新疆库米什地区晚石炭世-早二叠世花岗岩年代学、地球化学及其地质意义

陈超; 吕新彪; 曹晓峰; 吴春明; 朱江

doi:10.3799/dqkx.2013.023

新疆库米什地区晚石炭世-早二叠世花岗岩年代学、地球化学及其地质意义

doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2013.023

陈超^1,,
吕新彪^{1, 2, ,},
曹晓峰¹,
吴春明²,
朱江¹

1.
中国地质大学资源学院，湖北武汉 430074
2.
中国地质大学地质调查研究院，湖北武汉 430074

基金项目:

国家“十一五”科技支撑计划重点项目 2007BA25B04

详细信息

作者简介:
陈超(1984-)，男，在读博士研究生，矿产普查与勘探专业.E-mail：chenchao_02103103@163.com

通讯作者:
吕新彪，E-mail：lvxb_01@163.com

中图分类号: P597
计量
- 文章访问数: 3036
- HTML全文浏览量: 127
- PDF下载量: 530
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-04-15
- 刊出日期: 2013-03-01

Geochronology, Geochemistry and Geological Significance of Late Carboniferous-Early Permian Granites in Kumishi Area, Xinjiang

1.
Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
2.
Institute of Geological Survey, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China

摘要

摘要: 南天山东缘库米什地区花岗岩广泛出露，沿库米什断裂形成NWW向花岗岩带.该地区发现有忠宝和桑树园子矽卡岩型白钨矿床，矿化与二云母花岗岩关系密切.锆石U-Pb LA-ICP-MS定年分别获得忠宝岩体年龄为296±4 Ma，桑树园子岩体年龄为293±3 Ma，形成时代为晚石炭世-早二叠世.两岩体总体具有高SiO₂(72.51%~74.84%，70.68%~74.14%)，K₂O＞Na₂O，铝饱和(A/CNK=1.11~1.48，1.05~1.11)，可见原生白云母矿物等特征，反映了同碰撞S型花岗岩的特点.样品总体富集LILE元素、亏损HFSE元素，稀土元素表现为轻稀土富集、重稀土亏损的“右倾”型特征，具中等的负Eu异常.综合岩体的I_Sr值(0.707 6~0.708 8和0.706 5~0.707 7)、负的ε_Nd(t)值(-6.3~-7.1和-4.7~-5.1)、岩体单阶段模式年龄(T_DM)值(1.59~1.8 Ga和1.50~1.56 Ga)及古老的继承锆石年龄(2.5~0.8 Ga)分析认为，忠宝及桑树园子岩体为库米什地区星星峡群变泥质岩云母类矿物脱水部分熔融的产物，并可能混有杂砂岩成分，而南天山东部存在古老基底.本次研究显示南天山洋东部(库米什地区)于晚石炭世-早二叠世最终闭合，早中二叠世A型花岗岩及基性岩浆活动的出现表明该地区进入板内伸展阶段.富钨的星星峡群是本地区钨矿化可能的矿源层，早二叠世挤压向伸展的转换阶段为南天山东部钨矿有利的成矿构造体制，经历多旋回构造重熔的星星峡群在早二叠世造山过程的再次“重熔”作用致使成矿元素最终富集成矿.
- 南天山库米什二 /
- 云母花岗岩 /
- 地质年代学 /
- 地球化学 /
- 构造背景 /
- 钨矿
Abstract: Granitoids are widely distributed in east part of south Tianshan orogen, forming a NWW orientated granite belt along Kumishi fault. Zhongbao and Sangshuyuanzi skarn-type tungsten deposits have been discovered in this region and the mineralization is closely related to two-mica granites. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon dating yields the ages of Zhongbao and Sangshuyuanzi granites of 296±4 Ma and 293±3 Ma, respectively, which belong to Late Carboniferous-Early Permian. Both of the granites are peraluminous (A/CNK=1.11-1.48, 1.05-1.11) with high contents of SiO₂ (72.51%-74.84%, 70.68%-74.14%) and primary muscovites, which show the characteristics of syn-collision S-type granites. The samples are characterized with enriched LILE, LREE and loss of HFSE, with HREE showing moderate negative Eu anomalies. I_Sr values of two granites range from 0.707 6 to 0.708 8 and 0.706 5 to 0.707 7; ε_Nd(t) values range from -6.3 to-7.1 and -4.7 to -5.1; Nd single-stage modle ages (T_DM) range from 1.59 to 1.8 Ga and 1.50 to 1.56 Ga, and the old inherited zircon ages range from 2.5 to 0.8 Ga. The above data indicate that the two granites are derived from partial melting of metapelites of Xingxingxia group and might contain mix greywacke ingredients, suggesting that there exists Precambrian basement in the eastern part of South Tianshan. Based on this research and previous studies as well, we are convinced that South Tianshan ocean finally closed in Late Carboniferous-Early Permian and the appearance of A-type granites and mafic magmatism means that the south Tianshan orogenic belt enters the post-orogenic stage.Tungsten-rich Xingxingxia Group is the possible source of regional tungsten mineralization and the conversion stage from syn-collision to post-collision is the advantageous matallotecttonic system. Xingxingxia Group that had experienced the polycycle tectonism remelted again in orogenic processes in Early Permian, resulting in the final concentration of ore-forming elements.
- South Tianshan orogen /
- two-mica granites /
- geochemistry /
- tectonic setting /
- tungsten deposits /

HTML全文

图 1 库米什地区区域地质简图(据杨天南和王小平，2006修改)

1.长城系星星峡群；2.早古生界地层；3.下泥盆统阿尔彼什麦组下亚组；4.下泥盆统阿尔彼什麦组上亚组；5.中泥盆统；6.石炭系；7.蛇绿岩；8.早古生代变形花岗岩；9.晚古生代未变形花岗岩；10.辉长岩；11.北天山单元；12.逆冲断层；13.钨矿点

Fig. 1. Regional geology of Kumishi area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 忠宝矿区(a)和桑树园子矿区(b)地质简

Fig. 2. Geological map of ore deposits in Zhongbao (a) and Shangshuyuanzi areas (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 微量元素原始地幔标准化(a)及稀土元素球粒陨石标准化图解(b)

Fig. 3. Primitive mantle-normalized trace element (a) and chondrite-normalized REE diagram (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 忠宝、桑树园子岩体锆石阴极发光图像

Fig. 4. CL image of zircons from Zhongbao and Shangshuyuanzi granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 忠宝(a)、桑树园子(b)岩体锆石U-Pb年龄谐和曲线

Fig. 5. Concordia diagram of U-Pb data for zircons of Zhongbao (a) and Shangshuyuanzi (b) granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 岩体氧化物源区判定图解(据Patino Douce, 1999)

Fig. 6. Oxide discrimination diagrams of granite source

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 岩体Rb/Sr-Rb/Ba源区判定图解(据Sylvester, 1998)

Fig. 7. Rb/Sr-Rb/Ba discrimination diagrams of granite source

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 岩体ε_Nd(t)-ε_Sr(t)图解

Fig. 8. ε_Nd(t)-ε_Sr(t) diagram of granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 岩体ε_Nd(t)-t图解

Fig. 9. ε_Nd(t)-t diagram of granites

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同矿物脱水熔融的温度压力关系

Fig. 10. Temperature and pressure relations of mineral dehydration melting

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 岩体主量(%)及微量元素(10^-6)化学分析结果

Table 1. Major element (%) and trace element (10^-6) compositions of granites

岩性	忠宝二云母二长花岗岩						桑树园子二云母二长花岗岩
样号	ZB1-1	ZB1-2	ZB1-3	ZB1-4	ZB1-5	ZB1-6	SSY-1	SSY-2	SSY-3	SSY-4	SSY-5	SSY-6	SSY-7	SSY-8
SiO₂	72.51	72.86	73.64	73.04	74.84	74.43	72.10	73.16	70.68	74.14	73.61	73.02	73.66	73.74
MgO	0.44	0.49	0.39	0.48	0.46	0.41	0.33	0.28	0.37	0.19	0.26	0.31	0.26	0.21
Al₂O₃	14.80	14.98	14.66	15.08	14.98	14.61	14.58	14.24	15.47	14.32	14.33	14.39	14.24	14.51
Na₂O	3.70	3.42	3.50	3.39	2.91	3.10	3.34	3.45	3.49	3.05	3.51	3.48	3.56	3.24
P₂O₅	0.18	0.20	0.22	0.19	0.17	0.18	0.09	0.08	0.09	0.05	0.07	0.07	0.06	0.14
K₂O	4.86	4.88	4.64	4.77	3.11	3.64	5.09	4.74	5.65	5.23	4.82	4.76	4.59	5.09
CaO	1.04	1.09	0.88	1.05	1.06	1.15	1.46	1.43	1.41	1.15	1.40	1.45	1.46	1.34
TiO₂	0.14	0.15	0.12	0.14	0.11	0.11	0.14	0.12	0.17	0.09	0.12	0.14	0.11	0.10
MnO	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.04	0.05	0.04	0.06	0.02	0.05	0.05	0.04	0.03
Fe₂O₃	1.24	1.34	1.10	1.26	0.29	0.11	0.74	0.32	0.40	0.37	0.27	0.39	0.44	0.21
FeO	0.88	0.98	0.88	0.85	1.06	1.24	0.87	0.92	1.23	0.50	0.88	1.07	0.78	0.62
H₂O	0.18	0.53	0.32	0.46	0.85	0.92	0.95	0.95	0.74	0.66	0.45	0.59	0.55	0.59
Li	57.4	121.0	89.2	68.3	112.3	76.5	31.7	29.2	48.2	25.7	23.9	40.5	34.6	28.5
W	31.10	15.70	10.50	20.60	18.50	27.30	7.75	8.63	9.38	10.80	8.01	9.20	6.12	8.90
Rb	245	276	292	255	273	256	261	241	303	253	248	249	236	248
Zr	90.76	136.00	98.33	200.00	74.10	90.20	133.00	103.00	137.00	49.90	90.90	108.00	92.70	79.90
Cl	342.0	478.0	523.0	421.0	396.0	406.0	301.0	309.0	150.0	53.4	62.5	77.6	65.2	83.3
Ba	311.0	318.0	81.2	231.0	356.0	389.0	480.0	454.0	522.0	353.0	468.0	444.0	480.0	397.0
Sr	65.79	68.30	26.58	51.47	112.00	138.00	148.00	148.00	157.00	124.00	151.00	151.00	152.00	136.00
Hf	3.30	4.32	3.46	5.76	3.18	3.02	5.20	4.60	6.00	1.80	3.00	4.80	4.20	3.90
Sn	7.80	7.70	8.30	6.50	9.20	10.10	4.36	4.72	6.02	9.13	4.10	4.80	3.78	6.38
Nb	19.41	19.74	19.82	8.39	12.30	11.30	33.30	18.90	22.50	18.90	14.90	15.30	13.30	16.10
Ta	3.66	3.75	4.08	3.14	2.88	3.18	3.13	2.05	2.40	1.83	1.69	1.62	1.35	1.70
U	2.02	1.55	2.36	0.96	1.66	1.79	3.23	2.83	4.40	1.72	1.89	2.99	2.49	2.19
Th	9.66	12.05	8.68	9.47	8.17	11.90	23.50	21.80	30.10	11.00	12.10	19.70	18.00	16.80
F	590	480	610	530	470	620	500	479	543	450	437	450	415	488
La	19.7	24.9	21.2	21.8	19.6	23.2	29.5	24.3	35.9	14.3	26.3	27.8	24.8	27.6
Ce	36.4	44.7	39.3	38.6	34.4	40.2	47.9	43.3	65.1	25.5	45.0	51.4	43.3	47.6
Pr	3.80	4.80	4.40	4.10	3.86	4.40	5.72	4.61	6.79	2.84	4.97	5.34	4.80	5.23
Nd	13.5	16.3	15.6	14.1	13.6	15.0	18.2	14.6	22.1	8.9	15.2	16.8	14.9	16.5
Sm	2.70	3.10	3.20	2.50	2.74	2.94	3.58	2.91	4.29	1.77	2.92	3.34	2.84	3.28
Eu	0.51	0.49	0.32	0.56	0.51	0.55	0.56	0.52	0.68	0.40	0.57	0.59	0.56	0.55
Gd	2.30	2.60	2.80	2.50	2.26	2.39	3.32	2.59	3.70	1.88	2.84	3.06	2.71	3.41
Tb	0.31	0.40	0.46	0.35	0.33	0.35	0.51	0.41	0.62	0.35	0.47	0.51	0.48	0.63
Dy	1.60	1.70	2.20	1.70	1.57	1.57	2.66	2.11	3.35	2.10	2.63	2.71	2.35	3.61
Ho	0.26	0.28	0.36	0.26	0.26	0.26	0.59	0.46	0.80	0.54	0.63	0.61	0.55	0.88
Er	0.61	0.67	0.78	0.70	0.64	0.62	1.43	1.14	1.96	1.42	1.64	1.59	1.41	2.35
Tm	0.08	0.11	0.11	0.11	0.10	0.09	0.24	0.19	0.34	0.26	0.28	0.29	0.25	0.41
Yb	0.57	0.67	0.74	0.70	0.62	0.60	1.55	1.31	2.29	1.80	1.92	1.84	1.67	2.82
Lu	0.09	0.11	0.10	0.10	0.09	0.09	0.24	0.20	0.36	0.27	0.31	0.29	0.26	0.43
Y	9.70	11.60	14.60	17.20	7.25	7.25	15.00	15.60	23.80	15.10	17.70	19.90	15.90	28.50
ΣREE	82.43	100.83	91.57	88.08	80.58	92.26	116.00	98.65	148.28	62.33	105.68	116.17	100.88	115.30
LREE	76.61	94.29	84.02	81.66	74.71	86.29	105.46	90.24	134.86	53.71	94.96	105.27	91.20	100.76
HREE	5.82	6.54	7.55	6.42	5.86	5.97	10.54	8.41	13.42	8.62	10.72	10.90	9.68	14.54
LREE/HREE	13.16	14.42	11.13	12.72	12.73	14.44	10.01	10.73	10.05	6.23	8.86	9.66	9.42	6.93
(La/Yb)_N	24.79	26.66	20.55	22.34	22.68	27.74	13.65	13.31	11.25	0.70	9.83	10.84	10.65	7.02
δEu	0.61	0.51	0.32	0.68	0.61	0.62	0.49	0.57	0.51	0.67	0.60	0.55	0.61	0.50

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 忠宝和桑树园子岩体锆石U-Pb LA-ICP-MS测试结果

Table 2. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb data of Zhongbao and Shangshuyuanzi granites

岩体	测试点	Th(10^-6)	U(10^-6)	Th/U	U-Th-Pb同位素比值						年龄(Ma)
岩体	测试点	Th(10^-6)	U(10^-6)	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁸Pb/²³²Th	1σ	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	1σ	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	1σ	²⁰⁸Pb/²³²Th	1σ
忠宝	A1-01	90	219	0.41	0.383 9	0.023 6	0.045 8	0.000 8	0.013 9	0.000 7	330	9	291	5	288	6
	A1-02	89	128	0.57	0.340 8	0.010 4	0.048 1	0.000 5	0.018 2	0.000 8	297	8	303	3	321	16
	A1-03	104	230	0.45	0.348 7	0.012 6	0.046 4	0.000 5	0.015 1	0.000 5	303	9	293	3	302	6
	A1-04	187	328	0.57	0.340 8	0.010 4	0.048 1	0.000 5	0.018 2	0.000 8	296	8	299	5	305	6
	A1-05	72	75	0.96	0.454 2	0.029 3	0.060 9	0.001 0	0.019 6	0.000 6	380	6	381	6	393	9
	A1-06	247	492	0.50	0.471 4	0.037 7	0.066 1	0.000 7	0.018 5	0.000 4	391	9	397	4	371	6
	A1-07	104	230	0.45	0.348 7	0.012 6	0.046 4	0.000 5	0.015 1	0.000 5	303	9	297	3	299	6
	A1-08	128	140	0.91	2.079 8	0.046 0	0.194 4	0.001 2	0.374 4	0.058 3	1 142	15	1 144	8	1 146	22
	A1-09	163	330	0.49	1.316 1	0.041 5	0.142 3	0.002 7	0.042 6	0.001 4	853	18	855	15	843	26
	A1-10	129	201	0.64	0.363 8	0.011 8	0.052 6	0.000 7	0.018 0	0.000 6	315	9	302	4	313	8
	A1-11	106	148	0.72	4.897 6	0.092 5	0.316 1	0.002 3	0.394 2	0.090 4	1 801	16	1 771	11	1 750	15
	A1-12	244	428	0.57	0.340 8	0.010 4	0.048 1	0.000 5	0.018 2	0.000 8	298	8	301	3	311	6
	A1-13	95	191	0.50	1.044 4	0.058 1	0.123 4	0.002 5	0.038 2	0.001 5	726	29	750	14	758	19
	A1-14	91	226	0.40	0.484 6	0.016 3	0.064 3	0.000 6	0.018 5	0.000 4	401	8	401	4	404	9
	A1-15	188	250	0.75	1.219 3	0.044 2	0.132 3	0.001 8	0.039 6	0.001 3	809	20	801	10	786	15
	A1-16	83	185	0.45	0.362 6	0.019 8	0.044 9	0.000 7	0.014 0	0.000 4	314	8	283	7	281	9
	A1-17	94	276	0.34	14.867 2	0.257 2	0.490 1	0.005 5	0.652 3	0.145 9	2 806	16	2 571	23	2 753	21
	A1-18	91	193	0.47	0.349 2	0.013 1	0.047 5	0.000 5	0.014 9	0.000 5	298	7	295	5	299	6
	A1-19	91	165	0.55	8.773 2	0.163 5	0.408 9	0.003 1	0.118 2	0.002 4	2 314	16	2 209	13	2 259	24
	A1-20	93	209	0.44	0.348 7	0.012 6	0.046 4	0.000 5	0.015 1	0.000 5	302	9	292	3	303	8
	A1-21	112	208	0.54	0.363 8	0.011 8	0.052 6	0.000 7	0.018 0	0.000 6	315	9	330	4	360	12
桑树园子	SSY-1	100	134	0.75	0.338 5	0.012 5	0.047 1	0.000 7	0.014 1	0.000 4	296	9	297	4	283	9
	SSY-2	81	112	0.72	0.373 7	0.018 9	0.046 6	0.000 6	0.016 1	0.000 6	322	14	293	4	323	12
	SSY-3	108	137	0.79	0.323 3	0.010 4	0.046 6	0.000 6	0.013 6	0.000 4	284	8	293	4	274	8
	SSY-4	640	820	0.78	0.347 3	0.012 4	0.047 1	0.000 5	0.014 5	0.000 4	303	9	297	3	292	8
	SSY-5	260	278	0.94	0.364 0	0.011 5	0.046 8	0.000 6	0.014 5	0.000 4	315	7	295	4	291	8
	SSY-6	110	146	0.75	0.453 2	0.019 3	0.049 3	0.000 5	0.017 1	0.000 6	380	14	310	3	343	12
	SSY-7	724	927	0.78	0.318 8	0.012 3	0.046 8	0.000 6	0.013 6	0.000 4	281	9	295	4	272	8
	SSY-8	120	117	1.03	0.295 7	0.010 7	0.046 7	0.000 5	0.013 7	0.000 5	263	8	294	3	274	9
	SSY-9	63	93	0.68	0.322 6	0.012 8	0.047 0	0.000 6	0.014 6	0.000 4	284	10	296	4	294	9
	SSY-10	108	151	0.72	0.339 2	0.012 8	0.046 8	0.000 6	0.015 4	0.000 4	297	9	295	4	309	8
	SSY-11	87	119	0.73	0.313 8	0.011 4	0.044 7	0.000 5	0.014 4	0.000 4	277	9	282	3	289	8
	SSY-12	256	277	0.92	0.519 1	0.023 5	0.065 7	0.000 9	0.020 5	0.000 7	425	16	410	6	410	13
	SSY-13	106	124	0.85	0.336 0	0.011 5	0.041 5	0.000 5	0.013 3	0.000 4	294	9	285	3	288	8
	SSY-14	57	149	0.38	2.188 7	0.102 8	0.181 8	0.005 1	0.078 0	0.003 6	1 177	33	1 077	28	1 519	68
	SSY-15	294	537	0.55	0.337 3	0.015 6	0.047 5	0.000 6	0.014 6	0.000 6	295	12	299	4	293	12
	SSY-16	140	139	1.01	0.377 3	0.012 0	0.040 2	0.000 9	0.012 8	0.000 4	325	9	254	5	256	8
	SSY-17	73	327	0.22	0.425 1	0.019 0	0.062 0	0.000 9	0.021 5	0.001 1	360	14	388	6	431	22
	SSY-18	115	188	0.61	0.505 5	0.027 1	0.072 2	0.001 2	0.020 1	0.000 8	415	18	449	7	402	16

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 忠宝、桑树园子岩体Sr-Nd同位素测试结果

Table 3. Sr-Nd isotope composition of Zhongbao and Shangshuyuanzi granites

样品号	⁸⁷Rb/⁸⁶Sr	⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr	I(Sr)	¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd	¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd	I(Nd)	ε_Nd(t)	T_DM(Ma)
ZB-1	6.525	0.736 289	0.708 8	0.126 1	0.512 159	0.511 916	-6.7	1 723
ZB-2	15.471	0.772 732	0.707 6	0.129 3	0.512 147	0.511 898	-7.1	1 810
ZB-3	7.836	0.741 456	0.708 5	0.111 8	0.512 150	0.511 935	-6.3	1 495
ZB-4	5.678	0.732 198	0.708 3	0.119 8	0.512 136	0.511 905	-6.9	1 646
SSY-1	4.967	0.727 818	0.707 1	0.123 9	0.512 262	0.512 018	-4.7	1 509
SSY-2	4.586	0.726 478	0.707 4	0.125 6	0.512 248	0.512 005	-5.0	1 561
SSY-3	5.436	0.730 355	0.707 7	0.122 3	0.512 235	0.511 994	-5.1	1 527
SSY-4	5.747	0.730 421	0.706 5	0.125 3	0.512 251	0.512 004	-4.9	1 551
T_DM的计算公式如下：T_DM=1/λln[1 +[(¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_s-(¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_DM]/[(¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd)_s-(¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd)_DM]；式中下标s和DM分别代表现今样品测定值和亏损地幔值；式中(¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd)_DM=0.213 57，(¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd)_DM=0.513 215(Miller and OpNions, 1985)；t代表样品结晶年龄；λ= 6.54 ×10^-12 a^-1.

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 忠宝、桑树园子岩体长石Pb同位素测试结果

Table 4. Pb isotope compositions of Zhongbao and Shangshuyuanzi granites feldspar

样品名称	²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	Pb(10^-6)	Th(10^-6)	U(10^-6)	(²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb)_t	(²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb)_t	(²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁴Pb)_t
ZB-1	18.671	15.636	38.504	24.4	9.7	2.0	18.386	15.621	38.072
ZB-2	18.526	15.629	38.497	22.8	12.1	1.6	18.293	15.617	37.924
ZB-3	18.753	15.651	38.399	24.1	8.7	2.4	18.416	15.633	38.008
ZB-4	18.199	15.619	38.232	18.0	9.5	1.0	18.017	15.610	37.664
SSY-1	19.073	15.666	38.680	19.8	8.2	1.7	18.784	15.651	38.231
SSY-2	19.310	15.663	39.150	21.6	12.1	1.9	19.006	15.648	38.534
SSY-3	18.877	15.641	38.975	27.7	19.7	3.0	18.505	15.621	38.200
SSY-4	18.796	15.637	39.071	25.3	18.0	2.5	18.458	15.619	38.297

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(73)

[1]	Arndt, N.T., Goldstein, S.L., 1987. Use and Abuse of Crust-Formation Ages. Geology, 15(10): 893-895. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<893:UAAOCA>2.0.CO;2
[2]	Barbarin, B., 1999. A Review of the Relationships between Granitoid Types, Their Origins and Their Geodynamic Environments. Lithos, 46(3): 605-626. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00085-1
[3]	Brookfield, M.E., 2000. Geological Development and Phanerozoic Crustal Accretion in the Western Segment of the Southern TienShan (Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan). Tectonophysics, 328(1-2): 1-14. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00175-X
[4]	Chen, C., 2010. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of Zhongbao Tungsten Deposit and Prediction of Its Surrounding Prospecting Objects, Tuokexun, Xinjiang Prov (Dissertation). China University of Geosciences, Wuhan (in Chinese with English abstract).
[5]	Deng, J.F., Zhao, H.L., Lai, S.C., et al., 1994. Generation of Muscovite/Two-Mica Granite and Intracontinental Subduction. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 19(2): 139-147(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/84134A/199401/4001418664.html
[6]	Deng, J.F., Zhao, H.L., Mo, X.X., et al., 1995. Intracontinental Subduction of the Yangtze Continent and Continent Reducing-Inferred from Muscovite (Two-Mica) Granites. Geological Journal of Universities, 1(1): 50-57(in Chinese with English abstract). http://search.cnki.net/down/default.aspx?filename=GXDX501.005&dbcode=CJFD&year=1995&dflag=pdfdown
[7]	Dong, Y.P., Zhou, D.W., Zhang, G.W., et al., 2005. Tectonic Setting of the Wuwamen Ophiolite at the Southern Margin of Middle Tianshan Belt. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 21(1): 37-44(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279574130_Tectonic_setting_of_the_Wuwamen_ophiolite_at_the_southern_margin_of_Middle_Tianshan_Belt
[8]	Douce, A.E.P., Beard, J.S., 1995. Dehydration Melting of Biotite Gneiss and Quartz Amphibolite from 3 to 15 Kbar. J. Petrol. , 36: 707-738. doi: 10.1093/petrology/36.3.707
[9]	Douce, A.E.P., Johnston, A.D., 1991. Phase Equilibria and Melt Productivity in the Pelitic System: Implications for the Origin of Peraluminous Granoids and Aluminous Granulites. Cotrib. Mineral. Etrol. , 107(2): 202-218. doi: 10.1007/BF00310707
[10]	Foley, S., Tiepolo, M., Vannucci, R., 2002. Growth of Earth Continental Crust Controlled by Melting of Amphibolites in Subduction Zones. Nature, 417: 837-840. doi: 10.1038/nature00799
[11]	Gao, J., Long, L.L., Qian, Q., et al., 2006. Southern Tianshan: A Late Paleozoic or a Triassic Orogen? Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(5): 1049-1061 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[12]	Gao, J., Klemd, R., Qian, Q., et al., 2011. The Collision between the Yili and Tarim Blocks of the Southwestern Altaids: Geochemical and Age Constraints of a Leucogranite Dike Cross Cutting the HPLT Metamorphic Belt in the Chinese Tianshan Orogen. Tectonophysics, 499(1-4): 118-131. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.01.001
[13]	Gao, L.E., Zeng, L.S., Liu, J., et al., 2009. Early Oligocene Na- Rich Peraluminous Leucogranites in the YardoiGneiss Dome, Southern Tibet: Formation Mechanism and Tectonic Implications. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 25(9): 2289- 2302 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[14]	Gao, L.E., Zeng, L.S., Xie, K.J., 2011. Eocene High-Grade Metamorphism and Crustal Anatexis in North Himalayan Gneiss Domes, Southern Tibet. Chinese Science Bulletin, 56(36): 3078-3090 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1360/csb2011-56-36-3078
[15]	Gao, X.Y., Zheng, Y.F., 2011. On the Zr-in-Rutile and Ti-in-Zircon Geothermometers. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(2): 417- 432(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/279605387_On_the_Zr-in-rutile_and_Ti-in-zircon_geothermometers
[16]	He, G.Q., Li, M.S., Han, B.F., 2001. Geotectonic Research of South-West Tianshan and Its West Adjacent Area, China. Xinjiang Geology, 19(1): 7-11(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/312979796_Geotectonic_research_of_southwest_Tianshan_and_its_west_adjacent_area_China
[17]	Hu, A.Q., Wang, Z.G., Tu, G.Z., et al., 1997. Geological Evolution and Diagenetic Mineralization Regularity of Northern Xinjiang. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
[18]	Hu, A.Q., Zhang, G.X., Chen, Y.B., et al., 2006. Isotope Geochronology and Geochemistry for Major Geological Events of Continental Crust Evolution of Xinjiang, China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
[19]	Huang, G., Wang, X.L., Zhang, W.F., et al., 2011. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Age and Geochemistry of Two-Mica Granite in Kumishi Area in Eastern Part of Southern Tianshan Mountains. Xinjiang Geology, 29 (3): 263-269(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI201103005.htm
[20]	Huang, H., Zhang, Z.C., Zhang, D.Y., et al., 2011. Petrogenesis of Late Carboniferous to Early Permian Granitoid Plutons in the Chinese South Tianshan: Implications for Crustal Accretion. Acta Geologica Sinica, 85(8): 1305-1333 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/284459890_Petrogenesis_of_Late_Carboniferous_to_Early_Permian_granitoid_plutons_in_the_Chinese_South_Tianshan_Implications_for_crustal_accretion
[21]	Huang, W. L, Wyllie, P.J., 1973. Muscovite Dehydration and Melting in Deep Crust and Subducted Oceanic Sediments. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 18(1): 133-136. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(73)90045-9
[22]	Jahn, B.M., Griffin, W.L., Windley, B., 2000. Continental Growth in the Phanerozoic: Evidence from Central Asia. Tectonophysics, 328(1-2): 7-10. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00174-8
[23]	Jiang, C.Y., Mu, Y.M., Bai, K.Y., et al., 1999. Chronology, Petrology, Geochemistry and Tectonic Environment of Granitoids in the Southern Tianshan Mountain, Western China. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 15(2): 298-308 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.oalib.com/paper/1472082
[24]	Jiang, C.Y., Wu, W.K., Li, L.C., et al., 2001. Phanerozoic Tectonic Evolution of South Tianshan Orogenic Belt. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
[25]	Li, J.Y., Yang, J.S., Xu, X.Z., et al., 2011. Characteristics and Genesis of Ultrabasic and Basic Rocks in the Kuzi Mountain on the Eastern Margin of Southern Tianshan, Xinjiang. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 38(4): 890-908(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DIZI201104009.htm
[26]	Li, Q.G., Liu, S.W., Han, B.F., et al., 2005. The Constraints of the Source Area and the Role of the Ancient Weathering from the Geochemical Characteristics of Xingxingxia Group Metapelites in East Part of Middle Tianshan. Science in China (Series D), 35 (3): 225-234 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[27]	Li, Y.J., Yang, H.J., Zhao, Y., et al., 2009. Tectonic Frame Work and Evolution of South Tianshan, NW China. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 33(1): 94-104 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK200901013.htm
[28]	Liu, S.W., Guo, Z.J., Zhang, Z.C., et al., 2004. The Characteristic of East Part of Middle Tianshan Precambrian Metamorphic Blocks: Constraints from Geochronology and Nd Isotopic Geochemistry. Science in China (Series D), 34(5): 395~403(in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	Patino Douce, A.E., 1999. What do Experiments Tell Us about the Relative Contributions of Crust and Mantle to the Origin of Granitic Magma? In: Castro, A., Fernandez, C., Vigneresse, T.L., eds., Understanding Granites: Intergrating New and Classical Techniques. Geol. Soc. London, Spec Publ. , 168: 55-75. doi: 101007/s00410-009-0465-7
[30]	Sylvester, P.J., 1998. Post-Collisional Strongly Peraluminous Granites. Lithos, 45(1-4): 29-44. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(98)00024-3
[31]	Watson, E.B., Harrison, T.M., 1983. Zircon Saturation Revisited: Temperature and Composition Effect in Avariety of Crustal Magmas Types. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 64(2): 295-304. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(83)90211-X
[32]	Wu, Y.B., Zheng, Y.F., 2004. The Zircon Minerageny Research and Its Constraints on Interpretation of U-Pb Age. Chinese Science Bulletin, 49(16): 1589-1604(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1360/csb2004-49-16-1589
[33]	Xiao, W. J, . Windley, B.F., Yuan, C., et al., 2009. Paleozoic Multiple Subduction-Accretion Processes of the Southern Altaids. American Journal of Science, 309(3): 221-270. doi: 10.2475/03.2009.02
[34]	Xiao, W.J., Huang, B. C, Han, C.M., et al., 2010. A Review of the Western Part of the Altaids: A Key to Understanding the Architecture of Accretionary Orogens. Gondwana Research, 18(2-3): 253-273. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2010.01.007
[35]	Xiao, X.C., Tang, Y.Q., Feng, Y.M., et al., 1992. Tectonic Evolution of Northern Xinjiang and Its Adjacent Regions. Geological Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
[36]	Yang, T.N., Wang, X.P., 2006. Geochronology, Petrochemistry and Tectonic Implications of Early Devonian Pluton in Kumux Area, Xinjiang. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 25 (5): 401-411 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/313059166_Geochronology_petrochemistry_and_tectonic_implications_of_Early_Devonian_plutons_in_Kumux_area_Xinjiang
[37]	Yang, J.S., Xu, X.Z., Li, T.F., et al., 2011. U-Pb Ages of Zircons from Ophiolite and Related Rocks in the Kumishi Region at the Southern Margin of Middle Tianshan, Xinjiang: Evidence of Early Paleozoic Oceanic Basin. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 27(1): 77-95 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[38]	Yang, T.N., Li, J.Y., Sun, G.H., et al., 2006. Earlier Devonian Active Continental Arc in Central: Evidence of Geochemical Analyses and Zircon SHRIMP Dating on Mylonitized Granitic Rock. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22 (1): 41-48 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.oalib.com/paper/1471515
[39]	Yuan, H.L., Wu, F.Y., Gao, S., et al., 2003. Zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb Dating and Rare Earth Element Component Analysis of Cenozoic Intrution from North East China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48(14): 1511-1520(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.1360/csb2003-48-14-1511
[40]	Zhang, H.F., Nigel, H., Randall, P., et al., 2005. Geochemistry of North Himalayan Leucogranites: Regional Comparison, Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 30(3): 275- 288(in Chinese with English abstract).
[41]	Zhang, L.F., Ai, Y.L., Li, X. P., et al., 2007. Triassic Collision of Western Tianshan Orogenic Belt, China: Evidence from SHRIMP U-Pb Dating of Zircon from HP/ HP Eclogitic Rocks. Lithos, 96(1-2): 266-280. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.09.012
[42]	Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Li, C.D., et al., 2006. Granite Classification on the Basis of Sr and Yb Contents and Its Implications. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 22(9): 2249-2269(in Chinese with English abstract). http://www.oalib.com/paper/1473353
[43]	Zhang, Z.M., Ma, H. F, Cai, G.Q., 2001. The Main Characteristics of Geological Tectonic Evolution of Kumishi Basin. Xinjiang Geology, 19(1): 49-53 (in Chinese with English abstract).
[44]	Zhu, Z.X., Li, J.Y., Dong. L.H., et al., 2008. The Age Determineation of Late Carboniferous Intrusions in Mangqisu Region and Its Constraints to the Closure of Oceanic Basin in South Tianshan, Xinjiang. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24 (12): 2761-2766(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200812011.htm
[45]	陈超, 2010. 新疆忠宝钨矿地质特征、成因研究及外围预测(硕士学位论文). 武汉: 中国地质大学.
[46]	邓晋福, 赵海玲, 赖绍聪, 等, 1994. 白云母∕二云母花岗岩形成与陆内俯冲作用. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 19(2): 139-147. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX199402001.htm
[47]	邓晋福, 赵海玲, 莫宣学, 等, 1995. 扬子大陆的陆内俯冲与大陆的缩小——由白云母(二云母)花岗岩推导. 高校地质学报, 1(1): 50-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXDX501.005.htm
[48]	董云鹏, 周鼎武, 张国伟, 等, 2005. 中天山南缘乌瓦门蛇绿岩形成构造环境. 岩石学报, 21(1): 37-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200501004.htm
[49]	高俊, 龙灵利, 钱青, 等, 2006. 南天山晚古生代还是三叠纪碰撞造山带?岩石学报, 22(5): 1049-1061. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200605001.htm
[50]	高利娥, 曾令森, 刘静, 等, 2009. 藏南也拉香波早渐新世富钠过铝质淡色花岗岩的成因机制及其构造动力学意义. 岩石学报, 25(9): 2289-2302. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200909021.htm
[51]	高利娥, 曾令森, 谢克家, 2011. 北喜马拉雅片麻岩穹窿始新世高级变质和深熔作用的厘定. 科学通报, 56(36): 3078 -3090. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KXTB201136008.htm
[52]	高晓英, 郑永飞, 2011. 金红石Zr和锆石Ti含量地质温度计. 岩石学报, 27(2): 417-432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201102006.htm
[53]	何国琦, 李茂松, 韩宝福, 等, 2001. 中国西南天山及邻区大地构造研究. 新疆地质, 19(1): 7-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2001.01.002
[54]	胡霭琴, 王中刚, 涂光炽, 等, 1997. 新疆北部地质演化及成岩成矿规律. 北京: 科学出版社.
[55]	胡霭琴, 张国新, 陈义兵, 等, 2006. 中国新疆地壳演化主要地质事件年代学和地球化学. 北京: 地质出版社.
[56]	黄岗, 王新录, 张文峰, 等, 2011. 库米什地区二云母花岗岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年及岩石地球化学特征. 新疆地质, 29(3): 263-269. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2011.03.004
[57]	黄河, 张招崇, 张东阳, 等, 2011. 中国南天山晚石炭世-早二叠世花岗质侵入岩的岩石成因与地壳增生. 地质学报, 85(8): 1305-1333. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201108007.htm
[58]	姜常义, 穆艳梅, 白开寅, 等, 1999. 南天山花岗岩类的年代学、岩石学、地球化学及其构造环境. 岩石学报, 15(2): 298-308. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB902.017.htm
[59]	姜常义, 吴文奎, 李良辰, 等, 2001. 南天山东段显生宙构造演化. 北京: 地质出版社.
[60]	李金阳, 杨经绥, 徐向珍, 等, 2011. 新疆南天山东段库兹山基性超基性岩特征和成因探讨. 中国地质, 38(4): 890-908. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2011.04.008
[61]	李秋根, 刘树文, 韩宝福, 等. 2005. 中天山东段星星峡群变质泥质岩的地球化学特征及其对物源区和古风化作用的制约. 中国科学(D辑), 35(3): 225-234. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200503003.htm
[62]	李曰俊, 杨海军, 赵岩, 等, 2009. 南天山区域大地构造与演化. 大地构造与成矿学, 33(1): 94-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.01.012
[63]	刘树文, 郭召杰, 张志诚, 等, 2004. 中天山东段前寒武纪变质地块的性质: 地质年代学和钕同位素地球化学的约束. 中国科学(D辑), 34(5): 395-403. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200405000.htm
[64]	吴元保, 郑永飞, 2004. 锆石成因矿物学研究及其对U-Pb年龄解释的制约. 科学通报, 49(16): 1589-1604. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2004.16.002
[65]	肖序常, 汤耀庆, 冯益民, 等, 1992. 新疆北部及其邻区大地构造. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社.
[66]	杨经绥, 徐向珍, 李天福, 等, 2011. 新疆中天山南缘库米什地区蛇绿岩的锆石U-Pb同位素定年: 早古生代洋盆的证据. 岩石学报, 27(1): 77-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB201101006.htm
[67]	杨天南, 李锦轶, 孙桂华, 等, 2006. 中天山早泥盆世陆弧来自花岗质糜棱岩地球化学及SHRIMP U-Pb定年的证据. 岩石学报, 22(1): 41-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200601004.htm
[68]	杨天南, 王小平, 2006. 新疆库米什早泥盆世侵入岩时代、地球化学及大地构造意义. 岩石矿物学杂志, 25(5): 401-411. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2006.05.004
[69]	袁洪林, 吴福元, 高山, 等, 2003. 东北地区新生代侵入体的锆石激光探针U-Pb年龄测定与稀土元素成分分析. 科学通报, 48(14): 1511-1520. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2003.14.008
[70]	张宏飞, Nigel, H., Randall, P., 等, 2005. 北喜马拉雅淡色花岗岩地球化学: 区域对比、岩石成因及其构造意. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 30(3): 275-288. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200503003.htm
[71]	张旗, 王焰, 李承东, 等, 2006. 花岗岩的Sr-Yb分类及其地质意义. 岩石学报, 22(9): 2249-2269. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200609000.htm
[72]	张子敏, 马汉峰, 蔡根庆, 2001. 南天山独山锡矿床的成矿特征及成矿模式. 新疆地质, 19(1): 49-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2001.01.009
[73]	朱志新, 李锦轶, 董连慧, 等, 2008. 新疆南天山盲起苏晚石炭世侵入岩的确定及对南天山洋盆闭合时限的限定. 岩石学报, 24(12): 2761-2766. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200812011.htm