• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    库车盆地中新生代构造演化: 磷灰石裂变径迹证据

    罗梦 朱文斌 郑碧海 朱晓青

    罗梦, 朱文斌, 郑碧海, 朱晓青, 2012. 库车盆地中新生代构造演化: 磷灰石裂变径迹证据. 地球科学, 37(5): 893-902. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2012.098
    引用本文: 罗梦, 朱文斌, 郑碧海, 朱晓青, 2012. 库车盆地中新生代构造演化: 磷灰石裂变径迹证据. 地球科学, 37(5): 893-902. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2012.098
    LUO Meng, ZHU Wen-bin, ZHENG Bi-hai, ZHU Xiao-qing, 2012. Mesozoic-Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Kuqa Basin: Evidence from Apatite Fission-Track Data. Earth Science, 37(5): 893-902. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2012.098
    Citation: LUO Meng, ZHU Wen-bin, ZHENG Bi-hai, ZHU Xiao-qing, 2012. Mesozoic-Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Kuqa Basin: Evidence from Apatite Fission-Track Data. Earth Science, 37(5): 893-902. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2012.098

    库车盆地中新生代构造演化: 磷灰石裂变径迹证据

    doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2012.098
    基金项目: 

    国家自然科学基金项目 40972133

    国家科技重大专项 2011zx05035-005-001hz

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      罗梦(1987-), 女, 硕士在读, 从事低温热年代学研究.E-mail: luomeng_08@126.com

    • 中图分类号: P546

    Mesozoic-Cenozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Kuqa Basin: Evidence from Apatite Fission-Track Data

    • 摘要: 通过对库车河剖面14个样品磷灰石裂变径迹的测试, 研究了库车盆地及其源区的构造演化.根据表观年龄和地层年龄关系, 将结果分成8个退火样品和6个碎屑样品.退火样品年龄从北向南从136~93.7 Ma, 记录了构造发育自造山带向盆地扩展的运动样式.其中09dk-6, 09dk-7, 09dk-8和09dk-11未通过X2检验, 分析认为与后期构造活动有关, 分解得到最年轻的年龄组记录了库如力向斜, 捷斯德里克背斜和阿合断层分别在74.4 Ma、24.2 Ma和50.8 Ma的最新一期活动.碎屑磷灰石得到了250 Ma、160 Ma和100 Ma3个明显的静态峰.结合热模拟研究表明, 研究区存在250 Ma、160 Ma、100 Ma和20 Ma四期构造隆升, 是对亚洲南缘多期地体碰撞增生的响应.

       

    • 图  1  库车再生前陆盆地前陆变形带构造单元(据卢华复等,1999修改)

      构造带:Ⅰ.北部单斜带;Ⅱ.斯的克背斜带;Ⅲ.克-依构造带;Ⅳ.拜城-阳霞凹陷带;Ⅴ.秋里塔格构造带

      Fig.  1.  Structures in the deformation belt of the Kuqa rejuvenation foreland basin

      图  2  库车河地质构造略图(a)和A-A'剖面图(b)

      Q1x.西域组;(N2-Q1)k.库车组;N2k.库车组;N1k.康村组;N1j.吉迪克组;E2-3s.苏维依组;E1-2km.库姆格列木组;K1bs.巴什基奇克组;K1b.巴西盖组;K1s.舒善河组;K1y.亚格列木组;J2q.恰克马克组;J2k.克孜勒努尔组;J1y.阳霞组;J1a.阿合组;T3t.塔里奇克组;T3h.黄山街组;T2kl.塔里奇克组;T1e.俄霍布拉克组;P1x.小铁里干克群;P3by.比尤勒包谷孜组;09dk-1~ 09dk-27示采样位置

      Fig.  2.  Geological map of the Kuqa River area (a) and A-A' cross-section (b)

      图  3  样品的单颗粒年龄雷达图(a)和径迹长度分布(b)

      a图左侧纵坐标为标准差,右侧纵坐标为年龄(Ma)

      Fig.  3.  Single-grain age distribution (a) and track length histograms (b)

      图  4  样品09dk-6(a)、09dk-8(b)和09dk-11(c)的Dpar值分布

      Fig.  4.  Dpar values of samples 09dk-6 (a), 09dk-8 (b) and 09dk-11 (c)

      图  5  碎屑磷灰石样品年龄峰

      Fig.  5.  Peaks of the detrital apatite samples

      图  6  样品09dk-1、09dk-2、09dk-6、09dk-8和09dk-11的热史模拟

      浅灰色区代表“可以接受的”热史拟合曲线集; 深灰色区为“高质量的”热史曲线集; 黑色曲线代表“最佳”热史拟合曲线(Ketcham, 2005)

      Fig.  6.  Thermal modelling history of samples 09dk-1, 09dk-2, 09dk-6, 09dk-8 and 09dk-11

      表  1  库车河剖面样品裂变径迹数据

      Table  1.   Apatite fission track data of the Kuqa River section

      样号 层位 N ρs
      (105 cm-2)
      Ns ρi
      (105 cm-2)
      Ni ρd
      (105 cm-2)
      Nd P(X2)(%) t(Ma) Nt L(μm)
      A 09dk-1 γ4 29 8.91 1 647 14.20 1 647 11.5 2 862 74.92 126.2±4.7 11 10.873±1.58
      09dk-2 P1x 27 10.02 1 213 16.37 1 982 11.4 2 840 17.59 128.1±7.6 46 10.789±1.78
      09dk-6 T3t 30 8.23 1 049 13.42 1 711 11.3 2 818 0.00 121.5±8.3 17 11.35±2.049
      09dk-7 T3h 31 4.42 925 18.00 3 770 11.2 2 796 0.00 49.7±3.1
      09dk-8 J1a 30 6.42 738 14.06 1 615 11.1 2 774 0.00 92.0±6.8 11 12.036±1.58
      09dk-11 J1y 30 5.79 762 17.63 2 320 11.0 2 753 0.06 62.7±4.2 8 11.21±1.84
      09dk-12 J2q 11 5.80 342 11.59 684 10.9 2 731 56.62 109.1±11.7
      09dk-27 K1b 9 5.39 216 13.39 537 12.3 3 065 5.58 88.8±10.1
      B 09dk-14 K1y 30 11.51 1 664 13.47 1 947 12.7 3 187 0.01 196.3±11.3
      09dk-15 Q1x 32 6.67 1 228 29.25 5 384 12.7 3 170 0.00 51.8±3.9
      09dk-21 N1k 30 7.39 1 252 15.65 2 650 12.5 3 135 0.61 104.3±5.2
      09dk-22 Q1x 30 7.39 836 16.79 1 899 12.5 3 117 0.00 102.0±7.8
      09dk-23 E2-3s 30 8.35 1 123 11.84 1 593 12.4 3 100 3.32 154.5±8.4
      09dk-25 E2-3s 30 16.86 2 045 26.29 3 189 12.3 3 082 0.00 140.9±8.5
      注:N=样品颗粒数;Nd=铀标准玻璃对应外探测器的诱发径迹条数;Ns=自发径迹条数;Ni =诱发径迹条数;P(X2)为卡方检测的结果;Nt=所测量的围限径迹长度数;ρs.自发径迹密度;ρi.诱发径迹密度;ρd.铀标准玻璃的诱发径迹密度;L=所测量的围限径迹长度.
      下载: 导出CSV

      表  2  砂岩屑样品二项式拟合年龄峰值统计结果

      Table  2.   Binomial analysis results of detrital samples

      样品 层位 颗粒数 P(F) 最佳拟合峰(Ma)及所占比例
      P0 P1 P2
      09dk-15 Q1x 32 0.01 35.3(46.6%) 58.4(33.3%) 86.1(20.4%)
      09dk-22 Q1x 30 0.02 71.8(30.7%) 107.9(65.9%) 445.2(3.4%)
      09dk-21 N1k 30 0.00 101.2(95.8%) 250.1(0.34%)
      09dk-25 E2-3s 30 0.02 111.7(46.5%) 163.9(47.0%) 256(6.6%)
      09dk-23 E2-3s 30 0.00 145.5(88.8%) 234.7(11.2%)
      09dk-14 K1y 30 0.02 152.5(32.1%) 216.4(64.6%) 785(3.3%)
      下载: 导出CSV
    • [1] Abdrakhmatov, K.Y., Aldazhanov, S.A., Hager, B.H., 1996. Relatively recent construction of the Tien Shan inferred from GPS measurements of presentday crustal deformation rates. Nature, 384(6608): 450-453. doi: 10.1038/384450a0
      [2] Avouac, J.P., Tapponnier, P., Bai, M., et al., 1993. Active thrusting and folding along the northern Tien Shan and late Cenozoic rotation of the Tarim relative to Dzungaria and Kazakhstan. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98(B4): 6755-6804. doi: 10.1029/92JB01963
      [3] Baldwin, S.L., Harrison, T.M., Burke, K., 1986. Fission track evidence for the source of accreted sandstones, Barbados. Tectonics, 5(3): 457-468. doi: 10.1029/TC005i003p00457
      [4] Brandon, M.T., 1992. Decomposition of fission-track grain-age distributions. American Journal of Science, 292: 535-564. doi: 10.2475/ajs.292.8.535
      [5] Brandon, M.T., 2002. Decomposition of mixed grain age distributions using Binomfit. On Track, 24: 13-18.
      [6] Charreau, J., Gilder, S., Chen, Y., et al., 2006. Magnetostratigraphy of the Yaha section, Tarim basin (China): 11 Ma acceleration in erosion and uplift of the Tian Shan mountains. Geology, 34(3): 181-184. doi: 10.1130/G22106.1
      [7] Dobretsov, N.L., Buslov, M.M., Delvaux, D., et al., 1996. Meso-and Cenozoic tectonics of the Central Asian mountain belt: effects of lithospheric plate interaction and mantle plumes. International Geology Review, 38(5): 430-466. doi: 10.1080/00206819709465345
      [8] Du, Z.L., Wang, Q.C., Zhou, X.H., 2007. Mesozoic and Cenozoic uplifting history of the Kuqa-South Tianshan basin-Mountain system from the evidence of apatite fission track analysis. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 26(5): 399-408 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-YSKW200705003.htm
      [9] Dumitru, T.A., 1990. Subnormal Cenozoic geothermal gradients in the extinct Sierra Nevada magmatic arc: consequences of Laramide and post-Laramide shallow-angle subduction. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95(B4): 4925-4941. doi: 10.1029/JB095iB04p04925
      [10] Galbraith, R.F., 1990. The radial plot: graphical assessment of spread in ages. International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation, Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements, 17(3): 207-214. doi: 10.1016/1359-0189(90)90036-W
      [11] Gallagher, K., 1995. Evolving temperature histories from apatite fission-track data. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 136(3-4): 421-435. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(95)00197-K
      [12] Garver, J.I., Brandon, M.T., 1994. Erosional denudation of the British Columbia Coast Ranges as determined from fission-track ages of detrital zircon from the Tofino basin, Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106(11): 1398-1412. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1994)106<1398:EDOTBC>2.3.CO;2
      [13] Gleadow, A.J.W., Duddy, I.R., Green, P.F., et al., 1986. Confined fission track lengths in apatite: a diagnostic tool for thermal history analysis. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 94(4): 405-415. doi: 10.1007/BF00376334
      [14] Green, P.F., Duddy, I.R., Gleadow, A.J.W., et al., 1985. Fission-track annealing in apatite: track length measurements and the form of the Arrhenius plot. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements(1982), 10(3): 323-328. doi: 10.1016/0735-245X(85)90121-8
      [15] Green, P.F., Duddy, I.R., Laslett, G.M., et al., 1989. Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite 4. Quantitative modelling techniques and extension to geological timescales. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience Section, 79(2): 155-182. doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(89)90018-3
      [16] He, G.Y., Zhao, Q., Li, S.X., et al., 2006. Analysis on Mesozoic prototypes of the Kuqa basin in Tarim, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Geology, 41(1): 44-53 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-DZKX200601005.htm
      [17] Hendrix, M.S., Graham, S.A., Carroll, A.R., et al., 1992. Sedimentary record and climatic implications of recurrent deformation in the Tian Shan: evidence from Mesozoic strata of the North Tarim, South Junggar, and Turpan basins, Northwest China. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 104(1): 53-79. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1992)104<0053:SRACIO>2.3.CO;2
      [18] Huang, B.C., Piper, J.D.A., Peng, S.T., et al., 2006. Magnetostratigraphic study of the Kuche depression, Tarim basin, and Cenozoic uplift of the Tian Shan Range, western China. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 251(3-4): 346-364. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.09.020
      [19] Hurford, A.J., 1986. Cooling and uplift patterns in the Lepontine Alps South Central Switzerland and an age of vertical movement on the Insubric fault line. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 92(4): 413-427. doi: 10.1007/BF00374424
      [20] Jia, C.Z., 1997. Structural and petroleum geology of the Tarim basin. Petroleum Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
      [21] Jia, C.Z., Chen, H.L., Yang, S.F., et al., 2003. Late Cretaceous uplifting process and its geological response in Kuqa depression. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 24(3): 1-5, 15(in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200303000.htm
      [22] Ketcham, R.A., Carter, A., Donelick, R, A., et al., 2007. Improved modeling of fission-track annealing in apatite. American Mineralogist, 92(5-6): 799-810. doi: 10.2138/am.2007.2281
      [23] Ketcham, R.A., 2005. Forward and inverse modeling of low-temperature thermochronometry data. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 58(1): 275. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2005.58.11
      [24] Ketcham, R.A., Donelick, R.A., Carlson, W.D., 1999. Variability of apatite fission-track annealing kinetics: III, Extrapolation to geological time scales. American Mineralogist, 84(9): 1235-1255. doi: 10.2138/am-1999-0903
      [25] Kowallis, B.J., Heaton, J.S., Bringhurst, K., 1986. Fission-track dating of volcanically derived sedimentary rocks. Geology, 14(1): 19-22. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<19:FDOVDS>2.0.CO;2
      [26] Laslett, G.M., Green, P.F., Duddy, I.R., et al., 1987. Thermal annealing of fission tracks in apatite 2. A quantitative analysis. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience Section, 65(1): 1-13. doi: 10.1016/0168-9622(87)90057-1
      [27] Li, Z., Wang, D.X., Lin, W., et al., 2004. Mesozoic-Cenozoic clastic composition in Kuqa depression, Northwest China: implication for provenance types and tectonic attributes. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 20(3): 656-666 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200403029.htm
      [28] Lin, C.S., Liu, J.Y., Zhang, Y.M., et al., 2002. The characteristics of Eogene tectonic sequence stratigraphy and effect on response of foreland tectonic movement of the Palaeogeue Kuqu depression. Science in China (SeriesD), 32(3): 177-183 (in Chinese).
      [29] Liu, Z.H., Lu, H.F., Jia, C.Z., et al., 1999. The orogeny timing of the Kuqa rejuvenation foreland thrust belt. Earth Science Frontiers, 6(4): 236 (in Chinese). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/285868950_Nature_and_timing_of_the_Kuqa_Cenozoic_structures
      [30] Liu, Z.H., Lu, H.F., Jia, C.Z., et al., 2000. Orogeny timing and fault-slip rate and their significance to the rejuvenated foreland thrusts belt of Kuche. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 27(1): 12-15(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [31] Lu, H.F., Chen, C.M., Liu, Z.H., et al., 2000. The structural features and origin of the Kuqa rejuvenation foreland thrust belt. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 21(3): 18-24(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [32] Marshallsea, S.J., George, A.D., Wyrwoll, K.H., et al., 2000 Mid-Miocene cooling in Hexi corridor-Qilian Shan region, Qinhai-Tibet plateau. In: 9th International conference on fission track dating and thermochronology, Melboume, Australia.
      [33] Naeser, C.W., 1979. Fission-track dating and geologic annealing of fission tracks. In: Jager, E., Hunziker, J.C., eds., Lectures in isotope geology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 154-169.
      [34] Rahn, M., Seward, D., 2000. How many track lengths do we need? On track (unpublished Newsletter of the International Fission-Track Community), 10, 14-17.
      [35] Reigber, C., Michel, G.W., Galas, R., et al., 2001. New space geodetic constraints on the distribution of deformation in Central Asia. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 191(1-2): 157-165. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00414-9
      [36] Shu, L.S., Guo, Z.J., Zhu, W.B., et al., 2004. Post-collision tectonism and basin-range evolution in the Tianshan belt. Geological Journal of China Universities, 10(3): 393-404 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [37] Sobel, E.R., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., et al., 2006. Exhumation of basement-cored uplifts: example of the Kyrgyz Range quantified with apatite fission track thermochronology. Tectonics, 25(2): C2008. doi: 10.1029/2005TC001809
      [38] Tian, Z.J., Song, J.G., 1999. Tertiary structure characteristics and evolution of Kuche foreland basin. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 20(4): 7-13(in Chinese with English abstract).
      [39] Wang, Y.B., Wang, Y., Liu, X., et al., 2001. Apatite fission-track records of Mesozoic and Cenozoic episodic reactivation of the Tianshan and West Kunlun mountains. Regional Geology of China, 20(1): 95-99 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [40] Yin, A., Nie, S., Craig, P., et al., 1998. Late Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the southern Chinese Tian Shan. Tectonics, 17(1): 1-27. doi: 10.1029/97TC03140
      [41] Yang, S.F., Chen, H.L., Cheng, X.G., et al., 2003. Cenozoic uplifting and unroofing of southern Tien Shan, China. Journal of Nanjing University(Natural Sciences), 39(1): 1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract). http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-NJDZ200301001.htm
      [42] Zhu, W.B., Shu, L.S., Wan, J.L., et al., 2006. Fission-track evidence for the exhumation history of Bogda-Harlik Mountains, Xinjiang since the Cretaceous. Acta Geology Sinica, 80(1): 16-22 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [43] 杜治利, 王清晨, 周学慧, 2007. 中新生代库车-南天山盆山系统隆升历史的裂变径迹证据. 岩石矿物学杂志, 26(5): 399-408. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2007.05.002
      [44] 何光玉, 赵庆, 李树新, 等, 2006. 塔里木库车盆地中生代原型分析. 地质科学, 41(1): 44-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0636.2006.01.009
      [45] 贾承造, 1997. 中国塔里木盆地构造特征与油气. 北京: 石油出版社, 348-364. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-167X.1997.04.019
      [46] 贾承造, 陈汉林, 杨树锋, 等, 2003. 库车坳陷晚白垩世隆升过程及其地质响应. 石油学报, 24(3): 1-5, 15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200303000.htm
      [47] 李忠, 王道轩, 林伟, 等, 2004. 库车坳陷中-新生界碎屑组分对物源类型及其构造属性的指示. 岩石学报, 20(3): 656-666. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200403029.htm
      [48] 林畅松, 刘景彦, 张燕梅, 等, 2002. 库车坳陷第三系构造层序的构成特征及其对前陆构造作用的响应. 中国科学(D辑), 32(3): 177-183. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JDXK200203000.htm
      [49] 刘志宏, 卢华复, 贾承造, 等, 1999. 库车再生前陆逆冲带造山运动时间的厘定. 地学前缘, 6(4): 236. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.1999.04.028
      [50] 刘志宏, 卢华复, 贾承造, 等, 2000. 库车再生前陆逆冲带造山运动时间、断层滑移速率的厘定及其意义. 石油勘探与开发, 27(1): 12-15. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2000.01.004
      [51] 卢华复, 陈楚铭, 刘志宏, 等, 2000. 库车再生前陆逆冲带的构造特征与成因. 石油学报, 21(3): 18-24. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2000.03.004
      [52] 舒良树, 郭召杰, 朱文斌, 等, 2004. 天山地区碰撞后构造与盆山演化. 高校地质学报, 10(3): 393-404. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2004.03.010
      [53] 田作基, 宋建国, 1999. 塔里木库车新生代前陆盆地构造特征及形成演化. 石油学报, 20(4): 7-13. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB904.001.htm
      [54] 王彦斌, 王永, 刘训, 等, 2001. 天山、西昆仑山中、新生代幕式活动的磷灰石裂变径迹记录. 中国区域地质, 20(1): 95-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZQYD200101017.htm
      [55] 杨树锋, 陈汉林, 程晓敢, 等, 2003. 南天山新生代隆升和去顶作用过程. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 39(1): 1-8. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0469-5097.2003.01.001
      [56] 朱文斌, 舒良树, 万景林, 等, 2006. 新疆博格达-哈尔里克山白垩纪以来剥露历史的裂变径迹证据. 地质学报, 80(1): 16-22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2006.01.002
    • 加载中
    图(6) / 表(2)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  222
    • HTML全文浏览量:  103
    • PDF下载量:  14
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2012-05-19
    • 网络出版日期:  2021-11-10
    • 刊出日期:  2012-09-15

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回