Occurrence Mechanism and Key Controlling Factors of Wufeng-Longmaxi Shale Gas, Eastern Sichuan Basin
-
摘要: 页岩气是重要的非常规天然气资源，主要以游离气与吸附气状态赋存于页岩中，研究和阐明其含量、主控因素和演化规律对于揭示页岩气成藏机理具有重要意义.采用不同条件下页岩高温高压等温吸附实验、FE-EM、CO2吸附、N2吸附、压汞等实验方法综合研究页岩气藏中的游离气与吸附气的主控因素.结果表明，游离气主要受页岩孔隙类型、孔隙结构、储层温度与压力等条件控制；OC、成熟度和水分影响吸附气含量.基于吸附气体积校正、地质模型和数值计算综合表征，五峰-龙马溪组页岩中以游离气为主，其平均含量约为%，吸附气含量约为4%.在抬升阶段，储层温度和压力发生改变，页岩气赋存形式随之变化，游离气减少，吸附气增加.Abstract: Shale gas is one important kind of natural resources, which occurs in reservoir by free state and absorbing state. In order to reveal its accumulation mechanism, it is significant to study and illuminate the TOC content, main controlling factors, evolution rule of shale gas. In this study, we analyze the main controlling factor of free gas and absorbed gas in reservoir comprehensively by high temperature and high pressure adsorption isothermal experiment, FE-SEM, CO2 adsorption experiment, N2 adsorption experiment and mercury injection experiment. The results show that free gas is controlled by pore types and pore structure of shale, temperature and pressure in reservoir; while absorbed gas is controlled by TOC, maturity and moisture. In different stages of hydrocarbon generation, the content of free gas and absorbed gas changes regularly. Free gas occurs in the highly mature stage, and increases the process of hydrocarbon generation and the evolution of pores. It transforms into absorbed gas in the lifting stage because of the changes of temperature and pressure, which results in free gas decrease and absorbed gas increase.
-
Key words:
- shale gas /
- free gas /
- adsorbed gas /
- Jiaoshiba area /
- Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation /
- petroleum geology
-
图 1 焦石坝构造简图(a)和焦页1井地层柱状图(b)
据项目报告《焦石坝及其邻区页岩气富集机理》，中国石化集团南方勘探分公司，2014
Fig. 1. The regional tectonic of Jiaoshiba (a) and stratigraphic histogram of well JY1 (b)
图 2 焦页1井五峰-龙马溪组页岩孔隙类型
图a和图b来自样品JY1-2；图c和图d来自样品JY1-5
Fig. 2. Pore types in the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales of well JY1
图 3 数学模型拟合的五峰-龙马溪组页岩中不同类型孔隙的孔隙度(a)及其比例(b)
Fig. 3. Porosity (a) and relatively ratio (b) of different pore types in Wufeng-Longmaxi shales using mathematic models
图 4 焦页1井五峰-龙马溪组页岩孔径分布
Fig. 4. Pore size distribution in the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales of well JY1
图 5 焦页1井五峰-龙马溪组页岩等温吸附曲线
Fig. 5. Isotherms of methane adsorbed in the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales of well JY1
图 6 焦页1井五峰-龙马溪组有机碳含量和Langmuir最大吸附量关系
Fig. 6. The relation between TOC and Langmuir maximum adsorbed methane capacity in the Wufeng-Longmaxi shales of well JY1
图 7 页岩吸附量与热成熟度的关系
Fig. 7. The relation between shale methane adsorbed amount and thermal maturity
图 8 样品JY1-5的不同温度等温吸附实验曲线
Fig. 8. Adsorbed isotherm at different temperatures of sample JY1-5
图 9 焦页1井游离气、吸附气和总含气量计算值与现场解析气含量对比
Fig. 9. Comparison of free gas, adsorbed gas and total gas contents obtained from mathematical model and desorbed gas content of well JY1
图 10 焦页1井页岩吸附气与游离气随埋藏史的演化
据项目报告《焦石坝及其邻区页岩气富集机理》，中国石化集团南方勘探分公司，2014
Fig. 10. Evolution of free gas and adsorbed gas in the Longmaxi shale of well JY1
表 1 样品参数及矿物成分
Table 1. Geochemical parameters and mineral components of shale samples
样品 深度(m) TOC(%) 粘土矿物(%) 石英(%) 钾长石(%) 斜长石(%) 方解石(%) 白云石(%) 黄铁矿(%) JY1-1 2 340.09 1.34 54.0 30.5 1.9 9.3 - - 4.3 JY1-2 2 361.44 2.09 33.5 33.1 2.1 10.8 5.9 9.9 4.7 JY1-3 2 375.06 2.08 36.0 32.5 3.5 11.8 3.5 9.9 2.8 JY1-4 2 384.18 2.98 34.5 38.2 3.3 8.6 5.9 5.8 3.7 JY1-5 2 404.43 4.09 35.1 42.7 2.0 7.2 6.5 3.7 2.8 JY1-6 2 414.56 6.45 38.0 36.6 5.7 9.1 1.9 5.6 3.1 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 抬升期计算的游离气与吸附气含量
Table 2. Free gas content and adsorbed gas content during the uplift
深度
(m)年代
(Ma)地层温度*
(K)地层压力α
(MPa)游离气
(m3/t·岩石)吸附气
(m3/t·岩石)5 500 100 473 79 3.16 1.35 4 500 60 403 60 3.06 1.52 2 414 0 358 36 2.58 1.60 注：地层温度*和地层压力α来自盆地模拟.
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Bernard, S., Wirth, R., Schreiber, A., et al., 2012.Formation of Nanoporous Pyrobitumen Residues during Maturation of the Barnett Shale (Fort Worth Basin).International Journal of Coal Geology, 103:3-11.doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.04.010 [2] Bowker, K.A., 2007.Barnett Shale Gas Production, Fort Worth Basin:Issues and Discussion.AAPG Bulletin, 91(4):523-533.doi: 10.1306/06190606018 [3] Cardott, B.J., Landis, C.R., Curtis, M.E., 2015.Post-Oil Solid Bitumen Network in the Woodford Shale, USA-A Potential Primary Migration Pathway.International Journal of Coal Geology, 139:106-113.doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.08.012 [4] Curtis, M.E., Cardott, B.J., Sondergeld, C.H., et al., 2012a.Development of Organic Porosity in the Woodford Shale with Increasing Thermal Maturity.International Journal of Coal Geology, 103:26-31.doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2012.08.004 [5] Curtis, M.E., Sondergeld, C.H., Ambrose, R.J., et al., 2012b.Microstructural Investigation of Gas Shales in Two and Three Dimensions Using Nanometer-Scale Resolution Imaging.AAPG Bulletin, 96(4):665-677.doi: 10.1306/08151110188 [6] Dai, J.X., Zou, C.N., Liao, S.M., et al., 2014.Geochemistry of the Extremely High Thermal Maturity Longmaxi Shale Gas, Southern Sichuan Basin.Organic Geochemistry, 74:3-12.doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2014.01.018 [7] Deng, B., Liu, S.G., Liu, S., et al., 2009.Restoration of Exhumation Thickness and Its Significance in Sichuan Basin, China.Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 36(6):675-686(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279895760_Restoration_of_exhumation_thickness_and_its_significance_in_Sichuan_Basin_China [8] Gasparik, M., Bertier, P., Gensterblum, Y., et al., 2014.Geological Controls on the Methane Storage Capacity in Organic-Rich Shales.International Journal of Coal Geology, 123:34-51.doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.06.010 [9] Gasparik, M., Ghanizadeh, A., Bertier, P., et al., 2012.High-Pressure Methane Sorption Isotherms of Black Shales from the Netherlands.Energy & Fuels, 26(8):4995-5004.doi: 10.1021/ef300405g [10] Guo, T.L., Zhang, H.R., 2014.Formation and Enrichment Mode of Jiaoshiba Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 41(1):28-36(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201401003.htm [11] Guo, X.S., Hu, D.F., Li, Y.P., et al., 2016.Analyses and Thoughts on Accumulation Mechanisms of Marine and Lacustrine Shale Gas:A Case Study in Shales of Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin.Earth Science Frontiers, 23(2):18-28(in Chinese with English abstract). [12] Hao, F., Guo, T.L., Zhu, Y.M., et al., 2008.Evidence for Multiple Stages of Oil Cracking and Thermochemical Sulfate Reduction in the Puguang Gas Field, Sichuan Basin, China.AAPG Bulletin, 92(5):611-637.doi: 10.1306/01210807090 [13] Hao, F., Zou, H.Y., 2013.Cause of Shale Gas Geochemical Anomalies and Mechanisms for Gas Enrichment and Depletion in High-Maturity Shales.Marine and Petroleum Geology, 44:1-12.doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.03.005 [14] Hao, F., Zou, H.Y., Lu, Y.C., 2013.Mechanisms of Shale Gas Storage:Implications for Shale Gas Exploration in China.AAPG Bulletin, 97(8):1325-1346.doi: 10.1306/02141312091 [15] Hu, H.Y., 2013.Porosity Evolution of the Organic-Rich Shale with Thermal Maturity Increasing.Acta Petrolei Sinica, 34(5):820-825(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282738523_Porosity_evolution_of_the_organic-rich_shale_with_thermal_maturity_increasing [16] Hu, H.Y., Zhang, T.W., Wiggins-Camacho, J.D., et al., 2015.Experimental Investigation of Changes in Methane Adsorption of Bitumen-Free Woodford Shale with Thermal Maturation Induced by Hydrous Pyrolysis.Marine and Petroleum Geology, 59:114-128.doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.07.029 [17] Jarvie, D.M., Hill, R.J., Ruble, T.E., et al., 2007.Unconventional Shale-Gas Systems:The Mississippian Barnett Shale of North-Central Texas as One Model for Thermogenic Shale-Gas Assessment.AAPG Bulletin, 91(4):475-499.doi: 10.1306/12190606068 [18] Ji, L.M., Zhang, T.W., Milliken, K.L., et al., 2012.Experimental Investigation of Main Controls to Methane Adsorption in Clay-Rich Rocks.Applied Geochemistry, 27(12):2533-2545.doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.08.027 [19] Löhr, S.C., Baruch, E.T., Hall, P.A., et al., 2015.Is Organic Pore Development in Gas Shales Influenced by the Primary Porosity and Structure of Thermally Immature Organic Matter?Organic Geochemistry, 87:119-132.doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.07.010 [20] Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C., et al., 2009.Morphology, Genesis, and Distribution of Nanometer-Scale Pores in Siliceous Mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale.Journal of Sedimentary Research, 79(12):848-861.doi: 10.2110/jsr.2009.092 [21] Loucks, R.G., Reed, R.M., Ruppel, S.C., et al., 2012.Spectrum of Pore Types and Networks in Mudrocks and a Descriptive Classification for Matrix-Related Mudrock Pores.AAPG Bulletin, 96(6):1071-1098.doi: 10.1306/08171111061 [22] Ma, Y.S., Guo, X.S., Guo, T.L., et al., 2007.The Puguang Gas Field:New Giant Discovery in the Mature Sichuan Basin, Southwest China.AAPG Bulletin, 91(5):627-643.doi: 10.1306/11030606062 [23] Mastalerz, M., Schimmelmann, A., Drobniak, A., et al., 2013.Porosity of Devonian and Mississippian New Albany Shale Across a Maturation Gradient:Insights from Organic Petrology, Gas Adsorption, and Mercury Intrusion.AAPG Bulletin, 97(10):1621-1643.doi: 10.1306/04011312194 [24] Milliken, K.L., Rudnicki, M., Awwiller, D.N., et al., 2013.Organic Matter-Hosted Pore System, Marcellus Formation (Devonian), Pennsylvania.AAPG Bulletin, 97(2):177-200.doi: 10.1306/07231212048 [25] Modica, C.J., Lapierre, S.G., 2012.Estimation of Kerogen Porosity in Source Rocks as a Function of Thermal Transformation:Example from the Mowry Shale in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.AAPG Bulletin, 96(1):87-108.doi: 10.1306/04111110201 [26] Montgomery, S.L., Jarvie, D.M., Bowker, K.A., et al., 2005.Mississippian Barnett Shale, Fort Worth Basin, North-Central Texas:Gas-Shale Play with Multi-trillion Cubic Foot Potential.AAPG Bulletin, 89(2):155-175.doi: 10.1306/09170404042 [27] Ross, D.J.K., Bustin, R.M., 2007.Shale Gas Potential of the Lower Jurassic Gordondale Member, Northeastern British Columbia, Canada.Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 55(1):51-75.doi: 10.2113/gscpgbull.55.1.51 [28] Ross, D.J.K., Bustin, R.M., 2008.Characterizing the Shale Gas Resource Potential of Devonian-Mississippian Strata in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin:Application of an Integrated Formation Evaluation.AAPG Bulletin, 92(1):87-125.doi: 10.1306/09040707048 [29] Ross, D.J.K., Bustin, R.M., 2009.The Importance of Shale Composition and Pore Structure Upon Gas Storage Potential of Shale Gas Reservoirs.Marine and Petroleum Geology, 26(6):916-927.doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2008.06.004 [30] Slatt, R.M., O'Brien, N.R., 2011.Pore Types in the Barnett and Woodford Gas Shales:Contribution to Understanding Gas Storage and Migration Pathways in Fine-Grained Rocks.AAPG Bulletin, 95(12):2017-2030.doi: 10.1306/03301110145 [31] Su, X.B., Zhang, L.P., 2004.Prediction of Reservoir Pressure for Coal-Bed Gas.Natural Gas Industry, 24(5):88-90(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shimin_Liu4/publication/257003249_Permeability_prediction_of_coalbed_methane_reservoirs_during_primary_depletion/links/0a85e52d7e1fdd5bac000000.pdf?disableCoverPage=true [32] Tian, H., Li, T.F., Zhang, T.W., et al., 2016.Characterization of Methane Adsorption on Overmature Lower Silurian-Upper Ordovician Shales in Sichuan Basin, Southwest China:Experimental Results and Geological Implications.International Journal of Coal Geology, 156:36-49.doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2016.01.013 [33] Wang, Y.M., Dong, D.Z., Yang, H., et al., 2014.Quantitative Characterization of Reservoir Space in the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Shale, Southern Sichuan, China.Science in China (Series D), 57:313-322(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1007/s11430-013-4645-y [34] Wu, S.T., Zhou, C.N., Zhu, R.K., et al., 2015.Reservoir Quality Characterization of Upper Triassic Chang 7 Shale in Ordos Basin.Earth Science, 40(11):1810-1823(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288230011_Reservoir_quality_characterization_of_upper_triassic_Chang_7_Shale_in_Ordos_Basin [35] Zhang, L.Y., Li, J.Y., Li, Z., et al., 2015.Development Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Intra-Organic Reservoir Space in Lacustrine Shales.Earth Science, 40(11):1824-1833(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288230302_Development_characteristics_and_formation_mechanism_of_intra-organic_reservoir_space_in_lacustrine_shales [36] Zhang, T.W., Ellis, G.S., Ruppel, S.C., et al., 2012.Effect of Organic-Matter Type and Thermal Maturity on Methane Adsorption in Shale-Gas Systems.Organic Geochemistry, 47:120-131.doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.03.012 [37] Zhao, W.Z., Li, J.Z., Yang, T., et al., 2016.Geological Difference and Its Significance of Marine Shale Gases in South China.Petroleum Exploration and Development, 43(4):547-559(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(16)30065-9 [38] Zhu, G.Y., Zhang, S.C, Liang, Y.B., et al., 2006.The Characteristics of Natural Gas in Sichuan Basin and Its Sources.Earth Science Frontiers, 13(2):234-248(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200602027.htm [39] Zou, C.N., Dong, D.Z., Wang, Y.M., et al., 2015.Shale Gas in China:Characteristics, Challenges and Prospects (Ⅰ).Petroleum Exploration and Development, 42(6):689-701(in Chinese with English abstract). http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_syktykf201506001.aspx [40] 邓宾, 刘树根, 刘顺, 等, 2009.四川盆地地表剥蚀量恢复及其意义.成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 36(6):675-686. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CDLG200906016.htm [41] 郭彤楼, 张汉荣, 2014.四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式.石油勘探与开发, 41(1):28-36. doi: 10.11698/PED.2014.01.03 [42] 郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等, 2016.海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考:以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例.地学前缘, 23(2):18-28. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY201602005.htm [43] 胡海燕, 2013.富有机质Woodford页岩孔隙演化的热模拟实验.石油学报, 34(5):820-825. doi: 10.7623/syxb201305002 [44] 苏现波, 张丽萍, 2004.煤层气储层压力预测方法.天然气工业, 24(5):88-90. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TRQG200405031.htm [45] 王玉满, 董大忠, 杨桦, 等, 2014.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩储集空间定量表征.中国科学(D辑), 44(6):1348-1356. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK201406025.htm [46] 吴松涛, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 等, 2015.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统长7段泥页岩储集性能.地球科学, 40(11):1810-1823. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3188 [47] 张林晔, 李钜源, 李政, 等, 2015.湖相页岩有机储集空间发育特点与成因机制.地球科学, 40(11):1824-1833. http://www.earth-science.net/WebPage/Article.aspx?id=3189 [48] 赵文智, 李建忠, 杨涛, 等, 2016.中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义.石油勘探与开发, 43(4):499-510. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201604002.htm [49] 朱光有, 张水昌, 梁英波, 等, 2006.四川盆地天然气特征及气源.地学前缘, 13(2):234-248. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DXQY200602027.htm [50] 邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等, 2015.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一).石油勘探与开发, 42(6):689-701. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK201506002.htm -
点击查看大图
图(10) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 4059
- HTML全文浏览量: 1758
- PDF下载量: 31
- 被引次数: 0
