• 中国出版政府奖提名奖

    中国百强科技报刊

    湖北出版政府奖

    中国高校百佳科技期刊

    中国最美期刊

    留言板

    尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

    姓名
    邮箱
    手机号码
    标题
    留言内容
    验证码

    黔东南地区褶皱构造样式及其断层突破模式

    崔敏 ,  汤良杰 ,  郭彤楼 ,  宁飞 ,  田海芹 ,  胡东风

    崔敏, 汤良杰, 郭彤楼, 宁飞, 田海芹, 胡东风, 2009. 黔东南地区褶皱构造样式及其断层突破模式. 地球科学, 34(6): 907-913.
    引用本文: 崔敏, 汤良杰, 郭彤楼, 宁飞, 田海芹, 胡东风, 2009. 黔东南地区褶皱构造样式及其断层突破模式. 地球科学, 34(6): 907-913.
    CUI Min, TANG Liang-jie, GUO Tong-lou, NING Fei, TIAN Hai-qin, HU Dong-feng, 2009. Structural Style and Thrust Breakthrough Model of Fold in Southeast Guizhou. Earth Science, 34(6): 907-913.
    Citation: CUI Min, TANG Liang-jie, GUO Tong-lou, NING Fei, TIAN Hai-qin, HU Dong-feng, 2009. Structural Style and Thrust Breakthrough Model of Fold in Southeast Guizhou. Earth Science, 34(6): 907-913.

    黔东南地区褶皱构造样式及其断层突破模式

    基金项目: 

    国家“973”计划项目 2005CB422107

    国家自然科学基金项目 40672143

    详细信息
      作者简介:

      崔敏(1981—), 男, 博士研究生, 构造地质学专业. E-mail: cuimin800@163.com

    • 中图分类号: P542

    Structural Style and Thrust Breakthrough Model of Fold in Southeast Guizhou

    • 摘要: 黔东南地区发育隔槽式褶皱组合和逆冲断层.通过对褶皱和地层的平面展布、断层的产状和性质以及滑脱层的分析, 结合典型地震剖面解释和平衡剖面恢复, 对黔东南地区构造特征及其成因进行了探讨.结果表明, 隔槽式褶皱的发育不仅与滑脱深度和剥蚀差异有关, 而且与逆冲断层的推覆距离、逆冲断层的产状、断坪断坡长度比、断层突破方式和多层次滑脱等方面存在着密切联系.结合区域构造演化和推覆距离的制约, 建立了黔东南地区的隔槽式褶皱构造样式的几何学和运动学模型, 确定其主要影响因素是断坪断坡长度比较小、多种方式断层突破和多层次滑脱.

       

    • 图  1  黔东南地区地质略图(贵州省地质矿产局, 1987)

      1.新生界; 2.侏罗系和白垩系; 3.三叠系; 4.上古生界; 5.下古生界; 6.中、上元古界; 7.逆断层; 8.走滑断层; 9.地层产状

      Fig.  1.  Geological sketch map of the Southeast Guizhou

      图  2  黔东南地区隔槽式褶皱平衡剖面恢复(位置见图 1)

      Fig.  2.  Restoration of seismic cross-sections of through-like fold in Southeast Guizhou

      图  3  滑脱深度不同的滑脱褶皱膝折模型(Ramsay and Huber, 1987)

      A-A′剖面显示隔槽式特征; B-B′剖面显示隔槽式特征; H.滑脱面深度; W.背斜宽度

      Fig.  3.  Kink-band model of detachment folds in different depths

      图  4  不同断坪-断坡长度比的断层突破模式

      Fig.  4.  Fault-breakthrough models for the different scales of flat to ramp

      图  5  黔东南地区隔槽式褶皱组合的滑脱褶皱-断层突破形成模式

      Fig.  5.  A breakthrough of detachment folds model showing the formative process of the trough-like folds in Southeast Guizhou

      表  1  黔东南地区3个向斜的缩短量与缩短率(以寒武系为标志层)

      Table  1.   The amount and the rate of shortening in the three synclines in Southeast Guizhou

    • [1] Atkinson, P. K., Wallace, W. K., 2003. Competent unit thickness variation in detachment folds in the North-eastern Brooks Range, Alaska: Geometric analysis and a conceptual model. Journal of Structural Geology, 25 (10): 1751-1771. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(03)00003-8
      [2] Ding, D. G., Liu, G. X., 2007. Progressive deformation in Yangtze plate—Series 2 of the southern structure studies. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 29 (3): 238-246, 252 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [3] Erslev, E. A., Mayborn, K. R., 1997. Multiple geometries and modes of fault-propagation folding in the Canadian thrust belt. Journal of Structural Geology, 19 (3-4): 321-335. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(97)83027-1
      [4] Guizhou Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, 1987. Regional geology of Guizhou Province. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, China, 608-616 (in Chinese).
      [5] Hanks, C. L., Parris, T. M., Wallace, W. K., 2006. Fracture paragenesis and microthermometry in Lisburne Group detachment folds: Implications for the thermal and structural evolution of the northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska. AAPG Bulletin, 90 (1): 1-20. doi: 10.1306/08090504134
      [6] Li, L., Wang, Y. M., Zhang, L. M., et al., 2008. Sedimentary patterns and structural control across toe thrust belts, Niger delta. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 33 (5): 643-650 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2008.079
      [7] Li, X. J., 1988. The duplexes in Kaili area, Guizhou Province. Geology of Guizhou, 14 (5): 78-81 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [8] Li, Y. F., Qu, G. S., Zhang, J., 2007. Developments in research of arcuate structure. Advances in Earth Science, 22 (7): 708-715 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [9] Liu, H. L., 1990. Cogniton of nappe tectonics in southeastern Guizhou. Geology of Guizhou, 24 (3): 271-279 (inChinese with English abstract).
      [10] Mitra, S., 2003. A unified kinematic model for the evolutionof detachment folds. Journal of Structural Geology, 25 (10): 1659-1673. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8141(02)00198-0
      [11] Qiu, Y. X., Zhang, Y. C., Ma, W. P., 1999. The tectonic nature and evolution of Xuefeng Mountains: One model of formation and evolution of intra-continental orogenic belt. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, 49-133 (inChinese).
      [12] Ramsay, J. G., Huber, M. I., 1987. The techniques of modern structural geology: Fold and fracture. Vol. 2. Academic Press, San Diego, 347-363.
      [13] Tang, L. J., Guo, T. L., Tian, H. Q., et al., 2008. Poly-cycle tectonic evolution, differential deformation and hydrocarbon reservation of Central Guizhou and adjacent region. Acta Geologica Sinica, 82 (3): 298-307 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [14] Tang, L. J., Guo, T. L., Yu, Y. X., et al., 2007. Salt-related structures in the foreland fold-thrust belt of the northeastern Sichuan basin, South China. Acta Geologica Sinica, 81 (8): 1048-1056 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [15] Yan, D. P., Zhou, M. F., Song, H. L., et al., 2003. Origin and tectonic significance of a Mesozoic multi-layer overthrust system within the Yangtze block (South China). Tectonophysics, 361 (3-4): 239-254. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00646-7
      [16] Zhao, J., Peng, W., Li, J. F., et al., 2005. In-situ stress logging responding characteristics of piedmont thrust belt and its influence on hydrocarbon distribution. Earth Science—Journal of China University of Geosciences, 30 (4): 467-472 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [17] Zhu, Z. C., 1983. On jura-type fold (S. China) and its mechanism. Earth Science—Journal of Wuhan College of Geosciences, 22 (3): 43-51 (in Chinese with English abstract).
      [18] 丁道桂, 刘光祥, 2007. 扬子板内递进变形——南方构造问题之二. 石油实验地质, 29 (3): 238-246, 252. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2007.03.004
      [19] 贵州省地质矿产局, 1987. 贵州省区域地质志. 北京: 地质出版社, 608-616.
      [20] 李磊, 王英民, 张莲美, 等, 2008. 尼日尔三角洲坡脚逆冲带沉积样式及构造控制. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 33 (5): 643-650. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200805010.htm
      [21] 李学军, 1988. 凯里地区的两个双层构造. 贵州地质. 14 (5): 78-81. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ198801011.htm
      [22] 李岩峰, 曲国胜, 张进, 2007. 弧形构造研究进展. 地球科学进展, 22 (7): 708-715. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2007.07.006
      [23] 刘洪磊, 1990. 黔东南推覆构造之认识. 贵州地质, 24 (3): 271-279. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GZDZ199003012.htm
      [24] 丘元禧, 张渝昌, 马文璞, 1999. 雪峰山的构造性质与演化: 一个陆内造山带的形成与演化模式. 北京: 地质出版社, 49-133.
      [25] 汤良杰, 郭彤楼, 田海芹, 等, 2008. 黔中地区多期构造演化、差异变形与油气保存条件. 地质学报, 82 (3): 298-307. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200803001.htm
      [26] 汤良杰, 郭彤楼, 余一欣, 等, 2007. 四川盆地东北部前陆褶皱-冲断带盐相关构造. 地质学报, 81 (8): 1048-1056. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.08.004
      [27] 赵军, 彭文, 李进福, 等, 2005. 前陆冲断构造带地应力响应特征及其对油气分布的影响. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 30 (4): 467-472. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX200504012.htm
      [28] 朱志澄, 1983. 中国南方侏罗山式褶皱及其形成机制. 地球科学——武汉地质学院学报, 22 (3): 43-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX198303004.htm
    • 加载中
    图(5) / 表(1)
    计量
    • 文章访问数:  3688
    • HTML全文浏览量:  123
    • PDF下载量:  64
    • 被引次数: 0
    出版历程
    • 收稿日期:  2008-11-26
    • 刊出日期:  2009-11-25

    目录

      /

      返回文章
      返回