53 深灰色泥岩 南屯组二段 59 59 3 3 35 3 棕黄 31.25 Ⅱ2 2 220~2 255 碳质泥岩 南屯组一段 1 1 91 8 -77.21 Ⅲ
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 呼和湖凹陷包裹体测温结果
Table 5. The fluid inclusion homogenization temperature in Huhehu depression
编号 井深（m） 层位 岩性 均一温度（℃） 和1-1 1 634.81~1 641.18 大磨拐河组一段 含油细砂岩 90、92、93、94、98、155、156、157、160，163，165，170 和1-2 1 845.13~1 853.70 南屯组二段 砂岩 88、90、92、94、95、96、98、155
157，159，160，165，167，170和2 1 637.24~1 655.10 南屯组二段 油浸粗砂岩 92、96、91、99、98、100、158
159，164，166，167，170，171，175
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Barker, C. E., Pawlew, M. J., 1986. The Correlation of Vitrinite Reflectance with Maximum Temperature in Humic Organic Matter. In: Buntearth, G., Stegena, L., eds., Paleogeothmics: Evaluation of Geothermal Conditions in the Geological Past. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. [2] Chen, J. L., Wu, H. Y., Zhu, D. F., et al., 2007. Tectonic Evolution of the Hailar Basin and Its Potentials of Oil-Gas Exploration. Chinese Journal of Geology, 42(1):147-159 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkx200701013 [3] Cui, J. P., Ren, Z. L., Xiao, H., et al., 2007. Relations between the Thermal History and Petroleum Generation in the Huh Lake Depression, Hailar Basin. Geology in China, 34(3):522-527 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgdizhi200703023 [4] Dong, L., Wang, W. M., Yu, X. B., et al., 2011. Study on Hydrocarbon Accumulation Stages in Nantun Formation, Huhehu Depression, Halaer Basin. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 18(3):20-23 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=yqdzycsl201103005 [5] Dow, W. G., 1977. Kerogen Studies and Geological Interpretations. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 7(2):79-99. https:// doi: 10.1016/0375-6742(77)90078-4 [6] Fildani, A., Hanson, A. D., Chen, Z. Z., et al., 2005. Geochemical Characteristics of Oil and Source Rocks and Implications for Petroleum Systems, Talara Basin, Northwest Peru. AAPG Bulletin, 89(11): 1519-1545. https://doi.org/10.1306/06300504094 [7] Guo, L. Y., Zhang, S. W., Xie, X. N., et al., 2017. Geochemical Characteristics and Organic Matter Enrichment of the Dongyuemiao Member Mudstone of Lower Jurassic in the Western Hubei-Eastern Chongqing. Earth Science, 42(7):1235-1246 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201707018 [8] Li, J. H., Lu, S. F., Meng, Q. A., et al., 2011. Tectonic Evolution and Its Controlling on Hydrocarbon of Huhehu Depression in Hailar Basin. Chinese Journal of Geology, 46(4):929-941 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzkx201104002 [9] Li, J. Y., Guo, F., Li, C. W., et al., 2014. Neodymium Isotopic Variations of Late Paleozoic to Mesozoic I and A Type Granitoids in NE China: Implications for Tectonic Evolution. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 30(7):1995-2008 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=86f43348082ed3b895a1db66a5970938&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [10] Liu, H. Y., 2010. The Evalution of Hydrocarbon Source Rock in Huhehu Depression (Dissertation). Daqing Petroleum Institute, Daqing (in Chinese with English abstract). [11] Liu, J. L., Jiang, Z. X., Liu, K. Y., et al., 2016. Fluid Inclusion Characteristics and Hydrocarbon Accumulation Process of Yangtake Area, Kuqa Foreland Basin. Earth Science, 41(7):1188-1197 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqkx201607009 [12] Liu, S. G., Luo, Z. L., Zhao, X. K., et al., 1993. Studying the Evolution of the Hailaer Basin, Neimenggu. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 20(2):78-86 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG199302013.htm [13] Lu, K., Hou, D.J., Hong, H.F., et al., 2010. Geochemical Characteristics of Crude Oil and Correlation of Oil Source in Huhehu Sag. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 30(1):28-32 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=glgxy201001004 [14] Lu, S. F., Liu, X. Y., Qu, J. Y., et al., 1995. Restoring of Original Hydrocarbon Potential and Original or Ganic Carbon of Source Rocks in Huhehu Depression Hailar Basin. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 19(1):31-34 (in Chinese with English abstract). [15] Petersen, H. I., Sherwood, N., Mathiesen, A., et al., 2009. Application of Integrated Vitrinite Reflectance and FAMM Analyses for Thermal Maturity Assessment of the Northeastern Malay Basin, Offshore Vietnam: Implications for Petroleum Prospectivity Evaluation. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(3): 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2008.04.004 [16] Qiu, N. S., 2002. Thermal Evaluation and Hydrocarbon Generation History of the Sedimentary Basins in Western China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 29(1):6-8 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf200201002 [17] Ren, Z. L., 1992. Advances on Thermal Histories of Sedimentary Basins. Advance in Earth Sciences, 7(3):43-49 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=7aa7346a120725a401bb16b78a4992f5&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [18] Ren, Z. L., 1996. Research on the Relations between Geothermal History and Oil-Gas Accumulation in the Ordos Basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 17(1):17-24 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600519123 [19] Ren, Z. L., Tian, T., Li, J. B., et al., 2014. Review on Methods of Thermal Evolution History in Sedimentary Basins and Thermal Evolution History Reconstruction of Superimposed Basins. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 36(3):1-20 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=xagcxyxb201403003 [20] Ren, Z. L., Xiao, D. M., Chi, Y. L., 2001. Restoration of the Palaeogeotherm in Songliao Basin. Petroleum Geology & Olifield Development in Daqing, 20(1):13-14 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dqsydzykf200101004 [21] Ren, Z. L., Xiao, D. M., Chi, Y. L., et al., 2011. Restoration of Thermal History of the Permo-Carboniferous Basement in the Songliao Basin. Oil & Gas Geology, 32(3):430-439 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syytrqdz201103016 [22] Ren, Z. L., Yu, Q., Cui, J. P., et al., 2017. Thermal History and Its Controls on Oil and Gas of the Ordos Basin. Earth Science Frontiers, 24(3):137-148 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dxqy201703012 [23] Riediger, C. L., 1993. Solid Bitumen Reflectance and Rock-Eval Tmax as Maturation Indices: An Example from the "Nordegg Member", Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. International Journal of Coal Geology, 22(3-4): 295-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-5162(93)90031-5 [24] Shalaby, M. R., Hakimi, M. H., Abdullah, W. H., 2011. Geochemical Characteristics and Hydrocarbon Generation Modeling of the Jurassic Source Rocks in the Shoushan Basin, North Western Desert, Egypt. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 28(9): 1611-1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2011.07.003 [25] Shen, W. J., 2010. Geochemical Characteristics and the Origin of Gas from He 10 Well, Huhehu Depression in Hailer Basin. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 33(3):22-25 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=trqktykf201003007 [26] Sweeney, J. J., Burnham, A. K., 1990. Evaluation of a Simple Model of Vitrinite Reflectance Based on Chemical Kinetics. AAPG Bulletin, 74: 1559-1570. https://doi.org/10.1306/0c9b251f-1710-11d7-8645000102c1865d [27] Tang, X. Y., Yang, S. C., Hu, S. B., 2014. Thermal and Maturation History of Jurassic Source Rocks in the Kuqa Foreland Depression of Tarim Basin, NW China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 89: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.03.023 [28] Wang, P. J., Zhong, J. H., Niu, Y. B., 2009. Tectonic Feature and Evolution of Huhehu Depression in Hailar Basin. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 16(5):25-27 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=tzyqc200905007 [29] Wei, Z. B., Zhang, D. J., Xu, H. X., et al., 2001. Application of Easy%Ro Model to the Studies of Thermal History for Mesozoic Basins, Western China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 28(2):43-46 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=syktykf200102013 [30] Wu, H. B., Li, J. H., 2012. Sequence Stratigraphic Geochemistry and its Application to the Evaluation of Source Rocks of Huhehu Sag in Hailar Basin. Acta Geologica Sinica, 86(4):661-670 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dizhixb201204012 [31] Xing, Y., 2012. The Research on the Resource Potential of Huhehu Depression in Hailar Basin (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract). [32] Yun, J. B., Luo, D. Q., Li, Y. X., 1994. Tectonical Evolution and Petroleum Accumulation in the Rift Group in North-Eastern China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 21(6):40-45 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199400717723 [33] Zhang, X. D., Liu, G. D., Wang, J. L., 1994. Structural Characters of the Hailar Basin and Its Geological Evolution. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 16(2):119-127 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYSD402.001.htm [34] Zhang, X. Z., Guo, Y., Zeng, Z., et al., 2015. Dynamic Evolution of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic Basins in the Northeastern China. Earth Science Frontiers, 22(3):88-98 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201503008 [35] Zhang, Y. Q., Zhao, Y., Dong, S. W., et al., 2004. Tectonic Evolution Stages of the Early Cretaceous Rift Basins in Eastern China and Adjacent Areas and Their Geodynamic Background. Earth Science Frontiers, 11(3):123-133 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD2004-DXQY200403017.htm [36] Zhou, J. B., Zhang, X. Z., Ma, Z. H., et al., 2009. Tectonic Framework and Basin Evolution in Northeast China. Oil & Gas Geology, 30(5):530-538 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200905002.htm [37] Zuo, Y. H., Qiu, N. S., Hao, Q. Q., et al., 2015. Geothermal Regime and Source Rock Thermal Evolution in the Chagan Sag, Inner Mongolia, Northern China. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 59: 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.09.001 [38] 陈均亮, 吴河勇, 朱德丰, 等, 2007.海拉尔盆地构造演化及油气勘探前景.地质科学, 42(1):147-159. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2007.01.013 [39] 崔军平, 任战利, 肖晖, 等, 2007.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷热演化史与油气关系.中国地质, 34(3):522-527. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2007.03.023 [40] 董立, 王伟明, 余学兵, 等, 2011.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷南屯组油气成藏期次研究.油气地质与采收率, 18(3):20-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2011.03.005 [41] 郭来源, 张士万, 解习农, 等, 2017.鄂西-渝东地区下侏罗统东岳庙段泥岩地球化学特征及有机质富集模式.地球科学, 42(7):1235-1246. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2017.100 [42] 李军辉, 卢双舫, 蒙启安, 等, 2011.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷断裂形成演化及其对油气的控制作用.地质科学, 46(4):929-941. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2011.04.002 [43] 李竞妍, 郭锋, 李超文, 等, 2014.东北地区晚古生代-中生代Ⅰ型和A型花岗岩Nd同位素变化趋势及其构造意义.岩石学报, 30(7):1995-2008. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ysxb98201407013 [44] 刘海英, 2010.呼和湖凹陷烃源岩评价(硕士学位论文).大庆: 大庆石油学院. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10220-2010156519.htm [45] 刘建良, 姜振学, 刘可禹, 等, 2016.库车前陆盆地羊塔克地区流体包裹体特征及油气成藏过程.地球科学, 41(7):1188-1197. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2016.096 [46] 刘树根, 罗志立, 赵锡奎, 等, 1993.内蒙古海拉尔盆地演化研究.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 20(2):78-86. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD1993-CDLG199302013.htm [47] 卢双舫, 刘晓艳, 曲佳燕, 等, 1995.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷烃源岩原始生烃潜力和原始有机碳的恢复.东北石油大学学报, 19(1):31-34. doi: 10.1097-NCC.0b013e3181d55d33/ [48] 鹿坤, 侯读杰, 洪海峰, 等, 2010.呼和湖凹陷原油地球化学特征及油源对比.桂林理工大学学报, 30(1):28-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9057.2010.01.004 [49] 邱楠生, 2002.中国西部地区沉积盆地热演化和成烃史分析.石油勘探与开发, 29(1):6-8. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2002.01.002 [50] 任战利, 1992.沉积盆地热演化史研究新进展.地球科学进展, 7(3):43-49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DXJZ199203007.htm [51] 任战利, 1996.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史与油气关系的研究.石油学报, 17(1):17-24. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600519123 [52] 任战利, 田涛, 李进步, 等, 2014.沉积盆地热演化史研究方法与叠合盆地热演化史恢复研究进展.地球科学与环境学报, 36(3):1-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2014.03.003 [53] 任战利, 萧德铭, 迟元林, 2001.松辽盆地古地温恢复.大庆石油地质与开发, 20(1):13-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2001.01.004 [54] 任战利, 萧德铭, 迟元林, 等, 2011.松辽盆地基底石炭-二叠系热演化史.石油与天然气地质, 32(3):430-439. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/syytrqdz201103016 [55] 任战利, 于强, 崔军平, 等, 2017.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史及其对油气的控制作用.地学前缘, 24(3):137-148. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dxqy201703012 [56] 申文静, 2010.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷和10井天然气地球化学特征及成因分析.天然气勘探与开发, 33(3):22-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3177.2010.03.007 [57] 王培俊, 钟建华, 牛永斌, 2009.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷构造特征与演化.特种油气藏, 16(5):25-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2009.05.007 [58] 魏志彬, 张大江, 许怀先, 等, 2001. EASY%Ro模型在我国西部中生代盆地热史研究中的应用.石油勘探与开发, 28(2):43-46. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2001.02.013 [59] 吴海波, 李军辉, 2012.层序地层地球化学在海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷烃源岩评价中的应用.地质学报, 86(4):661-670. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dizhixb201204012 [60] 邢娅, 2012.海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷资源潜力研究(硕士学位论文).北京: 中国地质大学. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1013136573.htm [61] 云金表, 罗笃清, 李玉喜, 1994.东北地区中生代断陷盆地群构造演化与成油关系探讨.石油勘探与开发, 21(6):40-45. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199400717723 [62] 张晓东, 刘光鼎, 王家林, 1994.海拉尔盆地的构造特征及其演化.石油实验地质, 16(2):119-127. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbtkgc201308021 [63] 张兴洲, 郭冶, 曾振, 等, 2015.东北地区中-新生代盆地群形成演化的动力学背景.地学前缘, 22(3):88-98. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/9142062 [64] 张岳桥, 赵越, 董树文, 等, 2004.中国东部及邻区早白垩世裂陷盆地构造演化阶段.地学前缘, 11(3):123-133. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2004.03.014 [65] 周建波, 张兴洲, 马志红, 等, 2009.中国东北地区的构造格局与盆地演化.石油与天然气地质, 30(5):530-538. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2009.05.002 -
点击查看大图
图(13) / 表(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 3719
- HTML全文浏览量: 707
- PDF下载量: 53
- 被引次数: 0
